Mini-Residencies to Improve Care for Women Veterans: A Decade of Re-Educating Veterans Health Administration Primary Care Providers
Publication: Journal of Women's Health
Volume 31, Issue Number 7
Abstract
Background: Many primary care providers (PCPs) in the Veterans Health Administration need updated clinical training in women's health. The objective was to design, implement, and evaluate a training program to increase participants' comfort with and provision of care to women Veterans, and foster practice changes in women's health care at their local institutions.
Methods: The Women's Health Mini-Residency was developed as a multi-day training program, based on principles of adult learning, wherein knowledge gleaned through didactic presentations was solidified during small-group case study discussions and further enhanced by hands-on training and creation of a facility-specific action plan to improve women Veterans' care. Pre, post, and 6-month surveys assessed attendees' comfort with and provision of care to women. The 6-month survey also queried changes in practice, promulgation of program content, and action plan progress.
Results: From 2008 to 2019, 2912 PCPs attended 26 programs. A total of 2423 (83.2%) completed pretraining and 2324 (79.3%) completed post-training surveys. The 6-month survey was sent to the 645 attendees from the first 14 programs; 297 (46.1%) responded. Comparison of pre-post responses indicated significant gains in comfort managing all 19 content areas. Six-month data showed some degradation, but comfort remained significantly improved from baseline. At 6 months, participants also reported increases in providing care to women, including performing more breast and pelvic examinations, dissemination of program content to colleagues, and progress on action plans.
Conclusions: This interactive program appears to have been successful in improving PCPs' comfort in providing care for women Veterans and empowering them to implement institutional change.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1. National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics. August 5, 2020. Available at: https://www.va.gov/VETDATA/Veteran_Population.asp Accessed October 28, 2020.
2. Lowe MM, Aparicio A, Galbraith R, et al. The future of continuing medical education: Effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based educational guidelines. Chest 2009;135:69S–75S.
3. Gruppen LD, Simpson D, Searle NS, Robins L, Irby DM, Mullan PB. Educational fellowship programs: Common themes and overarching issues. Acad Med 2006;81:990–994.
4. Knowles MS. The adult learner, 6th ed. Burlington, MA: Elsevier, 2005.
5. Kaufman DM. Applying educational theory in practice. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine. BMJ 2003;326:213–216.
6. Simpson DD. A conceptual framework for transferring research to practice. J Subst Abuse Treat 2002;22:171–182.
7. Mazmanian PE, Daffron SR, Johnson RE, Davis DA, Kantrowitz MP. Information about barriers to planned change: A randomized controlled trial involving continuing medical education lectures and commitment to change. Acad Med 1998;73:882–886.
8. Bryner CL Jr. Learning as a function of lecture length. Fam Med 1995;27:379–382.
9. Lomas J, Enkin M, Anderson GM, Hannah WJ, Vayda E, Singer J. Opinion leaders vs. audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines. Delivery after previous Cesarean section. JAMA 1991;265:2202–2207.
10. Forsetlund L, Bjørndal A, Rashidian A, et al. Continuing education meetings and workshops: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;2009:CD003030.
11. Marinopoulos SS, Dorman T, Ratanawongsa N, et al. Effectiveness of continuing medical education. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2007;149:1–69.
12. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA 1995;274:700–705.
13. Bloom BS. Effects of continuing medical education on improving physician clinical care and patient health: A review of systematic reviews. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005;21:380–385.
14. Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, et al. Changing provider behavior: An overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care 2001;39:II2–II45.
15. Smith WR. Evidence for the effectiveness of techniques to change physician behavior. Chest 2000;118;8S–17S.
16. Edmondson Amy. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin Sci Q 1999;44:350–383.
17. Imel S. Inclusive adult learning environments. ERIC Digest #162. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education, 1995.
18. Musselwhite C. Managing change: Styles, stages, and effective leadership for academic leaders. In: Johnson MJ, Hanna DE, Olcott D Jr., eds. Bridging the gap: Leadership, technology, and organizational change for university deans and chairpersons. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing, 2003:55–74.
19. Johnson DW, Johnson RT. Cooperative learning: Where we have been, where we are going. Coop Learn Coll Teach 1993;3:6–9.
20. Schwartz PL. Active, small group learning with a large group in a lecture theatre: A practical example. Med Teach 1989;11:81–86.
