Research Article
No access
Published Online: 11 March 2014

Respecting Choices® and Advance Directives in a Diverse Community

Publication: Journal of Palliative Medicine
Volume 17, Issue Number 3

Abstract

Background: Respecting Choices® is a program designed and verified to improve advance care planning, yet it has not been tested in racially/ethnically diverse communities. Research has shown racial/ethnic minorities are less likely to have advance directives (ADs).
Objective: To determine whether Respecting Choices® would improve AD prevalence and utilization in a racially and ethnically diverse community.
Methods: The study design was that of a retrospective chart review. Subjects were all decedents from 2005 to 2010 (n=732) in a 300-bed Midwestern metropolitan hospital. Prevalence was assessed by the presence of an AD in the chart. Utilization was measured by the consistency of wishes expressed in an AD and treatment received (“No CPR,” “No Feeding Tube,” “No Antibiotics,” “No Ventilator,” “Comfort Care,” and “Terminal Extubation”). Average treatment effect using regression analysis and matching on covariates was used for analysis of Respecting Choices® on AD prevalence. Proportional difference tests were used to compare consistency of wishes by race/ethnicity before and after Respecting Choices®.
Results: The prevalence of ADs increased significantly for racial and ethnic minorities after the implementation of Respecting Choices®: from 25.8% to 38.4% (p=0.011). The increase in AD prevalence for whites following Respecting Choices® was only marginal (46.7% to 47.3%; p=0.648), and the overall prevalence of ADs did not significantly change (35.9% to 42.9%; p=0.069). Consistency was high (74% to 96%) for all orders, and there were no significant differences following implementation of Respecting Choices® or between whites and racial and ethnic minorities.
Conclusions: The prevalence of ADs increased after Respecting Choices® was initiated in a racially and ethnically diverse community.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Patient Self Determination Act of 1990, HR 4449, 101st Cong, 2nd Sess (1990). http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d101:H.R.4449 (Last accessed January 25, 2013).
2.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Office of Disability, Aging and Long-Term Care Policy: Advance directives and advance care planning: Report to Congress. http://aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/reports/2008/ADCongRpt.pdf (Last accessed January 25, 2013).
3.
SUPPORT Principal Investigators: A controlled trial to improve care for seriously hospitalized patients. JAMA 1995;274:1591–1598.
4.
Hammes BJ, Rooney BL: Death and end-of-life planning in one Midwestern community. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:383–390.
5.
U.S. Bureau of the Census: Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: 2000. http://factfinder2.census.gov/bkmk/table/1.0/en/DEC/00_SF1/DP1/0500000US55063 (Last accessed January 25, 2013).
6.
Kwak J, Haley WE: Current research findings on end-of-life decision making among racially or ethnically diverse groups. Gerontologist 2005;45:634–641.
7.
Wisconsin Hospital Association: Crosswalk for WI Cancer Registry and WHA Information Center Race and Ethnicity Categories. www.whainfocenter.com/dsug_minutes/RECrosswalk.pdf (Last accessed January 25, 2013).
8.
StataCorp.: Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP, 2013.
9.
Abadie A, Imbens GW: Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica 2006;74:235–267.
10.
Abadie A, Imbens GW: Bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects. J Bus Econ Stat 2011;29:1–11.
11.
Daaleman TP, Emmett CP, Dobbs D, Williams SW: An exploratory study of advance care planning in seriously ill African-American elders. J Natl Med Assoc 2008;100:1457–1462.
12.
Waters CM: Understanding and supporting African Americans' perspectives of end-of-life care planning and decision making. Qual Health Res 2001;11:385–398.
13.
Morrison RS, Meier DE: High rates of advance care planning in New York City's elderly population. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2421–2426.
14.
Bullock K: Promoting advance directives among African Americans: A faith-based model. J Palliat Med 2006;9:183–195.
15.
Johnson KS, Kuchibhatla M, Tulsky JA: What explains racial differences in the use of advance directives and attitudes toward hospice care? J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56:1953–1958.
16.
Bullock K: The influence of culture on end-of-life decision making. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care 2011;7:83–98.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Palliative Medicine
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Volume 17Issue Number 3March 2014
Pages: 282 - 287
PubMed: 24325558

History

Published online: 11 March 2014
Published in print: March 2014
Published ahead of print: 10 December 2013
Accepted: 1 November 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Topics

    Authors

    Affiliations

    Kristen E. Pecanac
    University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, Madison, Wisconsin.
    Mark F. Repenshek
    Department of Ethics, Columbia St. Mary's Hospital, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
    David Tennenbaum
    Department of Inpatient Medicine, Columbia St. Mary's Hospital, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
    Bernard J. Hammes
    Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, Wisconsin.

    Notes

    Address correspondence to:Kristen E. Pecanac, MS, RNSchool of NursingUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonBox 2455 Clinical Science Center600 Highland AvenueMadison, WI 53792E-mail: [email protected]

    Author Disclosure Statement

    BJH is an employee of the Gundersen Health System, a not-for-profit organization dedicated to medical education and research that owns the copyrighted materials known as Respecting Choices referred to in this article and sells these materials and the related training. BJH is a coauthor of the Respecting Choices professional training materials and is entitled to a small royalty if and when a net profit is made on these materials.

    Metrics & Citations

    Metrics

    Citations

    Export citation

    Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

    View Options

    Get Access

    Access content

    To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

    Society Access

    If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

    Restore your content access

    Enter your email address to restore your content access:

    Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

    View options

    PDF/EPUB

    View PDF/ePub

    Full Text

    View Full Text

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Copy the content Link

    Share on social media

    Back to Top