Bioreactors as Additive Manufacturing Environments
Publication: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
Abstract
This article discusses the evolving use of bioreactors, beyond traditional life sciences and bioengineering, in fields such as architecture, fashion, and product design. It explores the role of bioreactors in additive fabrication, highlighting their distinct characteristics compared with conventional digital manufacturing. The discussion is centered on the differences in materializing biologically-active (living) versus biologically-passive, or biologically-derived (nonliving) matter in which ingredients require closed-loop fabrication environments that differ from traditional additive manufacturing tools. Two novel biofabrication platforms, Microbial Design Studio and B | reactor are presented as examples with case studies demonstrating their use in various manufacturing workflows with live cells. The article emphasizes the unique capabilities of bioreactors in engaging with living matter and facilitating complex interactions between biological, algorithmic, and mechanical systems in additive manufacturing.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1. Camere S, Karana E. Fabricating materials from living organisms: An emerging design practice. J Clean Prod 2018;186:570–584.
2. Gough P, Yoo S, Tomitsch M, et al. Applying Bioaffordances through an inquiry-based model: A literature review of interactive biodesign. Int J Hum Comput Interact 2021;37(17):1583–1597.
3. Telhan O. Design.bio. In: BioCoder #11. O’Reilly Media, Inc.; 2016. Available from: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/biocoder-11/9781098105570/ch05.html [Last accessed: September 1, 2024].
4. Siwal SS, Mishra K, Saini AK, et al. Additive manufacturing of bio-based hydrogel composites: Recent advances. J Polym Environ 2022;30(11):4501–4516;
5. Portanguen S, Tournayre P, Sicard J, et al. Toward the design of functional foods and biobased products by 3D printing: A review. Trends Food Sci Technol 2019;86:188–198.
6. Choudhury D, Anand S, Naing MW. The arrival of commercial bioprinters–Towards 3D bioprinting revolution! Int J Bioprint 2018;4(2):139.
7. Zeidler H, Klemm D, Böttger-Hiller F, et al. 3D printing of biodegradable parts using renewable biobased materials. Procedia Manuf 2018;21:117–124.
8. Tao Y, Wang H, Li Z, et al. Development and application of wood flour-filled polylactic acid composite filament for 3D printing. Materials 2017;10(4):339.
9. Corcoran AA, Hunt RW. Capitalizing on harmful algal blooms: From problems to products. Algal Research 2021;55:1022656;
10. Mogas-Soldevila L, Duro-Royo J, Oxman N. Water-based robotic fabrication: largescale additive manufacturing of functionally graded hydrogel composites via multichamber extrusion. 3D Print Addit Manuf 2014;1(3):141–151.
11. Mogas-Soldevila L, et al. Additively manufactured leather-like silk protein materials. Mater Des 2021;203:109631.
12. Mobaraki M, Ghaffari M, Yazdanpanah A, et al. Bioinks and bioprinting: A focused review. Bioprinting 2020;18:e00080.
13. Schulze S, Schiller H, Mutan Z, et al. Cost-effective and versatile analysis of archaeal surface adhesion under shaking and standing conditions. In: Archaea. Methods Mol Biol. (Ferreira-Cerca S, eds.) Humana: New York, NY; 2022. p; 27.
14. Pataranutaporn P, Vujic A, Kong DS, et al. Living bits: Opportunities and challenges for integrating living microorganisms in human-computer interaction. In: Proceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference. 2020; pp. 1–12.
15. Qian J, Lu Z-X, Mancuso CP, et al. Barcoded microbial system for high-resolution object provenance. Science 2020;368(6495):1135–1140.
16. Zolotovsky K. Guided growth: design and computation of biologically active materials [Doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
17. Rodrigo-Navarro A, Sankaran S, Dalby MJ, et al. Engineered living biomaterials. Nat Rev Mater 2021;6(12):1175–1190;
18. Telhan O. From growing tools to designing organisms: changing the literacies of design. In: Teaching Computational Creativity. Cambridge University Press; 2017;259.
19. Bandoni A, Almendra R, Forman G. Interdisciplinarity and collaboration–a study focusing on experienced biodesign practitioners. Advances in Human Dynamics for the Development of Contemporary Societies 2022;25:77.
20. Soh E, Teoh JH, Leong B, et al. H. 3D printing of mycelium engineered living materials using a waste-based ink and non-sterile conditions. Mater Des 2023;236.
21. Allevi. Bioprinting services. Available from: https://www.allevi3d.com/bioprinting-services/ [Last accessed: September 1, 2024].
22. Arnardottir TH, Dade-Robertson M, Zhang M, et al. Living manufacture: principles for a microbial 3D printer. In: Structures and Architecture A Viable Urban Perspective? CRC Press; 2022; pp. 59–66.
23. Boghani HC, Michie I, Dinsdale RM, et al. Control of microbial fuel cell voltage using a gain scheduling control strategy. J Power Sources 2016;322:106–115.
24. Marxen K, Vanselow KH, Lippemeier S, et al. A photobioreactor system for computer controlled cultivation of microalgae. J Appl Phycol 2005;17(6):535–549;
25. Pollinator Kit. Checkerspot Pollinator Series. Available from: https://www.pollinatorkit.com/ [Last accessed: September 1, 2024].
26. Living Ink. Pigments and Inks. Available from: https://www.livingink.co/shop [Last accessed: September 1, 2024].
27. Hogan M, Telhan O, Hogan K. System method and device for high-throughput automated culturing of genetically modified organisms. US Patent No. 10,954,483 B2. 2015. Available from: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/90/15/27/ 8c096ff082dd8f/US10954483.pdf [Last accessed: January 14, 2024].
28. Haar S, Schrader E, Gatewood BM. Comparison of aluminum mordants on the colorfastness of natural dyes on cotton. Cloth Text Res J 2013;31(2):97–108;
29. Abbet M. Understanding the emerging beer spoilage yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. diastaticus. 2020.
30. Vermont Natural Coating. Green Building Supply. Available from: https://www.greenbuildingsupply.com/All-Products/Paints-Coatings-Wood-Stains-Sealers/Vermont-Natural-Coatings-PolyWhey-Exterior-Penetrating-Stain-Finish [Last accessed: September 1, 2024].
31. OpenCV. Cv:SimpleBlobDetector Class Reference. Available from: https://docs.opencv.org/3.4/d0/d7a/classcv_1_1SimpleBlobDetector.html [Last accessed: September 1, 2024].
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
Copyright
Copyright 2024, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.
History
Published online: 29 October 2024
Authors
Author Disclosure Statement
The author acknowledges that there was no conflict of interest between this research and potential commercial interests of the companies involved. Biorealize Inc., ceased operations before the publication of this article.
Funding Information
The funds used for the research, design, and build of the biomanufacturing platforms Microbial Design Studio and B | reactor were provided by Biorealize.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Get Access
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.