Research Article
No access
Published Online: 1 August 2017

Advances in Application of Mechanical Stimuli in Bioreactors for Cartilage Tissue Engineering

Publication: Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews
Volume 23, Issue Number 4

Abstract

Articular cartilage (AC) is the weight-bearing tissue in diarthroses. It lacks the capacity for self-healing once there are injuries or diseases due to its avascularity. With the development of tissue engineering, repairing cartilage defects through transplantation of engineered cartilage that closely matches properties of native cartilage has become a new option for curing cartilage diseases. The main hurdle for clinical application of engineered cartilage is how to develop functional cartilage constructs for mass production in a credible way. Recently, impressive hyaline cartilage that may have the potential to provide capabilities for treating large cartilage lesions in the future has been produced in laboratories. The key to functional cartilage construction in vitro is to identify appropriate mechanical stimuli. First, they should ensure the function of metabolism because mechanical stimuli play the role of blood vessels in the metabolism of AC, for example, acquiring nutrition and removing wastes. Second, they should mimic the movement of synovial joints and produce phenotypically correct tissues to achieve the adaptive development between the micro- and macrostructure and function. In this article, we divide mechanical stimuli into three types according to forces transmitted by different media in bioreactors, namely forces transmitted through the liquid medium, solid medium, or other media, then we review and summarize the research status of bioreactors for cartilage tissue engineering (CTE), mainly focusing on the effects of diverse mechanical stimuli on engineered cartilage. Based on current researches, there are several motion patterns in knee joints; but compression, tension, shear, fluid shear, or hydrostatic pressure each only partially reflects the mechanical condition in vivo. In this study, we propose that rolling–sliding–compression load consists of various stimuli that will represent better mechanical environment in CTE. In addition, engineers often ignore the importance of biochemical factors to the growth and development of engineered cartilage. In our point of view, only by fully considering synergistic effects of mechanical and biochemical factors can we find appropriate culture conditions for functional cartilage constructs. Once again, rolling–sliding–compression load under appropriate biochemical conditions may be conductive to realize the adaptive development between the structure and function of engineered cartilage in vitro.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Grogan S.P., Creighton L., and Lotz M.K. Mesenchymal progenitor cell markers in human articular cartilage: normal distribution and changes in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 11, 1, 2009.
2.
Bernhard J.C., and Vunjak-Novakovic G. Should we use cells, biomaterials, or tissue engineering for cartilage regeneration? Stem Cell Res Ther 7, 56, 2016.
3.
Dumont S., and Prakash M. Emergent mechanics of biological structures. Mol Biol Cell 25, 3461, 2014.
4.
Guilak F., Butler D.L., Goldstein S.A., and Baaijens F.P. Biomechanics and mechanobiology in functional tissue engineering. J Biomech 47, 1933, 2014.
5.
Wong M., and Carter D.R. Articular cartilage functional histomorphology and mechanobiology: a research perspective. Bone 33, 1, 2003.
6.
Responte D.J., Lee J.K., Hu J.C., and Athanasiou K.A. Biomechanics-driven chondrogenesis: from embryo to adult. FASEB J 26, 3614, 2012.
7.
Luria A., and Chu C.R. Articular cartilage changes in maturing athletes: new targets for joint rejuvenation. Sports Health 6, 18, 2014.
8.
Roddy K.A., Prendergast P.J., and Murphy P. Mechanical influences on morphogenesis of the knee joint revealed through morphological, molecular and computational analysis of immobilised embryos. PLoS One 6, 811, 2011.
9.
O'Conor C.J., Case N., and Guilak F. Mechanical regulation of chondrogenesis. Stem Cell Res Ther 4, 1, 2013.
10.
Zhao J., Griffin M., Cai J., Li S., Bulter P.E.M., and Kalaskar D.M. Bioreactors for tissue engineering: an update. Biochem Eng J 109, 268, 2016.
11.
Van der Meulen M.C., and Huiskes R. Why mechanobiology? A survey article. J Biomech 35, 401, 2002.
12.
Mabvuure N., Hindocha S., and Khan W.S. The role of bioreactors in cartilage tissue engineering. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 7, 287, 2012.
13.
