Research Article
No access
Published Online: 11 June 2021

Bioeconomy Opportunities for a Green Recovery and Enhanced System Resilience

Publication: Industrial Biotechnology
Volume 17, Issue Number 3
First page of PDF

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Editor's Note

The text presented here is excerpted from a report prepared by an ad-hoc network of experts for the European Commission's Knowledge Centre for Bioeconomy. The information and views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of Industrial Biotechnology or Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers, or their affiliates. The full report can be found at: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC123534. © European Union, 2021.

End Notes

1. Fritsche U, Brunori G, Chiaramonti D, et al. Future transitions for the Bioeconomy towards Sustainable Development and a Climate-Neutral Economy - Knowledge Synthesis Final Report, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2020, ISBN 978-92-76-21518-9 (online). (online), JRC121212
2. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Timeline of ECDC's response to COVID-19 (2020). Brussels Available at: https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/covid-19/timeline-ecdc-response
3. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Threat Assessment Brief Wuhan Jan 9 2020.
4. Rowan N, Galanakis C. Unlocking challenges and opportunities presented by COVID-19 pandemic for cross-cutting disruption in agri-food and green deal innovations: Quo Vadis? Science of the Total Environment 2020;748:141362 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141362
5. Reid G, O'Beirne N, Gibson N. How companies can reshape results and plan for a COVID-19 recovery (2020). Ernst & Young, Available at: https://ey.com/en_ie/strategy-transactions/companies-can-reshape-results-and-plan-for-covid-19-recovery
6. BIC Position paper: The bio-based industries - key to the EU's green recovery (2020). Bio-based Industries Consortium. Brussels Available at: https://biconsortium.eu/sites/biconsortium.eu/files/downloads/BIC_position_paper_on_Green_Recovery_June_2020.pdf
7. EC. How the bioeconomy contributes to the European Green Deal (2020). European Commission. Brussels https://doi.org/10.2777/67636
8. GBS. Global Bioeconomy Summit 2020 (2020). Recordings available at Available at: https://gbs2020.net/plenary-recordings/ and https://gbs2020.net/recordings/
9. IACGB. Expanding the Sustainable Bioeconomy – Vision and Way Forward. Communiqué of the Global Bioeconomy Summit 2020. International Advisory Council on Global Bioeconomy. Berlin Available at: https://gbs2020.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/GBS2020_IACGB-Communique.pdf
10. Previous severe 'Black Swan' events, e.g., the Black Death that devastated the Byzantine Empire, the Cholera outbreak of the 1830s, the Spanish Flu of 1918–1920, and World War II all indicate that societies responded to these traumata by unleashing tremendous changes in creativity, culture, thinking, and ambition to prevail (Rowan & Galanakis 2020). A similar reaction to COVID-19 can be expected, fuelling the discovery of disruptive innovations beyond this pandemic and novel approaches for the EU bioeconomy.
11. COVID-19 impacts point to a modest reduction of direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agriculture of about 1% or 50 million t of CO2 equivalents in 2020 and 2021. Elleby C, et al. Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Global Agricultural Markets. Environ Resour Econ 2020;76:1067–1079 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00473-6
12. HLPE. Impacts of COVID-19 on food security and nutrition: Developing effective policy responses to address the hunger and malnutrition pandemic (2020). High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security Issue Paper. Rome https://doi.org/10.4060/cb1000en
13. Countryside and Community Research Institute. Covid-19 and sustainable food systems: a shared learning resource (2020). University of Gloucestershire, Royal Agricultural University and Hartpury College. Available at: http://ccri.ac.uk/covid-19-food-system/
14. World Economic Forum. Why cooking at home during COVID-19 lockdown is reducing food waste. Available at: https://weforum.org/agenda/2020/11/covid19-coronavirus-lockdown-food-waste-sustainability/
15. Marchant-Forde J, Boyle L. COVID-19 effects on livestock production: A One Welfare issue. Frontiers in veterinary science 2020;7:734 https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.585787
16. Gyekye L. Post-corona: What would the bio-based industry look like (2020)? Available at: https://biomarketinsights.com/post-corona-what-would-the-bio-based-industry-look-like/
