Research Article
No access
Published Online: 8 June 2023

SoRSS: A Soft Robot for Bio-Mimicking Stomach Anatomy and Motility

Publication: Soft Robotics
Volume 10, Issue Number 3

Abstract

A human stomach is an organ in the digestive system that breaks down foods by physiological digestion, including mechanical and chemical functions. The mechanical function is controlled by peristaltic waves generated over the stomach body, known as antral contraction waves (ACW). The stomach's physiological digestion is essential to sustain nutrition and health in humans. Replicating the digestion process in a robot provides a test environment as an alternative solution to in vivo testing, which is difficult in practice. Stomach robots made of rigid rods and metal cylinders are unrealistic replicas to contract and expand like biological examples. With soft robotics technology, it is possible to translate biological behavior into an engineering context. Soft robotics introduce potential methods to replicate peristaltic waves and achieve a soft-bodied stomach simulator. This work presents a soft robotic stomach simulator's (SoRSS) concept, design, and experimental validation. A pneumatic bellows actuation for linear elongation and a ring of bellows actuation for circular contraction are proposed first. Multi-ring actuators are then arranged to form an SoRSS that generates ACW and antral contracting pressure (ACP). The SoRSS satisfies the specification of human stomach anatomy and motility and finally undergoes experimental validation using videofluoroscopy with the outcomes presenting the ACW, ACP, and the digestion phases during the actuation process. Those are compared with other medical studies to validate SoRSS functionality.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1. Rus D, Tolley MT. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature 2015;521:467–475.
2. Roche ET, Horvath MA, Wamala I, et al. Soft robotic sleeve supports heart function. Sci Transl Med 2017;9(373):aaf3925.
3. Bhattacharya D, Ali SJ, Cheng LK, et al. RoSE: A robotic soft esophagus for endoprosthetic stent testing. Soft Robot 2021;8(4):397–415.
4. Condino S, Harada K, Pak NN, et al. Stomach simulator for analysis and validation of surgical endoluminal robots. Appl Bionics Biomech 2011;8(2):267–277.
5. Guerra A, Etienne-Mesmin L, Livrelli V, et al. Relevance and challenges in modeling human gastric and small intestinal digestion. Trends Biotechnol 2012;30(11):591–600.
6. Alminger M, Aura A, Bohn T, et al. In vitro models for studying secondary plant metabolite digestion and bioaccessibility. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2014;13(4):413–436.
7. Dupont D, Alric M, Blanquet-Diot S, et al. Can dynamic in vitro digestion systems mimic the physiological reality? Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2019;59(10):1546–1562.
8. Brouwers J, Anneveld B, Goudappel G, et al. Food-dependent disintegration of immediate release fosamprenavir tablets: In vitro evaluation using magnetic resonance imaging and a dynamic gastrointestinal system. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2011;77(2):313–319.
9. Blanquet-Diot S, Denis S, Chalancon S, et al. Use of artificial digestive systems to investigate the biopharmaceutical factors influencing the survival of probiotic yeast during gastrointestinal transit in humans. Pharm Res 2012;29(6):1444–1453.
10. Hu W, Lum GZ, Mastrangeli M, et al. Small-scale soft-bodied robot with multimodal locomotion. Nature 2018;554(7690):81–85.
11. Alighaleh S, Cheng LK, Angeli TR, et al. A novel gastric pacing device to modulate slow waves and assessment by high-resolution mapping. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2019;66(10):2823–2830.
12. Mintchev MP, Sanmiguel CP, Otto SJ, et al. Microprocessor controlled movement of liquid gastric content using sequential neural electrical stimulation. Gut 1998;43(5):607–611.
13. O'Grady G, Du P, Cheng LK, et al. Origin and propagation of human gastric slow-wave activity defined by high-resolution mapping. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2010;299(3):G585–G592.
14. Schulze K. Imaging and modelling of digestion in the stomach and the duodenum. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2006;18(3):172–183.
15. Kong F, Singh RP. Disintegration of solid foods in human stomach. J Food Sci 2008;73(5):R67–R80.
16. Schuster MM, Crowell MD, Koch KL. Schuster atlas of gastrointestinal motility in health and disease. PMPH-USA 2002;18(5):485–486.
