Self-Detection Remains a Key Method of Breast Cancer Detection for U.S. Women
Publication: Journal of Women's Health
Volume 20, Issue Number 8
Abstract
Purpose: The method by which breast cancer is detected becomes a factor for long-term survival and should be considered in treatment plans. This report describes patient characteristics and time trends for various methods of breast cancer detection in the United States.
Methods: The 2003 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), a nationally representative self-report health survey, included 361 women survivors diagnosed with breast cancer between 1980 and 2003. Responses to the question, How was your breast cancer found? were categorized as accident, self-examination, physician during routine breast examination, mammogram, and other. We examined responses by income, race, age, and year of diagnosis.
Results: Most women survivors (57%) reported a detection method other than mammographic examination. Women often detected breast cancers themselves, either by self-examination (25%) or by accident (18%).
Conclusions: Despite increased use of screening mammography, a large percentage of breast cancers are detected by the patients themselves. Patient-noted breast abnormalities should be carefully evaluated.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
McPherson CPSwenson KKJolitz GMurray CL. Survival of women ages 40–49 years with breast carcinoma according to method of detectionCancer1997791923-1932. 1. McPherson CP, Swenson KK, Jolitz G, Murray CL. Survival of women ages 40–49 years with breast carcinoma according to method of detection. Cancer 1997;79:1923–1932.
2.
Shen YYang YInoue LYMunsell MFMiller ABBerry DA. Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: Analysis of randomized screening trialsJ Natl Cancer Inst2005971195-1203. 2. Shen Y, Yang Y, Inoue LY, Munsell MF, Miller AB, Berry DA. Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: Analysis of randomized screening trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1195–1203.
3.
Berry DACronin KAPlevritis SK et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancerN Engl J Med20053531784-1792. 3. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1784–1792.
4.
National Cancer Institute. Cancer trends progress report—2005 update2005. 4. National Cancer Institute. Cancer trends progress report—2005 update, 2005.
5.
Coates RJUhler RJBrogan DJ et al. Patterns and predictors of the breast cancer detection methods in women under 45 years of age (United States)Cancer Causes Control200112431-442. 5. Coates RJ, Uhler RJ, Brogan DJ, et al. Patterns and predictors of the breast cancer detection methods in women under 45 years of age (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2001;12:431–442.
6.
Newcomer LMNewcomb PATrentham-Dietz A et al. Detection method and breast carcinoma histologyCancer200295470-477. 6. Newcomer LM, Newcomb PA, Trentham-Dietz A, et al. Detection method and breast carcinoma histology. Cancer 2002;95:470–477.
7.
Reeves MJNewcomb PARemington PLMarcus PM. Determinants of breast cancer detection among Wisconsin (United States) women, 1988–90Cancer Causes Control19956103-111. 7. Reeves MJ, Newcomb PA, Remington PL, Marcus PM. Determinants of breast cancer detection among Wisconsin (United States) women, 1988–90. Cancer Causes Control 1995;6:103–111.
8.
Breen NYabroff KRMeissner HI. What proportion of breast cancers are detected by mammography in the United States?Cancer Detect Prev200731220-224. 8. Breen N, Yabroff KR, Meissner HI. What proportion of breast cancers are detected by mammography in the United States? Cancer Detect Prev 2007;31:220–224.
9.
Rosenberg ABurke LVos PLiles D. Self-exam is the most common method of breast cancer identificationJ Clin Oncol2007ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (post-meeting edition)2518S1543. 9. Rosenberg A, Burke L, Vos P, Liles D. Self-exam is the most common method of breast cancer identification. J Clin Oncol, 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (post-meeting edition) 25(18S):1543.
10.
Baker L. Breast cancer detection demonstration project: Five-year summary reportCancer J Clin198232194-225. 10. Baker L. Breast cancer detection demonstration project: Five-year summary report. Cancer J Clin 1982;32:194–225.
11.
Beahrs OShapiro SSmart CMcDivitt R. Report of the Working Group to Review the National Cancer Institute-American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration ProjectsJ Natl Cancer Inst197962639-709. 11. Beahrs O, Shapiro S, Smart C, McDivitt R. Report of the Working Group to Review the National Cancer Institute-American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Projects. J Natl Cancer Inst 1979;62:639–709.
12.
Shapiro S. Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trialCancer197739Suppl 62772-2782. 12. Shapiro S. Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial. Cancer 1977;39(Suppl 6):2772–2782.
13.
Nemoto TNatarajan NSmart CRMettlin CMurphy GP. Patterns of breast cancer detection in the United StatesJ Surg Oncol198221183-188. 13. Nemoto T, Natarajan N, Smart CR, Mettlin C, Murphy GP. Patterns of breast cancer detection in the United States. J Surg Oncol 1982;21:183–188.
