Meaning in Life and Care for the Environment: Bridging the Actions for Addressing Ecological Issues and Enhancing Residential Quality
Abstract
This article discusses the role of meaning in life (meaningfulness and crisis of meaning) and various sources of meaning in predicting and explaining people’s commitment toward enhancing the environmental quality at both the global (ecological) and local (residential) levels. An online questionnaire, including measures of meaningfulness, crisis of meaning, and multiple sources of meaning from the Sources of Meaning and Meaning in Life Questionnaire, together with measures of pro-environmental behaviors and residential engagement (i.e., actions that improve the quality of one’s residential environment), was administered to 199 participants. Significant associations were found between meaningfulness, various sources of meaning, and both types of behavioral commitment. Moreover, meaningfulness revealed to be a direct predictor of the same behaviors over and above other well-known predictors, such as general pro-environmental attitudes and place attachment. Implications for research and application in residential as well as pro-environmental behaviors are discussed as well.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
REFERENCES
Adeola, F. O. (2000). Endangered community, enduring people: Toxic contamination, health, and adaptive responses in a local context. Environment and Behavior, 32, 209–249;
Alaimo, K, Reischl, T. M, & Allen, J. O. (2010). Community gardening, neighborhood meetings, and social capital. Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 497–514;
Alisat, S, & Riemer, M. (2015). The environmental action scale: Development and psychometric evaluation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 13–23;
Allen, J, & Ferrand, J. (1999). Environmental locus of control, sympathy and pro-environmentalbehavior. A test of Geller’s actively caring hypothesis. Environment and Behavior, 31, 338–353;
Altman, I, & Low, S. M. (Eds) (1992). Place attachment. New York: Plenum.
Amérigo, M, & Aragonés, J. I. (1997). A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 47–57;
Anderson, J. C, & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.
Aragonés, J. L, Amérigo, M, & Pérez-López, R. (2017). Residential satisfaction and quality of life. In G Fleury-Bahi, E Pol, O Navarro .(Eds), Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of life research (pp. 311–328). Springer International Publishing.
Bamberg, S, & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14–25;
Böhmer, M. C, La Cour, P, & Schnell, T. (2022). A randomized controlled trial of the sources of meaning card method: A new meaning-oriented approach predicts depression, anxiety, pain acceptance, and Crisis of meaning in patients with chronic pain. Pain Medicine (Malden, Mass.), 23, 314–325;
Bonaiuto, M, Aiello, A, Perugini, M, Bonnes, M, & Ercolani, A. P. (1999). Multidimensional perception of residential environment quality and neighborhood attachment in the urban environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 331–352;
Bonaiuto, M, Fornara, F, & Bonnes, M. (2003). Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighborhood attachment in urban environments: A confirmation study on the city of Rome. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 41–52;
Bonaiuto, M, Bonnes, M, & Continisio, M. (2004). Neighborhood evaluation within a multiplace perspective on urban activities. Environment and Behavior, 36, 41–69;
Bonaiuto, M, Fornara, F, Alves, S, et al. (2015). Urban environment and well-being: Cross-cultural studies on Perceived Residential Environment Quality Indicators (PREQIs). Cognitive Processing, 16 Suppl 1, 165–169;
Bonnes, M, Mannetti, L, Secchiaroli, G, & Tanucci, G. (1990). The city as a multi-place system: An analysis of people-urban environment transactions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10, 37–65;
Carmona, B, Loureiro, A. M, & Aguilar-Luzón, C. (2021). Environmental action scale: Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version (Escala de acciones ambientales: Propriedades psicométricas de la versión portuguesa). PsyEcology, 12, 24–44;
Caspi, A, Taylor, A, Moffitt, T. E, & Plomin, R. (2000). Neighborhood deprivation affects children’s mental health: Environmental risks identified in a genetic design. Psychological Science, 11, 338–342;
Corral-Verdugo, V, Bonnes, M, Tapia-Fonllem, C, et al. (2009). Correlates of pro-sustainability orientation: The affinity towards diversity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 34–43.
Corral-Verdugo, V, Mireles-Acosta, J, Tapia-Fonllem, C. O, & Fraijo-Sing, B. S. (2011). Happiness as correlate of sustainable behavior: A study of pro-ecological, frugal, equitable and altruistic actions that promote subjective wellbeing. Human Ecology Review, 18, 95–104.
