Abstract

Excessive use of technology has become a worldwide problem due to its high prevalence, fast growth rate, and undesirable consequences. However, little is known about underlying psychological mechanisms that maintain excessive use of technology. We investigated the mediating role of self-esteem, novelty seeking, and persistence on the relationship between attachment dimensions and technology addiction among young adults. Data were collected from 727 young adults (females, N = 478; 66.3 percent), aged 23.44 ± 3.02 years. Participants completed self-report measures of secure and insecure attachment dimensions, personality, and temperament characteristics (i.e., self-esteem, novelty seeking, and persistence), technology addiction and frequency of technology use (i.e., own technology use, perceived use by peers and parents). The mediation model was tested through a path analysis. The effects of attachment insecurity on technology addiction were partially mediated by the levels of persistence and self-esteem, whereas the effects of attachment security on technology addiction were fully mediated. The effects remained robust even after controlling for the frequency of technology use. The model was gender and age invariant, suggesting that the mediation worked in a similar way for both men and women and across ages. Findings suggest that attachment dimensions exert not only a direct but also an indirect effect on technology addiction through self-esteem and persistence. Such findings may help to develop psychosocial interventions that are sensitive to young adults' attachment, personality, and temperament characteristics.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1. Statista. (2021) Global digital as of January 2021 (in billions). https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide/ (accessed Apr. 10, 2021).
2. Goossens FA, van Ijzendoorn MH. Quality of infants' attachments to professional caregivers: relation to infant-parent attachment and day-care characteristics. Child Development 1990; 61:832–837.
3. Griffiths M. Technological addictions. Clinical Psychology Forum 1995; 76:14–19.
4. Chen A. From attachment to addiction: the mediating role of need satisfaction on social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior 2019; 98:80–92.
5. Remondi C, Compare A, Tasca GA, et al. Insecure attachment and technology addiction among young adults: the mediating role of impulsivity, alexithymia, and general psychological distress. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2020; 23:761–767.
6. Bowlby J. (1969) Attachment and loss. New York: Basic Books.
7. Cassidy J, Kirsh SJ, Scolton KL, et al. Attachment and representations of peer relationships. Developmental Psychology 1996; 32:892–904.
8. Shaver PR, Mikulincer M. (2014) Adult attachment and emotion regulation. In Handbook of emotion regulation. 2nd ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press, pp. 237–250.
9. Marrero-Quevedo RJ, Blanco-Hernández PJ, Hernández-Cabrera JA. Adult attachment and psychological well-being: the mediating role of personality. Journal of Adult Development 2019; 26:41–56.
10. Zhang Y, Mei S, Li L, et al. The relationship between impulsivity and internet addiction in Chinese College Students: a moderated mediation analysis of meaning in life and self-esteem. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0131597.
11. Kim E, Cho I, Kim EJ. Structural equation model of smartphone addiction based on adult attachment theory: mediating effects of loneliness and depression. Asian Nursing Research 2017; 11:92–97.
12. Fumero A, Marrero RJ, Voltes D, et al. Personal and social factors involved in internet addiction among adolescents: a meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior 2018; 86:387–400.
13. Pettorruso M, Valle S, Cavic E, et al. Problematic Internet use (PIU), personality profiles and emotion dysregulation in a cohort of young adults: trajectories from risky behaviors to addiction. Psychiatry Research 2020; 289:113036.
14. Lee SJ, Cloninger CR, Park SH, et al. The association of parental temperament and character on their children's behavior problems. PeerJ 2015; 3:e1464.
15. Pierrehumbert B, Miljkovitch R, Plancherel B, et al. Attachment and temperament in early childhood; Implications for later behavior problems. Infant and Child Development: An International Journal of Research and Practice 2000; 9:17–32.
16. Goldsmith HH, Campos JJ. The structure of temperamental fear and pleasure in infants: a psychometric perspective. Child Development 1990; 61:1944–1964.
17. Harris MA, Orth U. The link between self-esteem and social relationships: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2020; 119:1459.
18. Shi X, Wang J, Zou H. Family functioning and Internet addiction among Chinese adolescents: the mediating roles of self-esteem and loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior 2017; 76:201–210.