17. International Energy Agency. Global Energy Review 2020 The impacts of the Covid-19 crisis on global energy demand and CO2 emissions. International Energy Agency (2020). Available at: https://webstore.iea.org/download/direct/2995
18. Eurelectric. Impact of COVID 19 on customers and society – Recommendations from the European Power sector (2020). Brussels Available at: https://cdn.eurelectric.org/media/4313/impact_of_covid_19_on_customers_and_society-2020-030-0216-01-e-h-E7E407BA.pdf
19. IEA (2020g) Renewable Energy Market Uptake. Outlook for 2020 and 2021. International Energy Agency. Paris
20. WBA. COVID19 and Bioenergy: Impacts and future outlook. Results from Survey on Impacts of COVID 19 on Bioenergy Sector (2020). World Bioenergy Association. Stockholm Available at: https://worldbioenergy.org/uploads/200612%20WBA%20COVID%20Survey%20Report%20Final.pdf
21. Chiaramonti D, Maniatis K. Security of supply, strategic storage and Covid19: Which lessons learnt for renewable and recycled carbon fuels, and their future role in decarbonizing transport? Appl Energ 2020;271:115216 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115216
22. EC. The European Green Deal. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The European Council, the Council of the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (2019). COM(2019) 640 final. Brussels Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/european-green-deal-communication_en.pdf
23. IAP. Global Green Recovery After COVID-19: Using scientific advice to ensure social equity, planetary and human health, and economic benefits (2020). InterAcademy Partnership Available at: https://interacademies.org/sites/default/files/2020-07/IAP_Green_Recovery.pdf
24. International Energy Agency. Sustainable Recovery - World Energy Outlook Special Report (2020). Paris Available at: https://webstore.iea.org/download/direct/3008
25. IEA. World Energy Outlook 2020. International Energy Agency. Paris https://doi.org/10.1787/557a761b-en
27. IEA (2020). Oil market report. International Energy Agency. Paris Available at: https://iea.org/reports/oil-market-report-april-2020
28. IEA (2020). COVID19 - Exploring the impacts of the COVID19 pandemic on global energy markets, energy resilience, and climate change. International Energy Agency. Paris https://www.iea.org/topics/Covid19
31. Sustainable Markets Initiative. Available at: https://sustainable-markets.org/
32. Burger A, Kristof K, Matthey A. The Green New Consensus: Study Shows Broad Consensus on Green Recovery Programmes and Structural Reforms (2020). German Federal Environment Agency. Dessau. Available at: https://umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/376/publikationen/thenewgreenconsensus_englisch_bf.pdf
33. Which should follow the Pan-European Guidelines for Afforestation and Reforestation. Available at: https://foresteurope.org/pan-europeanafforestationreforestationguidelines
34. Asian Development Bank. COVID-19 Recovery: A pathway to a low-carbon and resilient future (2020). Available at: https://adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/625476/covid-19-recovery-low-carbon-resilient-future.pdf
35. Asian Development Bank. An Updated Assessment of the Economic Impact of COVID-19 (2020). Available at: https://adb.org/publications/updated-assessment-economic-impact-covid-19
36. Hepburn C, et al. Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change? Smith School Working Paper 20-02 (2020) Oxford, UK Available at: https://smithschool.ox.ac.uk/publications/wpapers/workingpaper20-02.pdf
37. NCI, PBL & IIASA (2020) Overview of recently adopted mitigation policies and climate-relevant policy responses to COVID-19 – 2020 Update. NewClimate Institute, Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency & International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. The Hague Available at: https://newclimate.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/NewClimate_PBL-CLIMA_2020OctUpdate.pdf
38. OECD (2020). Building Back Better: A Sustainable, Resilient Recovery after COVID-19. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Paris Available at: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=133_133639-s08q2ridhf&title=Building-back-better-_A-sustainable-resilient-recovery-after-Covid-19
39. TWI (2020). Innovations for Sustainability. Pathways to an efficient and post-pandemic future. Report prepared by The World in 2050 initiative. IIASA. Laxenburg Available at: http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/16533/1/TWI2050-web.pdf
40. OECD (2020) Strengthening Agricultural Resilience in the Face of Multiple Risks. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Paris https://doi.org/10.1787/2250453e-en