Corral-Verdugo, V, Pato, C. M, & Torres-Soto, N. Y. (2021). Testing a tridimensional model of sustainable behavior: Self-care, caring for others, and caring for the planet. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 12867–12882;
Creutzig, F, Niamir, L, Bai, X, et al. (2022). Demand-side solutions to climate change mitigation consistent with high levels of well-being. Nature Climate Change, 12, 36–46;
Cutrona, C. E, Wallace, G, & Wesner, K. A. (2006). Neighborhood characteristics and depression: An examination of stress processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 188–192;
Dang, L, Seemann, A.-K, Lindenmeier, J, & Saliterer, I. (2022). Explaining civic engagement: The role of neighborhood ties, place attachment, and civic responsibility. Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 1736–1755.
Devine-Wright, P, Price, J, & Leviston, Z. (2015). My country or my planet? Exploring the influence of multiple place attachments and ideological beliefs upon climate change attitudes and opinions. Global Environmental Change, 30, 68–79. http://hdl.handle.net/10871/20384
Dietz, T. (2015). Altruism, self-interest and energy consumption. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 1654–1655;
Dietz, T, Stern, P. C, & Guagnano, G. A. (1998). Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 30, 450–471.
Dunlap, R. E, Van Liere, K. D, Mertig, A. G, & Emmet Jones, R. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442;
Erikson, E. H. (1988). Der vollständige Lebenszyklus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Faul, F, Erdfelder, E, Lang, A.-G, & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
Faul, F, Erdfelder, E, Buchner, A, & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.
Fornara, F, Bonaiuto, M, & Bonnes, M. (2010). Cross-validation of abbreviated Perceived Residential Environment Quality (PREQ) and Neighborhood Attachment (NA) Indicators. Environment and Behavior, 42, 171–196;
Gandelman, N, Piani, G, & Ferre, Z. (2012). Neighborhood determinants of quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 547–563;
Gatersleben, B. (2018). Measuring environmental behaviour. In L Steg, M de Groot .(Eds) Environmental Psychology: An introduction (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Geiger, S. M, Otto, S, & Schrader, U. (2017). Mindfully green and healthy: An indirect path from mindfulness to ecological behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2306;
Geller, E. S. (1995). Actively caring for the environment: An integration of behaviorism and humanism. Environment and Behavior, 27, 184–195;
Gifford, R, & Lacombe, C. (2006). Housing quality and children’s socioemotional health. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 21, 177–189, available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41107338
Gifford, R. (2007). Environmental Psychology: Principles and Practice (4th ed.). Colville, WA: Optimal Books.
Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. The American Psychologist, 66, 290–302;
Gifford, R, & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behavior: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49.
Gifford, R. (2015). Dragons, mules, and honeybees: Barriers, carriers, and unwitting enablers of climate change action. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 69, 41–48.
Gifford, R, & McCunn, L. J. (2018). Appraising and designing built environments that promote well‐being and healthy behavior. In L Steg, A van den Berg, & J de Groot. (Eds), Environmental Psychology: An Introduction (2nd ed., pp. 104-112). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Gligorić, V, da Silva, M. M, Eker, S, et al. (2021). The usual suspects: How psychological motives and thinking styles predict the endorsement of well‐known and COVID‐19 conspiracy beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35, 1171–1181.
Goretzko, D, Pham, T. T. H, & Bühner, M. (2021). Exploratory factor analysis: Current use, methodological developments and recommendations for good practice. Current Psychology, 40, 3510–3521.
Higgins, B. R, & Hunt, J. (2016). Collective efficacy: Taking action to improve neighborhoods. National Institute of Justice Journal, 277, 18–21. http://nij.gov/journals/277/Pages/ collective-efficacy.aspx (accessed 5 March 2023).
Hooker, S. A, Masters, K. S, & Park, C. L. (2018). A meaningful life is a healthy life: A conceptual model linking meaning and meaning salience to health. Review of General Psychology, 22, 11–24;
Jones-Rounds, ML, Evans, GW, Braubach, M. (2014). The interactive effects of housing and neighbourhood quality on psychological well-being. J Epidemiol Community Health. Feb;, 68(2), 171–175;
Korpela, K, & Hartig, T. (1996). Restorative qualities of favorite places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 221–233;
Kothencz, G, Kolcsár, R, Cabrera‐Barona, P, & Szilassi, P. (2017). Urban green space perception and its contribution to well‐being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, 766;
Kruglanski, A. W, & Orehek, E. (2011). The role of the quest for personal significance in motivating terrorism. In J Forgas, A Kruglanski, & K Williams. (Eds), The Psychology of Social Conflict and Aggression (pp. 153-166). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Lange, F, & Dewitte, S. (2019). Measuring pro-environmental behavior: Review and recommendations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 92–100.