Madeira C., Santhagunam A., Salgueiro J.B., and Cabral J.M.S. Advanced cell therapies for articular cartilage regeneration. Trends Biotechnol 33, 35, 2015.
14.
Shafa M., Sjonnesen K., Yamashita A., Liu S., Michalak M., Kallos M.S., and Rancourt D.E. Expansion and long-term maintenance of induced pluripotent stem cells in stirred suspension bioreactors. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 6, 462, 2012.
15.
Li B., Wang X., Wang Y., Gou W., Yuan X., Peng J., Guo Q., and Lu S. Past, present, and future of microcarrier-based tissue engineering. J Orthop Translat 3, 51, 2015.
16.
Hoenig E., Leicht U., Winkler T., Mielke G., Beck K., Peters F., Schilling A.F., and Morlock M.M. Mechanical properties of native and tissue-engineered cartilage depend on carrier permeability: a bioreactor study. Tissue Eng Part A 19, 1534, 2013.
17.
Green J.D., Dougherty V.T.M., Yan Z., Yin L., Ye J., Collier Z., Mohammed M.K., Haydon R.C., Luu H.H., Kang R., Lee M.J., Ho S.H., He T.C., Shi L.L., and Athiviraham A. Multifaceted signaling regulators of chondrogenesis: implications in cartilage regeneration and tissue engineering. Genes Dis 2, 307, 2015.
18.
Bastiaansen-Jenniskens Y.M., de Bart A.C.W., Koevoet W., Jansen K.M.B., Verhaar J.A.N., van Osch G.J.V.M., and DeGroot J. Elevated levels of cartilage oligomeric matrix protein during in vitro cartilage matrix generation decrease collagen fibril diameter. Cartilage 1, 200, 2010.
19.
Wu M.H., Wang H.Y., Liu H.L., Wang S.S., Liu Y.T., Chen Y.M., Tsai S.W., and Lin C.L. Development of high-throughput perfusion-based microbioreactor platform capable of providing tunable dynamic tensile loading to cells and its application for the study of bovine articular chondrocytes. Biomed Microdevices 13, 789, 2011.
20.
Nims R.J., Cigan A.D., Durney K.M., Jones B.K., O'Neill J.D., Law W.A., Vunjak-Novakovic G., Hung C.T., and Ateshian G.A. Constrained cage culture improves engineered cartilage functional properties by enhancing collagen network stability. Tissue Eng Part A [Epub ahead of print];, 2017.
21.
Ng J., Wei Y., Zhou B., Burapachaisri A., Guo E., and Vunjak-Novakovic G. Extracellular matrix components and culture regimen selectively regulate cartilage formation by self-assembling human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro and in vivo. Stem Cell Res Ther 7, 183, 2016.
22.
Cigan A.D., Roach B.L., Nims R.J., Tan A.R., Albro M.B., Stoker A.M., Cook J.L., Vunjak-Novakovic G., Hung C.T., and Ateshian G.A. High seeding density of human chondrocytes in agarose produces tissue-engineered cartilage approaching native mechanical and biochemical properties. J Biomech 49, 1909, 2016.
23.
Moutos F.T., Glass K.A., Compton S.A., Ross A.K., Gersbach C.A., Guilak F., and Estes B.T. Anatomically shaped tissue-engineered cartilage with tunable and inducible anticytokine delivery for biological joint resurfacing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113, E4513, 2016.
24.
Grad S., Eglin D., Alini M., and Stoddart M.J. Physical stimulation of chondrogenic cells in vitro: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469, 2764, 2011.
25.
Decroos A.J.N., Petrera M., Park S., Kandel R.A., and Theodoropoulos J.S. Mechanical stimulation enhances integration in an in vitro model of cartilage repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24, 2055, 2016.
26.
Oragui E., Nannaparaju M., and Khan W.S. The role of bioreactors intissue engineering for musculoskeletal applications. Open Orthop J 5, 267, 2011.
27.
Vunjaknovakovic G., and Scadden D.T. Biomimetic platforms for human stem cell research. Cell Stem Cell 8, 252, 2011.
28.
