Internal Medicine Residents' Perceived Ability to Direct Patient Care: Impact of Gender and Experience
Publication: Journal of Women's Health
Volume 17, Issue Number 10
Abstract
Background: Physicians are expected to effect patient care by giving orders to members of a healthcare team. Because women are socialized to be less directive than men, the assertive behavior required of new physicians may be experienced differently by male and female residents. We sought to explore the effects of gender and year of training on residents' experiences and perceived ability to direct patient care.
Methods: This was a mixed-methods, cross-sectional, descriptive study employing a quantitative written survey and qualitative interviews among internal medicine residents at an academic health center. Measurements included questionnaires and interviews about stress, assertiveness, and personal factors that influence their effectiveness in directing patient care. Analyses examined differences by gender and year of training.
Results: One hundred residents were invited to participate; 65 returned questionnaires, and 16 of these residents were interviewed. Compared with male residents, female residents selected less assertive behaviors for clinical scenarios (p = 0.047) and were more likely to perceive gender as inhibiting their ability to influence patient care (p < 0.01). Stress associated with being assertive varied more with experience than gender. Interviews corroborated these findings and supported the complexity of gender norms for behavior for female residents in a directive leadership position.
Conclusions: When compared with male peers, female residents reported more gender issues in residency and chose less assertive behaviors in clinical scenarios. Experience mitigated some gender differences. Our findings suggest that discussion of the existing research on prescriptive gender norms for behavior and leadership may be warranted in resident orientation.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Association of American Medical CollegesData warehouse: Applicant matriculant file as of October 27, 2006www.aamc.org/data/facts/2006/2006summary.htmAugust92007. 1. Association of American Medical Colleges. Data warehouse: Applicant matriculant file as of October 27, 2006. Available at www.aamc.org/data/facts/2006/2006summary.htm Accessed August 9, 2007.
2.
American Medical AssociationFREIDA online specialty training statistics information: internal medicine 2005www.ama-assn.org/vapp/freida/spcstsc/0,1238,140,00.htmlAugust92007. 2. American Medical Association. FREIDA online specialty training statistics information: internal medicine 2005. Available at www.ama-assn.org/vapp/freida/spcstsc/0,1238,140,00.html Accessed August 9, 2007.
3.
Greiner ACKnebel EHealth professions education: A bridge to qualityWashington, DCNational Academy Press2003. 3. Greiner AC, Knebel E, eds. Health professions education: A bridge to quality. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2003.
4.
Bem S. The measurement of psychological androgenyJ Consult Clin Psychol197442155-162. 4. Bem S. The measurement of psychological androgeny. J Consult Clin Psychol 1974;42:155–162.
5.
Holt CLEllis JB. Assessing the current validity of the Bem Sex-Role InventorySex Roles199839929-941. 5. Holt CL, Ellis JB. Assessing the current validity of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles 1998;39:929–941.
6.
Konrad AMHarris C. Desirability of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory items for women and men: A comparison between African Americans and European AmericansSex Roles200247259-271. 6. Konrad AM, Harris C. Desirability of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory items for women and men: A comparison between African Americans and European Americans. Sex Roles 2002;47:259–271.
7.
Schein VE. The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristicsJ Appl Psychol197360340-344. 7. Schein VE. The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. J Appl Psychol 1973;60:340–344.
8.
Schein VEMueller RLituchy TLiu J. Think manager—Think male: A global phenomenon?J Organizational Behav19961733-41. 8. Schein VE, Mueller R, Lituchy T, Liu J. Think manager—Think male: A global phenomenon? J Organizational Behav 1996;17:33–41.
9.
Eagly AHKarau SJ. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leadersPsychol Rev2002109573-598. 9. Eagly AH, Karau SJ. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychol Rev 2002;109:573–598.
10.
Eagly AHJohnson BT. Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysisPsychol Bull1990108233-256. 10. Eagly AH, Johnson BT. Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 1990;108:233–256.
11.
