“The Single Most Important Thing That Has Happened to Me in My Life”: Development of the Impact of Diagnosis Scale—Preliminary Revision
Abstract
Background: Awareness and diagnosis of autism in adulthood is on the rise. Studies have considered the impact of receiving an autism diagnosis for parents of children on the spectrum, although only few primarily qualitative studies have considered the self-reported impact of autism diagnosis. The Impact of Diagnosis Scale (IODS) was initially developed with a focus on borderline personality disorder. Our aim was to develop a version suitable for autistic individuals.
Methods: The research team and a group of autistic advisors revised the IODS items for suitability and accessibility to autistic participants. We gathered participant data for 92 autistic adolescents and adults from the Cooperative Research Centre for Living with Autism (Autism CRC) Study of Australian School Leavers with Autism (SASLA) and the Australian Longitudinal Study of Autism in Adulthood (ALSAA). We used iterated principal factors analysis to explore potential factors, and thematic analysis to explore responses to two open-ended items.
Results: Factor analysis suggested three factors of “Service Access (SA),” “Being Understood (BU),” and “Self-Acceptance and Understanding (SU)” for the 12 items of the IODS–Preliminary Revision (IODS-PR). Cronbach's alpha was good overall and acceptable for subdomains. Item mean scores suggest that although impact of autism diagnosis was generally perceived as positive for SU, scores were neutral in other domains. Qualitative analysis identified themes of Self-Understanding, Identity, and Acceptance, Supports and Services, Valence of Response, Relationships, and Camouflaging.
Conclusions: The IODS-PR is the first scale to measure the self-reported experience of receiving an autism diagnosis. It showed good psychometrics and provides new insight into the experience of autism diagnosis. Qualitative analysis identified domains that remain unexplored and the potential for an expanded item set. A further revision of the tool will soon be available. It will provide critical information for clinicians and has potential applications for research and service evaluation.
Lay summary
Why was this study done?
There are increasing numbers of adults who are only diagnosed with autism in their teen and adult years. Research on this topic is limited, with most using surveys or interviews.
What was the purpose of this study?
The purpose was to develop a revision of the Impact of Diagnosis Scale (IODS) to make it suitable to autistic teenagers and adults.
What did the researchers do?
We worked with autistic research advisors to create the IODS–Preliminary Revision (IODS-PR), which has 12 items scored on a 7-point agree/disagree scale and two open-ended questions. We then gathered data using the IODS-PR from the Study of Australian School Leavers with Autism (SASLA) and the Australian Longitudinal Study of Autism in Adulthood (ALSAA). We ran a factor analysis on the scores and conducted a thematic analysis of the open-ended responses. One of the autistic advisors reviewed how we interpreted our results.
What were the results of the study?
There were 92 autistic participants (46 males, 38 females, 8 nonbinary; mean age of 36 years old). On average, participants were diagnosed with autism at age 30. The factor analysis suggested three domains in the IOD-PR: Self-Acceptance and Understanding, Being Understood, and Service Access. On average, participants' scores suggested receiving an autism diagnosis was helpful for understanding and accepting themselves, but neutral for being understood by others or getting support from services.
The thematic analysis identified several themes, the strongest theme was Self-Understanding, Identity, and Acceptance, where participants mostly commented on the positive new self-identity that came from their autism diagnosis. There was a Supports and Services theme that was divided into Enabled Support, Support not needed, and No or poor services. Most concerning was that many participants commented that the autism diagnosis did not enable any access to supports or that there were no appropriate supports available. There was a Valence of Response theme that was divided into Relief, Positive impact, Wish diagnosed earlier, and Negative impact. There was a Relationships theme divided into Connected with autistic community, Improves relationships, and Others lack understanding. Finally, there was a Camouflaging theme.
Based on these results, the researchers are working on further revisions to the IODS-PR to make it more useful and accessible.
What do these findings add to what was already known?
The adapted IODS shows promise and findings will guide further development of the tool. These early-stage findings agree with what previous research said about the impact of receiving a diagnosis of autism in adulthood.
What are potential weaknesses in the study?
There are strengths and weaknesses to using a questionnaire tool to research this topic. Interview research can get a more in-depth understanding of an individual's response to the diagnosis.
How will these findings help autistic adults now or in the future?
When the revised IODS is available, it could be used to evaluate support services and help clinicians understand how to help create a more positive response to diagnosis. Our findings confirm more needs to be performed about postdiagnosis supports.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Authorship Confirmation Statement
S.R.C.A., Y.I.J.H., A.R., J.N.T., and L.P.L. contributed to original conceptualization and design. S.R.C.A., Y.H., Y.I.J.H., A.R., J.N.T., and L.P.L. contributed to the analysis and interpretation of research data, and drafting significant parts or critically revising the article. All authors have reviewed and approved this article. This article has been submitted solely to this journal and is not published, in press, or submitted elsewhere.