Vunjak-Novakovic G., Martin I., Obradovic B., Treppo S., Grodzinsky A.J., Langer R., and Freed L.E. Bioreactor cultivation conditions modulate the composition and mechanical properties of tissue-engineered cartilage. J Orthop Res 17, 130, 1999.
29.
Soltz M.A., and Ateshian G.A. Interstitial fluid pressurization during confinedcompression cyclical loading of articular cartilage. Ann Biomed Eng 28, 150, 2000.
30.
Hall A.C., Urban J.P., and Gehl K.A. The effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrixsynthesis in articular cartilage. J Orthop Res 9, 1, 1991.
31.
Kraft J.J., Jeong C., Novotny J.E., Seacrist T., Chan G., Domzalski M., Turka C.M., Richardson D.W., and Dodge G.R. Effects of hydrostatic loading on a self-aggregating, suspension culture-derived cartilage tissue analog. Cartilage 2, 254, 2011.
32.
Mizuno S. Novel cell culture model using pure hydrostatic pressure and a semipermeable membrane pouch. Cell Transplant 20, 767, 2011.
33.
Heyland J., Wiegandt K., Goepfert C., Nagel-Heyer S., Ilinich E., Schumacher U., and Pörtner R. Redifferentiation of chondrocytes and cartilage formation under intermittent hydrostatic pressure. Biotechnol Lett 28, 1641, 2006.
34.
Correia C., Pereira A.L., Duarte A.R., Frias A.M., Pedro A.J., Oliveira J.T., Sousa R.A., and Reis R.L. Dynamic culturing of cartilage tissue: the significance of hydrostatic pressure. Tissue Eng Part A 18, 1979, 2012.
35.
Tarng Y.W., Huang B.F., and Su F.C. A novel recirculating flow-perfusion bioreactor for periosteal chondrogenesis. Int Orthop 36, 863, 2012.
36.
Waldman S.D., Spiteri C.G., Grynpas M.D., Pilliar R.M., and Kandel R.A. Long-termintermittent shear deformation improves the quality ofcartilaginous tissue formed in vitro. J Orthop Res 21, 590, 2003.
37.
Pei Y., Fan J.J., Zhang X.Q., Zhang Z.Y., and Yu M. Repairing the osteochondral defect in goat with the tissue-engineered osteochondral graft preconstructed in a double chamber stirring bioreactor. Biomed Res Int 2014, 219203, 2014.
38.
Detzel C.J., and Van-Wie B.J. Use of a centrifugal bioreactor for cartilaginous tissue formation from isolated chondrocytes. Biotechnol Prog 27, 451, 2011.
39.
Petri M., Ufer K., Toma I., Becher C., Liodakis E., Brand S., Haas P., Liu C., Richter B., Haasper C., von-Lewinski G., and Jagodzinski M. Effects of perfusion and cyclic compression on in vitro tissue engineered meniscus implants. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20, 223, 2012.
40.
Seidel J.O., Pei M., Gray M.L., Langer R., Freed L.E., and Vunjak-Novakovic G. Long-term culture of tissue engineered cartilage in a perfused chamber with mechanical stimulation. Biorheology 41, 445, 2004.
41.
Bueno E.M., Bilgen B., and Barabino G.A. Hydrodynamic parameters modulate biochemical, histological, and mechanical properties of engineered cartilage. Tissue Eng Part A 15, 773, 2009.
42.
Elder B.D., and Athanasiou K.A. Hydrostatic pressure in articular cartilage tissue engineering: from chondrocytes to tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 15, 43, 2009.
43.
Chen J., Yuan Z., Liu Y., Zheng R., Dai Y., Tao R., Xia H., Liu H., Zhang Z., Zhang W., Liu W., Cao Y., and Zhou G. Improvement of in vitro three-dimensional cartilageregeneration by a novel hydrostatic pressurebioreactor. Stem Cells Transl Med 5, 1, 2016.
44.
Schröder C., Hölzer A., Zhu G., Woiczinski M., and Betz O. A closed loop perfusion bioreactor for dynamic hydrostatic pressure loading and cartilage tissue engineering. J Mech Med Bio 16, 1650025, 2016.
45.
