Research Article
No access
Published Online: 7 July 2004

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Symptomatic Gallstones in Diabetic Patients

Publication: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Volume 11, Issue Number 5

Abstract

Purpose: To find out whether diabetes mellitus is a risk factor in patients who undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy because of symptomatic gallbladder stones.
Patients and Methods: Eight hundred sixty-two patients with symptomatic gallbladder stones underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at our institution between January 1993 and July 2000. Age, sex, risk classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), laboratory tests, operative records, morbidity, and length of hospital stay for each patient were analyzed.
Results: There were 184 (21%) diabetic and 678 (79%) nondiabetic patients. The ASA class I applied to 534 nondiabetic (control) patients (79%), and ASA class II to 161 diabetic (study) patients (88%). There was no significant difference between the diabetic and nondiabetic patients regarding leukocyte count, bilirubin, or amylase levels. Operative and postoperative complication rates were significantly higher in the diabetic patients. Conversion to open surgery was required in 19 of 678 patients in the control group (2.8%) and 13 of 184 in the study group (7.1%). The operative time and length of hospital stay were not significantly different in the two groups.
Conclusions: Although they had the same symptoms and laboratory findings, laparoscopic cholecystectomy in diabetic patients is associated with more morbidity and a higher conversion rate than in nondiabetic patients.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Volume 11Issue Number 5October 2001
Pages: 281 - 284
PubMed: 11642663

History

Published online: 7 July 2004
Published in print: October 2001

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/ePub

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top