“It Helps Make the Fuzzy Go Away”: Autistic Adults' Perspectives on Nature's Relationship with Well-being Through the Life Course
Abstract
Background: While previous work highlights the links between nature and various positive well-being-related outcomes, the experiences of autistic people in nature have received limited empirical research. Our study aimed at gathering autistic adults' perspectives on the relationship between nature and well-being in both childhood and adulthood.
Methods: We used an online survey to capture the views of 127 autistic adults across the United Kingdom. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we analyzed responses to three questions focused on nature experiences in childhood and adulthood and how the participants felt that nature was (or was not) related to well-being. Guided by self-determination theory, we used both inductive and deductive analysis.
Results: We developed three main themes to reflect the nature experiences of autistic adults: choosing to escape into nature, supporting relatedness through connecting in (and to) nature, and nature doesn't judge, but other people do. Compared with many other contexts, nature provides a non-judgmental space through which (in both childhood and adulthood) many, but not all, autistic individuals can meet individual needs and experience autonomy, relatedness, and competence.
Conclusion: This analysis of how autistic adults in the United Kingdom utilize nature to support well-being has implications for how nature can be used in social prescribing as well as in ensuring that existing outdoor spaces, organizations, and activities are supportive of autistic people.
Abstract
Community brief
Why is this an important issue?
Autistic adults often experience poorer mental health and overall well-being than neurotypical adults. Since some autistic adults are very interested in nature and often report that they feel better after spending time in nature, natural spaces and activities taking place outside could be one way of improving well-being for autistic adults.
What was the purpose of this study?
There is very little research on how autistic adults experience nature, although some autistic people have written about their experiences. The purpose of this study was to develop an understanding of how autistic people experience nature and how nature might benefit their well-being.
What did the researchers do?
We created a survey that asked 26 questions about how autistic adults experience nature. This survey included questions about how often they visited nature, if they had a focused interest in nature, whether and how nature was related to their well-being, and childhood experiences of nature. Focusing on three of the questions, we used reflexive thematic analysis (a way of identifying patterns in data) to develop three themes.
What were the results of the study?
The three themes we developed were: choosing to escape into nature, supporting relatedness through connecting in (and to) nature, and nature doesn't judge, but other people do. These themes illustrate the different ways that autistic adults experienced nature. For some, nature was a way of relating to others and relating more deeply with themselves. Nature was also a way of escaping from people who were unkind, from situations that were uncomfortable, and from other stresses in life. Many autistic participants reported that nature was helpful to their well-being, because they experienced less judgment from natural spaces and creatures—though other people were sometimes judgmental, which made nature experiences worse.
What do these findings add to what was already known?
These findings confirm previous research showing that many autistic people have focused interests in nature. The findings not only add to the numerous existing anecdotal accounts about how autistic people feel in nature but also demonstrate a diverse range of perspectives. Not all autistic participants in this study felt that nature was beneficial to their well-being.
What are the potential weaknesses of the study?
Unfortunately, surveys are only accessible to people who have Wi-Fi/internet access, can use a computer or phone, and have the time to complete the survey. The survey might also have drawn in participants who were specifically interested in this topic, which might influence the findings.
How will these findings help autistic adults now or in the future?
These findings will help autistic adults, practitioners, and carers to identify a potential source of support for well-being. As autistic adults in this study used nature to meet different needs related to their well-being, natural space and nature-based activities may help improve well-being in autistic adults who enjoy nature.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Authorship Confirmation Statement
S.F.: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, analysis, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, and funding acquisition. R.N.: conceptualization, methodology. S.A.: analysis, visualization. J.L.G.: conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, and supervision. C.H.: conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, and supervision.
References
1. Friedman S, Imrie S, Fink E, Gedikoglu M, Hughes C. Understanding changes to children's connection to nature during the COVID-19 pandemic and implications for child well-being. People Nat. 2022;4(1):155–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10270.
2. Richardson EA, Pearce J, Shortt NK, Mitchell R. The role of public and private natural space in children's social, emotional and behavioural development in Scotland: A longitudinal study. Environ Res. 2017;158:729–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.07.038.
3. Mygind L, Kjeldsted E, Hartmeyer R, Mygind E, Bølling M, Bentsen P. Mental, physical and social health benefits of immersive nature-experience for children and adolescents: A systematic review and quality assessment of the evidence. Health Place. 2019;58:102136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.05.014.
4. Chawla L, Keena K, Pevec I, Stanley E. Green schoolyards as havens from stress and resources for resilience in childhood and adolescence. Health Place. 2014;28:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.03.001.
5. Barrable A. Shaping space and practice to support autonomy: Lessons from natural settings in Scotland. Learn Environ Res. 2020;23(3):291–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09305-x.
6. Twohig-Bennett C, Jones A. The health benefits of the great outdoors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes. Environ Res. 2018;166:628–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.030.
