Speaker Introductions at Internal Medicine Grand Rounds: Forms of Address Reveal Gender Bias
Publication: Journal of Women's Health
Volume 26, Issue Number 5
Abstract
Background: Gender bias has been identified as one of the drivers of gender disparity in academic medicine. Bias may be reinforced by gender subordinating language or differential use of formality in forms of address. Professional titles may influence the perceived expertise and authority of the referenced individual. The objective of this study is to examine how professional titles were used in the same and mixed-gender speaker introductions at Internal Medicine Grand Rounds (IMGR).
Methods: A retrospective observational study of video-archived speaker introductions at consecutive IMGR was conducted at two different locations (Arizona, Minnesota) of an academic medical center. Introducers and speakers at IMGR were physician and scientist peers holding MD, PhD, or MD/PhD degrees. The primary outcome was whether or not a speaker's professional title was used during the first form of address during speaker introductions at IMGR. As secondary outcomes, we evaluated whether or not the speakers professional title was used in any form of address during the introduction.
Results: Three hundred twenty-one forms of address were analyzed. Female introducers were more likely to use professional titles when introducing any speaker during the first form of address compared with male introducers (96.2% [102/106] vs. 65.6% [141/215]; p < 0.001). Female dyads utilized formal titles during the first form of address 97.8% (45/46) compared with male dyads who utilized a formal title 72.4% (110/152) of the time (p = 0.007). In mixed-gender dyads, where the introducer was female and speaker male, formal titles were used 95.0% (57/60) of the time. Male introducers of female speakers utilized professional titles 49.2% (31/63) of the time (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: In this study, women introduced by men at IMGR were less likely to be addressed by professional title than were men introduced by men. Differential formality in speaker introductions may amplify isolation, marginalization, and professional discomfiture expressed by women faculty in academic medicine.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bickel J, Wara D, Atkinson BF, et al. Increasing women's leadership in academic medicine: Report of the AAMC Project Implementation Committee. Acad Med 2002;77:1043–1061.
2.
Jagsi R, Guancial EA, Worobey CC, et al. The “gender gap” in authorship of academic medical literature—a 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med 2006;355:281–287.
3.
Valantine H, Sandborg CI. Changing the culture of academic medicine to eliminate the gender leadership gap: 50/50 by 2020. Acad Med 2013;88:1411–1413.
4.
Carnes MMDMS, Devine PGP, Baier Manwell LMS, et al. The effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit for faculty at one institution: A cluster randomized, controlled trial. Acad Med 2015;90:221–230.
5.
Bates C, Gordon L, Travis E, et al. Striving for gender equity in academic medicine careers: A call to action. Acad Med 2016;91:1050–1052.
6.
Thibault GE. Women in academic medicine. Acad Med 2016;91:1045–1046.
7.
Carnes M, Geller S, Fine E, Sheridan J, Handelsman J. NIH Director's Pioneer Awards: Could the selection process be biased against women? J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2005;14:684–691.
8.
Burgess DJ, Joseph A, van Ryn M, Carnes M. Does stereotype threat affect women in academic medicine? Acad Med 2012;87:506–512.
9.
Carnes M, Devine PG, Isaac C, et al. Promoting Institutional Change Through Bias Literacy. J Divers High Educ 2012;5:63–77.
10.
Girod S, Fassiotto M, Grewal D, et al. Reducing Implicit Gender Leadership Bias in Academic Medicine With an Educational Intervention. Acad Med 2016;91:1143–1150.
11.
Kaatz A, Magua W, Zimmerman DR, Carnes M. A quantitative linguistic analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 application critiques from investigators at one institution. Acad Med 2015;90:69–75.
12.
Siegling A, Eskritt M, Delaney M. A Preliminary Investigation into Effects of Linguistic Abstraction on the Perception of Gender in Spoken Language. Curr Psychol 2014;33:479–500.
13.
Trix F, Psenka C. Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse Soc 2003;14:191–220.
14.
Valantine HA, Grewal D, Ku MC, et al. The gender gap in academic medicine: Comparing results from a multifaceted intervention for stanford faculty to peer and national cohorts. Acad Med 2014;89:904–911.
15.
Thiels CA, Bergquist JR, Pandian TK, Heller SF. Improving Communication Skills and Professionalism Among General Surgery Residents, One Page at a Time. Mayo Clinic Proc 2016;91:539–541.
16.
