Research Article
No access
Published Online: 13 October 2006

Psychometric Characteristics of a Quality of Communication Questionnaire Assessing Communication about End-of-Life Care

Publication: Journal of Palliative Medicine
Volume 9, Issue Number 5

Abstract

The importance of good clinician–patient communication to quality end-of-life care has been well documented yet there are no validated measures that allow patients to assess the quality of this communication. Using a sample of hospice patients (n = 83) and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n = 113), we evaluated the psychometric characteristics of a 13-item patient-centered, patient-report questionnaire about the quality of end-of-life communication (QOC). Our purpose was to explore the measurement structure of the QOC items to ascertain if the items represent unitary or multidimensional constructs and to describe the construct validity of the QOC score(s). Analyses included: principal component analyses to identify scales, internal consistency analyses to demonstrate reliability, and correlational and group comparisons to support construct validity. Findings support the construction of two scales: a six-item "general communication skills" scale and a seven-item, "communication about end-of-life care" scale. The two scales meet standards of scale measurement, including good factor convergence (values ≥ 0.63) and discrimination (values different ≥ 0.25), percent of variance explained (69.3%), and good internal consistency (α ≥ 0.79). The scales' construct validity is supported by significant associations (p ≤ 0.01) with items assessing overall quality of doctor communication and quality of care, number and type of end-of-life discussions, and doctor's awareness of patient's treatment preferences. The general communication skills scale correlates more strongly with the general communication items while the communication about end-of-life care scale correlates more strongly with items addressing end-of-life topics. While further validation studies are needed, this assessment of the QOC represents an important step toward providing a measure of the quality of end-of-life communication.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Palliative Medicine
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Volume 9Issue Number 5October 2006
Pages: 1086 - 1098
PubMed: 17040146

History

Published online: 13 October 2006
Published in print: October 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Topics

Authors

Affiliations

Ruth Engelberg
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Lois Downey
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
J. Randall Curtis
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/ePub

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top