Research Article
No access
Published Online: 10 April 2013

Children's Perspectives on Cyberbullying: Insights Based on Participatory Research

Publication: Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Volume 16, Issue Number 4

Abstract

Cyberbullying is an emerging problem among youngsters. Although the current body of knowledge about cyberbullying is expanding rapidly, it lacks a more in-depth research approach honoring adolescents' perspectives on the problem. Moreover, very few studies have focused on cyberbullying among elementary school children. The purpose of this study therefore, was to explore children's perspectives on the problem of cyberbullying. A participatory research design was used in which 28 children (aged 11–12 from four elementary schools) actively participated for 6 weeks in weekly scheduled group sessions. In these sessions, different aspects of cyberbullying were discussed using various enabling techniques. Between sessions, the children were given preparation assignments. The research revealed several ambiguities that should be addressed in interventions against cyberbullying. First, it appears difficult for all parties involved to distinguish cyberbullying from innocent pranks. Frequency and intention are key variables, but these are ambiguous in the context of cyberbullying. Second, cyberbullies may have very different motives, not all of which have to do with their relationship with the victim. Third, the expectations children have of the way their parents or teachers will react to incidents of cyberbullying are an obstacle for seeking help. Children are particularly afraid of overreaction and the subsequent loss of their Internet privileges. These results confirm earlier insights from research on cyberbullying, and examine the ambiguities in more detail. In addition, the research demonstrates the usefulness of participatory research to investigate cyberbullying among younger children and demonstrates that the research led to mutual learning.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Li Q. Bullying in the new playground: research into cyberbullying and cyber victimizationAustralian Journal of Educational Technology200723435-454. 1. Li Q. Bullying in the new playground: research into cyberbullying and cyber victimization. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 2007; 23:435–454.
2.
Mason KL. Cyberbullying: a preliminary assessment for school personnelPsychology in the Schools200845323-348. 2. Mason KL. Cyberbullying: a preliminary assessment for school personnel. Psychology in the Schools 2008; 45:323–348.
3.
Besley BCyberbullyingwww.cyberbullying.caNov.222011. 3. Besley B. Cyberbullying. Available at www.cyberbullying.ca (accessed Nov. 22, 2011).
4.
Wang JIannotti RJNansel TR. School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational and cyberJournal of Adolescence Health200945368-375. 4. Wang J, Iannotti RJ, Nansel TR. School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational and cyber. Journal of Adolescence Health 2009; 45:368–375.
5.
Law DMShapka JDDomene JFGagné MH. Are cyberbullies really bullies? An investigation of reactive and proactive online aggressionComputers in Human Behavior201228664-672. 5. Law DM, Shapka JD, Domene JF, Gagné MH. Are cyberbullies really bullies? An investigation of reactive and proactive online aggression. Computers in Human Behavior 2012; 28:664–672.
6.
Langos C. Cyberbullying: the challenge to defineCyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking201215285-289. 6. Langos C. Cyberbullying: the challenge to define. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2012; 15:285–289.
7.
Slonje RSmith PK. Cyberbullying: another main type of bullying?Scandinavian Journal of Psychology200849147-154. 7. Slonje R, Smith PK. Cyberbullying: another main type of bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2008; 49:147–154.
8.
Juvonen JGross EF. Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspaceJournal of School Health200878496-505. 8. Juvonen J, Gross EF. Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health 2008; 78:496–505.
9.
Vandebosch HVan Cleemput K. Defining cyberbullying: a qualitative research into the perceptions of youngstersCyberPsychology and Behavior200811499-503. 9. Vandebosch H, Van Cleemput K. Defining cyberbullying: a qualitative research into the perceptions of youngsters. CyberPsychology and Behavior 2008; 11:499–503.
10.
Agatston PWKowalski RLimber S. Students' perspectives on cyberbullyingJournal of Adolescent Health20074159-60. 10. Agatston PW, Kowalski R, Limber S. Students' perspectives on cyberbullying. Journal of Adolescent Health 2007; 41:59–60.
11.
David-Ferdon CFeldman M. Electronic media, violence and adolescents: an emerging public health problemJournal of Adolescent Health200741S1-S5. 11. David-Ferdon C, Feldman M. Electronic media, violence and adolescents: an emerging public health problem. Journal of Adolescent Health 2007; 41:S1–S5.
