H3Africa and the African Life Sciences Ecosystem: Building Sustainable Innovation
Publication: OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology
Volume 18, Issue Number 12
Abstract
Interest in genomics research in African populations is experiencing exponential growth. This enthusiasm stems in part from the recognition that the genomic diversity of African populations is a window of opportunity for innovations in postgenomics medicine, ecology, and evolutionary biology. The recently launched H3Africa initiative, for example, captures the energy and momentum of this interest. This interdisciplinary socio-technical analysis highlights the challenges that have beset previous genomics research activities in Africa, and looking ahead, suggests constructive ways H3Africa and similar large scale science efforts could usefully chart a new era of genomics and life sciences research in Africa that is locally productive and globally competitive. As independent African scholars and social scientists, we propose that any serious global omics science effort, including H3Africa, aiming to build genomics research capacity and capability in Africa, needs to fund the establishment of biobanks and the genomic analyses platforms within Africa. Equally they need to prioritize community engagement and bioinformatics capability and the training of African scientists on these platforms. Historically, the financial, technological, and skills imbalance between Africa and developed countries has created exploitative frameworks of collaboration where African researchers have become merely facilitators of Western funded and conceived research agendas involving offshore expatriation of samples. Not surprisingly, very little funding was allocated to infrastructure and human capital development in the past. Moving forward, capacity building should materialize throughout the entire knowledge co-production trajectory: idea generation (e.g., brainstorming workshops for innovative hypotheses development by African scientists), data generation (e.g., genome sequencing), and high-throughput data analysis and contextualization. Additionally, building skills for political science scholarship that questions the unchecked assumptions of the innovation performers be they funders, scientists, and social scientists, would enable collective innovation that is truly sustainable, ethical, and robust.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Adoga MP, Fatumo SA, and Agwale SM. (2014). H3Africa: A tipping point for a revolution in bioinformatics, genomics and health research in Africa. Source Code Biol Med 9, 10.
Bessant J, and Möslein K. (2011). Open Collective Innovation. Published by The Advanced Institute of Management Research for the EPSRC and ESRC research councils. http://www.aimresearch.org/uploads/file/Publications. Accessed September 15, 2014.
Birch K, and Tyfield D. (2013). Theorizing the Bioeconomy: Biovalue, Biocapital, Bioeconomics or…What? Science Technol Human Values 38, 299–327.
Bishop TO, Adebiyi EF, Alzohairy AM, et al. (for the H3ABioNet Consortium, as members of The H3Africa Consortium). (2014). Bioinformatics Education-Perspectives and Challenges out of Africa. Brief Bioinform 2014.
Bondia-Pons I, Cañellas N, Abete I, et al. (2013). Nutri-metabolomics: Subtle serum metabolic differences in healthy subjects by NMR-based metabolomics after a short-term nutritional intervention with two tomato sauces. OMICS 17, 611–618.
Buseh AG, Underwood SM, Stevens PE, Townsend L, and Kelber ST. (2013). Black African immigrant community leaders' views on participation in genomics research and DNA biobanking. Nursing Outlook 61, 196–204.
Butterfield SH. (2004). U.S. Development Aid—An Historic First Achievements and Failures in the Twentieth Century. Westport, Conn, Praeger Publishers. http://ebooks.abc-clio.com/?isbn=9780313085079.
Dandara C, Adebamowo C, de Vries J, et al. (2012). An idea whose time has come? An African foresight observatory on genomics medicine and data-intensive global science. Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med 10, 7–15.
Dandara C, Swart M, Mpeta B, Wonkam A, and Masimirembwa C. (2014). Cytochrome P450 pharmacogenetics in African populations: Implications for public health. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 10, 769–785.
De Vries R. (2004). How can we help? From ‘Sociology in’ Bioethics to ‘Sociology of’ Bioethics. J Law Med Ethics 32, 279–292.
Dove ES. (2013). Questioning the governance of pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine for global health. Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med 11, 253–256.
Gotch F, and Gilmour J. (2007). Science, medicine and research in the developing world: A perspective. Nature Immunol 8, 1273–1276.
Graboyes M. (2010). Fines, orders, fear…and consent? Medical research in East Africa, c.1950s. Devel World Bioethics 10, 34–41.
H3Africa Consortium. (2014). Enabling the genomic revolution in Africa (H3Africa is developing capacity for health-related genomics research in Africa). Science 344, 1346–1348.
H3Africa consortium. Harnessing genomic technologies towards improving health in Africa: Recommendations for the Human Heredity and Health in Africa (H3Africa) Initiative to the Wellcome Trust and the National Institutes of Health OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES 2011; White Paper on H3Africa (www.h3africa.org). Last access: Nov. 10, 2014.
