Abstract

The resting brain dynamics self-organize into a finite number of correlated patterns known as resting-state networks (RSNs). It is well known that techniques such as independent component analysis can separate the brain activity at rest to provide such RSNs, but the specific pattern of interaction between RSNs is not yet fully understood. To this aim, we propose here a novel method to compute the information flow (IF) between different RSNs from resting-state magnetic resonance imaging. After hemodynamic response function blind deconvolution of all voxel signals, and under the hypothesis that RSNs define regions of interest, our method first uses principal component analysis to reduce dimensionality in each RSN to next compute IF (estimated here in terms of transfer entropy) between the different RSNs by systematically increasing k (the number of principal components used in the calculation). When k=1, this method is equivalent to computing IF using the average of all voxel activities in each RSN. For k≥1, our method calculates the k multivariate IF between the different RSNs. We find that the average IF among RSNs is dimension dependent, increasing from k=1 (i.e., the average voxel activity) up to a maximum occurring at k=5 and to finally decay to zero for k≥10. This suggests that a small number of components (close to five) is sufficient to describe the IF pattern between RSNs. Our method—addressing differences in IF between RSNs for any generic data—can be used for group comparison in health or disease. To illustrate this, we have calculated the inter-RSN IF in a data set of Alzheimer's disease (AD) to find that the most significant differences between AD and controls occurred for k=2, in addition to AD showing increased IF w.r.t. controls. The spatial localization of the k=2 component, within RSNs, allows the characterization of IF differences between AD and controls.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Adams IM. 1991. Structural plasticity of synapses in Alzheimer's disease. Mol Neurobiol 5:411–419.
Amieva H, Phillips LH, Della Sala S, Henry JD. 2004. Inhibitory functioning in Alzheimer's disease. Brain 127:949–964.
Barnett L, Barrett AB, Seth AK. 2009. Granger causality and transfer entropy are equivalent for Gaussian variables. Phys Rev Lett 103:238701.
Barrett AB, Barnett L, Seth AK. 2010. Multivariate Granger causality and generalized variance. Phys Rev E 81:041907.
Beckmann CF, DeLuca M, Devlin JT, Smith SM. 2005. Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:1001–1013.
Beckmann CF, Smith SM. 2004. Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23:137–152.
Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ. 1995. An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput 7:1129–1159.
Bentley P, Driver J, Dolan RJ. 2008. Cholinesterase inhibition modulates visual and attentional brain responses in Alzheimer's disease and health. Brain 131:409–424.
Binnewijzend MA, Schoonheim MM, Sanz-Arigita E, Wink AM, van der Flier WM, Tolboom N, Adriaanseand SM, Damoiseaux JS, Scheltensand P, van Berckel BN, Barkhof F. 2012. Resting-state fMRI changes in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging 33:2018–2028.
Boveroux P, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Brun MA, Noirhomme Q, Lauwick S, Luxen A, Degueldre C, Plenevau A, Schnakers C, Phillips C, Brichant JF, Bonhomme V, Maquet P, Greicius MD, Laureys S, Boly M. 2010. Breakdown of within- and between-network resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity. Anesthesiology 113:1038–1053.
Bressler SL, Seth AK. 2011. Wiener-granger causality: a well-established methodology. Neuroimage 58:323–329.
Brier MR, Thomasand JB, Snyder AZ, Benzinger TL, Zhang D, Raichle ME, Holtzman DM, Morris JC, Ances BM. 2012. Loss of intranetwork and internetwork resting state functional connections with Alzheimer's disease progression. J Neurosci 32:8890–8898.
Bullmore E, Sporns O. 2009. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:186–198.
Carhart-Harris RL, Leech R, Hellyer PJ, Shanahan M, Feilding A, Tagliazucchi E, Chialvo DR, Nutt D. 2014. The entropic brain: A theory of conscious states informed by neuroimaging research with psychedelic drugs. Front Hum Neurosci 8:20.
Cox RW. 1996. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res 29:162–173.
Damoiseaux JS, Rombouts SA, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, Stam CJ, Smith SM, Beckmann CF. 2006. Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:13848.
Delamillieure P, Doucet G, Mazoyer B, Turbelin M-R, Delcroix N, Mellet E, Zago L, Crivello F, Petit L, Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Joliot M. 2010. The resting state questionnaire: An introspective questionnaire for evaluation of inner experience during the conscious resting state. Brain Res Bull 81:565–573.
Demirci O, Stevens MC, Andreasen NC, Michael A, Liu J, White T, Pearlson GD, Clark VP, Calhoun VD. 2009. Investigation of relationships between fMRI brain networks in the spectral domain using ICA and Granger causality reveals distinct differences between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls. Neuroimage 46:419–431.
Deshpande G, LaConte S, James GA, Peltier S, Hu X. 2009. Multivariate Granger causality analysis of fMRI data. Hum Brain Mapp 30:1361–1373.
Fornito A, Zalesky A, Breakspear M. 2013. Graph analysis of the human connectome: promise, progress, and pitfalls. Neuroimage 80:426–444.
Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Corbetta M, Van Essen DC, Raichle MEAG. 2005. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:9673–9678.
Friston KJ. 2009. Causal modelling and brain connectivity in functional magnetic resonance imaging. PLoS Biol 7:e33.
Friston KJ. 2011. Dynamic causal modeling and Granger causality Comments on: the identification of interacting networks in the brain using fMRI: model selection, causality and deconvolution. Neuroimage 58:303–305.
Friston KJ, Harrison L, Penny W. 2003. Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage 19:1273–1302.
Granger CWJ. 1969. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37:424–438.
Greicius MD, Srivastava C, Reiss AL, Menon V. 2004. Default-mode network activity distinguishes Alzheimer's disease from healthy aging: evidence from functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:4637–4642.
Haimovici A, Tagliazucchi E, Balenzuela P, Chialvo DR. 2013. Brain organization into resting state networks emerges at criticality on a model of the human connectome. Phys Rev Lett 110:178101.
Heine L, Soddu A, Gomez F, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Tshibanda L, Thonnard M, Charland-Verville V, Kirsch M, Laureys S, Demertzi A. 2012. Resting state networks and consciousness: alterations of multiple resting state network connectivity in physiological, pharmacological, and pathological consciousness states. Front Psychol 3:295.
