The Prevalence and Gratification of Nude Self-Presentation of Men Who Have Sex with Men in Online-Dating Environments: Attracting Attention, Empowerment, and Self-Verification
Publication: Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Volume 21, Issue Number 1
Abstract
This study builds on research about the importance of body presentation among men who have sex with men (MSM) by exploring the phenomenon of nude body presentation in online dating environments. In a quantitative survey of N = 9,235 MSM users of a gay online dating site (ODS) in Germany, the prevalence of nude pictures and gratifications sought while displaying them were investigated. About two-thirds of the participants declared that they use nude pictures in their dating profiles, with only small differences in prevalence between members of different ages, education levels, and sexual orientation. Furthermore, the results indicate that the use of nudity is driven by three underlying gratifications: (1) Attracting attention, meaning that nudity is used to accelerate sexual outcomes from online dating use; (2) empowerment, meaning that nudity online serves as an environment for otherwise and elsewhere inhibited forms of body presentation; and (3) self-verification, whereby nudity is used as a means of receiving affirmation from others. Regression analyses are used to investigate associations of these gratifications with sociodemographics and online dating behavior. Findings are discussed in relation to earlier research on self-presentation as well as theories of body importance among gay men. While earlier research has mainly focused on the negative implications of body presentation (e.g., self-objectification; reinforcing standards of beauty), the findings of this study hint that ODS may provide a platform for acts of nude body presentation that are not possible elsewhere and are thus accompanied by empowerment and self-verification.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Morrison MA, Morrison TG, Sager CL. Does body satisfaction differ between gay men and lesbian women and heterosexual men and women? A meta-analytic review. Body Image 2004; 1:127–138.
2.
Rothblum ED. (2002) Gay and lesbian body images. In Cash TF, Pruzinsky T, eds. Body image: a handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice. New York, NY: The Guilford Press, pp. 257–265.
3.
Atkins D. (1998) Introduction: looking queer. In Atkins D, ed. Looking queer: body image and identity in lesbian, bisexual, gay and transgender communities. New York, NY: Haworth Press, pp. xxix–li.
4.
Duncan D. Out of the closet and into the gym: gay men and body image in Melbourne, Australia. The Journal of Men's Studies 2007; 15:331–346.
5.
Silberstein LR, Mishkind ME, Striegel-Moore RH, et al. Men and their bodies: a comparison of homosexual and heterosexual men. Psychosomatic Medicine 1989; 51:337–346.
6.
Sergios PA, Cody J. Physical attractiveness and social assertiveness skills in male homosexual dating behavior and partner selection. Journal of Homosexuality 1985; 125:505–514.
7.
Bailey JM, Gaulin SY, Agyei Y, et al. Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionarily relevant aspects of human mating psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994; 66:1081–1093.
8.
Siever MD. Sexual orientation and gender as factors in socioculturally acquired vulnerability to body dissatisfaction and eating disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1994; 62:252–260.
9.
Peplau LA, Frederick DA, Yee C, et al. Body image satisfaction in heterosexual, gay, and lesbian adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior 2009; 38:713–725.
10.
Tiggemann M, Martins Y, Kirkbride A. Oh to be lean and muscular: body image ideals in gay and heterosexual men. Psychology of Men & Masculinity 2007; 8:15–24.
11.
Yelland C, Tiggemann M. Muscularity and the gay ideal: body dissatisfaction and disordered eating in homosexual men. Eating Behaviors 2003; 4:107–116.
12.
Campbell JE. (2004) Getting it on online: cyberspace, gay male sexuality, and embodied identity. New York: Harrington Park Press.
13.
Miller B. “Dude, where's your face?” Self-presentation, self-description, and partner preferences on a social networking application for men who have sex with men: a content analysis. Sexuality & Culture 2015; 19:637–658.
14.
Lemke R, Weber M. That man behind the curtain: investigating the sexual online dating behavior of men who have sex with men but hide their same-sex sexual attraction in offline surroundings. Journal of Homosexuality 2017; 64:1561–1582.
15.
Ross MW. Typing, doing, and being: sexuality and the Internet. The Journal of Sex Research 2005; 42:342–352.
16.
Benotsch EG, Kalichman S, Cage M. Men who have met sex partners via the Internet: prevalence, predictors, and implications for HIV prevention. Archives of Sexual Behavior 2002; 31:177–183.
17.
Elford J, Bolding G, Davis M, et al. Web-based behavioral surveillance among men who have sex with men: a comparison of online and offline samples in London, UK. Journal of Aquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome 2004; 35:421–426.