21. Knox A. Helping adults learn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986.
22. Janis IL, Mann L. Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press, 1977.
23. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. The transtheoretical approach: Crossing the traditional boundaries of therapy. Melbourne, FL: Krieger, 1984.
24. Grant J. Learning needs assessment: Assessing the need. BMJ 2002; 324:156–159.
25. Moon J. Reflection in learning and professional development: Theory and practice. London: Kogan Page, 1999.
26. Tipping J, Donahue J, Hannah E. Value of unstructured time (breaks) during formal continuing medical education events. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2001;21:90–96.
27. Deming WE. The new economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.
28. Lowe M, Rappolt S, Jaglal S, MacDonald G. The role of reflection in implementing learning from continuing education into practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2007;27:143–148.
29. Sheridan J. Rethinking andragogy: The case for collaborative learning in continuing higher education. J Contin Higher Educ 1989;37:2–6.
30. Overton GK, MacVicar R. Requesting a commitment to change: Conditions that produce behavioral or attitudinal commitment. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008;28:60–66.
31. Herscovitch L, Meyer JP. Commitment to organizational change: Extension of a three-component model. J Appl Psychol 2002;87:474–487.
32. Pereles L, Lockyer J, Hogan D, Gondocz T, Parboosingh J. Effectiveness of commitment contracts in facilitating change in continuing medical education interventions. J Contin Educ Health Prof 1997;17:27–31.
33. Weiner Y. Commitment in organizations: A normative view. Acad Manage Rev 1982;7:418–428.
34. White MI, Grzybowski S, Broudo M. Commitment to change instrument enhances program planning, implementation, and evaluation. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2004;24:153–162.
35. Wakefield J. Commitment to change: Exploring its role in changing physician behavior through continuing education. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2004;24:197–204.
36. Wakefield J, Herbert CP, Maclure M, et al. Commitment to change statements can predict actual change in practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2003;23:81–93.
37. Vermunt JD. Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Educ 1996;31:25–50.
38. Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics, AP and GO Women's Healthcare Education Office. Women's health care competencies for medical students: Taking steps to include sex and gender differences in the curriculum. Crofton, MD: APGO, 2005.
39. Cassel C, Blank L, Braunstein G, Burke W, Fryhofer SA, Pinn V. What internists need to know: Core competencies in women's health. Am J Med 1997;102:507–512.
40. Magrane DM, McIntyre-Seltman K. Women's health care issues for medical students: An education proposal. Womens Health Issues 1996;6:183–191.
41. National Academy on Women's Health Medical Education. Women's health in the curriculum: A resource guide for faculty: Undergraduate, residency, and continuing education. Philadelphia, PA: NAWHME, 1996.
42. Rohrbach LA, Grana R, Sussman S, Valente TW. Type II translation: Transporting prevention interventions from research to real-world settings. Eval Health Prof 2006;29:302–333.
43. Peloso PM, Stakiw KJ. Small-group format for continuing medical education: A report from the field. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2000;20,:27–32.
44. Casebeer L, Centor RM, Kristofco RE. Learning in large and small groups. In: Davis D, Barnes BE, Fox R, eds. The continuing professional development of physicians: From research to practice. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, 2003:169–190.
45. Maltby HJ, Andrusyszyn MA. The case study approach of teaching decision-making to post-diploma nurses. Nurse Educ Today 1990;10:415–419.
46. Satterlee WG, Eggers RG, Grimes DA. Effective medical education: Insights from the Cochrane Library. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2008;63:329–333.
47. Bennett S, Harper B, Hedberg J. Designing real life cases to support authentic design activities. Aust J Educ Tech 2002;18:1–12.
48. Irby DM. Three exemplary models of case-based teaching. Acad Med 1994;69:947–953.
49. Williams SM. Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples from legal and medical education. J Learn Sci 1992;2:367–427.
50. Cacioppo JT, Petty RE. Effects of message repetition on argument processing, recall, and persuasion. Basic Appl Soc Psych 1989;10:3–12.
51. Haug JD. Physicians' preferences for information sources: A meta-analytic study. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1997;85:223–232.
52. Premi J. Individualized continuing medical education. In: Davis DA, Fox RD, eds. The physician as learner: Linking research to practice. Chicago: American Medical Association, 1994:201–216.