Halonem M. (2004). Coordination failure in foreign aid. Washington DC, World Bank, Development Research Group, Public Services. http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/54667590.html. Last access: Nov. 10, 2014.
Hayden EC. (2013). African genes tracked back. Nature 500, 514.
High-Level Principles on Ethics, Governance and Resource Sharing. Available at http://h3africa.org/about/ethics-and-governance. Last access: Nov. 10, 2014.
Huzair F, and Papaioannou T. (2012). UK Biobank: Consequences for Commons and Innovation. Science Public Policy 39, 500–501.
Ingman M, Kaessmann H, Pääbo S, and Gyllensten U. (2000). Mitochondrial genome variation and the origin of modern humans. Nature 408, 708–713.
Jasanoff S. (2003). Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41, 223–244.
Jasanoff S. (2013). Epistemic subsidiarity—Coexistence, cosmopolitanism, constitutionalism. Eur J Risk Regul 2, 133–141.
Lyall C, and Tait J. (2005). Shifting policy debates and the implications for governance In: New Modes of Governance; Developing an Integrated Policy Approach to Science, Technology, Risk and the Environment (Lyall C, and Tait J, Eds), p. 1–15. Ashgate
Masimirembwa C, Dandara C, and Hasler J. (2014). Population Diversity and Pharmacogenomics in Africa. In: Handbook of Pharmacogenomics and Stratified Medicine. Padmanabhan S, Ed., Elsevier, UK. pp. 971–996.
Mayosi BM, Ntsekhe M, Bosch J, et al. (2014). Prednisolone and Mycobacterium indicus pranii in tuberculous pericarditis. N Engl J Med 371, 1121–1130.
Mduluza T, Midzi N, Duruza D, and Ndebele P. (2013). Maintaining respect and fairness in the usage of stored shared specimens. BMC Med Ethics 14, 57.
Mello MM, and Wolf LE. (2010). The Havasupai Indian Tribe Case—Lessons for research involving stored biological samples. N Engl J Med 363, 204–207.
Misra N, and Panda PK. (2013). In search of actionable targets for agrigenomics and microalgal biofuel production: Sequence-structural diversity studies on algal and higher plants with a focus on GPAT protein. OMICS 17, 173–186.
Mosse D. (2005). Cultivating development an ethnography of aid policy and practice. London, Pluto Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx. Last access: Nov. 10, 2014.
Nienaber A. (2011). Consent to and authorisation of the export and use of human biological specimens for future research—Perspectives from three African countries. Compar Intl Law J Southern Africa 44, 225–254.
Pang T. (2011). Developing medicines in line with global public health needs: The role of the World Health Organization. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 20, 290–297.
Rajan KS. (2006). Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life. Durham: Duke University Press.
Rajan KS. (2013). Questions of critique for big biology: Conjuncture, agency and the global postcolonial. BioSocieties 8, 486–490.
Sen A. (1985). Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1985.
Staunton C, and Moodley K. (2013). Challenges in biobank governance in Sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Med Ethics 14, 35.
Suresh S. (2012). Cultivating global science. Science 336, 959.
Vivar JC, Pemu P, McPherson R, and Ghosh S. (2013). Redundancy control in pathway databases (ReCiPa): An application for improving gene-set enrichment analysis in Omics studies and “Big data” biology. OMICS 17, 414–422.
Wang P, and Chen Z. (2013). Traditional Chinese medicine ZHENG and Omics convergence: A systems approach to post-genomics medicine in a global world. OMICS 17, 451–459.
Warner AW, Bhathena A, Gilardi S, et al. (2011). Challenges in obtaining adequate genetic sample sets in clinical trials: The perspective of the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89, 529–536.
Winickoff DE. (2007). Partnership in U.K. Biobank: A third way for genomic property? J Law Med Ethics 35, 440–456.
Wonkam A, Kenfack MA, Muna WFT, and Ouwe-Missi-Oukem-Boyer O. (2011). Ethics of human genetic studies in Sub-Saharan Africa: The case of Cameroon through a bibliometric analysis. Develop World Bioethics 11, 120–127.
Wright GE, Koornhof PG, Adeyemo AA, and Tiffin N. (2013). Ethical and legal implications of whole genome and whole exome sequencing in African populations. BMC Med Ethics 28, 14–21.
Wynne B. (2010). Strange weather, again: Climate science as political art In: Theory Culture Soc 27, 289–305.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology
Volume 18 • Issue Number 12 • December 2014
Pages: 733 - 739
PubMed: 25454511
Copyright
Copyright 2014, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
History
Published online: 2 December 2014
Published in print: December 2014
Topics
Authors
Author Disclosure Statement
No funding was received in support of this interdisciplinary socio-technical analysis and review article.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Get Access
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.