It's CRISPR Clear: Off-Target Study Misses the Mark
Publication: The CRISPR Journal
Volume 1, Issue Number 2
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Schaefer KA, Wu WH, Colgan DF, et al. Unexpected mutations after CRISPR-Cas9 editing in vivo. Nat Methods 2017;14:547–548.
2.
Lareau CA, Clement K, Hsu JY, et al. Response to “Unexpected mutations after CRISPR–Cas9 editing in vivo.” Nat Methods 2018;15: 238–239.
3.
Nutter LMJ, Heaney JD, Lloyd KCK, et al. Response to “Unexpected mutations after CRISPR–Cas9 editing in vivo.” Nat Methods 2018;15: 235–236.
4.
Kim S-T, Park J, Kim D, Kim K, et al. Response to “Unexpected mutations after CRISPR–Cas9 editing in vivo.” Nat Methods 2018;15: 239–240.
5.
Wilson CJ, Fennell T, Bothmer A, et al. Response to “Unexpected mutations after CRISPR–Cas9 editing in vivo.” Nat Methods 2018;15: 236–237.
6.
Lescarbeau RM, Murray B, Barnes TM, et al. Response to “Unexpected mutations after CRISPR–Cas9 editing in vivo.” Nat Methods 2018;15: 237.
7.
CRISPR off-targets: a reassessment. Nat Methods 2018; 15: 229–230.
8.
Schaefer KA, Darbro BW, Colgan DF, et al. Corrigendum and follow-up: whole genome sequencing of multiple CRISPR-edited mouse lines suggests no excess mutations. bioRxiv 2018 Mar 26; bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/154450.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In

Copyright
Copyright 2018, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
History
Published in print: April 2018
Published online: 1 April 2018
Topics
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.