41. SCAR (2020). Resilience and transformation. Report of the 5th SCAR Foresight Exercise Expert Group Natural resources and food systems: Transitions towards a ‘safe and just’ operating space. EC Standing Committee on Agricultural Research. Luxembourg https://doi.org/10.2777/717705
42. EC. Analysis of links between CAP Reform and Green Deal. European Commission Staff Working Document SWD(2020) 93 final. Brussels Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/food-farming-fisheries/sustainability_and_natural_resources/documents/analysis-of-links-between-cap-and-green-deal_en.pdf
43. EC. Farm to Fork Strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2020) 381 final. Brussels Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/communication-annex-farm-fork-green-deal_en.pdf
44. EC. EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 - Bringing nature back into our lives. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (2020). COM(2020) 380 final. Brussels Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/communication-annex-eu-biodiversity-strategy-2030_en.pdf
45. Tittonell P. Assessing Resilience and Adaptability in Agroecological Transitions. Agricultural Systems 2020;184:102862 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102862
46. van Zanten H et al. The Role of Farm Animals in a Circular Food System. Global Food Security 2019;21:18-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.06.003
47. Zinsstag J, et al. From “one medicine” to “one health” and systemic approaches to health and well-being. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2011;101(3–4):148–156 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.07.003
48. World Health Organization. One Health (2017). Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/one-health
50. Mottet A, et al. Livestock: On our plates or eating at our table? A new analysis of the feed/food debate. Global Food Security 2017;14:1–8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.01.001
51. Maréchal A, et al. Aligning the post-2020 Common Agricultural Policy with the European Green Deal. Institute for European Environmental Policy, Ecologic Institute & IDDRI (2020). Available at: https://ieep.eu/uploads/articles/attachments/34ac0c06-a1f4-4a72-87bb-7d548956b107/Aligning%20the%20post-2020%20CAP%20with%20the%20Green%20Deal.pdf
52. Matthews A. The new CAP must be linked more closely to the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Agricultural and Food Economics 2020;8:19 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-020-00163-3
53. EC. The Blue Economy report 2020. European Commission. Luxembourg https://doi.org/10.2771/363293
54. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020 - Sustainability in action. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2020). Rome Available at: https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9229en
55. Reisch L, et al. Mitigating climate change via food consumption and food waste: A systematic map of behavioral interventions. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021;279:123717 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123717
56. Galanakis C, et al. Food Ingredients and Active Compounds against the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Comprehensive Review. Foods 2020;9(11):1701 https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111701
57. As addressed in presentations during EFIB in October 2020. Available at: https://efibforum.com/programme-overview
58. Abubakar I. The future of migration, human populations, and global health in the Anthropocene (2020). The Lancet Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31523-3
59. Fears R, et al. Post-pandemic recovery: Use of scientific advice to achieve social equity, planetary health, and economic benefits. The Lancet Planetary Health 2020;4(9):E383-E384 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30176-5
60. Rizou M, et al. Safety of Foods, Surfaces, Food Supply Chain and Environment within the COVID-19 Pandemic. Trends in Food Science and Technology 2020;102:293–299 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.06.008
61. Galanakis C. The Food Systems in the Era of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic Crisis. Foods 2020;9:523 https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9040523
62. Nakicenovic N, et al. (2020) Innovations for sustainability: pathways to an efficient and sufficient post-pandemic future. The World in 2050 Initiative & International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Laxenburg https://doi.org/10.22022/TNT/07-2020.16533
63. Das O, et al. The need for fully bio-based facemasks to counter coronavirus outbreaks: A perspective. Science of the Total Environment 2020;736:139611 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139611