Karbasforoushan H, Woodward ND. 2012. Resting-state networks in schizophrenia. Curr Top Med Chem 12:2404–2414.
Li R, Wu X, Chen K, Fleisher AS, Reiman EM, Yao L. 2013. Alterations of directional connectivity among resting-state networks in Alzheimer disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:340–345.
Li SJ, Li Z, Wu G, Zhang MJ, Franczak M, Antuono PG. 2002. Alzheimers disease: evaluation of a functional MR imaging index as a marker. Radiology 225:253–259.
Liang P, Li Z, Deshpande G, Wang Z, Hu X, Li K. 2014. Altered causal connectivity of resting state brain networks in amnesic MCI. PLoS One 9:e88476.
Liao W, Ding J, Marinazzo D, Xu Q, Wang Z, Yuan C, Zhang Z, Lu G, Chen H. 2011. Small-world directed networks in the human brain: multivariate granger causality analysis of resting-state fMRI. Neuroimage 14:2683–2694.
Liao W, Zhang Z, Pan Z, Mantini D, Ding J, Duan X, Luo C, Lu G, Chen H. 2010. Altered functional connectivity and small-world in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. PLoS One 5:e8525.
Liu Z, Zhang Y, Bai L, Yan H, Dai R, Zhong C, Wang H, Wei W, Xue T, Feng Y, You Y, Tian J. 2012. Investigation of the effective connectivity of resting state networks in Alzheimer's disease: a functional mri study combining independent components analysis and multivariate granger causality analysis. NMR Biomed 25:1311–1320.
Maki-Marttunen V, Diez I, Cortes JM, Chialvo DR, Villarreal M. 2013. Disruption of transfer entropy and inter-hemispheric brain functional connectivity in patients with disorder of consciousness. Front Neuroinform 7:24.
Marinazzo D, Liao W, Chen H, Stramaglia S. 2011. Nonlinear connectivity by granger causality. Neuroimage 58:330–338.
Marinazzo D, Pellicoro M, Stramaglia S. 2008. Kernel method for nonlinear granger causality. Phys Rev Lett 100:144103.
McIntosh AR, Lobaugh NJ. 2004. Partial least squares analysis of neuroimaging data: applications and advances. Neuroimage 23:S250–S263.
McLaren DG, Sperling RA, Atri A. 2014. Flexible modulation of network connectivity related to cognition in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage 15:544–557.
Noirhomme Q, Soddu A, Lehembre R, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Boveroux P, Boly M, Laureys S. 2010. Brain connectivity in pathological and pharmacological coma. Front Syst Neurosci 4:160.
Penny WD, Stephan KE, Mechelli A, Friston KJ. 2004. Modelling functional integration: a comparison of structural equation and dynamic causal models. Neuroimage 23:264–274.
Raichle ME. 2009. A paradigm shift in functional brain imaging. J Neurosci 29:12729–12734.
Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, Powers WJ, Gusnard DA, Shulman GL. 2001. A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:676–682.
Raichle ME, Mintum MA. 2006. Brain work and brain imaging. Annu Rev Neurosci 29:449–476.
Raichle ME, Snyder AZ. 2007. A default mode of brain function: a brief history of an evolving idea. Neuroimage 37:1083–1090.
Reijneveldand JC, Ponten SC, Berendse HW, Stam CJ. 2007. The application of graph theoretical analysis to complex networks in the brain. Clin Neurophysiol 118:2317–2331.
Rodriguez E, George N, Lachaux JP, Martinerie J, Renault B, Varela FJ. 1999. Perception's shadow: long-distance synchronization of human brain activity. Nature 397:430–433.
Roebroeck A, Formisano E, Goebel R. 2005. Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. Neuroimage 25:230–242.
Rombouts SA, Barkhof FF, Goekoop R, Stam CJ, Scheltens P. 2005. Altered resting state networks in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 26:231–239.
Rytsar R, Fornari E, Frackowiak RS, Ghika JA, Knyazeva MG. 2011. Inhibition in early Alzheimer's disease: an fMRI-based study of effective connectivity. Neuroimage 57:1131–1139.
Sanz-Arigita EJ, Schoonheim MM, Damoiseaux JS, Rombouts SA, Maris E, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, Stam CJ. 2010. Loss of'small-world' networks in Alzheimer's disease: graph analysis of fMRI resting-state functional connectivity. PLoS One 5:e13788.
Sato JR, Fujita A, Cardoso EF, Thomaz CE, Brammer MJ, Amaro E. 2010. Analyzing the connectivity between regions of interest: an approach based on cluster Granger causality for fMRI data analysis. Neuroimage 52:1444–1455.
Schoonheim MM, Geurts JJ, Landi D, Douw L, van der Meer ML, Vrenken H, Polman CH, Barkhof F, Stam CJ. 2013. Functional connectivity changes in multiple sclerosis patients: a graph analytical study of MEG resting state data. Hum Brain Mapp 34:52–61.
Schreiber T. 2000. Measuring information transfer. Phys Rev Lett 85:461–464.
Sheline YI, Raichle ME. 2013. Resting state functional connectivity in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Biol Psychiatry 74:340–347.
Smith SM, Vidaurre D, Beckmann CF, Glasser MF, Jenkinson M, Miller KL, Nichols TE, Robinson EC, Salimi-Khorshidi G, Woolrich MW, Barch DM, Ugurbil K, Van Essen DC. 2013. Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI. Trends Cogn Sci 17:666–682.
Sporns O, Chialvo DR, Kaiser M, Hilgetag CC. 2004. Organization, development and function of complex brain networks. Trends Cogn Sci 8:418–425.
Stam CJ, Reijneveld JC. 2007. Graph theoretical analysis of complex networks in the brain. Nonlinear Biomed Phys 1:3.
Tagliazucchi E, Balenzuela P, Fraiman D, Chialvo DR. 2012. Criticality in large-scale brain fMRI dynamics unveiled by a novel point process analysis. Front Physiol 3:15.
Tagliazucchi E, Carhart-Harris R, Leech R, Nutt D, Chialvo DR. 2014. Enhanced repertoire of brain dynamical states during the psychedelic experience. Hum Brain Mapp 35:5442–5456.
Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, Mazoyer B, Joliot M. 2002. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in spm using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 15:273289.
Woodward ND, Rogers B, Heckers S. 2011. Functional resting-state networks are differentially affected in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 130:86–93.
Wu GR, Liao W, Stramaglia S, Ding JR, Chen H, Marinazzo D. 2013. A blind deconvolution approach to recover effective connectivity brain networks from resting state fMRI data. Med Image Anal 17:365–374.
Zhang D, Raichle ME. 2010. Disease and the brain's dark energy. Nat Rev Neurol 6:15–28.
Zhou Z, Chen Y, Ding M, Wright P, Lu Z, Liu Y. 2009. Analyzing brain networks with PCA and conditional Granger causality. Hum Brain Mapp 30:2197–2206.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Brain Connectivity
Brain Connectivity
Volume 5Issue Number 9November 2015
Pages: 554 - 564
PubMed: 26177254