Heilman MEWallen ASFuchs DTamkins MM. Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasksJ Appl Psychol200489416-427. 11. Heilman ME, Wallen AS, Fuchs D, Tamkins MM. Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. J Appl Psychol 2004;89:416–427.
12.
Banerjee N. Some “bullies” seek ways to soften up; toughness has risks for women executivesThe New York TimesAugust102001C1. 12. Banerjee N. Some “bullies” seek ways to soften up; toughness has risks for women executives. The New York Times, August 10, 2001:C1.
13.
Pope CMays N. Qualitative research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services researchBMJ199531142-45. 13. Pope C, Mays N. Qualitative research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ 1995;311:42–45.
14.
Patton MQQualitative evaluation and research methods2ndNewbury Park, CASage1990. 14. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.
15.
Heilman M. Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladderJ Soc Issues200157657-674. 15. Heilman M. Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. J Soc Issues 2001;57:657–674.
16.
Valian VWhy so slow? The advancement of womenCambridge, MAMIT Press1998. 16. Valian V. Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.
17.
Butler DGeis FL. Nonverbal affect responses to male and female leaders: Implications for leadership evaluationsJ Pers Soc Psychol19905848-59. 17. Butler D, Geis FL. Nonverbal affect responses to male and female leaders: Implications for leadership evaluations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1990;58:48–59.
18.
Rudman LAGlick P. Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic womenJ Soc Issues200157743-762. 18. Rudman LA, Glick P. Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. J Soc Issues 2001;57:743–762.
19.
Eagly AHMakhijani MGKlonsky BG. Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysisPsychol Bull19921113-22. 19. Eagly AH, Makhijani MG, Klonsky BG. Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 1992;111:3–22.
20.
Ridgeway C. Gender, status, and leadershipJ Soc Issues200157637-655. 20. Ridgeway C. Gender, status, and leadership. J Soc Issues 2001;57:637–655.
21.
Scott J. Gender: A useful category of historical analysisAm Hist Rev1986911053-1075. 21. Scott J. Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. Am Hist Rev 1986;91:1053–1075.
22.
Heilman MOkimoto TG. Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficitJ Appl Psychol20079281-92. 22. Heilman M, Okimoto TG. Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. J Appl Psychol 2007;92:81–92.
23.
Hirshbein L. Are women residency supervisors obligated to nurture?Med Educ2006401159-1161. 23. Hirshbein L. Are women residency supervisors obligated to nurture? Med Educ 2006;40:1159–1161.
24.
Archer LRKeever RRGordon RAArcher RP. The relationship between residents' characteristics, their stress experiences, and their psychosocial adjustment at one medical schoolAcad Med199166301-303. 24. Archer LR, Keever RR, Gordon RA, Archer RP. The relationship between residents' characteristics, their stress experiences, and their psychosocial adjustment at one medical school. Acad Med 1991;66:301–303.
25.
Leonard JCEllsbury KE. Gender and interest in academic careers among first- and third-year residentsAcad Med199671502-504. 25. Leonard JC, Ellsbury KE. Gender and interest in academic careers among first- and third-year residents. Acad Med 1996;71:502–504.
26.
Coombs RHHovanessian HC. Stress in the role constellation of female resident physiciansJ Am Med Womens Assoc19884321-27. 26. Coombs RH, Hovanessian HC. Stress in the role constellation of female resident physicians. J Am Med Womens Assoc 1988;43:21–27.
27.
Lowery BSHardin CDSinclair S. Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudiceJ Pers Soc Psychol200181842-855. 27. Lowery BS, Hardin CD, Sinclair S. Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudice. J Pers Soc Psychol 2001;81:842–855.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Women's Health
Volume 17 • Issue Number 10 • December 2008
Pages: 1615 - 1621
PubMed: 19049356
Copyright
Copyright 2008, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
History
Published online: 23 September 2010
Published in print: December 2008
Topics
Authors
Disclosure Statement
M. C. is employed part time by the William S. Middleton Veterans Hospital. GRECC publication number 08-27.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Get Access
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.