64. Portanguen, Stéphane et al. (2019) Toward the design of functional foods and biobased products by 3D printing: a review. Trends in Food Science & Technology 86: 188–198 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.023
65. Aragonés M, et al. Digital innovation hubs as a tool for boosting biomass valorisation in regional bioeconomies: Andalusian and South-East Irish case studies. J Open Innov Technol Mark Complex 2020;6(4):115 https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040115
66. Petetin L. The COVID-19 Crisis: An Opportunity to Integrate Food Democracy into Post-Pandemic Food Systems. European Journal of Risk Regulation 2020;11(2):326–336 https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2020.40
67. Blay-Palmer A. et al. Post COVID 19 and food pathways to sustainable transformation. Agriculture and Human Values 2020;37:517–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10051-7
68. Only 12% of the materials globally come from recycling (Palahì et al. 2020), non-metallic minerals such as sand or gravel account for about 50% of all resources extracted (IRP 2019).
69. Palahí M, et al. Investing in nature to transform the post COVID-19 economy - A 10-point Action Plan to create a circular bioeconomy devoted to sustainable wellbeing. Solutions Journal 2020;11:2 Available at: https://thesolutionsjournal.com/article/investing-nature-transform-post-covid-19-economy-10-point-action-plan-create-circular-bioeconomy-devoted-sustainable-wellbeing/
70. Churkina G, et al. Buildings as a global carbon sink. Nature Sustainability 2020;3:269–276 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0462-4
71. Hetemäki L, et al. European Forest Institute. Leading the way to a European circular bioeconomy strategy. From Science to Policy 5 (2017). Joensuu https://doi.org/10.36333/fs05
72. IPCC (2019) Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. Shukla, P. et al. (eds.). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva Available at: https://ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2019/08/Fullreport-1.pdf
73. Roe S, et al. Contribution of the land sector to a 1.5°C world. Nature Climate Change 2019;9:817–828 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0591-9
74. Wurm J. Living and bio-based building materials for regenerative cities. Presentation at the European Forum for Industrial Biotechnology & the Bioeconomy Digital Conference 5–9 Oct. 2020 Available at: https://efibforum.com/app/uploads/2020/10/EFIB2020_Day5_1330_Wurm_tobeshared.pdf
75. Chiappinelli O, et al. A Green COVID-19 Recovery of the EU Basic Materials Sector: Identifying Potentials, Barriers and Policy Solutions (2020). German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin). Berlin Available at: https://diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.805933.de/dp1921.pdf
76. EC. Critical Raw Materials Resilience: Charting a Path towards greater Security and Sustainability. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM(2020) 474 final. Brussels Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0474&from=EN
77. Casini D, et al. Production and characterization of co-composted biochar and digestate from biomass anaerobic digestion (2019). Biomass Conv Bioref https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00482-6
78. Miliotti E, et al. Lignocellulosic Ethanol Biorefinery: Valorization of Lignin-Rich Stream through Hydrothermal Liquefaction. Energies 2019;12(4):723 https://doi.org/10.3390/en12040723
79. Tamburini G, et al. Agricultural diversification promotes multiple ecosystem services without compromising yield. Science Advances 2020;6(45):eaba1715 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba1715
80. Chiaramonti D, Panoutsou C. Policy measures for sustainable sunflower cropping in EU-MED marginal lands amended by biochar: Case study in Tuscany, Italy. Biomass and Bioenergy 2019;126:199–210 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.04.021
81. Yang, Yi et al. Restoring Abandoned Farmland to Mitigate Climate Change on a Full Earth. One Earth 2020;3(2):176–186 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.019
82. Jeffery L, et al. Options for supporting Carbon Dioxide Removal (2020). Discussion paper. NewClimate Institute Available at: https://newclimate.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Options-for-supporting-Carbon-Dioxide-Removal_July_2020.pdf
83. Acuto M, et al. Seeing COVID-19 through an urban lens. Nature Sustainability 2020;3:977–978 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00620-3