History

Published online: 6 November 2015
Published in print: November 2015
Published ahead of print: 24 July 2015
Published ahead of production: 15 July 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Topics

Authors

Affiliations

Ibai Diez*
Computational Neuroimaging Lab, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Asier Erramuzpe*
Computational Neuroimaging Lab, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Iñaki Escudero
Computational Neuroimaging Lab, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Radiology Service, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Beatriz Mateos
Computational Neuroimaging Lab, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Radiology Service, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Alberto Cabrera
Osatek, Vitoria-Gazteiz, Spain.
Daniele Marinazzo
Department of Data Analysis, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Ernesto J. Sanz-Arigita
Radiology and Image Analysis Center, VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sebastiano Stramaglia
Dipartimento di Fisica, Universita degli Studi di Bari and INFN, Bari, Italy.
BCAM–Basque Center for Applied Mathematics, Bilbao, Spain.
Jesus M. Cortes Diaz
Computational Neuroimaging Lab, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Ikerbasque, The Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain.
Departamento de Biologia Celular e Histologia, University of the Basque Country, Leioa, Spain.
for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Notes

*
These two authors have contributed equally.
Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (adni.loni.ucla.edu). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data, but did not participate in the analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators is available at http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/how_to_apply/ADNI_Acknowledgement_List.pdf.
Address correspondence to:Jesus M. Cortes DiazComputational Neuroimaging LabBiocruces Health Research InstituteCruces University HospitalPlaza de Cruces S/NBarakaldo E-48903Spain
E-mail: [email protected]

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top