17. Li Y, Fortner L, Kong F. Development of a gastric simulation model (GSM) incorporating gastric geometry and peristalsis for food digestion study. Int Food Res J 2019;125:108598.
18. Pal A, Indireshkumar K, Schwizer W, et al. Gastric flow and mixing studied using computer simulation. Proc Royal Soc B 2004;271(1557):2587–2594.
19. Kong F, Singh RP. A human gastric simulator (HGS) to study food digestion in human stomach. J Food Sci 2010;75(9):E627–E635.
20. Kwiatek MA, Steingoetter A, Pal A, et al. Quantification of distal antral contractile motility in the healthy human stomach with magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24(5):1101–1109.
21. Hashem R, Stommel M, Cheng LK, et al. Design and characterization of a bellows-driven soft pneumatic actuator. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron 2020;26(5)2327–2338;
22. Dang Y, Liu Y, Hashem R, et al. SoGut: A soft robotic gastric simulator. Soft Robot 2021;8(3):273–283.
23. Hashem R, Xu W, Stommel M, et al. Conceptualisation and specification of a biologically-inspired, soft-bodied gastric robot. In: 2016 23rd International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice (M2VIP). Nanjing, China: IEEE; 2016; pp. 1–6.
24. Mercuri A, Passalacqua A, Wickham MS, et al. The effect of composition and gastric conditions on the self-emulsification process of ibuprofen-loaded self-emulsifying drug delivery systems: A microscopic and dynamic gastric model study. Pharm Res 2011;28(7):1540–1551.
25. Vardakou M, Mercuri A, Barker SA, et al. Achieving antral grinding forces in biorelevant in vitro models: Comparing the USP dissolution apparatus II and the dynamic gastric model with human in vivo data. AAPS Pharmscitech 2011;12(2):620–626.
26. Barker R, Abrahamsson B, Kruusmägi M. Application and validation of an advanced gastrointestinal in vitro model for the evaluation of drug product performance in pharmaceutical development. J Pharm Sci 2014;103(11):3704–3712.
27. Blanquet S, Zeijdner E, Beyssac E, et al. A dynamic artificial gastrointestinal system for studying the behavior of orally administered drug dosage forms under various physiological conditions. Pharm Res 2004;21(4):585–591.
28. Hashem R, Kazemi S, Stommel M, et al. A biologically inspired ring-shaped soft pneumatic actuator for large deformations. Soft Robot 2022;9(4):807–819;
29. Dang Y, Stommel M, Cheng LK, et al. A soft ring-shaped actuator for radial contracting deformation: Design and modeling. Soft Robot 2019;6(4):444–454.
30. Du P, O'Grady G, Cheng LK, et al. A multiscale model of the electrophysiological basis of the human electrogastrogram. Biophys J 2010;99(9):2784–2792.
31. Ferrua MJ, Singh RP. Understanding the fluid dynamics of gastric digestion using computational modeling. Procedia Food Sci 2011;1:1465–1472.
32. Ehrlein HJ, Schemann M. Gastrointestinal Motility. Technische Universität München: Munich; 2005; pp. 1–26.
33. Jarrett KE, Glasgow RE. Normal gastric motility. In: Gastroparesis. Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2020; pp. 3–20.
34. Steele CM, Van Lieshout PH. Influence of bolus consistency on lingual behaviours in sequential swallowing. Dysphagia 2004;19(3):192–206.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Soft Robotics
Soft Robotics
Volume 10Issue Number 3June 2023
Pages: 504 - 516
PubMed: 36346277

History

Published online: 8 June 2023
Published in print: June 2023
Published ahead of print: 7 November 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Topics

Authors

Affiliations

Ryman Hashem
Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Shahab Kazemi
Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Riddet Institute Centre of Research Excellence (CoRE), Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Martin Stommel
Riddet Institute Centre of Research Excellence (CoRE), Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Leo K. Cheng
Riddet Institute Centre of Research Excellence (CoRE), Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Weiliang Xu [email protected]
Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Riddet Institute Centre of Research Excellence (CoRE), Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Notes

Address correspondence to: Weiliang Xu, Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, The University of Auckland, 20 Symonds Street, Auckland 1142, New Zealand [email protected]

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Funding Information

The research was supported in part by the Riddet Institute Centre of Research Excellence (CoRE), New Zealand.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top