Disparities in Physicians' Interpretations of Heart Disease Symptoms by Patient Gender: Results of a Video Vignette Factorial Experiment
Publication: Journal of Women's Health
Volume 18, Issue Number 10
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have documented the underdiagnosis of coronary heart disease (CHD) in women, but less is known about which alternate diagnoses take precedence and whether additional patient factors modify possible gender bias.
Objective: To measure gender variation in clinical decision making, including (1) the number, types, and certainty levels of diagnoses considered and (2) how diagnoses vary according to patient characteristics, when patients have identical symptoms of CHD.
Methods: This was a factorial experiment presenting videotaped CHD symptoms, systematically altering patient gender, age, socioeconomic status (SES) and race, and physician gender and level of experience. The primary end point was physicians' most certain diagnosis.
Results: Physicians (n = 128) mentioned five diagnoses on average, most commonly heart, gastrointestinal, and mental health conditions. Physicians were significantly less certain of the underlying cause of symptoms among female patients regardless of age (p = 0.006), but only among middle-aged women were they significantly less certain of the CHD diagnosis (p < 0.001). Among middle-aged women, 31.3% received a mental health condition as the most certain diagnosis, compared with 15.6% of their male counterparts (p = 0.03). An interaction effect showed that females with high SES were most likely to receive a mental health diagnosis as the most certain (p = 0.006).
Conclusions: Middle-aged female patients were diagnosed with the least confidence, whether for CHD or non-CHD conditions, indicating that their gender and age combination misled physicians, particularly toward mental health alternative diagnoses. Physicians should be aware of the potential for psychological symptoms to erroneously take a central role in the diagnosis of younger women.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Burgess DJFu SSvan Ryn M. Why do providers contribute to disparities and what can be done about it?J Gen Intern Med2004191154-1159. 1. Burgess DJ, Fu SS, van Ryn M. Why do providers contribute to disparities and what can be done about it? J Gen Intern Med 2004;19:1154–1159.
2.
Institute of MedicineUnequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in healthcareWashington, DCNational Academies Press2003. 2. Institute of Medicine. Unequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003.
3.
Wallen JWaitzkin HStoeckle JD. Physician stereotypes about female health and illness: A study of patient's sex and the informative process during medical interviewsWomen Health19794135-146. 3. Wallen J, Waitzkin H, Stoeckle JD. Physician stereotypes about female health and illness: A study of patient's sex and the informative process during medical interviews. Women Health 1979;4:135–146.
4.
Verbrugge LM. How physicians treat mentally distressed men and womenSoc Sci Med1984181-9. 4. Verbrugge LM. How physicians treat mentally distressed men and women. Soc Sci Med 1984;18:1–9.
5.
McKinlay JBCrawford SLMcKinlay SMSellers DECzajkowski SMHill DRClarkson TB. On the reported gender difference in coronary heart disease: An illustration of the social construction of epidemiologic ratesWomen Behavior and Cardiovascular DiseaseBethesda, MDNIH Publication19946223-252. 5. McKinlay JB, Crawford SL, McKinlay SM, Sellers DE. On the reported gender difference in coronary heart disease: An illustration of the social construction of epidemiologic rates. In: Czajkowski SM, Hill DR, Clarkson, TB, editors. Women Behavior and Cardiovascular Disease, Bethesda, MD: NIH Publication No. 94-3309; 1994. 6. 223–252.
6.
McKinlay JBPotter DAFeldman HA. Non-medical influences on medical decision-makingSoc Sci Med199642769-776. 6. McKinlay JB, Potter DA, Feldman HA. Non-medical influences on medical decision-making. Soc Sci Med 1996;42:769–776.
7.
McKinlay JBBurns RBDurante R et al. Patient, physician and presentational influences on clinical decision making for breast cancer: Results from a factorial experimentJ Eval Clin Pract1997323-57. 7. McKinlay JB, Burns RB, Durante R, et al. Patient, physician and presentational influences on clinical decision making for breast cancer: Results from a factorial experiment. J Eval Clin Pract 1997;3:23–57.
8.
McKinlay JBLin TFreund KMoskowitz M. The unexpected influence of physician attributes on clinical decisions: Results of an experimentJ Health Soc Behav20024392-106. 8. McKinlay JB, Lin T, Freund K, Moskowitz M. The unexpected influence of physician attributes on clinical decisions: Results of an experiment. J Health Soc Behav 2002;43:92–106.
9.
Arber SMcKinlay JAdams AMarceau LLink CO'Donnell A. Patient characteristics and inequalities in doctors' diagnostic and management strategies relating to CHD: A video-simulation experimentSoc Sci Med200662103-115. 9. Arber S, McKinlay J, Adams A, Marceau L, Link C, O'Donnell A. Patient characteristics and inequalities in doctors' diagnostic and management strategies relating to CHD: A video-simulation experiment. Soc Sci Med 2006;62:103–115.
10.
