Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between body shame and participation in sexting among adolescents by examining the mediational roles of social physique anxiety and misuse of social networking sites (SNSs). Four hundred thirty-nine adolescents completed self-report measures for assessing their levels of body shame, social physique anxiety, SNS addiction symptoms, and sexting participation. Female adolescents reported higher scores in body shame, social physique anxiety, and SNS addiction symptoms, whereas male adolescents reported higher participation in sexting behaviors. In addition, gender did not moderate the relationship between body shame and higher sexting behaviors. Finally, the results showed an indirect (but not a direct) association between body shame and sexting behaviors through social physique anxiety and SNS addiction symptoms. These findings provide empirical evidence for the development of sexting prevention programs that are focused on body acceptance with the aim of reducing body shame, social physique anxiety, and SNS addiction.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1. Döring NM. The internet's impact on sexuality: a critical review of 15 years of research. Computers in Human Behavior 2009; 25:1089–1101.
2. Strassberg DS, McKinnon RK, Sustaíta MA, et al. Sexting by high school students: an exploratory and descriptive study. Archives of Sexual Behavior 2013; 42:15–21.
3. Tsitsika AK, Tzavela EC, Janikian M, et al. Online social networking in adolescence: patterns of use in six european countries and links with psychosocial functioning. Journal of Adolescent Health 2014; 55:141–147.
4. de Vries DA, Peter J, de Graaf H, et al. Adolescents' social network site use, peer appearance-related feedback, and body dissatisfaction: testing a mediation model. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 2016; 45:211–224.
5. Markey CN. Invited commentary: why body image is important to adolescent development? Journal of Youth and Adolescence 2010; 39:1387–1391.
6. Tiggemann M, Slater A. NetGirls: the Internet, Facebook, and body image concern in adolescent girls. International Journal of Eating Disorders 2013; 46:630–633.
7. Villanueva-Blasco VJ, Serrano-Bernal S. Pattern of internet use and parental monitoring of social networks as a predictor of sexting in adolescents: a gender perspective [in Spanish]. Journal of Psychology and Education 2019; 14:16–26.
8. Morelli M, Bianchi D, Baiocco R, et al. Not-allowed sharing of sexts and dating violence from the perpetrator's perspective: the moderation role of sexism. Computers in Human Behavior 2016; 56:163–169.
9. Molla-Esparza C, López-González E, Losilla JM. Sexting prevalence and socio-demographic correlates in Spanish secondary school students. Sexuality Research and Social Policy 2020; 18:97–111.
10. Barrense-Dias Y, Berchtold A, Surís JC, et al. Sexting and the definition issue. Journal of Adolescent Health 2017; 61:544–554.
11. Klettke B, Hallford DJ, Mellor DJ. Sexting prevalence and correlates: a systematic literature review. Clinical Psychology Review 2014; 34:44–53.
12. Madigan S, Ly A, Rash CL, et al. Prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior among youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics 2018; 172:327–335.
13. Alonso C, Romero E. Sexting behaviour in adolescents: Personality predictors and psychosocial consequences in a one-year follow-up [in Spanish]. Anales de Psicologia-Spain 2019; 35:214–224.
14. Krieger MA. Unpacking “sexting”: a systematic review of nonconsensual sexting in legal, educational, and psychological literatures. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 2017; 18:593–601.
15. Ricketts ML, Maloney C, Marcum CD, et al. The effect of Internet related problems on the sexting behaviors of juveniles. American Journal of Criminal Justice 2015; 40:270–284.
16. Presnell K, Bearman SK, Madeley MC. Body dissatisfaction in adolescent females and males: risk and resilience. Prevention Research 2007; 14:3–6.
17. Pingitore R, Spring B, Garfieldt D. Gender differences in body satisfaction. Obesity Research 1997; 5:402–409.
18. Güemes-Hidalgo M, Ceñal González-Fierro MJ, Hidalgo Vicario MI. Puberty and adolescence [in Spanish]. Adolescere 2017; 5:7–22.
19. Harter S. (1999) The Construction of the Self: A Developmental Perspective. New York: Guilford Press.
20. Webb HJ, Zimmer-Gembeck MJ. The role of friends and peers in adolescent body dissatisfaction: a review and critique of 15 years of research. Journal of Research on Adolescence 2014; 24:564–590.
21. Fredrickson BL, Roberts TA. Objectification theory: toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly 1997; 21:173–206.
22. Hoffmann S, Warschburger P. Patterns of body image concerns in adolescence and early adulthood: a latent profile analysis. Eating Behaviors 2018; 29:28–34.
23. McKinley NM, Hyde JS. The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale: development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly 1996; 20:181–215.
24. Mustapic J, Marcinko D, Vargek P. Eating behaviours in adolescent girls: the role of body shame and body dissatisfaction. Eating and Weight Disorders 2015; 20:329–335.
