School Protective Factors and Substance Use Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Adolescents in California Public Schools
Abstract
Purpose: The majority of studies examining substance use among lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) youth have focused on a wide array of risk factors (e.g., victimization). Few studies have explored the protective role of schools. This study aims to fill this gap in the literature and inform programs aimed at reducing substance use among LGB youth. More specifically, this study explores the extent to which school connectedness and support from teachers and other adults at school are associated with substance use among LGB youth in school and within the past 30 days.
Methods: A secondary analysis of the 2013–2015 California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS) was conducted to examine associations between school protective factors (i.e., school connectedness and adult support) and substance use among LGB youth, above and beyond a key risk factor, school victimization. The study outcomes were past 30-day and in-school use of cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana, inhalants, prescription pain medication, and other illegal drugs.
Results: Overall, school connectedness and school adult support were associated with lower odds of substance use. For example, higher levels of school connectedness were associated with 22% decreased odds of past 30-day inhalant use (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.72–0.86), and 25% decreased odds of past 30-day prescription pain medication use (AOR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.69–0.82). Higher levels of adult support in school were also associated with 17% decreased odds of marijuana use on school property in the past 30 days (AOR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.77–0.91).
Conclusion: The results indicate a need for substance use prevention programs that integrate school connectedness and adult support in school.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Goldbach JT, Tanner-Smith EE, Bagwell M, Dunlap S: Minority stress and substance use in sexual minority adolescents: A meta-analysis. Prev Sci 2014;15:350–363.
2.
Newcomb ME, Birkett M, Corliss HL, Mustanski B: Sexual orientation, gender, and racial differences in illicit drug use in a sample of US high school students. Am J Public Health 2014;104:304–310.
3.
Meyer IH: Minority stress and mental health in gay men. J Health Soc Behav 1995;36:38–56.
4.
Meyer IH: Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in the lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Bull 2003;129:674–697.
5.
Marshal MP, Friedman MS, Stall R, et al.: Sexual orientation and adolescent substance use: A meta-analysis and methodological review. Addiction 2008;103:546–556.
6.
Seil KS, Desai MM, Smith MV: Sexual orientation, adult connectedness, substance use, and mental health outcomes among adolescents: Findings from the 2009 New York City Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Am J Public Health 2014;104:1950–1956.
7.
Darwich L, Hymel S, Waterhouse T: School avoidance and substance use among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and questioning youths: The impact of peer victimization and adult support. J Educ Psychol 2012;104:381–392.
8.
Birkett M, Espelage DL, Koenig B: LGB and questioning students in schools: The moderating effects of homophobic bullying and school climate on negative outcomes. J Youth Adolesc 2009;38:989–1000.
9.
Newcomb ME, Ryan DT, Greene GJ, et al.: Prevalence and patterns of smoking, alcohol use, and illicit drug use in young men who have sex with men. Drug Alcohol Depend 2014;141:65–71.
10.
Newcomb ME, Heinz AJ, Birkett M, Mustanski B: A longitudinal examination of risk and protective factors for cigarette smoking among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. J Adolesc Health 2014;54:558–564.
11.
Corliss HL, Rosario M, Birkett MA, et al.: Sexual orientation disparities in adolescent cigarette smoking and intersections with race/ethnicity, gender, and age. Am J Public Health 2013;104:1137–1147.
12.
Huebner DM, Thoma BC, Neilands TB: School victimization and substance use among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender adolescents. Prev Sci 2015;16:734–743.
13.
Bontempo DE, D'Augelli AR: Effects of at-school victimization and sexual orientation on lesbian, gay, or bisexual youths' health risk behavior. J Adolesc Health 2002;30:364–374.
14.
Espelage DL, Aragon SR, Birkett MA, Koenig BW: Homophobic teasing, psychological outcomes, and sexual orientation among high school students: What influence do parents and schools have? Sch Psychol Rev 2008;37:202–216.
15.
Cohen J, McCabe L, Michelli NM, Pickeral T: School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teach Coll Rec 2009;111:180–213.