Leontiev, A. N. (1982). One is not born a personality! Interview with Alexei Leontiev (Y. Filippov, Trans.). In K Levitin. (Ed.), One is not Born a Personality: Profiles of Soviet Education Psychologists (pp. 110–126). Moscow, Russia: Progress Publishers.
Leventhal, T, & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2003). Moving to opportunity: An experimental study of neighborhood effects on mental health. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1576–1582;
Lewicka, M. (2005). Ways to make people active: Role of place attachment, cultural capital, neighborhood ties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 209–231.
Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 207–230;
Manzo, L. C, & Perkins, D. D. (2006). Finding common ground: The importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 20, 335–350;
Maslow, A. H. (1971). The Further Reaches of Human Nature. New York: Viking.
McAdams, D. P, & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new big five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. The American Psychologist, 61, 204–217;
McKnight, P. E, & Kashdan, T. B. (2009). Purpose in life as a system that creates and sustains health and well-being: An integrative, testable theory. Review of General Psychology, 13, 242–251.
Milfont, T. L, & Denny, S. J. (2017). Everyday environments and quality of life: Positive school and neighborhood environments influence the health and well-being of adolescents. In G Fleury-Bahi, E Pol, & O Navarro. (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life Research (pp. 369-384). New York: Springer.
Nelson, T. A, Abeyta, A. A, & Routledge, C. (2021). What Makes life meaningful for theists and atheists? Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 13, 111–118.
Pelletier, L. G, Tuson, K. M, Green-Demers, I, Noels, K, & Beaton, A. M. (1998). Why are you doing things for the environment? The Motivation Towards the Environment Scale (MTES). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 437–468.
Pennycook, G, Cheyne, J. A, Seli, P, Koehler, D. J, & Fugelsang, J. A. (2012). Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition, 123, 335–346.
Perlaviciute, G, & Steg, L. (2018). Environment and quality of life. In Steg, L, & De Groot, M. (Eds.), Environmental psychology: An introduction (pp. 189–197). Wiley, New York.
Pritchard, A, Richardson, M, Sheffield, D, & McEwan, K. (2020). The relationship between nature connectedness and eudaimonic well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21, 1145–1167.
Rafiei, S, & Gifford, R. (2023). The meaning of the built environment: A comprehensive model based on users traversing their university campus. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 87, 101975.
Ramkissoon, H, Smith, L. D, & Weiler, B. (2013). Testing the dimensionality of place attachment and its relationships with place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviors: A structural equation modeling approach. Tourism Management, 36, 552–566. https://researchportal.scu.edu.au/discovery/fulldisplay/alma991012821659002368/61SCU_INST:Research Repository
Reker, G. T, & Wong, P. T. P. (1988). Aging as an individual process: Toward a theory of personal meaning. In J. E Birren, & V. L Bengtson .(Eds.), Emergent Theories of Aging (pp. 214–246). Springer Publishing Company.
Routledge, C. (2018). Supernatural: Death, Meaning, and the Power of the Invisible World. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Ryff, C. D, & Singer, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 1–28.
Scannell, L, & Gifford, R. (2010a). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 1–10;
Scannell, L, & Gifford, R. (2010b). The relations between natural and civic place attachment and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 289–297;
Scannell, L, & Gifford, R. (2017). Place attachment enhances psychological need satisfaction. Environment and Behavior, 49, 359–389.
Scannell, L, Tan, L. Q, Cox, R. S, & Gifford, R. (2019). Place attachment, well-being and resilience. In K Bishop, N Marshall., (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of People and Place in the 21st—Century City. New York: Routledge.
Schnell, T, & Becker, P. (2007). Der Fragebogen zu Lebensbedeutungen und Lebenssinn (LeBe). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Schnell, T. (2009). The Sources of Meaning and Meaning in Life Questionnaire (SoMe): Relations to demographics and well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 483–499;
Schnell, T. (2010). Existential indifference: Another quality of meaning in life. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 50, 351–373;
Schnell, T. (2011). Individual differences in meaning-making: Considering the variety of sources of meaning, their density and diversity. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 667–673.
Schnell, T. (2014). An empirical approach to existential psychology: Meaning in life operationalized. In S Kreitler, & T Urbanek .(Eds.), Conceptions of Meaning (pp. 173–194). New York: Nova Science.
