Mechanical Performance of Three-Dimensional Printed Lattice Structures: Assembled Versus Direct Print
Publication: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
Volume 10, Issue Number 2
Abstract
Lattice structures are composed of a collection of struts with different orientations. During slicing, the inclined struts generate multiple disjoint contours along the build direction in additive manufacturing (AM). These contours are substantially smaller in size due to the narrow cross-section of the individual lattice struts, and they can lead to contour plurality in AM processes. Contour plurality reduces the amount of continuous contact region between two successive layers, thus resulting in poor interlayer adhesion, structural integrity, and mechanical properties of the printed lattice structure. A new interlocking and assemble-based lattice structure building approach is investigated by increasing continuity in layers and avoiding support structure to minimize contour plurality. Two lattice configurations in the form of cubic and octet lattice structures are examined. The compressive performance of the designed lattice structures is compared with the traditional single-build direct three-dimensional printed lattice structures. The mechanical performance (e.g., peak stress, specific energy absorption) of the assembled structures is found to be generally better than their direct print counterparts. The empirical constants of Ashby-Gibson power law are found to be larger than their suggested values in both direct print and assembly techniques. However, their values are more compliant for octet assembled structures, which are less susceptible to manufacturing imperfections.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1. Khoda B, Ahsan AMMN, Shovon AN, et al. 3D metal lattice structure manufacturing with continuous rods. Sci Rep 2021;11:434.
2. Brackett DJ, Ashcroft IA, Wildman RD, et al. An error diffusion based method to generate functionally graded cellular structures. Comput Struct 2014;138:102–111.
3. Maxwell JC. L. On the calculation of the equilibrium and stiffness of frames. Philos Mag 1864;27:294–299.
4. Wadley HNG, Dharmasena KP, O'Masta MR, et al. Impact response of aluminum corrugated core sandwich panels. Int J Impact Eng 2013;62:114–128.
5. Rashed MG, Ashraf M, Mines RAW, et al. Metallic microlattice materials: a current state of the art on manufacturing, mechanical properties and applications. Mater Des 2016;95:518–533.
6. Schaedler TA, Carter WB. Architected cellular materials. Annu Rev Mater Res 2016;46:187–210.
7. Seepersad CC, Allen JK, McDowell DL, et al. Multifunctional topology design of cellular material structures. J Mech Des 2008;130:31404–31413.
8. Evans AG, Hutchinson JW, Fleck NA, et al. The topological design of multifunctional cellular metals. Prog Mater Sci 2001;46:309–327.
9. Khoda B, Ahsan AMMN. A novel rapid manufacturing process for metal lattice structure. 3D Print Addit Manuf 2021;7:111–125.
10. Seepersad CC, Allen JK, McDowell DL, et al. Robust design of cellular materials with topological and dimensional imperfections. J Mech Des 2006;128:1285–1297.
11. Wang A-J, McDowell DL. Effects of defects on in-plane properties of periodic metal honeycombs. Int J Mech Sci 2003;45:1799–1813.
12. Yuan W, Song H, Lu L, et al. Effect of local damages on the buckling behaviour of pyramidal truss core sandwich panels. Compos Struct 2016;149:271–278.
13. Ahsan AMMN, Habib MA, Khoda B. Resource based process planning for additive manufacturing. Comput Aided Des 2015;69:112–125.
14. Ahsan N, Khoda B. AM optimization framework for part and process attributes through geometric analysis. Addit Manuf 2016;11:85–96.
15. Habib MA, Khoda B. Attribute driven process architecture for additive manufacturing. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 2017;44:253–265.
16. Khoda AKM, Ozbolat IT, Koc B. A functionally gradient variational porosity architecture for hollowed scaffolds fabrication. Biofabrication 2011;3:034106.
17. Gautam R, Idapalapati S, Feih S. Printing and characterisation of Kagome lattice structures by fused deposition modelling. Mater Des 2018;137:266–275.
18. Nazir A, Abate KM, Kumar A, et al. A state-of-the-art review on types, design, optimization, and additive manufacturing of cellular structures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2019;104:3489–3510.
19. Dong G, Wijaya G, Tang Y, et al. Optimizing process parameters of fused deposition modeling by Taguchi method for the fabrication of lattice structures. Addit Manuf 2018;19:62–72.
20. Azzouz L, Chen Y, Zarrelli M, et al. Mechanical properties of 3-D printed truss-like lattice biopolymer non-stochastic structures for sandwich panels with natural fibre composite skins. Compos Struct 2019;213:220–230.
21. Bhandari S, Lopez-Anido RA, Gardner DJ. Enhancing the interlayer tensile strength of 3D printed short carbon fiber reinforced PETG and PLA composites via annealing. Addit Manuf 2019;30:100922.
22. Jiang P, De Meter EC, Basu S. The influence of defects on the elastic response of lattice structures resulting from additive manufacturing. Comput Mater Sci 2021;199:110716.
23. Rajpurohit SR, Dave HK. Effect of process parameters on tensile strength of FDM printed PLA part. Rapid Prototyp J 2018;24:1317–1324.
24. Kiendl J, Gao C. Controlling toughness and strength of FDM 3D-printed PLA components through the raster layup. Compos B Eng 2020;180:107562.
25. Rathbun HJ, Wei Z, He MY, et al. Measurement and simulation of the performance of a lightweight metallic sandwich structure with a tetrahedral truss core. J Appl Mech 2004;71:368–374.
26. Khoda, B. Process plan for multimaterial heterogeneous object in additive manufacturing. 3D Print Addit Manuf 2014;1:210–218.
27. Dong L, Deshpande V, Wadley H. Mechanical response of Ti–6Al–4V octet-truss lattice structures. Int J Solids Struct 2015;60–61:107–124.
28. Glaesener RN, Träff EA, Telgen B, et al. Continuum representation of nonlinear three-dimensional periodic truss networks by on-the-fly homogenization. Int J Solids Struct 2020;206:101–113.
29. Liu W, Song H, Wang Z, et al. Improving mechanical performance of fused deposition modeling lattice structures by a snap-fitting method. Mater Des 2019;181:108065.
30. Deshpande VS, Fleck NA, Ashby MF. Effective properties of the octet-truss lattice material. J Mech Phys Solids 2001;49:1747–1769.
31. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
32. Chen W, Liu Z, Robinson HM, et al. Flaw tolerance vs. performance: a tradeoff in metallic glass cellular structures. Acta Mater 2014;73:259–274.
33. Li C, Lei H, Zhang Z, et al. Architecture design of periodic truss-lattice cells for additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 2020;34:101172.
34. Ashby MF. The properties of foams and lattices. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 2006;364:15–30.
35. Chen W, Watts S, Jackson JA, et al. Stiff isotropic lattices beyond the Maxwell criterion. Sci Adv 2019;5:eaaw1937.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
Volume 10 • Issue Number 2 • April 2023
Pages: 256 - 268
Copyright
Copyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.
History
Published online: 12 April 2023
Published in print: April 2023
Published ahead of print: 3 February 2022
Topics
Authors
Author Disclosure Statement
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding Information
Partial financial support was provided by the Grant US-DOT number 693JK31850009CAAP.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.