Research Article
No access
Published Online: 29 January 2009

Head Injury Mechanisms and the Concept of Preventive Management: A Review and Critical Synthesis

Publication: Journal of Neurotrauma
Volume 12, Issue Number 4

ABSTRACT

Recent advances in head injury research have produced a plethora of useful data coupled with a paucity of conceptual integration across the four ways in which this research is pursued. These research orientations are the epidemiological, biomechanical, basic neuroscientific, and clinicopathologic/therapeutic (including rehabilitation). This overview of the history and current state of the art assumes that biomechanics is the basic science of causation in head injury research and when fully integrated with its counterparts, physiology and pathology, it can serve to overcome our conceptual handicaps. A paradigm integrating biomechanics into the sequence of preventive, protective, acute therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions will be described as the concept of preventive management. From this we derive the hypothesized claim that the exact biomechanics and the physiopathologic response at the time of injury (at the macroscopic and microscopic levels) determine the sequence of so-called secondary effects that are conceived as the inexorable delayed manifestations of the primary events and concomitant boundary conditions. Knowledge of these events will enable accurate predictions of the natural history and outcome of head injuries from observations carried out in the early acute phase. Examples to test this claim will be given with particular reference to the two types of traumatic brain injury (TBI) phenomenologically associated with disturbances of consciousness, the onset of which can be either immediate or delayed. The current economics and availability of computational power provide a significant opportunity for the development of selected experimental, physical, and simulated models of head injury on the basis of which the complex neurovascular and nonneural cellular and fluid elements of the nervous system may be accurately modeled. This approach will significantly improve the efficiency and quality of the essential biological and clinical observations and model experiments required to validate the theoretical methods and their predictions.
Key words: traumatic brain injury; biomechanics; centripetal theory; TADD syndrome; venospasm; head injury mechanisms; prevention

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Neurotrauma
Journal of Neurotrauma
Volume 12Issue Number 4AUGUST 1995
Pages: 527 - 546
PubMed: 8683604

History

Published online: 29 January 2009
Published in print: AUGUST 1995

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Topics

Authors

Affiliations

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/ePub

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top