25. Bartky SL. (1999) Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. New York: Routledge.
26. Lindberg SM, Hyde JS, McKinley NM. A measure of objectified body consciousness for preadolescent and adolescent Youth. Psychology of Women Quarterly 2006; 30:65–76.
27. Slater A, Tiggemann M. Body image and disordered eating in adolescent girls and boys: a test of objectification theory. Sex Roles 2010; 63:42–49.
28. Lawler M, Nixon E. Body dissatisfaction among adolescent boys and girls: the effects of body mass, peer appearance culture and internalization of appearance ideals. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 2011; 40:59–71.
29. Slater A, Tiggemann M. Media exposure, extracurricular activities, and appearance-related comments as predictors of female adolescents' self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly 2015; 39:375–389.
30. Hart EA, Leary MR, Rejeski WJ. The measurement of social physique anxiety. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 1989; 11:94–104.
31. Leary MR. Self-presentational processes in exercise and sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 1992; 14:339–351.
32. Sabiston CM, Sedgwick WA, Crocker PRE, et al. Social physique anxiety in adolescence: an exploration of influences, coping behaviors, and health behaviors. Journal of Adolescent Research 2007; 22:78–101.
33. Sicilia A, Alcaraz-Ibáñez M, Granero-Gallegos A, et al. Psychometric properties of the Objectified Body Consciousness Scale (OBCS) in Spanish preadolescents. Sex Roles 2019; 82:241–251.
34. Moradi B, Huang YP. Objectification theory and psychology of women: a decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly 2008; 32:377–398.
35. Dryman MT, Gardner S, Weeks JW, et al. Social anxiety disorder and quality of life: how fears of negative and positive evaluation relate to specific domains of life satisfaction. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 2016; 38:1–8.
36. Gioia F, Griffiths MD, Boursier V. Adolescents' body shame and social networking sites: the mediating effect of body image control in photos. Sex Roles 2020; 83:773–785.
37. Prizant-Passal S, Shechner T, Aderka IM. Social anxiety and internet use—a meta-analysis: what do we know? What are we missing? Computers in Human Behavior 2016; 62:221–229.
38. Lee BW, Stapinski LA. Seeking safety on the Internet: relationship between social anxiety and problematic Internet use. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 2012; 26:197–205.
39. Karaiskos D, Tzavellas E, Balta G, et al. P02-232—social network addiction: a new clinical disorder? European Psychiatric 2010; 25:855.
40. Andreassen CS. Online social network site addiction: a comprehensive review. Current Addiction Reports 2015; 2:175–184.
41. Echeburúa E, de Corral P. Addiction to new technologies and to online social networking in young people: A new challenge [in Spanish]. Adicciones 2010; 22:91–96.
42. Müller KW, Dreier M, Beutel ME, et al. A hidden type of internet addiction? Intense and addictive use of social networking sites in adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior 2016; 55:172–177.
43. Eleuteri S, Saladino V, Verrastro V. Identity, relationships, sexuality, and risky behaviors of adolescents in the context of social media. Sexual and Relationship Therapy 2017; 32:354–365.
44. Vannucci A, Simpson EG, Gagnon S, et al. Social media use and risky behaviors in adolescents: a meta-analysis. Journal of Adolescence 2020; 79:258–274.
45. Dake JA, Price JH, Maziarz L, et al. Prevalence and correlates of sexting behavior in adolescents. American Journal of Sexuality Education 2012; 7:1–15.
46. Drouin M, Ross J, Tobin E. Sexting: a new, digital vehicle for intimate partner aggression? Computers in Human Behavior 2015; 50:197–204.
47. Van Ouytsel J, Ponnet K, Walrave M. The associations between adolescents' consumption of pornography and music videos and their sexting behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2014; 17:772–778.
48. Bianchi D, Morelli M, Baiocco R, et al. Sexting as the mirror on the wall: body-esteem attribution, media models, and objectified-body consciousness. Journal of Adolescence 2017; 61:164–172.
49. Howard D, Klettke B, Clancy E, et al. Body image self-consciousness and sexting among heterosexual and non-exclusively heterosexual individuals. New Media & Society 2020;23:1217–1235.
50. Howard D, Klettke B, Ling M, et al. Does body dissatisfaction influence sexting behaviors in daily life? Computers in Human Behavior 2019; 101:320–326.
51. Bianchi D, Morelli M, Baiocco R, et al. Individual differences and developmental trends in sexting motivations. Current Psychology 2019;1–10.
52. Liong M, Cheng GHL. Objectifying or liberating? Investigation of the effects of sexting on body image. Journal of Sex Research 2019; 56:337–344.
53. Moya-Garófano A, Megías JL, Rodríguez-Bailón R, et al. Spanish version of the Objectified Body Consciousness Scale (OBCS): results from two samples of female university students [in Spanish]. Revista de Psicologia Social 2017; 32:362–394.
54. Sáenz-Alvarez P, Sicilia Á, González-Cutre D, et al. Psychometric properties of the Social Physique Anxiety Scale (SPAS–7) in Spanish adolescents. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 2013; 16:1–9.