Wigboldus DH, Semin GR, Spears R. How do we communicate stereotypes? Linguistic bases and inferential consequences. J Pers Soc Psychol 2000;78:5–18.
17.
Morand DA. What's in a name? An Exploration of the Social Dynamics of Form of Address in Organizations. Manage Commun Q 1996;9:422–451.
18.
Berry CA. They Call Me Dr. Berry. New York Times. New York: The New York Times Company, 2014.
19.
Grady D. Carolyn Kaelin, Breast Cancer Surgeon Patient Advocate and Patient, Dies at 54. New York: New York Times, 2015.
20.
Post E. Professional Titles. Emily Post Etipedia 2015. Available at: www.emilypost.com/communication-and-technology/social-names-and-titles/774-professional-titles. Accessed September 14, 2015.
21.
Kaatz A, Carnes M. Stuck in the out-group: Jennifer can't grow up, Jane's invisible, and Janet's over the hill. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2014;23:481–484.
22.
Kramer RM, Leonardelli GJ, Livingston RW. Social Cognition, Social Identity, and Intergroup Relations. New York, NY: Psychology Press Taylor & Francis Group, 2011.
23.
Amanatullah ET, Tinsley CH. Ask and Ye Shall Receive? How Gender and Status Moderate Negotiation Success. Negotiation Confl Manage Res 2013;6:252–272.
24.
Jagsi R. A piece of my mind. What's in a name? JAMA 2013;310:1347–1348.
25.
Carnes M, Bland C. Viewpoint: A challenge to academic health centers and the National Institutes of Health to prevent unintended gender bias in the selection of clinical and translational science award leaders. Acad Med 2007;82:202–206.
26.
Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Stewart A, Sambuco D, DeCastro R, Ubel PA. Gender differences in salary in a recent cohort of early-career physician-researchers. Acad Med 2013;88:1689–1699.
27.
Jena AB, Olenski AR, Blumenthal DM. Sex Differences in Physician Salary in US Public Medical Schools. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:1294–1304.
28.
Mayer AP, Blair JE, Ko MG, et al. Gender distribution of U.S. medical school faculty by academic track type. Acad Med 2014;89:312–317.
29.
Wright AL, Ryan K, St Germain P, Schwindt L, Sager R, Reed KL. Compensation in academic medicine: Progress toward gender equity. J Gen Intern Med 2007;22:1398–1402.
30.
Maslach C, Leiter MP. Early predictors of job burnout and engagement. J Appl Psychol 2008;93:498–512.
31.
Shanafelt TD, Gorringe G, Menaker R, et al. Impact of Organizational Leadership on Physician Burnout and Satisfaction. Mayo Clinic Proc 2015;90:432–440.
32.
Pololi LH, Jones SJ: Women faculty: An analysis of their experiences in academic medicine and their coping strategies. Gend Med 2010;7:438–450.
33.
Rubini M, Menegatti M. Hindering Women's Careers in Academia: Gender Linguistic Bias in Personnel Selection. J Lang Soc Psychol 2014;33:632–650.
34.
Wing Sue D. Microaggressions: More than just race. Psychol Today 2010; www.psychologytoday.com/blog/microaggressions-in-everyday-life/201011/microaggressions-more-just-race Accessed February 14, 2017.
35.
Westring AF, Speck RM, Sammel MD, et al. A culture conducive to women's academic success: development of a measure. Acad Med 2012;87:1622–1631.
36.
Westring AF, Speck RM, Dupuis Sammel M, et al. Culture matters: The pivotal role of culture for women's careers in academic medicine. Acad Med 2014;89:658–663.
37.
Carnes M, Devine PG, Baier Manwell L, et al. The effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit for faculty at one institution: A cluster randomized, controlled trial. Acad Med 2015;90:221–230.
38.
Krupat E, Pololi L, Schnell ER, Kern DE. Changing the culture of academic medicine: The C-Change learning action network and its impact at participating medical schools. Acad Med 2013;88:1252–1258.
39.
Pati S, Reum J, Conant E, et al. Tradition meets innovation: Transforming academic medical culture at the University of Pennsylvania's Perelman School of Medicine. Acad Med 2013;88:461–464.
40.
Carnes M, Bartels CM, Kaatz A, Kolehmainen C. Why is John More Likely to Become Department Chair Than Jennifer? Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 2015;126:197–214.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright 2017, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
History
Published in print: May 2017
Published online: 1 May 2017
Published ahead of print: 16 February 2017
Topics
Authors
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.