Research Article
No access
Published Online: 9 March 2015

The Use of Social Networking Sites for Relationship Maintenance in Long-Distance and Geographically Close Romantic Relationships

Publication: Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Volume 18, Issue Number 3

Abstract

Social networking sites (SNS) play an increasingly important role in maintaining geographically close romantic relationships (GCRR). However, knowledge about SNS use in long-distance romantic relationships (LDRR) is still lacking. The present study examined the relative importance of SNS in maintaining LDRR compared to GCRR, particularly with regard to the use of SNS to express involvement (via relational maintenance behaviors) and to gauge a partner's involvement (via partner surveillance and jealousy) in the relationship. An online survey was conducted among predominantly young adult Facebook users who were in a romantic relationship (N=272). Results showed that participants who were in a LDRR reported higher levels of relational maintenance behaviors through SNS than participants who were in a GCRR. Also, as compared to participants who were in a GCRR, participants who were in a LDRR used SNS more for partner surveillance and experienced higher levels of SNS jealousy.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Pistole MC, Roberts A. Measuring long-distance romantic relationships: a validity study. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development 2011; 44:63–76.
2.
Aylor BA. (2003) Maintaining long-distance relationships. In Canary DJ, Dainton M, eds. Maintaining relationships through communication: relational, contextual, and cultural variations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 127–139.
3.
Rabby MK, Walther JB. (2003) Maintaining on-line relationships In Canary DJ, Dainton M, eds. Maintaining relationships through communication: relational, contextual, and cultural variations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 141–162.
4.
Stephen TD. Communication and interdependence in geographically separated relationships. Human Communication Research 1986; 13:191–210.
5.
Papp LM, Danielewicz J, Cayemberg C. “Are we Facebook official?” Implications of dating partners' Facebook use and profiles for intimate relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2012; 15:85–90.
6.
Noyes D. (2013) The top 20 valuable Facebook statistics. http://zephoria.com/social-media/top-15-valuable-facebook-statistics/ (accessed Oct. 10, 2013).
7.
Clayton RB, Nagurney A, Smith JR. Cheating, breakup, and divorce: is Facebook use to blame? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2013; 16:717–720.
8.
Craig E, Wright KB. Computer-mediated relational development and maintenance on Facebook. Communication Research Reports 2012; 29:119–129.
9.
Dainton M. Relationship maintenance on Facebook: development of a measure, relationship to general maintenance and relationship satisfaction. College Student Journal 2013; 47:113–121.
10.
Darvell MJ, Walsh SP, White KM. Facebook tells me so: applying the theory of planned behavior to understand partner-monitoring behavior on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2011; 14:717–722.
11.
Emery LF, Muise A, Dix EL, et al. Can you tell that I'm in a relationship? Attachment and relationship visibility on Facebook. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 2014; 40:1466–1479.
12.
Fox J, Warber K. Social networking sites in romantic relationships: attachment, uncertainty, and partner surveillance on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2013; 17:3–7.
13.
Hand MM, Thomas D, Buboltz WC, et al. Facebook and romantic relationships: intimacy and couple satisfaction associated with online social network use. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2013; 16:8–13.
14.
Marshall TC, Bejanyan K, Di Castro G, et al. Attachment styles as predictors of Facebook-related jealousy and surveillance in romantic relationships. Personal Relationships 2012; 20:1–22.
15.
McEwan B. Sharing, caring, and surveilling: an actor-partner independence model examination of Facebook relational maintenance strategies. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2013; 16:863–869.
16.
Muise A, Christofides E, Desmarais S. More information than you ever wanted: does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy? CyberPsychology & Behavior 2009; 12:441–444.
17.
Saslow LR, Muise A, Impett EA, et al. Can you see how happy we are? Facebook images and relationship satisfaction. Social Psychological & Personality Science 2012; 4:411–418.
18.
Stewart MC, Dainton M, Goodboy AK. Maintaining relationships on Facebook: associations with uncertainty, jealousy, and satisfaction. Communication Reports 2014; 27:13–26.
19.
