Octopus-Inspired Muscular Hydrostats Powered By Twisted and Coiled Artificial Muscles
Abstract
Traditional robots are characterized by rigid structures, which restrict their range of motion and their application in environments where complex movements and safe human–robot interactions are required. Soft robots inspired by nature and characterized by soft compliant materials have emerged as an exciting alternative in unstructured environments. However, the use of multicomponent actuators with low power/weight ratios has prevented the development of truly bioinspired soft robots. Octopodes' limbs contain layers of muscular hydrostats, which provide them with a nearly limitless range of motions. In this work, we propose octopus-inspired muscular hydrostats powered by an emerging class of artificial muscles called twisted and coiled artificial muscles (TCAMs). TCAMs are fabricated by twisting and coiling inexpensive fibers, can sustain stresses up to 60 MPa, and provide tensile strokes of nearly 50% with <0.2 V/cm of input voltage. These artificial muscles overcome the limitations of other actuators in terms of cost, power, and portability. We developed four different configurations of muscular hydrostats with TCAMs arranged in different orientations to reproduce the main motions of octopodes' arms: shortening, torsion, bending, and extension. We also assembled an untethered waterproof device with on-board control, sensing, actuation, and a power source for driving our hydrostats underwater. The proposed TCAM-powered muscular hydrostats will pave the way for the development of compliant bioinspired robots that can be used to explore the underwater world and perform complex tasks in harsh and dangerous environments.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1. Majidi C. Soft robotics: A perspective—Current trends and prospects for the future. Soft Robot 2013;1(1):5–11.
2. Lee C, Kim M, Kim YJ, et al. Soft robot review. Int J Control Autom Syst 2017;15(1):3–15.
3. Laschi C, Mazzolai B, Cianchetti M. Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities. Sci Robot 2016;1(1):eaah3690.
4. Lipson H. Challenges and opportunities for design, Simulation, and fabrication of soft robots. Soft Robot 2013;1(1):21–27.
5. Ren L, Li B, Wei G, et al. Biology and bioinspiration of soft robotics: Actuation, sensing, and system integration. iScience 2021;24(9):103075.
6. Hochner B. An embodied view of octopus neurobiology. Curr Biol 2012;22(20):R887–R892;.
7. Kier WM, Stella MP. The arrangement and function of octopus arm musculature and connective tissue. J Morphol 2007;268(10):831–843;.
8. Cianchetti M, Follador M, Mazzolai B, et al. Design and development of a soft robotic octopus arm exploiting embodied intelligence. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Saint Paul, MN, USA, 2012; pp. 5271–5276.
9. Laschi C, Mazzolai B, Mattoli V, et al. Design of a biomimetic robotic octopus arm. Bioinspir Biomim 2009;4(1):015006.
10. Margheri L, Ponte G, Mazzolai B, et al. Non-invasive study of Octopus vulgaris arm morphology using ultrasound. J Exp Biol 2011;214(22):3727–3731.
11. Levy G, Hochner B. Embodied organization of Octopus vulgaris morphology, vision, and locomotion. Front Physiol 2017;8:164.
12. Kier WM, Smith AM. The morphology and mechanics of octopus suckers. Biol Bull 1990;178(2):126–136.
13. Hanlon RT, Messenger JB. Cephalopod Behaviour, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 2018.
14. Mather JA. How do octopuses use their arms? J Comp Psychol 1998;112(3):306–316.
15. Kier WM, Smith KK. Tongues, tentacles and trunks: The biomechanics of movement in muscular-hydrostats. Zool J Linn Soc 1985;83(4):307–324.
16. Cianchetti M, Calisti M, Margheri L, et al. Bioinspired locomotion and grasping in water: The soft eight-arm OCTOPUS robot. Bioinspir Biomim 2015;10(3):35003.
17. Grissom MD, Chitrakaran V, Dienno D, et al. Design and experimental testing of the OctArm soft robot manipulator. ProcSPIE 2006;2:62301F.1–62301F.10.
18. McMahan W, Chitrakaran V, Csencsits M, et al. Field trials and testing of the OctArm continuum manipulator. In: Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006 ICRA 2006; 2006; pp. 2336–2341.
19. Cianchetti M, Ranzani T, Gerboni G, et al. Soft robotics technologies to address shortcomings in today's minimally invasive surgery: The STIFF-FLOP Approach. Soft Robot 2014;1(2):122–131.
20. Li WY, Nabae H, Endo G, Suzumori K. New soft robot hand configuration with combined biotensegrity and thin artificial muscle. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 2020;5(3):4345–4351.
21. Greco C, Kotak P, Pagnotta L, Lamuta C. The evolution of mechanical actuation: From conventional actuators to artificial muscles. Int Mater Rev 2022;67(6):575–619.
22. Cianchetti M, Licofonte A, Follador M, et al. Bioinspired soft actuation system using shape memory alloys. Actuators 2014;3:226–244.
23. Zhang L, Xu M, Yang H. Research on soft manipulator actuated by shape memory alloy (SMA) springs. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Real-time Computing and Robotics (RCAR); 2017; pp. 74–78.
24. Ye T, Wang Y, Xu S, et al. Modeling and motion control of an octopus-like flexible manipulator actuated by shape memory alloy wires. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2021;33(1):3–16.
25. Zheng T, Yang Y, Branson DT, et al. Control design of shape memory alloy based multi-arm continuum robot inspired by octopus. In: 2014 9th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications; 2014; pp. 1108–1113.