55. Motl RW, Conroy DE. Validity and factorial invariance of the Social Physique Anxiety Scale. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 2000; 32:1007–1017.
56. Peris M, Maganto C, Garaigordobil M. Scale of risk of addiction to social networks and Internet for adolescents: reliability and validity (ERA-RSI) [in Spanish]. Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes 2018; 5:30–36.
57. Chacón-López H, Romero Barriga JF, Caurcel Cara MJ. Adaptation and Validation of the Sexting Behaviors Scale to Adolescents (ECS) [in Spanish]. REOP 2017; 27:99–115.
58. Dir AL. Understanding sexting behaviors, sexting expectancies, and the role of impulsivity in sexting behaviors. Thesis [Doctoral dissertation]. Purdue University, 2012.
59. Dir AL, Cyders MA, Coskunpinar A. From the bar to the bed via mobile phone: a first test of the role of problematic alcohol use, sexting, and impulsivity-related traits in sexual hookups. Computers in Human Behavior 2013; 29:1664–1670.
60. Parent MC. Handling Item-Level missing data: simpler is just as good. The Counseling Psychologist 2013; 41:568–600.
61. Downey RG, King C. Missing data in Likert ratings: a comparison of replacement methods. The Journal of General Psychology 1998; 125:175–191.
62. George D, Mallery P. SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference 17.0 Update. 10th Edition. Boston, MA: Pearson, 2010.
63. Gravetter FJ, Wallnau LB. Essentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth, 2005.
64. Field A. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 4th Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Ltd., 2013.
65. Slinker BK, Glantz SA. Multiple regression for physiological data analysis: the problem of multicollinearity. American Journal of Physiology 1985; 249:R1–R12.
66. Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: a Regression-based Approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2013.
67. Knauss C, Paxton SJ, Alsaker FD. Body dissatisfaction in adolescent boys and girls: objectified body consciousness, internalization of the media body ideal and perceived pressure from media. Sex Roles 2008; 59:633–643.
68. Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD. Social networking sites and addiction: ten lessons learned. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2017; 14:1–17.
69. Rey RD, Ojeda M, Casas JA, et al. Sexting among adolescents: the emotional impact and influence of the need for popularity. Frontiers in Psychology 2019; 10:1828.
70. Alcaraz-Ibáñez M, Sicilia A. Psychometric evaluation and sex invariance of the Spanish version of the Body and Appearance Self-Conscious Emotions Scale. Body Image 2018; 25:78–84.
71. Tiggemann M, Williams E. The role of self-objectification in disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual functioning among women: a comprehensive test of objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly 2012; 36:66–75.
72. Caplan SE. A social skill account of problematic internet use. Journal of Communication 2005; 55:721–736.
73. Manago AM, Ward LM, Lemm KM, et al. Facebook involvement, objectified body consciousness, body shame, and sexual assertiveness in college women and men. Sex Roles 2015; 72:1–14.
74. Rodgers RF, Donovan E, Cousineau T, et al. BodiMojo: efficacy of a mobile-based intervention in improving body image and self-compassion among adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 2018; 47:1363–1372.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Volume 24Issue Number 12December 2021
Pages: 799 - 805
PubMed: 34191601

History

Published online: 7 December 2021
Published in print: December 2021
Published ahead of print: 1 July 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Topics

Authors

Affiliations

Department of Psychology and Anthropology, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain.
Department of Psychology and Anthropology, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain.
Department of Social Psychology, Mind, Brain and Behavioral Research Center (CIMCYC), Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Francisca Expósito, PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6157-4292
Department of Social Psychology, Mind, Brain and Behavioral Research Center (CIMCYC), Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Notes

Address correspondence to: Laura Villanueva-Moya, Department of Social Psychology, Mind, Brain and Behavioral Research Center (CIMCYC), Faculty of Psychology, University of Granada, Campus Cartuja SN, Granada 18071, Spain [email protected]

Authors' Contributions

M.J.R.: Conceptualization, writing—review and editing. G.S.: Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing—review and editing. L.V.-M.: Conceptualization, writing—review and editing. F.E.: Supervision, writing—review and editing.

Author Disclosure Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding Information

This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness for the project “New Forms of Gender Violence: Risk and Protector Factors for Psychological Well-Being” [PSI-2017- 84703-R (MINECO/AEI/FEDER/UE)].

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top