84. For more details see e.g., Alexandra J, Norman B. The city as forest - Integrating living infrastructure, climate conditioning and urban forestry in Canberra, Australia. Sustainable Earth 2020;3:10 https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-020-00032-3; Cabanek A, Zingoni de Baro M, Newman P. Biophilic streets: A design framework for creating multiple urban benefits. Sustainable Earth 2020;3:7 https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-020-00027-0; Daniels P, et al. Evaluating net community benefits of integrating nature within cities. Sustainable Earth 2020;3:12 https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-020-00025-2; WBGU. Rethinking Land in the Anthropocene: from Separation to Integration - Summary. Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen. Berlin. Available at: https://wbgu.de/fileadmin/user_upload/wbgu/publikationen/hauptgutachten/hg2020/pdf/WBGU_HG2020_ZF_en.pdf; Wurm J. Living and bio-based building materials for regenerative cities (2020). Presentation at the European Forum for Industrial Biotechnology & the Bioeconomy Digital Conference 5–9 Oct. 2020 Available at: https://efibforum.com/app/uploads/2020/10/EFIB2020_Day5_1330_Wurm_tobeshared.pdf
85. Chateau J, Mavroeidi E. The jobs potential of a transition towards a resource efficient and circular economy (2020). OECD Environment Working Papers No. 167. Paris https://doi.org/10.1787/28e768df-en
86. BBI-JU & SCAR-BSW. Lessons learnt and recommendations for developing clusters in the bioeconomy (2019). Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking & EC Standing Committee on Agricultural Research, Bioeconomy Strategic Working Group Available at: http://biomonitor.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Findings-Clusters-for-Bioeconomy_Workshop_25.03.19.pdf
87. EC. A Renovation Wave for Europe - greening our buildings, creating jobs, improving lives. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM(2020) 662 final. Brussels Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/eu_renovation_wave_strategy.pdf
88. Prideaux B, Thompson M, Pabel A. Lessons from COVID-19 can prepare global tourism for the economic transformation needed to combat climate change. Tourism Geographies 2020;22(3):667–678 https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1762117
89. Rousseau S, Deschacht N. Public Awareness of Nature and the Environment During the COVID-19 Crisis. Environmental and Resource Economics 2020;76:1149–1159 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00445-w
90. IBEC. Reboot & Reimagine - Government July Stimulus Plan (2020). IBEC- for Irish Business. Dublin Available at: https://ibec.ie/-/media/documents/ibec-campaigns/reboot-and-reimagine/ibec-july-stimulus-submission.pdf
92. Hanspach J, et al. Biocultural approaches to sustainability: A systematic review of the scientific literature (2020). People and Nature https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10120
93. Galanakis C, et al. Innovations and Technology Disruptions in the Food Sector within the COVID-19 Pandemic and Post-lockdown Era. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2021;110:193–200 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.002
94. Morone P, Imbert E. Food waste and social acceptance of a circular bioeconomy: The role of stakeholders. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 2020;23:55–60.
95. Sanchez Lopez J, et al. Brief on food waste in the European Union (2020). EC Joint Research Centre for the European Commission's Knowledge Centre for Bioeconomy. Report JRC121196 Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/jrcsh/files/kcb-food_waste_brief_print_hq.pdf
96. Aldaco R, et al. Food waste management during the COVID-19 outbreak: A holistic climate, economic and nutritional approach. Science of the Total Environment 2020;742:140524 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140524
97. Global Alliance for the Future of Food. Systemic Solutions for Healthy Food Systems: A Guide to Government Action (2020). Available at: https://futureoffood.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/GA_SystemicSolutions-HealthyFoodSystems_GovtGuide_Oct2020.pdf
98. EC. 2020 Strategic Foresight Report - Charting the course towards a more resilient Europe. European Commission COM(2020) 493. Brussels Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/strategic_foresight_report_2020_1.pdf
99. Pulighe G, Lupia F. Food First: COVID-19 Outbreak and Cities Lockdown a Booster for a Wider Vision on Urban Agriculture. Sustainability 2020;12(12):5012 https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125012
100. Benton T. COVID-19 and disruptions to food systems. Agriculture and Human Values 2020;37:577–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10081-1