Zhu G., Mayer-Wagner S., Schröder C., Woiczinski M., Blum H., Lavagi I., Krebs S., Redeker J.I., Hölzer A., Jansson V., Betz O., and Müller P.E. Comparing effects of perfusion and hydrostatic pressure on gene profiles of human chondrocyte. J Biotechnol 210, 59, 2015.
46.
Afoke N.Y., Byers P.D., and Hutton W.C. Contact pressures in thehuman hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69, 536, 1987.
47.
Mow V.C., and Wang C.C. Some bioengineering considerations fortissue engineering of articular cartilage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367, 204, 1999.
48.
Von E.R., Adam C., Steinlechner M., Müller-Gerbl M., and Eckstein F. Quantitative determination of joint incongruity andpressure distribution during simulated gait and cartilage thickness in the human hip joint. J Orthop Res 17, 532, 1999.
49.
Chung C., and Burdick J.A. Engineering cartilage tissue. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60, 243, 2008.
50.
Démarteau O., Jakob M., Schäfer D., Heberer M., and Martin I. Development and validation of a bioreactor for physical stimulation of engineered cartilage. Biorheology 40, 331, 2003.
51.
Ng K.W., Mauck R.L., Wang C.C., Kelly T.A., Ho M.M., Chen F.H., Ateshian G.A., and Hung C.T. Duty cycle of deformational loading influences the growth of engineered articular cartilage. Cell Mol Bioeng 2, 386, 2009.
52.
Kuo C.K., and Tuan R.S. Mechanoactive tenogenic differentiation of humanmesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A 14, 1615, 2008.
53.
Connelly J.T., Vanderploeg E.J., Mouw J.K., Wilson C.G., and Levenston M.E. Tensileloading modulates bone marrow stromal cell differentiation and thedevelopment of engineered fibrocartilage constructs. Tissue Eng Part A 16, 1913, 2010.
54.
Baker B.M., Shah R.P., Huang A.H., and Mauck R.L. Dynamic tensile loading improvesthe functional properties of mesenchymal stem cell-laden nanofiber-basedfibrocartilage. Tissue Eng Part A 17, 1445, 2011.
55.
Cashion A.T., Caballero M., Halevi A., Pappa A., Dennis R.G., and van-Aalst J.A. Programmable mechanobioreactor for exploration of the effects of periodic vibratory stimulus on mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Biores Open Access 3, 19, 2014.
56.
Lujan T.J., Wirtz K.M., Bahney C.S., Madey S.M., Johnstone B., and Bottlang M. A novel bioreactor for the dynamic stimulation and mechanical evaluation of multiple tissue-engineered constructs. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 17, 367, 2011.
57.
Li S.T., Liu Y., Zhou Q., Lue R.F., Song L., Dong S.W., Guo P., and Kopjar B. A novel axial-stress bioreactor system combined with a substance exchanger for tissue engineering of 3D constructs. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 20, 205, 2014.
58.
Xu P., Men Y.T., Xu B.S., Yang Q., Lu J., and Zhang C.Q. A new loading device driven by voice coil motor. Appl Mech Mater 391, 250, 2013.
59.
Xu P., Liu H.Y., Men Y.T., Xu B.S., Lu J., and Zhang C.Q. A new type fatigue machine design with high frequency large stroke. Appl Mech Mater 496–500, 1522, 2014.
60.
Li D.W., Zhou Q., Guo P., Song L., and Liu Y. Proliferation of tissue-engineered cartilage cells under compressive stress. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 30, 2530, 2010.
61.
Nebelung S., Gavenis K., Rath B., Tingart M., Ladenburger A., Stoffel M., Zhou B., and Mueller-Rath R. Continuous cyclic compressive loading modulates biological and mechanical properties of collagen hydrogels seeded with human chondrocytes. Biorheology 48, 247, 2011.
62.
Correia V., Panadero J.A., Ribeiro C., Sencadas V., Rocha J.G., Gomez-Ribelles J.L., and Lanceros-Méndez S. Design and validation of a biomechanical bioreactor for cartilage tissue culture. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 15, 471, 2016.
63.
Hoffmann W., Feliciano S., Martin I., de-Wild M., and Wendt D. Novel perfused compression bioreactor system as an in vitro model to investigate fracture healing. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 3, 10, 2015.
64.
