Research Article
No access
Published Online: 10 July 2019

Predictors of Social Media Self-Control Failure: Immediate Gratifications, Habitual Checking, Ubiquity, and Notifications

Publication: Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Volume 22, Issue Number 7

Abstract

Social media users often experience the difficulty of controlling their social media use while having important tasks to do. Recent theorizing on self-control and media use proposes four possible factors (immediate gratifications, habitual checking, ubiquity, and notifications) that might cause social media self-control failure (SMSCF). We tested whether these factors indeed predict SMSCF among 590 daily social media users. Results showed that, when people checked social media habitually, or strongly experienced the online ubiquity of social media, or perceived strong disturbances from social media notifications, they were more likely to fail to control their social media use. However, social media-related immediate gratifications did not predict SMSCF. This study empirically identified social media-related factors that might induce social media users' self-control difficulty.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1. Du J, van Koningsbruggen GM, Kerkhof P. A brief measure of social media self-control failure. Computers in Human Behavior 2018; 84:68–75.
2. Hofmann W, Vohs KD, Baumeister RF. What people desire, feel conflicted about, and try to resist in everyday life. Psychological Science 2012; 23:582–588.
3. Reinecke L, Hofmann W. Slacking off or winding down? An experience sampling study on the drivers and consequences of media use for recovery versus procrastination. Human Communication Research 2016; 42:441–461.
4. Meier A, Reinecke L, Meltzer CE. “Facebocrastination”? Predictors of using Facebook for procrastination and its effects on students' well-being. Computers in Human Behavior 2016; 64:65–76.
5. Hofmann W, Reinecke L, Meier A. (2017) Of sweet temptations and bitter aftertaste: self-control as a moderator of the effects of media use on well-being. In Reinecke L, Oliver MB, eds. The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects. New York: Routledge, pp. 211–222.
6. van Koningsbruggen GM, Hartmann T, Du J. (2018) Always On? Explicating impulsive influences on media use. In Vorderer P, Hefner L, Reinecke L, Klimmt C, eds. Permanently online, permanently connected: Living and communicating in a POPC world. New York: Routledge, pp. 51–60.
7. LaRose R, Eastin MS. (2004). A social cognitive theory of Internet uses and gratifications: toward a new model of media attendance. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 48:358–377.
8. Raacke J, Bonds-Raacke J. Myspace and Facebook: applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 2008; 11:169–174.
9. Lin KY, Lu HP. Why people use social networking sites: an empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior 2011; 27:1152–1161.
10. Verplanken B, Orbell S. Reflections on past behavior: a self-report index of habit strength. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2003; 33:1313–1330.
11. Schnauber A, Wolf C. Media habits and their impact on media channel selection for information use. Studies in Communication | Media (SCM) 2016; 5:105–127.
12. Van Koningsbruggen GM, Hartmann T, Eden A, et al. Spontaneous hedonic reactions to social media cues. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2017; 20:334–340.
13. Du J, Van Koningsbruggen GM, Kerkhof P. (2018) Spontaneous approach reactions to social media cues. In 2018 Annual Conference of the Etmaal van de Communicatiewetenschap. Ghent, Belgium.
14. Schnauber-Stockmann A, Meier A, Reinecke L. Procrastination out of habit? The role of impulsive vs. reflective media selection in procrastinatory media use. Media Psychology 2018; 21: 640–668.
15. Wohn D, Velasquez A, Bjornrud T, et al. (2012) Habit as an explanation of participation in an online peer-production community. In Konstan J, Chi EH, Höök K, eds. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Austin, TX. New York: ACM, pp. 2905–2914.
16. Woods HC, Scott H. # Sleepyteens: social media use in adolescence is associated with poor sleep quality, anxiety, depression and low self-esteem. Journal of Adolescence 2016; 51, 41–49.
17. Vorderer P, Krömer N, Schneider FM. Permanently online—Permanently connected: explorations into university students' use of social media and mobile smart devices. Computers in Human Behavior 2016; 63:694–703.
