Research Article
No access
Published Online: 1 August 2016

Individual Differences Associated with Exposure to “Ana-Mia” Websites: An Examination of Adolescents from 25 European Countries

Publication: Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Volume 19, Issue Number 8

Abstract

This study explores the individual differences associated with adolescents’ exposure to “ana-mia” websites (i.e., websites where people discuss ways to be very thin, such as being anorexic). Participants were adolescents from a large cross-national survey in 25 European countries (N = 18,709, aged 11–16, 50% girls). Sociodemographic and individual factors (i.e., variables related to Internet use and personality traits) were included in a logistic regression performed separately for girls and boys. The results showed that sensation seeking and online disinhibition were both associated with an increased risk of exposure to “ana-mia” websites in girls as well as in boys, although some gender differences were apparent. In girls, but not in boys, the older the child and higher the socioeconomic status, higher the chance of being exposed to “ana-mia” websites. Further research is recommended to understand the real impact of “ana-mia” website exposure on adolescent health.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Perloff RM. Social media effects on young women's body image concerns: theoretical perspectives and an agenda for research. Sex Roles 2014; 71:363–377.
2.
de Vries DA, Peter J, de Graaf H, et al. Adolescents’ social network site use, peer appearance-related feedback, and body dissatisfaction: testing a mediation model. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 2016; 45:211–224.
3.
Amichai-Hamburger Y. (2013) The social net: understanding our online behavior. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4.
Rodgers RF, Lowy AS, Halperin DM, et al. A meta-analysis examining the influence of pro-eating disorder websites on body image and eating pathology. European Eating Disorders Review 2016; 24:3–8.
5.
Rouleau CR, von Ranson KM. Potential risks of pro-eating disorder websites. Clinical Psychology Review 2011; 31:525–531.
6.
Boepple L, Thompson JK. A content analytic comparison of fitspiration and thinspiration websites. International Journal of Eating Disorders 2016; 49:98–101.
7.
Borzekowski DLG, Schenk S, Wilson JL, et al. e-Ana and e-Mia: a content analysis of pro-eating disorder web sites. American Journal of Public Health 2010; 100:1526–1534.
8.
Ghaznavi J, Taylor LD. Bones, body parts, and sex appeal: an analysis of #thinspiration images on popular social media. Body Image 2015; 14:54–61.
9.
Casilli AA, Mounier L, Pailler F, et al. Les jeunes et le web des troubles alimentaires: dépasser la notion de “pro-ana.” Rapport du projet de recherche ANR ANAMIA “La sociabilité Ana-mia: une approche des troubles alimentaires par les réseaux sociaux en ligne et hors-ligne.” www.webcitation.org/6ce6HJibd (accessed Oct. 29, 2015).
10.
Livingstone S, Smith PK. Annual research review: harms experienced by child users of online and mobile technologies: the nature, prevalence and management of sexual and aggressive risks in the digital age. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines 2014; 55:635–654.
11.
Harper K, Sperry S, Thompson JK. Viewership of pro-eating disorder websites: association with body image and eating disturbances. International Journal of Eating Disorders 2008; 41:92–95.
12.
Rodgers RF, Skowron S, Chabrol H. Disordered eating and group membership among members of a pro-anorexic online community. European Eating Disorders Review 2012; 20:9–12.
13.
Custers K, Van den Bulck J. Viewership of pro-anorexia websites in seventh, ninth and eleventh graders. European Eating Disorders Review 2009; 17:214–219.
14.
Tiggemann M, Miller J. The Internet and adolescent girls’ weight satisfaction and drive for thinness. Sex Roles 2010; 63:79–90.
15.
Koronczai B, Kökönyei G, Urbán R, et al. The mediating effect of self-esteem, depression and anxiety between satisfaction with body appearance and problematic internet use. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 2013; 39:259–265.
16.
Claes L, Müller A, Norré J, et al. The relationship among compulsive buying, compulsive Internet use and temperament in a sample of female patients with eating disorders. European Eating Disorders Review 2012; 20:126–131.
17.
Rodgers RF, Melioli T, Laconi S, et al. Internet addiction symptoms, disordered eating, and body image avoidance. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2013; 16:56–60.
18.
Wooldridge T, Mok C, Chiu S. Content analysis of male participation in pro-eating disorder web sites. Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment & Prevention 2014; 22:97–110.
19.
Orchard LJ, Fullwood C. Current perspectives on personality and Internet use. Social Science Computer Review 2010; 28:155–169.
20.
Zuckerman M. (2007) Sensation seeking and risky behavior. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21.
Livingstone S, Helsper EJ. Taking risks when communicating on the Internet: the role of offline social-psychological factors in young people's vulnerability to online risks. Information, Communication & Society 2007; 10:619–644.
22.
Walker M, Thornton L, De Choudhury M, et al. Facebook use and disordered eating in college-aged women. Journal of Adolescent Health 2015; 57:157–163.