McKinlay JLink CMarceau L et al. How do doctors in different countries manage the same patient? Results of a factorial experimentHealth Serv Res2006412182-2200. 10. McKinlay J, Link C, Marceau L, et al. How do doctors in different countries manage the same patient? Results of a factorial experiment. Health Serv Res 2006;41:2182–2200.
11.
Rosamond WFlegal KFriday G et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2007 update: A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics SubcommitteeCirculation2007115e69-171. 11. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday G, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2007 update: A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2007;115:e69–171.
12.
Barrett-Connor E. Sex differences in coronary heart disease. Why are women so superior? The 1995 Ancel Keys LectureCirculation199795252-264. 12. Barrett-Connor E. Sex differences in coronary heart disease. Why are women so superior? The 1995 Ancel Keys Lecture. Circulation 1997;95:252–264.
13.
King KMKerr JR. The women's health agenda: Evolution of hormone replacement therapy as treatment and prophylaxis for coronary artery diseaseJ Adv Nurs199623984-991. 13. King KM, Kerr JR. The women's health agenda: Evolution of hormone replacement therapy as treatment and prophylaxis for coronary artery disease. J Adv Nurs 1996;23:984–991.
14.
Newell-Morris L. Thoughts on gender-related research—Models, myths and medicineAm J Hum Biol19957207-212. 14. Newell-Morris L. Thoughts on gender-related research—Models, myths and medicine. Am J Hum Biol 1995;7:207–212.
15.
Kardys IVliegenthart ROudkerk MHofman AWitteman JC. The female advantage in cardiovascular disease: Do vascular beds contribute equally?Am J Epidemiol2007166403-412. 15. Kardys I, Vliegenthart R, Oudkerk M, Hofman A, Witteman JC. The female advantage in cardiovascular disease: Do vascular beds contribute equally? Am J Epidemiol 2007;166:403–412.
16.
Ayanian JZEpstein AM. Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart diseaseN Engl J Med1991325221-225. 16. Ayanian JZ, Epstein AM. Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 1991;325:221–225.
17.
Kannel WBAbbott RDEaker EDPackard BWenger NKClarkson TBTyroler HA. Incidence and prognosis of myocardial infarction in women: The Framingham Study. Coronary heart disease in womenProceedings of an NIH WorkshopNew YorkHaymarket-Doyma1987208-214. 17. Kannel WB, Abbott RD. Incidence and prognosis of myocardial infarction in women: The Framingham Study. In: Eaker ED, Packard B, Wenger NK, Clarkson TB, Tyroler HA, ed. Coronary heart disease in women. Proceedings of an NIH Workshop. New York: Haymarket-Doyma, 1987:208–214.
18.
Schwartz LMFisher ESTosteson NA et al. Treatment and health outcomes of women and men in a cohort with coronary artery diseaseArch Intern Med19971571545-1551. 18. Schwartz LM, Fisher ES, Tosteson NA, et al. Treatment and health outcomes of women and men in a cohort with coronary artery disease. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:1545–1551.
19.
Chiaramonte GRFriend R. Medical students' and residents' gender bias in the diagnosis, treatment, and interpretation of coronary heart disease symptomsHealth Psychol200625255-266. 19. Chiaramonte GR, Friend R. Medical students' and residents' gender bias in the diagnosis, treatment, and interpretation of coronary heart disease symptoms. Health Psychol 2006;25:255–266.
20.
Kannel WBCupples LAGagnon DR. Incidence, precursors and prognosis of unrecognized myocardial infarctionAdv Cardiol199037202-214. 20. Kannel WB, Cupples LA, Gagnon DR. Incidence, precursors and prognosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction. Adv Cardiol 1990;37:202–214.
21.
McKinlay JB. Some contributions from the social system to gender inequalities in heart diseaseJ Health Soc Behav1996371-26. 21. McKinlay JB. Some contributions from the social system to gender inequalities in heart disease. J Health Soc Behav 1996;37:1–26.
22.
Cochran WGCox GMExperimental designsNew YorkJohn Wiley & Sons1957. 22. Cochran WG, Cox GM. Experimental designs. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1957.
23.
Fisher RAStatistical methods, experimental design and scientific inferenceNew YorkOxford University Press1990. 23. Fisher RA. Statistical methods, experimental design and scientific inference. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
24.
Feldman HAMcKinlay JBPotter DA et al. Nonmedical influences on medical decision making: An experimental technique using videotapes, factorial design, and survey samplingHealth Serv Res199732343-366. 24. Feldman HA, McKinlay JB, Potter DA, et al. Nonmedical influences on medical decision making: An experimental technique using videotapes, factorial design, and survey sampling. Health Serv Res 1997;32:343–366.
25.
Rhoades DRMcFarland KFFinch WHJohnson AO. Speaking and interruptions during primary care office visitsFam Med200133528-532. 25. Rhoades DR, McFarland KF, Finch WH, Johnson AO. Speaking and interruptions during primary care office visits. Fam Med 2001;33:528–532.