18. Vorderer P, Hefner D, Reinecke L, et al. (2017) Permanently online, permanently connected: Living and communicating in a POPC world. New York: Routledge.
19. Varni G, Volpe G, Camurri A. A system for real-time multimodal analysis of nonverbal affective social interaction in user-centric media. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 2010; 12:576–590.
20. Reinecke L, Klimmt C, Meier A, et al. Permanently online and permanently connected: development and validation of the Online Vigilance Scale. PLoS One 2018; 13):e0205384.
21. Stroebe W, Van Koningsbruggen GM, Papies EK, et al. Why most dieters fail but some succeed: a goal conflict model of eating behavior. Psychological Review 2013; 120:110–138.
22. Iqbal ST, Horvitz E. (2010) Notifications and awareness: a field study of alert usage and preferences. In Inkpen K, Gutwin C, Tang J, eds. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. Savannah, GA. New York: ACM, pp. 27–30.
23. Park C, Lim J, Kim J, et al. (2017) Don't bother me. I'm socializing!: A breakpoint-based smartphone notification system. In Lee CP, Poltrock S, Barkhuus L, et al., eds. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. Portland, OR. New York: ACM, pp. 541–554.
24. Sonnentag S, Reinecke L, Mata J, et al. Feeling interrupted—Being responsive: how online messages relate to affect at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior 2018; 39:369–383.
25. Stothart C, Mitchum A, Yehnert C. The attentional cost of receiving a cell phone notification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2015, 41: 893–897.
26. Kalman YM, Rafaeli S. Online pauses and silence: chronemic expectancy violations in written computer-mediated communication. Communication Research 2011; 38:54–69.
27. Peer E, Brandimarte L, Samat S, et al. Beyond the Turk: alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2017; 70:153–163.
28. Matjašič M, Vehovar V, Manfreda KL. Web survey paradata on response time outliers: a systematic literature review. Advances in Methodology & Statistics/Metodoloski zvezki 2018; 15:23–41.
29. Greszki R, Meyer M, Schoen H. Exploring the effects of removing “too fast” responses and respondents from web surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 2015; 79:471–503.
30. jamovi project. (2018) jamovi (Version 0.9) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org (accessed April 17, 2019).
31. R Core Team. (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna Austria. (Version 3.5.3). https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed April 17, 2019).
32. Dunn TJ, Baguley T, Brunsden V. From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology 2014; 105:399–412.
33. Jorgensen TD, Pornprasertmanit S, Schoemann AM, Rosseel Y. (2018) semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling. R Package (Version 0.5-1). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools/ (accessed April 17, 2019).
34. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 1981; 18:39–50.
35. Korkmaz S, Goksuluk D, Zararsiz G. MVN: an R package for assessing multivariate normality. The R Journal 2014; 6:151–162.
36. Sun PC, Tsai RJ, Finger G, et al. What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education 2008; 50:1183–1202.
37. LaRose R. The problem of media habits. Communication Theory, 2010; 20:194–222.
38. Sagioglou C, Greitemeyer T. Facebook's emotional consequences: why Facebook causes a decrease in mood and why people still use it. Computers in Human Behavior 2014; 35:359–363.
39. Hughes DJ, Rowe M, Batey M, et al. A tale of two sites: twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage. Computers in Human Behavior 2012; 28:561–569.
40. Mottram AJ, Fleming MJ. Extraversion, impulsivity, and online group membership as predictors of problematic Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2009; 12:319–321.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Volume 22Issue Number 7July 2019
Pages: 477 - 485
PubMed: 31295024

History

Published online: 10 July 2019
Published in print: July 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Topics

Authors

Affiliations

Jie Du, MSc [email protected]
Department of Communication Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter Kerkhof, PhD
Department of Communication Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Guido M. van Koningsbruggen, PhD
Department of Communication Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Notes

Address correspondence to: Jie Du, Department of Communication Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands [email protected]

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top