Schnell, T, Gerstner, R, & Krampe, H. (2018). Crisis of meaning predicts suicidality in youth independently of depression. Crisis, 39, 294–303;
Schnell, T. (2021). The Psychology of Meaning in Life. Routledge/Taylor, Francis Group.
Schnell, T, & Krampe, H. (2022). Meaningfulness protects and crisis of meaning exacerbates general mental distress longitudinally. BMC Psychiatry, 22, 285;
Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 327–339;
Sheldon, K. M, Wineland, A, Venhoeven, L, & Osin, E. (2016). Understanding the motivation of environmental activists: A comparison of self-determination theory and functional motives theory. Psyechology, 8, 228–238.
Sørensen, T, la Cour, P, Danbolt, L. J, et al. (2019). The sources of meaning and meaning in life questionnaire in the Norwegian context: Relations to mental health, quality of life, and self-efficacy. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 29, 32–45;
Stavrova, O, & Luhmann, M. (2016). Social connectedness as a source and consequence of meaning in life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11, 470–479.
Steger, M. F, & Frazier, P. (2005). Meaning in life: One link in the chain from religiousness to well-being. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 574–582;
Steg, L, & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309–317;
Steg, L, Perlaviciute, G, van der Werff, E, & Lurvink, J. (2014). The significance of hedonic values for environmentally relevant attitudes, preferences, and actions. Environment and Behavior, 46, 163–192;
Stern, P. C, & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 65–84;
Stern, P. C, Dietz, T, Abel, T, Guagnano, G. A, & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-beliefs-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81–97.
Stern, P. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424;
Stokols, D., & Shumaker, S. A. (1982). The psychological context of residential mobility and well-being. Journal of Social Issues, 38(3), 149–171;
Stokols, D, & Shumaker, S. A. (1981). People in places. A transaction view of settings. In J Harvey. (Ed.), Cognition, Social Behavior and the Environment (pp. 441–488). Hillsdale, N.J., Lawarence Erlbaum Associates.
Stokols, D, Shumaker, S. A, & Martinez, J. (1983). Residential mobility and personal well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 5–19;
Strandberg, C. (2023). Let’s stay together – the mediating role of self-congruity and place attachment on residents’ likelihood to stay. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 87, 101989–101911.
Tarka, P. (2018). An overview of structural equation modeling: Its beginnings, historical development, usefulness and controversies in the social sciences. Quality & Quantity, 52, 313–354.
Thompson, S. C. G, & Barton, M. A. (1994). Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 149–157;
Tognoli, J. (1987). Residential Environments. In D Stokols, & I Altman .(Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 655–690). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Torrey, E. F, & Bowler, A. (1990). Geographical distribution of insanity in America: Evidence for an urban factor. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 16, 591–604;
Trigwell, J. L, Francis, A. J, & Bagot, K. L. (2014). Nature connectedness and eudaimonic well-being: Spirituality as a potential mediator. Ecopsychology, 6, 241–251.
Udal, A. M, de Groot, J. I. M, de Jong, S. M. B, & Shankar, A. (2020). How do I see myself? A systematic review of identities in proenvironmental behavior research. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 19, 108–141.
Vail, K.E, & Routledge, C. (Eds) (2020) The Science of Religion, Spirituality, and Existentialism. New York: Elsevier Academic Press;
Van Os, J, Hanssen, M, Bak, M, Bijl, R. V, & Vollebergh, W. (2003). Do urbanicity and familial liability coparticipate in causing psychosis? The American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 477–482;
Van Vugt, M, John, P, Dowding, K, & Van Dijk, E. (2003). The exit of residential mobility or the voice of political action? Strategies for problem solving in residential communities. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 321–338.
Wong, P.T. (Ed.) (2013). The Human Quest for Meaning: Theories, Research and Applications. New York: Routledge.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In

Ecopsychology
Volume 16 • Issue Number 3 • September 2024
Pages: 230 - 244
Copyright
Copyright 2024, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.
History
Published online: 10 September 2024
Published in print: September 2024
Published ahead of print: 4 July 2024
Accepted: 22 May 2024
Received: 19 January 2024
Topics
Authors
Authors’ Contributions
Conceptualization: A.K.; methodology: A.K.; data collection: A.K. and M.M.; data analyses: A.K. and P.P.; writing—original draft preparation: A.K., P.P., and M.M.; writing—theoretical integration: T.S.; and writing—review and editing: P.P. and T.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the article.
Author Disclosure Statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Funding Information
No funding was received for this article.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.