26.
DeVon HARyan CJOchs ALShapiro M. Symptoms across the continuum of acute coronary syndromes: Differences between women and menAm J Crit Care20081714-24. 26. DeVon HA, Ryan CJ, Ochs AL, Shapiro M. Symptoms across the continuum of acute coronary syndromes: Differences between women and men. Am J Crit Care 2008;17:14–24.
27.
Dey SFlather MDDevlin GP et al. Sex-related differences in the presentation, treatment and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary EventsHeart2008. 27. Dey S, Flather MD, Devlin GP, et al. Sex-related differences in the presentation, treatment and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Heart 2008.
28.
Kawachi ISparrow DVokonas PSWeiss ST. Symptoms of anxiety and risk of coronary heart disease. The Normative Aging StudyCirculation1994902225-2229. 28. Kawachi I, Sparrow D, Vokonas PS, Weiss ST. Symptoms of anxiety and risk of coronary heart disease. The Normative Aging Study. Circulation 1994;90:2225–2229.
29.
Kubzansky LDKawachi IWeiss STSparrow D. Anxiety and coronary heart disease: A synthesis of epidemiological, psychological, and experimental evidenceAnn Behav Med19982047-58. 29. Kubzansky LD, Kawachi I, Weiss ST, Sparrow D. Anxiety and coronary heart disease: A synthesis of epidemiological, psychological, and experimental evidence. Ann Behav Med 1998;20:47–58.
30.
Milner KAFunk MRichards SWilmes RMVaccarino VKrumholz HM. Gender differences in symptom presentation associated with coronary heart diseaseAm J Cardiol199984396-399. 30. Milner KA, Funk M, Richards S, Wilmes RM, Vaccarino V, Krumholz HM. Gender differences in symptom presentation associated with coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 1999;84:396–399.
31.
Rothman KJ. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisonsEpidemiology1990143-46. 31. Rothman KJ. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology 1990;1:43–46.
32.
Braspenning JSergeant J. General practitioners' decision making for mental health problems: Outcomes and ecological validityJ Clin Epidemiol1994471365-1372. 32. Braspenning J, Sergeant J. General practitioners' decision making for mental health problems: Outcomes and ecological validity. J Clin Epidemiol 1994;47:1365–1372.
33.
Peabody JWLuck JGlassman PDresselhaus TRLee M. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: A prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring qualityJAMA20002831715-1722. 33. Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: A prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA 2000;283:1715–1722.
34.
Dresselhaus TRPeabody JWLee MWang MMLuck J. Measuring compliance with preventive care guidelines: Standardized patients, clinical vignettes, and the medical recordJ Gen Intern Med200015782-788. 34. Dresselhaus TR, Peabody JW, Lee M, Wang MM, Luck J. Measuring compliance with preventive care guidelines: Standardized patients, clinical vignettes, and the medical record. J Gen Intern Med 2000;15:782–788.
35.
Robra BPKania HKuss OSchonfisch KSwart E. [Determinants of hospital admission–investigation by case vignettes.]Gesundheitswesen20066832-40. 35. Robra BP, Kania H, Kuss O, Schonfisch K, Swart E. [Determinants of hospital admission–investigation by case vignettes.] Gesundheitswesen 2006;68:32–40.
36.
Veloski JTai SEvans ASNash DB. Clinical vignette-based surveys: A tool for assessing physician practice variationAm J Med Qual200520151-157. 36. Veloski J, Tai S, Evans AS, Nash DB. Clinical vignette-based surveys: A tool for assessing physician practice variation. Am J Med Qual 2005;20:151–157.
37.
Lutfey KELink CLGrant RWMarceau LDMcKinlay JB. Is certainty more important than diagnosis for understanding race and gender disparities? An experiment using coronary heart disease and depression case vignettesHealth Policy2008. 37. Lutfey KE, Link CL, Grant RW, Marceau LD, McKinlay JB. Is certainty more important than diagnosis for understanding race and gender disparities? An experiment using coronary heart disease and depression case vignettes. Health Policy 2008.
38.
Miech RAEaton WWBrennan K. Mental health disparities across education and sex: A prospective analysis examining how they persist over the life courseJ Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci20056093-98. 38. Miech RA, Eaton WW, Brennan K. Mental health disparities across education and sex: A prospective analysis examining how they persist over the life course. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2005;60:93–98.
39.
Kaplan GAKeil JE. Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: A review of the literatureCirculation1993881973-1998. 39. Kaplan GA, Keil JE. Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: A review of the literature. Circulation 1993;88:1973–1998.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Women's Health
Volume 18 • Issue Number 10 • October 2009
Pages: 1661 - 1667
PubMed: 19785567
Copyright
Copyright 2009, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
History
Published online: 26 October 2009
Published in print: October 2009
Published ahead of print: 28 September 2009
Topics
Authors
Disclosure Statement
No conflicts of interest or competing financial interests exist.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Get Access
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.