Research Article
No access
Published Online: 22 December 2023

Efficacy of Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis for Secondary Upper Extremity Lymphedema: Treatment Strategies with Effects of Compression Therapy Discontinuation and Site-Specific Evaluation of the Upper Extremity

Publication: Lymphatic Research and Biology
Volume 21, Issue Number 6

Abstract

Background: Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) has recently become a mainstream surgical treatment for lymphedema and is a useful treatment option in addition to conservative therapies such as compression therapy, exercise therapy, and lymphatic drainage. We performed LVA with the goal of stopping compression therapy and report the effect of LVA on secondary lymphedema of the upper extremities.
Methods and Results: The participants were 20 patients with secondary lymphedema of the upper extremities categorized as stage 2 or 3 according to the International Society of Lymphology classification. We measured and compared the upper limb circumference at six locations before and 6 months after LVA. Significant decreases in circumference after surgery were observed at 8 cm proximal to the elbow, the elbow joint, 5 cm distal to the elbow, and the wrist joints, but not at 2 cm distal to the axilla or the dorsum of the hand. At more than 6 months postoperatively, eight patients who had been wearing compression gloves were no longer required to wear them, and three patients who had been wearing both sleeves and gloves were no longer required to wear them.
Conclusions: LVA is effective in the treatment of secondary lymphedema of the upper extremities, particularly in improving elbow circumference, and is one of the treatments that contributes significantly to the improvement of quality of life. For severe cases with limited range of motion of the elbow joint, LVA should be performed first. Based on these results, we present an algorithm for upper extremity lymphedema treatment.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1. Onoda S, Yamada K, Matsumoto K, et al. A detailed examination of the characteristics and treatment in a series of 33 idiopathic lymphedema patients. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017;33(1):19–25;
2. DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, et al. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:500–515;
3. Teo I, Novy DM, Chang DW, et al. Examining pain, body image, and depressive symptoms in patients with lymphedema secondary to breast cancer. Psychooncology 2015;24:1377–1383;
4. Cornelissen AJM, Kool M, Lopez Penha TR, et al. Lymphatico-venous anastomosis as treatment for breast cancer-related lymphedema: A prospective study on quality of life. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017;163:281–286;
5. Penha TR, Botter B, Heuts EM, et al. Quality of life in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema and reconstructive breast surgery. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016;32:484–490;
6. Carl HM, Walia G, Bello R, et al. Systematic review of the surgical treatment of extremity lymphedema. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017;33(6):412–425;
7. Mihara M, Hara H, Furniss D, et al. Lymphaticovenular anastomosis to prevent cellulitis associated with lymphoedema. Br J Surg 2014;101(11):1391–1396;
8. Onoda S, Kinoshita M. Lymphaticovenular anastomosis in elderly patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2020;73(6):1174–1205;
9. Chung JH, Hwang YJ, ParkSH, et al. Preliminary outcomes of combined surgical approach for lower extremity lymphedema: Supraclavicular lymph node transfer and lymphaticovenular anastomosis. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2022;56(5):261–269;
10. Onoda S, Todokoro T, Hara H, et al. Minimally invasive multiple lymphaticovenular anastomosis at the ankle for the prevention of lower leg lymphedema. Microsurgery 2014;34(5):372–376;
11. Rosian K, Stanak M. Efficacy and safety assessment of lymphovenous anastomosis in patients with primary and secondary lymphoedema: A systematic review of prospective evidence. Microsurgery 2019;39(8):763–772;
12. Forte AJ, Sisti A, Huayllani MT, et al. Lymphaticovenular anastomosis for breast cancer-related upper extremity lymphedema: A literature review. Gland Surg 2020;9(2):539–544;
13. Executive Committee. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2016 consensus document of the International Society of Lymphology. Acta Angiol 2016;49(4):170–184.
