Research Article
Open access
Published Online: 2 December 2008

Cotransfer of Parthenogenetic Embryos Improves the Pregnancy and Implantation of Nuclear Transfer Embryos in Mouse

Publication: Cloning and Stem Cells
Volume 10, Issue Number 4

Abstract

The majority of somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) clones dies in the peri- or postimplantation period. Improvement of the full-term healthy pregnancy rates is a key issue for the economical viability and animal welfare profile of SCNT technology. In this study the effects of cotransfer of parthenogenetic or fertilized embryos on the pregnancy and implantation of SCNT mouse embryos have been investigated. SCNT embryos were produced by transferring cumulus cell nuclei into enucleated B6D2F1 mouse oocytes, whereas parthenogenetically activated (PA) and fertilized embryos were derived from ICR mice by artificial activation with strontium and in vivo fertilization, respectively. SCNT embryos were inferior in their developmental capacity to blastocyst compared to either PA or fertilized embryos. SCNT embryos were transferred alone (SCNT), or cotransferred with two to three PA (SCNT + PA) or fertilized (SCNT + Fert) embryos into the oviducts of an ICR recipient. Both pregnancy and implantation rates originating from clones in the SCNT + PA group were significantly higher than those of SCNT group (p < 0.05). The weight of placentas of clones derived from SCNT, SCNT + PA, or SCNT + Fert was in all cases significantly higher than that of fertilized controls (p < 0.001). Most of the clones derived from SCNT embryos cotransferred with PA or fertilized embryos survived to adulthood and were fertile and healthy according to histopathological observations. Our results demonstrate in mouse that cotransfer of PA embryos improves the pregnancy and implantation of SCNT embryos without compromising the overall health of the resulting clones.

Formats available

You can view the full content in the following formats:

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Cloning and Stem Cells
Cloning and Stem Cells
Volume 10Issue Number 4December 2008
Pages: 429 - 434
PubMed: 18752415

History

Published online: 2 December 2008
Published in print: December 2008
Published ahead of print: 27 August 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Topics

Authors

Affiliations

Qinggang Meng
Genetic Reprogramming Group, Agricultural Biotechnology Center, Godollo, Hungary.
Minkang Wang
Genetic Reprogramming Group, Agricultural Biotechnology Center, Godollo, Hungary.
Claudia Ana Stanca
Genetic Reprogramming Group, Agricultural Biotechnology Center, Godollo, Hungary.
Szilard Bodo
Genetic Reprogramming Group, Agricultural Biotechnology Center, Godollo, Hungary.
Andras Dinnyes
Genetic Reprogramming Group, Agricultural Biotechnology Center, Godollo, Hungary.
Molecular Animal Biotechnology Laboratory, Szent Istvan University, Godollo, Hungary.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/ePub

Get Access

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top