Tokunaga RS. Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding the use of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior 2011; 27:705–713.
20.
Utz S, Beukeboom CJ. The role of social network sites in romantic relationships: effects on jealousy and relationship happiness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2011; 16:511–527.
21.
Jiang LC, Hancock JT. Absence makes the communication grow fonder: geographic separation, interpersonal media, and intimacy in dating relationships. Journal of Communication 2013; 63:556–577.
22.
Johnson AJ, Haigh MM, Becker JAH, et al. College students' use of relational management strategies in email in long-distance and geographically close relationships. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2008; 13:381–404.
23.
Rintel S. Video calling in long-distance relationships: the opportunistic use of audio/video distortions as a relational resource. Electronic Journal of Communication 2013; 23:1–19.
24.
Tong ST, Walther JB. (2011) Relational maintenance and computer-mediated communication. In Wright KB, Webb LM, eds. Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 98–118.
25.
Caughlin JP, Sharabi LL. A communicative interdependence perspective of close relationships: the connections between mediated and unmediated interactions matter. Journal of Communication 2013; 63:873–893.
26.
Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C. The benefits of Facebook “friends”: social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2007; 12:1143–1168.
27.
Dindia K, Canary DJ. Definitions and theoretical perspectives on maintaining relationships. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships 1993; 10:163–173.
28.
Stafford L. (2003) A summary of one program of relational maintenance research. In Canary DJ, Dainton M, eds. Maintaining relationships through communication: relational, contextual, and cultural variations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 51–78.
29.
Canary DJ, Stafford L. Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs 1992; 59:243–267.
30.
Dainton M, Aylor BA. Routine and strategic maintenance efforts: behavioral patterns, variations associated with relational length, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs 2002; 69:52–66.
31.
Stafford L, Canary DJ. Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender, and relational characteristics. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships 1991; 8:217–242.
32.
Stafford L, Dainton M, Haas SM. Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: scale revision, sex versus gender roles, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs 2000; 67:306–323.
33.
Afifi WA, Dillow MR, Morse C. Examining predictors and consequences of information seeking in close relationships. Personal Relationships 2004; 11:429–449.
34.
Stafford L. (2005) Maintaining long-distance and cross-residential relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Weigel DJ, Brown C, O'Riordan CK. Everyday expressions of commitment and relational uncertainty as predictors of relationship quality and stability overtime. Communication Reports 2011; 24:38–50.
36.
Sternberg RJ. A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review 1986; 93:119–135.
37.
Norton R. Measuring marital quality: a critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage & Family 1983; 45:141–151.
38.
Larzelere RE, Huston TL. The dyadic trust scale: toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships. Journal of Marriage & the Family 1980; 42:595–604.
39.
Dainton M, Aylor BA. A relational uncertainty analysis of jealousy, trust, and the maintenance of long-distance versus geographically-close relationships. Communication Quarterly 2001; 49:172–188.
40.
Attridge M. Jealousy and relationship closeness: exploring the good (reactive) and bad (suspicious) sides of romantic jealousy. Sage Open 2013; 3(1).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Volume 18Issue Number 3March 2015
Pages: 152 - 157
PubMed: 25751046

History

Published online: 9 March 2015
Published in print: March 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Topics

Authors

Affiliations

Cherrie Joy Billedo, MA
Department of Communication Science, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychology, University of the Philippines, Quezon City, Philippines.
Peter Kerkhof, PhD
Department of Communication Science, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Catrin Finkenauer, PhD
Department of Clinical Child and Family Studies, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Notes

Address correspondence to:Cherrie Joy BilledoDepartment of Communication ScienceVU University AmsterdamDe Boelelaan 10811081 HV AmsterdamThe Netherlands
E-mail: [email protected]

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top