14. Yamamoto T, Narushima M, Doi K, et al. Characteristic indocyanine green lymphography findings in lower extremity lymphedema: The generation of a novel lymphedema severity staging system using dermal backflow patterns. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127(5):1979–1986;
15. Karlsson T, Karlsson M, Ohlin K, et al. Liposuction of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema reduces fat and muscle hypertrophy. Lymphat Res Biol 2022;20(1):53–63;
16. Koshima I, Narushima M, Yamamoto Y, et al. Recent advancement on surgical treatments for lymphedema. Ann Vasc Dis 2012;5(4):409–415;
17. Smith JW, Conway H. Selection of appropriate surgical procedures in lymphedema. Introduction of the hinged pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull 1962;30(1):10–31;
18. Thompson N. Buried dermal flap operation for chronic lymphedema of the extremities. Ten-year survey of results in 79 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1970;45(6):541–548;
19. Koshima I, Nanba Y, Tsutsui T, et al. Long-term follow-up after lymphaticovenular anastomosis for lymphedema in the leg. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003;19(04):209–215;
20. Wolfs JAGN, de Joode LGEH, van der Hulst RRWJ, et al. Correlation between patency and clinical improvement after lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) in breast cancer-related lymphedema: 12-month follow-up. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020;179:131–138;
21. Onoda S, Nishimon K. The utility of surgical and conservative combination therapy for advanced stage lymphedema. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2021;9(1):234–241;
22. Baklaci M, Eyigör S, Tanıgör G, et al. Assessment of muscle strength and volume changes in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Oncol Res Treat 2020;43(11):584–591;
23. Cornelissen AJM, Beugels J, Ewalds L, et al. Effect of lymphaticovenous anastomosis in breast cancer-related lymphedema: A review of the literature. Lymphat Res Biol 2018;16(5):426–434;
24. Drobot A, Bez M, Abu Shakra I, et al. Microsurgery for management of primary and secondary lymphedema. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2021;9(1):226.e1–233.e1;
25. Yang JC, Wu SC, Hayashi A, et al. Lower limb lymphedema patients can still benefit from supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) after vascularized lymph node flap transfer (VLNT) as delayed lymphatic reconstruction-A retrospective cohort study. J Clin Med 2021;10(14):3121;
26. Hara H, Mihara M. Lymphaticovenous anastomosis for advanced-stage lower limb lymphedema. Microsurgery 2021;41(2):140–145;
27. Brorson H, Ohlin K, Olsson G, et al. Breast cancer-related chronic arm lymphedema is associated with excess adipose and muscle tissue. Lymphat Res Biol 2009;7(1):3–10;
28. Brazio PS, Nguyen DH. Combined liposuction and physiologic treatment achieves durable limb volume normalization in class II-III lymphedema: A treatment algorithm to optimize outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 2021;86(5S Suppl. 3):S384–S389;
29. Onoda S, Satake T, Kinoshita M. Relationship between lymphaticovenular anastomosis outcomes and the number and types of anastomoses. J Surg Res 2022;269:103–109;
30. Park KE, Allam O, Chandler L, et al. Surgical management of lymphedema: A review of current literature. Gland Surg 2020;9(2):503–511;
31. Kwon JG, Hong DW, Suh HP, et al. Patient-specific surgical options for breast cancer-related lymphedema: Technical tips. Arch Plast Surg 2021;48(3):246–253;

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Lymphatic Research and Biology
Lymphatic Research and Biology
Volume 21Issue Number 6December 2023
Pages: 574 - 580
PubMed: 37252768

History

Published online: 22 December 2023
Published in print: December 2023
Published ahead of print: 26 May 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Erika Hamada
Department of Plastic Surgery, Toyama Nishi General Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
Satoshi Onoda [email protected]
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
Toshihiko Satake
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, Japan.

Notes

Address correspondence to: Satoshi Onoda, PhD, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Toyama University Hospital, 2630, Sugitani, Toyama 930-0194, Japan [email protected]

Authors' Contributions

E.H., S.O., and T.S. contributed to the study design. E.H. and S.O. contributed to the writing and revision of the article. E.H. performed surgery and data analysis.

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Funding Information

No funding was received for this article.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top