Research Article
No access
Published Online: 11 March 2015

Inadequate Progress for Women in Academic Medicine: Findings from the National Faculty Study

Publication: Journal of Women's Health
Volume 24, Issue Number 3

Abstract

Background: Women have entered academic medicine in significant numbers for 4 decades and now comprise 20% of full-time faculty. Despite this, women have not reached senior positions in parity with men. We sought to explore the gender climate in academic medicine as perceived by representatives to the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Group on Women in Medicine and Science (GWIMS) and Group on Diversity and Inclusion (GDI).
Methods: We conducted a qualitative analysis of semistructured telephone interviews with GWIMS and GDI representatives and other senior leaders at 24 randomly selected medical schools of the 1995 National Faculty Study. All were in the continental United States, balanced for public/private status and AAMC geographic region. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and organized into content areas before an inductive thematic analysis was conducted. Themes that were expressed by multiple informants were studied for patterns of association.
Results: Five themes were identified: (1) a perceived wide spectrum in gender climate; (2) lack of parity in rank and leadership by gender; (3) lack of retention of women in academic medicine (the “leaky pipeline”); (4) lack of gender equity in compensation; and (5) a disproportionate burden of family responsibilities and work-life balance on women's career progression.
Conclusions: Key informants described improvements in the climate of academic medicine for women as modest. Medical schools were noted to vary by department in the gender experience of women, often with no institutional oversight. Our findings speak to the need for systematic review by medical schools and by accrediting organizations to achieve gender equity in academic medicine.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Stewart A, Sambuco D, DeCastro R, Ubel PA. Gender differences in the salaries of physician researchers. JAMA 2012;307:2410–2417.
2.
Ash A, Carr PL, Goldstein R, Friedman RH. Compensation and advancement of women in academic medicine: Is there equity? Ann Intern Med 2004;141:205–212.
3.
Buddeberg-Fischer B, Stamm M, Buddeberg C, et al. The impact of gender and parenthood on physicians' careers—professional and personal situation seven years after graduation. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;10:40. Available at: http://www.biomedcentral/1472-6963/10/40 (accessed on August 15, 2013).
4.
Carr PL, Ash AS, Friedman RH, et al. Relation of family responsibilities and gender to the productivity and career satisfaction of medical faculty. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:532–538.
5.
Dannels S, McLaughlin J, Gleason KA, McDade SA, Richman R, Morahan PS. Medical school deans' perceptions of organizational climate: Useful indicators for advancement of women faculty and evaluation of a leadership program's impact. Acad Med 2009;84:67–79.
6.
Shollen SL, Bland CJ, Finstad DA, Taylor AL. Organizational climate and family life: How these factors affect the status of women faculty at one medical school. Acad Med 2009;84:87–94.
7.
Pololi LH, Jones SJ. Women faculty: An analysis of their experiences in academic medicine and their coping strategies. Gend Med 2010;7:438–450.
8.
Isaac C, Lee B, Carnes MS. Interventions that affect gender bias in hiring: A systematic review. Acad Med 2009;84:1440–1446.
9.
Ash AS, Carr PL, Goldstein R, Friedman RH. Compensation and advancement of women in academic medicine: is there equity? Ann Intern Med 2004;141:205–212.
10.
Carey J, Morgan M, Oxtoby MJ. Intercoder agreement in analysis of responses to open-ended interview questions: Examples from tuberculosis research. Cultural Anthropology Methods 1996;8:1–5.
11.
Cochran A, Hauschild T, Elder WB, Neumayer LA, Brasel KJ, Crandall ML. Perceived gender-based barriers to careers in academic surgery. Am J Surg 2013:206:263–268.
12.
Zhuge Y, Kaufman J, Simeone DM, Chen H, Velazquez OC. Is there still a glass ceiling for women in academic surgery? Ann Surg 2011;253:637–643.
13.
Wai PY, Dandar V, Radosevich DM, Brubaker L, Kuo PC. Engagement, workplace satisfaction and retention of surgical specialists in academic medicine in the United States. J Am Coll Surg 2014;19:31–42.
14.
Conrad P, Carr P, Knight S, Renfrew MR, Dunn MB, Pololi L. Hierarchy as a barrier to advancement for women in academic medicine. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2010;19:799–805.
15.
Cropsey KL, Masho SW, Shiang R, et al. Why do faculty leave? Reasons for attrition of women and minority faculty from a medical school: Four-year results. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2008;17:1111–1118.
16.
Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). The long-term retention and attrition of U.S. medical school faculty. Analysis in Brief. 2008;8. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/download/67968/data/ (accessed on August 15, 2013).
17.
Andriole DA, Jeffe DB. The road to an academic medicine career: A national cohort study of male and female U.S. medical graduates. Acad Med 2012;87:1722–1733.
18.
Weeks WB, Wallace AE. Gender differences in ophthalmologists' annual incomes. Ophthalmology 2007;114:1696–1701.
19.
Clem KJ, Promes SB, Glickman SW, et al. Factors enhancing career satisfaction among female emergency physicians. Ann Emer Med 2008;51:723–728.
20.
DesRoches CM, Zinner DE, Rao SR, Lezzoni LI, Campbell EG. Activities, productivity, and compensation of men and women in the life sciences. Acad Med 2010;85:631–639.
21.
Babcock L, Laschever S. Women don't ask: The high cost of avoiding negotiation and positive strategies for change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.
22.
Willett LL, Wellons MF, Hartig JR, et al. Do women residents delay childbearing due to perceived career threats? Acad Med 2010;85:640–646.
23.
Levine RB, Lin F, Kern DE, Wright SM, Carrese J. Stories from early-career women physicians who have left academic medicine: A qualitative study at a single institution. Acad Med 2011;86:752–758.
24.
Gunn CM, Freund KM, Kaplan SA, Raj A, Carr PL. Knowledge and perceptions of family leave policies among female faculty in academic medicine. Womens Health Issues 2014; 24:e205–e210.
25.
Isaac C, Byars-Winston A, McSorley R, Schultz A, Kaatz A, Carnes ML. A qualitative study of work-life choices in academic internal medicine. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2014;19:29–41.
26.
Carnes M, Devine PG, Isaac C, et al. Promoting institutional change through bias literacy. J Divers High Educ 2012;5:63–77.
27.
Westring AF, Speck RM, Sammel MD, et al. A culture conducive to women's academic success: Development of a measure. Acad Med 2012;87:1622–1631.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Women's Health
Journal of Women's Health
Volume 24Issue Number 3March 2015
Pages: 190 - 199
PubMed: 25658907

History

Published online: 11 March 2015
Published in print: March 2015
Published ahead of print: 6 February 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Topics

Authors

Affiliations

Phyllis L. Carr
Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christine M. Gunn
Women's Health Unit, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Samantha A. Kaplan
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Anita Raj
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California.
Karen M. Freund
Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

Notes

Part of this article was presented as a workshop at the AAMC Faculty Development Meeting, August 2013, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Address correspondence to:Phyllis L. Carr, MD, FACPMassachusetts General HospitalYawkey 4B, 55 Fruit StreetBoston, MA 02114E-mail: [email protected]

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top