101. Kinley R, et al. Mitigating the carbon footprint and improving productivity of ruminant livestock agriculture using a red seaweed. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020;259:120836 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120836
102. Jonsson R, et al. Boosting the EU forest-based bioeconomy: Market, climate, and employment impacts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2021;163:120478 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120478
103. ACSFI (2020) Webinar 2: The global forest sector and COVID-19: Navigating a sustainable future in an economically and socially constrained world - Synthesis of outcomes. FAO Advisory Committee on Sustainable Forest-based Industries. Rome Available at: http://fao.org/forestry/49818-08d2d46ecc1e277df5bbece00bae47081.pdf
104. Verkerk H, et al. Climate-Smart Forestry: The missing link. Forest Policy and Economics 2020;115:102164 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102164
105. Jones D, et al. Wood modification in Europe: a state-of-the-art about processes, products and applications (2019). Florence https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-6453-970-6
106. IUCN. IUCN Global Standard for Nature-based Solutions. Available at: https://iucn.org/theme/ecosystem-management/our-work/iucn-global-standard-nature-based-solutions
107. Classification suggested by Prof. Pete Smith, University of Aberdeen, UK (personal communication)
108. Hirst A, Lazarus H. Supporting a Green Recovery: An initial assessment of nature-based jobs and skills. NatureScot Research Report No. 1257. Inverness (2020). Available at: https://nature.scot/sites/default/files/2020-12/Publication%202020%20-%20NatureScot%20Research%20Report%201257%20-%20Supporting%20a%20green%20recovery_%20an%20initial%20assessment%20of%20nature-%20based%20jobs%20and%20skills.pdf
109. WBGU (2020) Rethinking Land in the Anthropocene: From Separation to Integration - Summary. Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen. Berlin Available at: https://wbgu.de/fileadmin/user_upload/wbgu/publikationen/hauptgutachten/hg2020/pdf/WBGU_HG2020_ZF_en.pdf
110. Buffet L. Europe increasingly dependent on risky oil imports. Transport & Environment – Briefing. Brussels (2016). Available at: https://transportenvironment.org/sites/te/files/publications/2016_07_Briefing_Europe_increasingly_dependent_risky_oil_FINAL_0.pdf
111. Panoutsou C, Singh A. A value chain approach to improve biomass policy formation. GCB Bioenergy 2020;12(7):464–475 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12685
112. Feindt P, Proestou M, Daedlow K. Resilience and policy design in the emerging bioeconomy – The RPD framework and the changing role of energy crop systems in Germany. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 2020;22(5):636–652 https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1814130
113. Arasto A, et al. Bioenergy's role in balancing the electricity grid and providing storage options-an EU perspective (2017). IEA Bioenergy: Task 41P6 Available at: https://ieabioenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/IEA-Bioenergy-Bioenergy-in-balancing-the-grid_master_FINAL-Revised-16.02.17.pdf
114. Lehtveer M, Fridahl M. Managing variable renewables with biomass in the European electricity system: Emission targets and investment preferences. Energy 2020;213:118786 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118786
115. Bacovsky D, et al. The Role of Renewable Transport Fuels in Decarbonizing Road Transport - Summary Report (2020). IEA Technology Collaboration Programmes Advanced Motor Fuels Annex 58 and IEA Bioenergy Task 41 Project 10 Available at: https://ieabioenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Summary-Report.pdf
116. Bacovsky D, et al. The Role of Renewable Transport Fuels in Decarbonizing Road Transport - Deployment Barriers and Policy Recommendations (2020). IEA Technology Collaboration Programmes Advanced Motor Fuels Annex 58 and IEA Bioenergy Task 41 Project 10 Available at: https://ieabioenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Deployment-Barriers-and-Policy-Recommendations.pdf
117. Lioutas E, Charatsari, Chrysanthi C. Enhancing the ability of agriculture to cope with major crises or disasters: What the experience of COVID-19 teaches us. Agricultural Systems 2021;187:103023 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103023
118. Altieri M, Nicholls C. Agroecology and the reconstruction of a post-COVID-19 agriculture. J Peasant Stud 2020;47:881–898 https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1782891
119. Jones J, et al. Toward a new generation of agricultural system data, models, and knowledge products: State of agricultural systems science. Agricultural Systems 2017;155:269–288 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.09.021