19. Brugnera A, Zarbo C, Farina B, et al. Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Experience in Close Relationship Scale 12 (ECR-12): an exploratory structural equation modeling study. Research Psychotherapy 2019; 22:392.
20. Lafontaine M-F, Brassard A, Lussier Y, et al. Selecting the best items for a short-form of the Experiences in Close Relationships questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 2016; 32:140–154.
21. Baiocco R, Laghi F, Paola R. The inventory of parent and peer attachment in an adolescence sample: a contribution to the Italian validation [in Italian]. Psicologia clinica dello sviluppo 2009; 13:355–384.
22. Raja SN, McGee R, Stanton WR. Perceived attachments to parents and peers and psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 1992; 21:471–485.
23. Ferraro G, Caci B, D'Amico A, et al. Internet addiction disorder: an Italian study. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2007; 10:170–175.
24. Young KS. Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology & Behavior 1998; 1:237–244.
25. Caplan SE. Theory and measurement of generalized problematic Internet use: a two-step approach. Computers in Human Behavior 2010; 26:1089–1097.
26. Fioravanti G, Primi C, Casale S. Psychometric evaluation of the Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2 in an Italian sample. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2013; 16:761–766.
27. Andreassen CS, Billieux J, Griffiths MD, et al. The relationship between addictive use of social media and video games and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: a large-scale cross-sectional study. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2016; 30:252–262.
28. Monacis L, De Palo V, Griffiths MD, et al. Social networking addiction, attachment style, and validation of the Italian version of the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale. Journal of Behavioral Addictions 2017; 6:178–186.
29. Cloninger CR, Svrakic DM, Przybeck TR. A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry 1993; 50:975–990.
30. Fossati A, Cloninger CR, Villa D, et al. Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Temperament and Character Inventory-Revised in an outpatient sample. Comprehensive Psychiatry 2007; 48:380–387.
31. Prezza M, Trombaccia FR, Armento L. La scala dell'autostima di Rosenberg: Traduzione e validazione Italiana. [The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Italian translation and validation.]. Giunti Organizzazioni Speciali 1997; 223:35–44.
32. Rosenberg M. (1965) Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33. Cohen J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Byrne BM. (2016) Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Miočević M, O'Rourke HP, MacKinnon DP, et al. Statistical properties of four effect-size measures for mediation models. Behavior Research Methods 2018; 50:285–301.
36. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. (2007) Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
37. Gioia F, Boursier V. (2019) Treatment of Internet addiction and Internet gaming disorder in adolescence: a systematic review. In Bozoglan B, ed., Multifaceted approach to digital addiction and its treatment. Information Science Reference/IGI Global, pp. 157–176.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Volume 25Issue Number 4April 2022
Pages: 258 - 263
PubMed: 35213256

History

Published online: 12 April 2022
Published in print: April 2022
Published ahead of print: 24 February 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Topics

Authors

Affiliations

Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Department of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.
School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Valeria Chiozza
Department of Psychology of Developmental and Socialisation Processes, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Silvia Carrara
Department of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.
Department of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.
Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Department of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.
Department of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.

Notes

Address correspondence to: Chiara Remondi, Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 5, 00185 Roma, Italy [email protected]

Authors' Contributions

C.R. and A.B. designed the study, conducted the data analysis, and led the article preparation. A.C. and G.A.T participated in the conception and review of the statistical analysis. G.L.C. provided feedback on article drafts with a focus on theoretical implications. V.C., A.F., and S.C. assisted with measure development and article preparation. A.G., B.P., and C.Z. provided conceptual inputs at various stages of study design. All authors contributed substantively to the interpretation of the data and the findings.

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Funding Information

No funding was received for this article.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top