53. Fox RD, Mazmanian PE, Putnam RW. A theory of learning and change. In: Fox RD, Mazmanian PE, Putnam RW, eds. Changing and learning in the lives of physicians. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1989:161–175.
54. Cialdini RB. Influence: The new psychology of modern persuasion. New York, NY: Quill, 1984.
55. Valente TW, Pumpuang P. Identifying opinion leaders to promote behavior change. Health Educ Behav 2007;34:881–896.
56. Doumit G, Gattellari M, Grimshaw J, O’Brien MA. Local opinion leaders: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;24:CD000125.
57. Kelly JA, St Lawrence JS, Diaz YE, et al. HIV risk behavior reduction following intervention with key opinion leaders of population: An experimental analysis. Am J Public Health 1991;81:168–171.
58. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. A Medical Education Model for the Prevention and Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorders. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Social Services, National Institutes of Health, NIAAA, 1998.
59. Kirkpatrick D. Great ideas revisited. Techniques for evaluating training programs. Revisiting Kirkpatrick's four level model. Training Dev 1996;50:54–59.
60. Washington DL, Yano EM, Simon B, Sun S. To use or not to use. What influences why women veterans choose VA health care. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:S11–S18.
61. Bean-Mayberry B, Bastian L, Trentalange M, et al. Associations between provider designation and female-specific cancer screening in women Veterans. Med Care 2015;53(Suppl 1):S47–S54.
62. Borrero S, Mor MK, Zhao X, McNeil M, Ibrahim S, Hayes P. Contraceptive care in the VA health care system. Contraception 2012;85:580–588.
63. Koenig AF, Borrero S, Zhao X, Callegari L, Mor MK, Sonalkar S. Factors associated with long-acting reversible contraception use among women Veterans in the ECUUN study. Contraception 2019;100:234–240.
64. Reddy A, Pollack CE, Asch DA, Canamucio A, Werner RM. The effect of primary care provider turnover on patient experience of care and ambulatory quality care. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:1157–1162.
65. Eccles MP, Hrisos S, Francis J, et al. Do self-reported intentions predict clinicians' behavior: A systematic review. Implement Sci 2006;1:5908–5928.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright 2022, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.
History
Published online: 12 July 2022
Published in print: July 2022
Published ahead of print: 18 January 2022
Topics
Authors
Authors' Contributions
L.B.M., MS, contributed to the design and coordinated the delivery of the mini-residencies. She participated in drafting and revising this article's intellectual and technical content, provided final approval, and assumes responsibility and accountability for the results.
M.M., MD, MPH, contributed to the design and conduct of the mini-residency. She made critical revisions to this article's intellectual and technical content, provided final approval, and assumes responsibility and accountability for the results.
M.R.G., MD, MPH, contributed to the design and conduct of the mini-residency. She made critical revisions to this article's intellectual and technical content, provided final approval, and assumes responsibility and accountability for the results.
S.I., MD, contributed to the design and conduct of the mini-residency. She made critical revisions to this article's intellectual and technical content, provided final approval, and assumes responsibility and accountability for the results.
S.S., MD, MS, contributed to the design and conduct of the mini-residency. She made critical revisions to this article's intellectual and technical content, provided final approval, and assumes responsibility and accountability for the results.
C.S., MD, contributed to the design and conduct of the mini-residency. She made critical revisions to this article's intellectual and technical content, provided final approval, and assumes responsibility and accountability for the results.
R.B., PhD, contributed to the design, conduct, and interpretation of data analyses. He participated in drafting and revising this article's intellectual and technical content, provided final approval, and assumes responsibility and accountability for the results
L.V., MD, contributed to the design and conduct of the mini-residency. She made critical revisions to this article's intellectual and technical content, provided final approval, and assumes responsibility and accountability for the results.
S.H., MD, MS, contributed to the conduct of the mini-residency. She made critical revisions to this article's intellectual and technical content, provided final approval, and assumes responsibility and accountability for the results.
P.H., PhD, contributed to the design of the mini-residency. She made critical revisions to this article's intellectual and technical content, provided final approval, and assumes responsibility and accountability for the results.
M.C., MD, MS, contributed to the design and conduct of the mini-residency. She participated in drafting and revising this article's intellectual and technical content, provided final approval, and assumes responsibility and accountability for the results.
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Funding Information
Office of Women's Health in the Veterans Health Administration provided all funding for the mini-residency program, including faculty and participant expenses.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.