References
1. Jensen CM, Steinhausen H-C, Lauritsen MB. Time trends over 16 years in incidence-rates of autism spectrum disorders across the lifespan based on Nationwide Danish Register Data. J Autism Dev Disord. 2014;44(8):1808–1818.
2. Whitehouse AJO, Cooper MN, Bebbington K, et al. Evidence of a reduction over time in the behavioral severity of autistic disorder diagnoses. Autism Res. 2017;10(1):179–187.
3. Lai M-C, Baron-Cohen S. Identifying the lost generation of adults with autism spectrum conditions. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2(11):1013–1027.
4. Lewis LF. Realizing a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder as an adult. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2016;25(4):346–354.
5. Hickey A, Crabtree J, Stott J. ‘Suddenly the first fifty years of my life made sense’: Experiences of older people with autism. Autism. 2018;22(3):357–367.
6. Jones L, Goddard L, Hill EL, Henry LA, Crane L. Experiences of receiving a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder: A survey of adults in the United Kingdom. J Autism Dev Disord. 2014;44(12):3033–3044.
7. Punshon C, Skirrow P, Murphy G. The ‘not guilty verdict’: Psychological reactions to a diagnosis of Asperger syndrome in adulthood. Autism. 2009;13(3):265–283.
8. Powell T, Acker L. Adults' experience of an Asperger syndrome diagnosis: Analysis of its emotional meaning and effect on participants' lives. Focus Autism Dev Disabil. 2016;31(1):72–80.
9. Tan CD. “I'm a normal autistic person, not an abnormal neurotypical”: Autism Spectrum Disorder diagnosis as biographical illumination. Soc Sci Med. 2018;197:161–167.
10. Ooi KL, Ong YS, Jacob SA, Khan TM. A meta-synthesis on parenting a child with autism. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016;12:745–762.
11. Feng X, Astell-Burt T. Impact of a type 2 diabetes diagnosis on mental health, quality of life, and social contacts: a longitudinal study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Amp Care. 2017;5(1):e000198.
12. Mcbride CM, Clipp E, Peterson BL, Lipkus IM, Demark-Wahnefried W. Psychological impact of diagnosis and risk reduction among cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2000;9(5):418–427.
13. Courtney DB, Makinen J. Impact of diagnosis disclosure on adolescents with borderline personality disorder. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016;25(3):177–184.
14. Arnold SRC, Foley K-R, Hwang YI, et al. Cohort profile: The Australian longitudinal study of adults with autism (ALSAA). BMJ Open. 2019;9(12):e030798.
15. Lawson LP, Haschek A, Richdale AL. Longitudinal Study of Australian School Leavers with Autism (SASLA): Baseline Characteristics. Olga Tennison Autism Research Centre (OTARC), La Trobe University, Melbourne; 2018.
16. Hoekstra RA, Vinkhuyzen AAE, Wheelwright S, et al. The construction and validation of an abridged version of the autism-spectrum quotient (AQ-Short). J Autism Dev Disord. 2011;41(5):589–596.
17. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition Text Revision: DSM-IV-TR. 4th ed. Text Revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2000.
18. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: Statacorp LP; 2017.
19. NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software. Version 12. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: QSR International Pty Ltd; 2018.
20. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th edition. Boston: Pearson; 2012.
21. Hull L, Petrides KV, Allison C, et al. “Putting on my best normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. J Autism Dev Disord. 2017;47(8):2519–2534.
22. Lai M-C, Lombardo MV, Ruigrok AN, et al. Quantifying and exploring camouflaging in men and women with autism. Autism. 2017;21(6):690–702.
23. Crane L, Batty R, Adeyinka H, Goddard L, Henry LA, Hill EL. Autism diagnosis in the United Kingdom: Perspectives of autistic adults, parents and professionals. J Autism Dev Disord. 2018;48(11):3761–3772.
24. Fletcher-Watson S, Adams J, Brook K, et al. Making the future together: Shaping autism research through meaningful participation. Autism. 2019;23(4):943–953.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright 2020, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.
History
Published online: 11 March 2020
Published in print: March 2020
Topics
Authors
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Funding Information
This work was supported by the Cooperative Research Centre for Living with Autism (Autism CRC), established and supported under the Australian Government's Cooperative Research Centres Program.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Get Access
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.