16.
Thapa A, Cohen J, Guffey S, Higgins-D'Alessandro A: A review of school climate research. Rev Educ Res 2013;83:357–385.
17.
Marachi R, Astor RA, Benbenishty R: Effects of student participation and teacher support on victimization in Israeli schools: An examination of gender, culture, and school type. J Youth Adolesc 2007;36:225–240.
18.
Gage NA, Prykanowski DA, Larson A: School climate and bullying victimization: A latent class growth model analysis. Sch Psychol Q 2014;29:256–271.
19.
De Pedro KT, Astor RA, Gilreath TD, et al.: School climate, deployment, and mental health among students in military-connected schools. Youth Soc 2015;.
20.
Benbenishty R, Astor RA: School Violence in Context: Culture, Neighborhood, Family, School and Gender. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
21.
Meyer IH: Resilience in the study of minority stress and health of sexual and gender minorities. Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers 2015;2:209–213.
22.
Colpitts E, Gahagan J: The utility of resilience as a conceptual framework for understanding and measuring LGBTQ health. Int J Equity Health 2016;15:60.
23.
Austin G, Bates S, Duerr M: Guidebook to the California School Climate, Health, and Learning Surveys. San Francisco: West Ed. 2014. Available at http://surveydata.wested.org/resources/calschls-integratedguidebook-admin-1415.pdf Accessed March 10, 2016.
24.
WestEd and California Department of Education: 2013–2015 California Healthy Kids Survey [Data file]. 2015. Available at http://chks.wested.org/ Accessed January 23, 2017.
25.
Kann L, McManus T, Harris WA, et al.: Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2015. MMWR Surveill Summ 2016;65:1–174.
26.
National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: 2013 NCHS Urban–Rural Classification Scheme for Counties. Vital and Health Statistics Series 2, No. 166, 2014. Available at www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_02/sr02_166.pdf Accessed June 30, 2016.
27.
Gilreath TD, Astor RA, Cederbaum JA, et al.: Prevalence and correlates of victimization and weapon carrying among military- and nonmilitary-connected youth in Southern California. Prev Med 2014;60:21–26.
28.
De Pedro KT, Gilreath T, Berkowitz R: A latent class analysis of school climate among middle and high school students in California public schools. Child Youth Serv Rev 2016;63:10–15.
29.
Savin-Williams RC, Beam GL: Prevalence and stability of sexual orientation components during adolescence and young adulthood. Arch Sex Behav 2007;36:385–394.
30.
Russell ST, Ryan C, Toomey RB, et al.: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender adolescent school victimization: Implications for young adult health and adjustment. J Sch Health 2011;81:223–230.
31.
Poteat VP, Calzo JP, Yoshikawa H: Promoting youth agency through dimensions of gay-straight alliance involvement and conditions that maximize associations. J Youth Adolesc 2016;45:1438–1451.
32.
Poteat VP, Sinclair KO, DiGiovanni CD, et al.: Gay-straight alliances are associated with student health: A multischool comparison of LGBTQ and heterosexual youth. J Res Adolesc 2013;23:319–330.
33.
Heck NC, Livingston NA, Flentje A, et al.: Reducing risk for illicit drug use and prescription drug misuse: High school gay-straight alliances and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. Addict Behav 2014;39:824–828.
34.
Reisner SL, Biello K, Rosenberger JG, et al.: Using a two-step method to measure transgender identity in Latin America/the Caribbean, Portugal, and Spain. Arch Sex Behav 2014;43:1503–1514.
35.
The Fenway Institute and Center for American Progress: Asking Patients Questions about Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Clinical Settings: A Study in Four Health Centers. Boston, MA and Washington, DC. 2013. Available at http://thefenwayinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/COM228_SOGI_CHARN_WhitePaper.pdf Accessed January 24, 2017.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright 2017, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
History
Published in print: June 2017
Published online: 1 June 2017
Published ahead of print: 12 May 2017
Topics
Authors
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.