23.
Amichai-Hamburger Y. (2009) Personality, individual differences and Internet use. In Joinson AN, McKenna KYA, Postmes T, Reips UD, eds. The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 187–204.
24.
Cassin SE, von Ranson KM. Personality and eating disorders: a decade in review. Clinical Psychology Review 2005; 25:895–916.
25.
Joinson AN. (2007) Disinhibition and the Internet. In Gackenbach J, ed. Psychology and the Internet: intrapersonal, interpersonal and transpersonal implications. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 75–92.
26.
Casale S, Fiovaranti G, Caplan S. Online disinhibition. Journal of Media Psychology 2015; 27:170–177.
27.
Stanley T, Barnes J, Short E. Appearance-focused Internet use and the thin-beauty ideal. Studies in Media and Communication 2015; 3:38–50.
28.
Ransom DC, La Guardia JG, Woody EZ, et al. Interpersonal interactions on online forums addressing eating concerns. The International Journal of Eating Disorders 2010; 43:161–170.
29.
Livingstone S, Haddon L, Görzig A, et al. (2011). Technical report and user guide: The 2010 EU Kids Online Survey. London: EU Kids Online. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/45270/ (accessed Jan. 29, 2015).
30.
Stephenson MT, Hoyle RH, Palmgreen P, et al. Brief measures of sensation seeking for screening and large-scale surveys. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2003; 72:279–286.
31.
Rodgers RF, Melioli T. The relationship between body image concerns, eating disorders and Internet use, Part I: a review of empirical support. Adolescent Research Review 2016; 1:95–119.
32.
Rodgers RF. The relationship between body image concerns, eating disorders and Internet use, Part II: an integrated theoretical model. Adolescent Research Review 2016; 1:121–137.
33.
Slater A, Tiggemann M, Hawkins K, et al. Just one click: a content analysis of advertisements on teen Web sites. Journal of Adolescent Health 2012; 50:339–345.
34.
Lewis SP, Arbuthnott AE. Searching for thinspiration: the nature of Internet searches for pro-eating disorder websites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2012; 15:200–204.
35.
Markey CN. Invited commentary: why body image is important to adolescent development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 2010; 39:1387–1391.
36.
Keel PK. (2010) Epidemiology and course of eating disorders. In Agras WS, ed. The Oxford handbook of eating disorders. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 25–32.
37.
Ferreiro F, Seoane G, Senra C. Toward understanding the role of body dissatisfaction in the gender differences in depressive symptoms and disordered eating: a longitudinal study during adolescence. Journal of Adolescence 2014; 37:73–84.
38.
Wilson JL, Peebles R, Hardy KK, et al. Surfing for thinness: a pilot study of pro-eating disorder Web site usage in adolescents with eating disorders. Pediatrics 2006; 118:e1635–e1643.
39.
Jenkins H. (2009) Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
40.
Ciao AC, Loth KA, Neumark-Sztainer DR. Preventing eating disorder pathology: common and unique features of successful eating disorders prevention programs. Current Psychiatry Reports 2014; 16:453.
41.
Wolk S. (2013) Caring hearts and critical minds: literature, inquiry, and social responsibility. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
42.
Johnson M. (2015) Digital literacy and digital citizenship: approaches to girls’ online experiences. In Bailey J, Steeves V, eds. eGirls, eCitizens. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, pp. 339–360.
43.
O'Reilly T. (2013). Open data and algorithmic regulation. In: Goldstein B, Dyson L, eds. Beyond transparency: open data and the future of civic innovation. San Francisco: Code for America Press, pp. 289–300.
44.
Wells C, Thorson K. (2015). How gatekeeping still matters: understanding media effects in an era of curated flows. In Vos T, Heinderyckx F, eds. Gatekeeping in transition. New York: Routledge, pp. 26–44.
45.
Graells-Garrido E. (2015) Biased behavior in web activities: from understanding to unbiased visual exploration. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/294280 (accessed Oct. 31, 2015).
46.
Veldhuis J, Konijn EA, Seidell JC. Negotiated media effects. Peer feedback modifies effects of media's thin-body ideal on adolescent girls. Appetite 2014; 73:172–182.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Volume 19Issue Number 8August 2016
Pages: 475 - 480
PubMed: 27448192

History

Published in print: August 2016
Published online: 1 August 2016
Published ahead of print: 22 July 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Topics

Authors

Affiliations

Carlos A. Almenara, PhD
Department of Psychology, Institute for Research on Children, Youth and Family, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Hana Machackova, PhD
Department of Psychology, Institute for Research on Children, Youth and Family, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
David Smahel, PhD
Department of Psychology, Institute for Research on Children, Youth and Family, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

Notes

Address correspondence to:Dr. Carlos A. AlmenaraDepartment of PsychologyInstitute for Research on Children, Youth and Family (IVMDR)Masaryk UniversityJoštova, 10Brno 602 00Czech Republic
E-mail: [email protected]

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top