12.
Topçu ÇErdur-Baker ÖÇapa-Aydin Y. Examination of cyberbullying experiences among Turkish students from different school typesCyberPsychology and Behavior200811643-648. 12. Topçu Ç, Erdur-Baker Ö, Çapa-Aydin Y. Examination of cyberbullying experiences among Turkish students from different school types. CyberPsychology and Behavior 2008; 11:643–648.
13.
Diamanduros TDowns EJenkins SJ. The role of school psychologists in the assessment, prevention and intervention of cyberbullyingPsychology in the Schools200845693-704. 13. Diamanduros T, Downs E, Jenkins SJ. The role of school psychologists in the assessment, prevention and intervention of cyberbullying. Psychology in the Schools 2008; 45:693–704.
14.
Thornberg R. ‘She's weird!’–the social construction of bullying in schools: a review of qualitative researchChild Society201125258-267. 14. Thornberg R. ‘She's weird!’–the social construction of bullying in schools: a review of qualitative research. Child Society 2011; 25:258–267.
15.
Parris LVarjas KMeyers JCutts H. High school students' perceptions of coping with cyberbullyingYouth and Society20111-23http://yas.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/03/06/0044118X11398881.abstractApr.242012. 15. Parris L, Varjas K, Meyers J, Cutts H. High school students' perceptions of coping with cyberbullying. Youth and Society 2011; 1–23. Available at: http://yas.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/03/06/0044118X11398881.abstract (accessed Apr. 24, 2012).
16.
Renati RBerrone CZanetti MA. Morally disengaged and unempathic: do cyberbullies fit these definitions? An exploratory studyCyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking201215391-398. 16. Renati R, Berrone C, Zanetti MA. Morally disengaged and unempathic: do cyberbullies fit these definitions? An exploratory study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2012; 15:391–398.
17.
Steffgen GKönig APfetsch JMelzer A. Are cyberbullies less empathic? Adolescents' cyberbullying behavior and empathic responsivenessCyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking201114643-648. 17. Steffgen G, König A, Pfetsch J, Melzer A. Are cyberbullies less empathic? Adolescents' cyberbullying behavior and empathic responsiveness. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2011; 14:643–648.
18.
Houghton SJNathan ETaylor M. To bully or not to bully, that is not the question: Western Australian early adolescents' in search of a reputationJournal of Adolescent Health20121-25http://jar.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/01/05/0743558411432638.abstractApr.272012. 18. Houghton SJ, Nathan E, Taylor M. To bully or not to bully, that is not the question: Western Australian early adolescents' in search of a reputation. Journal of Adolescent Health 2012; 1–25. Available at: http://jar.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/01/05/0743558411432638.abstract (accessed Apr. 27, 2012).
19.
Hart R2008. Children's participation: the theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental careLondenEarthscan. 19. Hart R. (2008) Children's participation: the theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care. Londen: Earthscan.
20.
Lansdown G2000. Promoting children's participation in democratic decision-makingFlorenceUNICEF Innocenti Research Center. 20. Lansdown G. (2000) Promoting children's participation in democratic decision-making. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Center.
21.
Pascal CBertram T. Listening to young citizens: the struggle to make real a participatory paradigm in research with young childrenEuropean Early Childhood Education Research Journal200917249-262. 21. Pascal C, Bertram T. Listening to young citizens: the struggle to make real a participatory paradigm in research with young children. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 2009; 17:249–262.
22.
Punch S. Research with children: the same or different from research with adults?Childhood20029321-341. 22. Punch S. Research with children: the same or different from research with adults? Childhood 2002; 9:321–341.
23.
Mishna MSaini MSolomon S. Ongoing and online: children and youth's perceptions of cyberbullyingChildren and Youth Services Review2009311222-1228. 23. Mishna M, Saini M, Solomon S. Ongoing and online: children and youth's perceptions of cyberbullying. Children and Youth Services Review 2009; 31:1222–1228.
24.
Smith PKMahdavi JCarvalho M et al. Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupilsJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry200849376-385. 24. Smith PK, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M, et al. Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 2008; 49:376–385.
25.