120. Ingram J, Maye D. What are the implications of digitalisation for agricultural knowledge? Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 2020;4:66 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00066
121. Ehlers M-H Huber R, Finger R. Agricultural policy in the era of digitalization (2021). Food Policy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.102019
122. Park S, Humphry J. Exclusion by design: Intersections of social, digital and data exclusion. Information, Communication & Society 2019;22(7):934–953 https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1606266
123. Poux X, Aubert P-M. An agroecological Europe in 2050: Multifunctional agriculture for healthy eating (2018). IDDRI. Paris https://www.iddri.org/sites/default/files/PDF/Publications/Catalogue%20Iddri/Etude/201809-ST0918EN-tyfa.pdf
124. Ker A. Risk management in Canada's agricultural sector in light of COVID-19. Can J Agric Econ Revue Canadienne D'agroeconomie 2020;68:139–142 https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12232
125. USDA. USDA Announces Coronavirus Food Assistance Program (2020). US Department of Agriculture Release No. 0222.20. Washington, DC Available at: https://usda.gov/media/press-releases/2020/04/17/usda-announces-coronavirus-food-assistance-program
126. Thakur R. Community marketing: Serving the base of the economic pyramid sustainably. J Bus Strateg 2015;36:40–47 https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-04-2014-0041
127. Richards T, Rickard B. COVID-19 impact on fruit and vegetable markets. Can J Agric Econ/Revue Canadienne D'agroeconomie 2020;68:189–194 https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12231
128. Verhaegen I, van Huylenbroeck G. Costs and benefits for farmers participating in innovative marketing channels for quality food products J Rural Stud 2001;17:443–456 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00017-1
129. Sharma M, et al. (2020). Developing a framework for enhancing survivability of sustainable supply chains during and post-COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Logist Res Appl https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2020.1810213
130. Gupta C, et al. Food policy councils and local governments: Creating effective collaboration for food systems change. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 2018;8(B):11–28 https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2018.08B.006
131. Jiang P, van Fan Y, Klemeš J. Impacts of COVID-19 on energy demand and consumption: Challenges, lessons and emerging opportunities. Applied Energy 2021;285:116441, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116441
132. Schwarz M, et al. COVID-19 and the academy: It is time for going digital. Energy Res Social Sci 2020;68:101684 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101684
133. Sisson P. How the '15-Minute City' Could Help Post-Pandemic Recovery (2020). Available at: https://bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-15/mayors-tout-the-15-minute-city-as-covid-recovery
134. Lim J. Clash of crises: How a climate-resilient electricity system can help us tackle climate change and Covid-19 (2020). Available at: https://iea.org/commentaries/clash-of-crises-how-a-climate-resilient-electricity-system-can-help-us-tackle-climate-change-and-covid-19
135. Camia A, et al. The use of woody biomass for energy production in the EU. Science for Policy report by the EC Joint Research Centre (2021). Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/831621

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Industrial Biotechnology
Industrial Biotechnology
Volume 17Issue Number 3June 2021
Pages: 134 - 150

History

Published online: 11 June 2021
Published ahead of print: 3 June 2021
Published in print: June 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Topics

Authors

Affiliations

Uwe Fritsche
International Institute for Sustainability Analysis and Strategy, Darmstadt, Germany.
Gianluca Brunori
University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
David Chiaramonti
Polytechnic Turin, Turin, Italy.
Charis M. Galanakis
Galanakis Laboratories, Greece & Food Waste Recovery Group, Vienna, Austria.
Robert Matthews
UK Forest Research, Farnham, United Kingdom.
Calliope Panoutsou
Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.

Notes

Uwe R. Fritsche is Task Leader of IEA Bioenergy Task 40 (Deployment of biobased value chains), Co-Leader of IEA Bioenergy Task 45 (Climate and Sustainability Effects of Bioenergy within the broader Bioeconomy), and contributes to the Global Bioenergy Partnership by leading its Task Force of Sustainability's Environment Subgroup.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top