14.
Joensuu HLehtimaki THolli K et al. Risk for distant recurrence of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methodsJAMA20042921064-1073. 14. Joensuu H, Lehtimaki T, Holli K, et al. Risk for distant recurrence of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods. JAMA 2004;292:1064–1073.
15.
Centers for Disease Control National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey (NHIS): Questionnaires, datasets, and related documentation 1997–2007www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htmJanuary2010. 15. Centers for Disease Control National Center for Health Statistics. National Health Interview Survey (NHIS): Questionnaires, datasets, and related documentation 1997–2007. Available at www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm Accessed January 2010.
16.
Schiller JSAdams PFNelson ZC. Summary health statistics for the U.S. population: National Health Interview Survey, 2003Vital Health Stat2005101-104. 16. Schiller JS, Adams PF, Nelson ZC. Summary health statistics for the U.S. population: National Health Interview Survey, 2003. Vital Health Stat 2005;10:1–104.
17.
Hendrick REChrvala CAPlott CMCutter GRJessop NWWilcox-Buchalla P. Improvement in mammography quality control: 1987–1995Radiology1998207663-668. 17. Hendrick RE, Chrvala CA, Plott CM, Cutter GR, Jessop NW, Wilcox-Buchalla P. Improvement in mammography quality control: 1987–1995. Radiology 1998;207:663–668.
18.
Conway BJSuleiman OHRueter FGAntonsen RGSlayton RJ. National survey of mammographic facilities in 1985, 1988, and 1992Radiology1994191323-330. 18. Conway BJ, Suleiman OH, Rueter FG, Antonsen RG, Slayton RJ. National survey of mammographic facilities in 1985, 1988, and 1992. Radiology 1994;191:323–330.
19.
Fintor LBrown MFischer R et al. The impact of mammography quality improvement legislation in Michigan: Implications for the National Mammography Quality Standards ActAm J Public Health199888667-671. 19. Fintor L, Brown M, Fischer R, et al. The impact of mammography quality improvement legislation in Michigan: Implications for the National Mammography Quality Standards Act. Am J Public Health 1998;88:667–671.
20.
Cronin KAYu BKrapcho M et al. Modeling the dissemination of mammography in the United StatesCancer Causes Control200516701-712. 20. Cronin KA, Yu B, Krapcho M, et al. Modeling the dissemination of mammography in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 2005;16:701–712.
21.
Hiatt RAKlabunde CBreen NSwan JBallard-Barbash R. Cancer screening practices from National Health Interview Surveys: Past, present, and futureJ Natl Cancer Inst2002941837-1846. 21. Hiatt RA, Klabunde C, Breen N, Swan J, Ballard-Barbash R. Cancer screening practices from National Health Interview Surveys: Past, present, and future. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1837–1846.
22.
Thind ADiamant AHoq LMaly R. Method of detection of breast cancer in low-income womenJ Womens Health2009181807-1811. 22. Thind A, Diamant A, Hoq L, Maly R. Method of detection of breast cancer in low-income women. J Womens Health 2009;18:1807–1811.
23.
Hakama MPukkala EHeikkila MKallio M. Effectiveness of the public health policy for breast cancer screening in Finland: Population based cohort studyBMJ1997314864-867. 23. Hakama M, Pukkala E, Heikkila M, Kallio M. Effectiveness of the public health policy for breast cancer screening in Finland: Population based cohort study. BMJ 1997;314:864–867.
24.
Maunsell EDrolet MOuhoummane NRobert J. Breast cancer survivors accurately reported key treatment and prognostic characteristicsJ Clin Epidemiol200558364-369. 24. Maunsell E, Drolet M, Ouhoummane N, Robert J. Breast cancer survivors accurately reported key treatment and prognostic characteristics. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:364–369.
25.
Phillips KAMilne RLBuys S et al. Agreement between self-reported breast cancer treatment and medical records in a population-based Breast Cancer Family RegistryJ Clin Oncol2005234679-4686. 25. Phillips KA, Milne RL, Buys S, et al. Agreement between self-reported breast cancer treatment and medical records in a population-based Breast Cancer Family Registry. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:4679–4686.
26.
Schootman MJeffe DBWest MMAft R. Self-report by elderly breast cancer patients was an acceptable alternative to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) abstract dataJ Clin Epidemiol2005581316-1319. 26. Schootman M, Jeffe DB, West MM, Aft R. Self-report by elderly breast cancer patients was an acceptable alternative to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) abstract data. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:1316–1319.
27.
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statementAnn Intern Med2009151716-726. 27. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:716–726.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
History
Published online: 9 August 2011
Published in print: August 2011
Published ahead of print: 15 June 2011
Topics
Authors
Disclosure Statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.