Bronfenbrenner U1979. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and designCambridge, MAHarvard University Press. 25. Bronfenbrenner U. (1979) The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
Almekinders CBeukema LTromp C2008. Research in action: Theories and practices for innovation and social changeWageningenWageningen Academic Publishers. 26. Almekinders C, Beukema L, Tromp C. (2008) Research in action: Theories and practices for innovation and social change. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
27.
Cornwall AJewkes R. What is participatory research?Social Science and Medicine1995411667-1676. 27. Cornwall A, Jewkes R. What is participatory research? Social Science and Medicine 1995; 41:1667–1676.
28.
Lawlor DMarsden CSanderson JSimmonds D. Rapid participatory appraisal of young people's sexual health needs: an evaluation of meta-planningHealth Education Journal199958228-232. 28. Lawlor D, Marsden C, Sanderson J, Simmonds D. Rapid participatory appraisal of young people's sexual health needs: an evaluation of meta-planning. Health Education Journal 1999; 58:228–232.
29.
Brown CSLloyd SMurray SA. Using consecutive rapid participatory appraisal studies to assess, facilitate and elevate health and social change in community settingsBMC Public Health2006668. 29. Brown CS, Lloyd S, Murray SA. Using consecutive rapid participatory appraisal studies to assess, facilitate and elevate health and social change in community settings. BMC Public Health 2006; 6:68.
30.
Chambers R. The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisalWorld Development199422953-969. 30. Chambers R. The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development 1994; 22:953–969.
31.
Loader RAmartya L. Participatory rural appraisal: extending the research methods baseAgricultural System19996273-85. 31. Loader R, Amartya L. Participatory rural appraisal: extending the research methods base. Agricultural System 1999; 62:73–85.
32.
Binns THill TNel E. Learning from the people: participatory rural appraisal, geography and rural development in the “new” South AfricaApplied Geography1997171-9. 32. Binns T, Hill T, Nel E. Learning from the people: participatory rural appraisal, geography and rural development in the “new” South Africa. Applied Geography 1997; 17:1–9.
33.
Rifkin SB. Rapid rural appraisal: its use and value for health planners and managersPublic Administration199674509-526. 33. Rifkin SB. Rapid rural appraisal: its use and value for health planners and managers. Public Administration 1996; 74:509–526.
34.
Malone K. Children, youth and sustainable citiesLocal Environment200165-12. 34. Malone K. Children, youth and sustainable cities. Local Environment 2001; 6:5–12.
35.
Nieuwenhuys O. Action research with street children: a role for street educatorsPLA Notes19962552-55. 35. Nieuwenhuys O. Action research with street children: a role for street educators. PLA Notes 1996; 25:52–55.
36.
Davis JM. Understanding the meanings of children: a reflexive processChild Society199812325-335. 36. Davis JM. Understanding the meanings of children: a reflexive process. Child Society 1998; 12:325–335.
37.
Van den Bulck J. Television viewing, computer game playing, and Internet use and self-reported time to bed and time out of bed in secondary-school childrenSleep200427101-104. 37. Van den Bulck J. Television viewing, computer game playing, and Internet use and self-reported time to bed and time out of bed in secondary-school children. Sleep 2004; 27:101–104.
38.
De Bell MChapman C. Computer and Internet use by children and adolescents in 2001Education Statistics Quarterly200357-11. 38. De Bell M, Chapman C. Computer and Internet use by children and adolescents in 2001. Education Statistics Quarterly 2003; 5:7–11.
39.
Glaser BGStraws AL1967. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative researchNew York, NYAldline. 39. Glaser BG, Straws AL. (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldline.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Volume 16Issue Number 4April 2013
Pages: 248 - 253
PubMed: 23438266

History

Published online: 10 April 2013
Published in print: April 2013
Published ahead of print: 25 February 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Topics

Authors

Affiliations

Niels Baas
Department of Communication Studies, Faculty of Behavioral Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Menno D.T. de Jong
Department of Communication Studies, Faculty of Behavioral Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Constance H.C. Drossaert
Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, Faculty of Behavioral Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Notes

Address correspondence to:Niels BaasDepartment of Communication StudiesFaculty of Behavioral SciencesUniversity of TwenteCubicus BuildingP.O. Box 2177500 AE EnschedeThe Netherlands
E-mail: [email protected]

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top