26. Laschi C, Mazzolai B, Mattoli V, et al. Design and development of a soft actuator for a robot inspired by the octopus arm. In: Experimental Robotics. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, Vol 54. (Khatib O, Kumar V, Pappas GJ. eds.) Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg; 2008; pp. 25–33.
27. Follador M, Tramacere F, Mazzolai B. Dielectric elastomer actuators for octopus inspired suction cups. Bioinspir Biomim 2014;9(4):46002.
28. Anderson IA, Gisby TA, McKay TG, et al. Multi-functional dielectric elastomer artificial muscles for soft and smart machines. J Appl Phys 2012;112(4):41101.
29. Doi T, Wakimoto S, Suzumori K, Mori K. Proposal of flexible robotic arm with thin McKibben actuators mimicking octopus arm structure. In: 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2016; pp. 5503–5508.
30. Yamane S, Wakimoto S. Development of a flexible manipulator with changing stiffness by granular jamming. In: 2017 24th International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice (M2VIP); 2017; pp. 1–5.
31. Guglielmino E, Tsagarakis N, Caldwell DG. An octopus anatomy-inspired robotic arm. In: 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems; 2010; pp. 3091–3096.
32. Furukawa S, Wakimoto S, Kanda T, Hagihara H. A soft master-slave robot mimicking octopus arm structure using thin artificial muscles and wire encoders. Actuators 2019;8:40.
33. Walker J, Zidek T, Harbel C, et al. Soft robotics: A review of recent developments of pneumatic soft actuators. Actuators 2020;9:3.
34. Mohd Jani J, Leary M, Subic A, Gibson MA. A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities. Mater Des 2014;56:1078–1113.
35. Guo Y, Liu L, Liu Y, Leng J. Review of dielectric elastomer actuators and their applications in soft robots. Adv Intell Syst 2021;3(10):2000282.
36. Jing Y, Su F, Yu X, et al. Advances in artificial muscles: A brief literature and patent review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2023;11:1083857.
37. Jiao Z, Zhang C, Wang W, et al. Advanced artificial muscle for flexible material-based reconfigurable soft robots. Adv Sci 2019;6(21):1901371.
38. Haines CS, Lima MD, Li N, et al. Artificial muscles from fishing line and sewing thread. Science (80-) 2014;343(6173):868–872.
39. Mirvakili SM, Rafie Ravandi A, Hunter IW, et al. Simple and strong: twisted silver painted nylon artificial muscle actuated by Joule heating. Electroact Polym Actuat Dev 2014;9056:90560I.
40. Leng X, Hu X, Zhao W, et al. Recent advances in twisted-fiber artificial muscles. Adv Intell Syst 2021;3(5):2000185.
41. Haines CS, Li N, Spinks GM, et al. New twist on artificial muscles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016;113(42):11709–11716.
42. Kotak P, Wilken JM, Anderson KM, Lamuta C. Carbon fiber-based twisted and coiled artificial muscles (TCAMs) for powered ankle-foot orthoses. J Biomech Eng 2021;144(1):014501.
43. Lamuta C. Perspective on highly twisted artificial muscles. Appl Phys Lett 2023;122(4):40502.
44. Lamuta C, Messelot S, Tawfick S. Theory of the tensile actuation of fiber reinforced coiled muscles. Smart Mater Struct 2018;27(5):1–13.
45. Giovinco V, Kotak P, Cichella V, et al. Dynamic model for the tensile actuation of thermally and electro-thermally actuated twisted and coiled artificial muscles (TCAMs). Smart Mater Struct 2019;29(2):25004.
46. Kotak P, Weerakkody T, Lamuta C. Physics-based dynamic model for the electro-thermal actuation of bio-inspired twisted spiral artificial muscles (TSAMs). Polymer (Guildf) 2021;222:123642.
47. Lamuta C, He H, Zhang K, et al. Digital texture voxels for stretchable morphing skin applications. Adv Mater Technol 2019;4(8):2–7.
48. Martínez J, Dumas J, Lefebvre S. Procedural voronoi foams for additive manufacturing. ACM Trans Graph 2016;35(4):1–12.
49. Hammond M, Cichella V, Weerakkody T, Lamuta C. Robust and adaptive sampled-data control of twisted and coiled artificial muscles. IEEE Control Syst Lett 2022;6:1232–1237.
50. Weerakkody TH, Hammond M, Neilan JH, et al. Modeling and control of twisted and coiled artificial muscles for soft robotics. Meccanica 2023;58(4):643–658.
51. Brekkevold M. 2009. Available from: https://www.flickr.com/photos/lunkwill42/3658339290/in/album-72157625550234751 [Last accessed: May 2, 2023].
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.
History
Published online: 20 June 2024
Published in print: June 2024
Published ahead of print: 16 November 2023
Topics
Authors
Authors' Contributions
P.K., S.M., and C.L. conceived the idea and designed the experiments. P.K. and S.M. manufactured and modeled the hydrostats. T.W. developed the control algorithm and untethered power unit for the hydrostats. P.K., S.M., and T.W. designed and manufactured the Rube Goldberg setup. V.C. supervised the development and implementation of the control algorithm. All authors contributed to writing the article. C.L. supervised the research.
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Funding Information
Funding for this study was received from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Young Faculty Award grant W911NF2110344-0011679424 (C.L.); Office of Naval Research Young Investigator Program grant N00014-23-1-2116 (C.L.); and the Iowa NASA Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research subaward 025372A from the Iowa State University (C.L.).
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Get Access
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.