18.
Marcus U, Schmidt AJ, Hamouda O, et al. Estimating the regional distribution of men who have sex with men (MSM) based on internet surveys. BMC Public Health 2009; 9:180–191.
19.
Rosser BR, Wilkerson JM, Smolenski DJ, et al. The future of Internet-based HIV prevention: a report on key findings from the men's Internet (MINTS-I, II) sex studies. AIDS and Behavior 2011; 15(Suppl. 1):91–100.
20.
Liau A, Millett G, Marks G. Meta-analytic examination of online sex-seeking and sexual risk behavior among men who have sex with men. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 2006; 33:576–584.
21.
Tate H, George R. The effect of weight loss on body image in HIV-positive gay men. AIDS Care 2001; 13:163–169.
22.
Siibak A. Constructing the self through the photo selection—visual impression management on social networking websites. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 2009; 3:article 1.
23.
van Oosten JMF, Peter J, Boot I. Exploring associations between exposure to sexy online self-presentations and adolescents' sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 2015; 44:1078–1091.
24.
Shafer A, Bobkowski P, Brown JD. (2013) Sexual media practice: how adolescents select, engange with, and are affected by sexual media. In Dill KE, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Media Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 223–251.
25.
Petrou P, Lemke R. Victimisation and life satisfaction of gay and bisexual individuals in 44 European countries: the moderating role of country-level and person-level attitudes towards homosexuality. Culture, Health & Sexuality 2017 [Epub ahead of print].
26.
Dannecker M. (1981) Theories of homosexuality. London: Gay Men's Press.
27.
Lanzieri N, Hildebrandt T. Using hegemonic masculinity to explain gay male attraction to muscular and athletic men. Journal of Homosexuality 2011; 58:275–293.
28.
Wood M. The gay male gaze: body image disturbance and gender oppression among gay men. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services 2004; 17:43–62.
29.
Baumgartner SE, Sumter SR, Peter J, et al. Sexual self-presentation on social network sites: who does it and how is it perceived? Computers in Human Behavior 2015; 50:91–100.
30.
Kapidzic S, Herring SC. Gender, communication, and self-presentation in teen chatrooms revisited: have patterns changed? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2011; 17:39–59.
31.
Chong ESK, Zhang Y, Mak WWS, et al. Social media as social capital of LGB individuals in Hong Kong: its relations with group membership, stigma, and mental well-being. American Journal of Community Psychology 2015; 55:228–238.
32.
Gudelunas D. There's an app for that: the uses and gratifications of online social networks for gay men. Sexuality & Culture 2012; 16:347–365.
33.
Ellison N, Heino R, Gibbs J. Managing impressions online: self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2006; 11:415–441.
34.
Sung Y, Lee J, Kim E, et al. Why we post selfies: understanding motivations for posting pictures of oneself. Personality and Individual Differences 2016; 97:260–265.
35.
Ranzini G, Lutz C, Gouderjaan M. (2016) Swipe right: an exploration of self-presentation and impression management on Tinder. Annual Conference of the International Communication Association (ICA).
36.
Tiidenberg K. Bringing sexy back: Reclaiming the body aesthetic via self-shooting. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 2014; 8:article 3.
37.
Eichenberg C, Döring N. Sexual self-presentation in the Internet [Sexuelle Selbstdarstellung im Internet]. Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung 2006; 19:133–153.
38.
Rui J, Stefanone MA. Strategic self-presentation online: a cross-cultural study. Computers in Human Behavior 2013; 29:110–118.
39.
Leary MR. (1995) Self-presentation: impression management and interpersonal behavior. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark Publishers.
40.
Lewis-Beck C, Lewis-Beck M. (2016) Applied regression: an introduction. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi, Singapore: SAGE Publications.
41.
Brown G, Maycock B, Burns S. Your picture is your bait: use and meaning of cybersex among gay men. Journal of Sex Research 2005; 42:63–73.
42.
Campbell WK. Is narcissism really so bad? Psychological Inquiry 2001; 12:214–216.
43.
van Oosten JMF. (2015) Putting things in perspective. Young people's susceptibility to the effects of sexual media content (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
44.
Gonzales AL, Hancock JT. Identity shift in computer-mediated environments. Media Psychology 2008; 11:167–185.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Volume 21 • Issue Number 1 • January 2018
Pages: 16 - 24
PubMed: 29261342
Copyright
Copyright 2018, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
History
Published in print: January 2018
Published online: 1 January 2018
Published ahead of print: 20 December 2017
Authors
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Get Access
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.