7. Capaldi CA, Passmore HA, Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM, Dopko RL. Flourishing in nature: A review of the benefits of connecting with nature and its application as a wellbeing intervention. Int J Wellbeing. 2015;5(4):449. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v5i4.449.
8. Pritchard A, Richardson M, Sheffield D, McEwan K. The relationship between nature connectedness and eudaimonic well-being: A meta-analysis. J Happiness Stud. 2020;21(3):1145–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00118-6.
9. Cartwright BDS, White MP, Clitherow TJ. Nearby nature ‘Buffers' the effect of low social connectedness on adult subjective wellbeing over the last 7 days. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(6):1238. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061238.
10. Berman MG, Jonides J, Kaplan S. The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychol Sci. 2008;19(12):1207–1212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x.
11. Li H, Zhang X, Wang H, et al. Access to nature via virtual reality: A mini-review. Front Psychol. 2021;12:725288. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725288.
12. Martin L, White MP, Hunt A, Richardson M, Pahl S, Burt J. Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations with health, wellbeing and pro-environmental behaviours. J Environ Psychol. 2020;68:101389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101389.
13. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publications; 2013.
14. Bottema-Beutel K, Kapp SK, Lester JN, Sasson NJ, Hand BN. Avoiding Ableist Language: Suggestions for Autism Researchers. Autism Adulthood. 2021;3(1):18–29. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2020.0014.
15. den Houting J. Neurodiversity: An insider's perspective. Autism. 2019;23(2):271–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318820762.
16. Benevides TW, Shore SM, Palmer K, et al. Listening to the autistic voice: Mental health priorities to guide research and practice in autism from a stakeholder-driven project. Autism. 2020;24(4):822–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361320908410.
17. Frazier TW, Dawson G, Murray D, Shih A, Sachs JS, Geiger A. Brief report: A survey of autism research priorities across a diverse community of stakeholders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2018;48(11):3965–3971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3642-6.
18. Pellicano E, Dinsmore A, Charman T. What should autism research focus upon? Community views and priorities from the United Kingdom. Autism. 2014;18(7):756–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361314529627.
19. Roche L, Adams D, Clark M. Research priorities of the autism community: A systematic review of key stakeholder perspectives. Autism. 2021;25(2):336–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361320967790.
20. Lai MC, Kassee C, Besney R, et al. Prevalence of co-occurring mental health diagnoses in the autism population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6(10):819–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30289-5.
21. Vasa RA, Hagopian L, Kalb LG. Investigating mental health crisis in youth with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 2020;13(1):112–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2224.
22. Weir E, Allison C, Ong KK, Baron-Cohen S. An investigation of the diet, exercise, sleep, BMI, and health outcomes of autistic adults. Mol Autism. 2021;12(1):31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-021-00441-x.
23. Adams D, Young K. A systematic review of the perceived barriers and facilitators to accessing psychological treatment for mental health problems in individuals on the autism spectrum. Rev J Autism Dev Disord. 2021;8(4):436–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-020-00226-7.
24. Mandy W. Six ideas about how to address the autism mental health crisis. Autism. 2022;26(2):289–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613211067928.
25. Lai MC, Lombardo MV, Ruigrok AN, et al. Quantifying and exploring camouflaging in men and women with autism. Autism. 2017;21(6):690–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316671012.
26. Cassidy S, Bradley L, Shaw R, Baron-Cohen S. Risk markers for suicidality in autistic adults. Mol Autism. 2018;9(1):42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-018-0226-4.
27. Cage E, Di Monaco J, Newell V. Experiences of autism acceptance and mental health in autistic adults. J Autism Dev Disord. 2018;48(2):473–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3342-7.
28. Hull L, Petrides KV, Allison C, et al. “Putting on My Best Normal”: Social camouflaging in adults with autism spectrum conditions. J Autism Dev Disord. 2017;47(8):2519–2534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3166-5.
29. Featherstone C, Sharpe RA, Axford N, Asthana S, Husk K. Health and wellbeing outcomes and social prescribing pathways in community-based support for autistic adults: A systematic mapping review of reviews. Health Soc Care Community. 2022;30(3):e621–e635. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13635.
30. McAnulty D. Diary of a Young Naturalist. Beaminster, UK: Little Toller Books; 2021.
31. Packham C. Fingers in the Sparkle Jar: A Memoir. London, UK: Random House; 2016.
32. Pellicano E, Fatima U, Hall G, et al. A capabilities approach to understanding and supporting autistic adulthood. Nat Rev Psychol. 2022;1(11):624–639. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00099-z.
33. Nussbaum M. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
34. Bradley K, Male D. “Forest School is muddy and I like it”: Perspectives of young children with autism spectrum disorders, their parents and educational professionals. Educ Child Psychol. 2017;34:80–96.
35. Friedman S, Morrison SA. “I just want to stay out there all day”: A case study of two special educators and five autistic children learning outside at school. Front Educ. 2021;6:668991. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.668991.
36. Friedman S, Gibson J, Jones C, Hughes C. ‘A new adventure’: A case study of autistic children at Forest School. J Adventure Educ Outdoor Learn. 2022. [Epub ahead of print]; https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2022.2115522.
37. Grove R, Hoekstra RA, Wierda M, Begeer S. Special interests and subjective wellbeing in autistic adults. Autism Res. 2018;11(5):766–775. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1931.
38. Jordan CJ, Caldwell-Harris CL. Understanding differences in neurotypical and autism spectrum special interests through internet forums. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012;50(5):391–402. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-50.5.391.
39. Hazen EP, Stornelli JL, O'Rourke JA, Koesterer K, McDougle CJ. Sensory symptoms in autism spectrum disorders. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2014;22(2):112. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HRP.0000445143.08773.58.
40. Thye MD, Bednarz HM, Herringshaw AJ, Sartin EB, Kana RK. The impact of atypical sensory processing on social impairments in autism spectrum disorder. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018;29:151–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.04.010.
41. Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol. 1991;11(3):201–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7.
42. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000:55(1):68–78.
43. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. New York: The Guilford Press; 2017.
44. Lee ES, Maillet MA, Grouzet FME. Why do individuals engage with the natural world? A self-determination theory perspective on the effect of nature engagement and well-being. Appl Res Qual Life. 2022;17(3):1501–1532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-021-09970-2.
45. Goldfarb Y, Gal E, Golan O. Implications of employment changes caused by COVID-19 on mental health and work-related psychological need satisfaction of autistic employees: A mixed-methods longitudinal study. J Autism Dev Disord. 2022;52(1):89–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-04902-3.
46. Friedman S, Gibson J. Autistic adults' experiences in nature. Published online October 26, 2021. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7X9JD.
47. Waterfield J. Convenience Sampling. In: Frey BB, ed. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2018.
48. Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42(5):533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
49. Fletcher-Watson S, Adams J, Brook K, et al. Making the future together: Shaping autism research through meaningful participation. Autism. 2019;23(4):943–953. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318786721.
50. Crane L, Sesterka A, den Houting J. Inclusion and rigor in qualitative autism research: A response to Van Schalkwyk and Dewinter (2020). J Autism Dev Disord. 2021;51(5):1802–1804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04634-w.
51. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
52. Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2019;11(4):589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806.
53. Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. London, UK: SAGE Publications; 2021.
54. Friedman S, Noble E, Archer S, Gibson J, Hughes C. Respite and connection: Autistic adults' reflections upon nature and wellbeing during the Covid-19 pandemic. Autism. 2023. [Epub ahead of print]; https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613231166462.
55. Klin A, Danovitch JH, Merz AB, Volkmar FR. Circumscribed interests in higher functioning individuals with autism spectrum disorders: An exploratory study. Res Pract Persons Severe Disabl. 2007;32(2):89–100. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.32.2.89.
56. Nowell KP, Bernardin CJ, Brown C, Kanne S. Characterization of special interests in autism spectrum disorder: A brief review and pilot study using the special interests survey. J Autism Dev Disord. 2021;51(8):2711–2724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04743-6.
57. Ryan R, Moller AC. Competence as Central, But Not Sufficient, for High-Quality Motivation: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. New York: Guilford Press; 2017.
58. Park N. Population estimates for the UK, England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland: mid-2020. Office for National Statistics. Published 2021. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/bulletins/annualmidyearpopulationestimates/mid2020 Accessed November 10, 2022.
59. Sparkes I, Riley E, Cook B, Machuel P. Outcomes for disabled people in the UK: 2021. Office for National Statistics. Published 2022. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/disability/articles/outcomesfordisabledpeopleintheuk/2021 Accessed January 11, 2023.
60. Loomes R, Hull L, Mandy WPL. What is the male-to-female ratio in autism spectrum disorder? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;56(6):466–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2017.03.013.
61. Malone KM, Pearson JN, Palazzo KN, Manns LD, Rivera AQ, Mason Martin DL. The scholarly neglect of Black autistic adults in autism research. Autism Adulthood. 2022;4(4):271–280. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0086.
62. McInroy LB. Pitfalls, potentials, and ethics of online survey research: LGBTQ and other marginalized and hard-to-access youths. Soc Work Res. 2016;40(2):83–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svw005.
63. Woolley H. Watch this space! Designing for children's play in public open spaces. Geogr Compass. 2008;2(2):495–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00077.x.
64. Charlton RA, Crompton CJ, Roestorf A, Torry C; The Autistica Physical Health and Ageing Study Group. Social prescribing for autistic people: A framework for service provision. AMRC Open Res. 2021;2(19):2. https://doi.org/10.12688/amrcopenres.12901.2.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Autism in Adulthood
Volume 6 • Issue Number 2 • June 2024
Pages: 192 - 204
Copyright
Copyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.
History
Published online: 17 June 2024
Published in print: June 2024
Published ahead of print: 8 September 2023
Topics
Authors
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Funding Information
Funding for this study was provided by St Edmund's College, University of Cambridge and the Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.