Lin W.Y., Chang Y.H., Wang H.Y., Yang T.C., Chiu T.K., Huang S.B., and Wu M.H. The study of the frequency effect of dynamic compressive loading on primary articular chondrocyte functions using a microcell culture system. BioMed Res Int 2014, 164, 2014.
65.
Gharravi A.M., Orazizadeh M., Ansari-Asl K., Banoni S., Izadi S., and Hashemitabar M. Design and fabrication of anatomical bioreactor systems containing alginate scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol 4, 65, 2012.
66.
Gharravi A.M., Orazizadeh M., and Hashemitabar M. Fluid-induced low shear stress improves cartilage like tissue fabrication by encapsulating chondrocytes. Cell Tissue Bank 17, 117, 2016.
67.
Fritton S.P., Mcleod K.J., and Rubin C.T. Quantifying the strain history of bone: spatial uniformity and self-similarity of low-magnitude strains. J Biomech 33, 317, 2000.
68.
Xie L., Jacobson J.M., Choi E.S., Busa B., Donahue L.R., Miller L.M., Rubin C.T., and Judex S. Low-level mechanical vibrations can influence bone resorption and bone formation in the growing skeleton. Bone 39, 1059, 2006.
69.
Reyes M.L., Hernández M., Holmgren L.J., Sanhueza E., and Escobar R.G. High-frequency, low-intensity vibrations increase bone mass and muscle strength in upper limbs, improving autonomy in disabled children. J Bone Miner Res 26, 1759, 2011.
70.
Zhang C., Qiu L., Gao L., Guan Y., Xu Q., Zhang X., and Chen Q. A novel dual-frequency loading system for studying mechanobiology of load-bearing tissue. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 69, 262, 2016.
71.
Zhang C., Zhang B., Gao L., Liu Q., and Dong X. A multi position points cyclic loading bioreactor [China Patent]. CN104152351A, Tianjin University of Technology, 2014.
72.
Stoddart M.J., Ettinger L., and Häuselmann H.J. Enhanced matrix synthesis in de novo, scaffold free cartilage-like tissue exposed to compression and shear. Biotechnol Bioeng 95, 1043, 2006.
73.
Li Z., Yao S., Alini M., and Grad S. Different response of articular chondrocyte subpopulations to surface motion. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 15, 1034, 2007.
74.
Sun M., Lv D., Zhang C., and Zhu L. Culturing functional cartilage tissue under a novel bionic mechanical condition. Med Hypotheses 75, 657, 2010.
75.
Fan Z., Zhang C., Liu H., Xu B., Li J., and Gao L. A novel model for the mass transfer of articular cartilage: rolling depression load device. Commun Comput Info Sci 135, 580, 2011.
76.
Gao J., Zhang C., Liu H., Gao L., Sun M., and Dong X. A roller-loading bioreactor system for researching cartilage mechanobiology. Procedia Environ Sci 8, 197, 2011.
77.
Huang A.H., Baker B.M., Ateshian G.A., and Mauck R.L. Sliding contact loading enhances the tensile properties of mesenchymal stem cell-seeded hydrogels. Eur Cells Mater 24, 29, 2012.
78.
Grad S., Loparic M., Peter R., Stolz M., Aebi U., and Alini M. Sliding motion modulates stiffness and friction coefficient at the surface of tissue engineered cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 20, 288, 2012.
79.
Schätti O., Grad S., Goldhahn J., Salzmann G., Li Z., Alini M., and Stoddart M.J. A combination of shear and dynamic compression leads to mechanically induced chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells. Eur Cells Mater 22, 214, 2011.
80.
Bilgen B., Chu D., Stefani R., and Aaron R.K. Design of a biaxial mechanical loading bioreactor for tissue engineering. J Vis Exp 74, e50387, 2013.
81.
Guo T., Yu L., Lim C.G., Goodley A.S., Xiao X., Placone J.K., Ferlin K.M., Nguyen B.N., Hsieh A.H., and Fisher J.P. Effect of dynamic culture and periodic compression on humanmesenchymal stem cell proliferation and chondrogenesis. Ann Biomed Eng 44, 2103, 2016.
82.
Yusoff N., Abu-Osman N.A., and Pingguan-Murphy B. Design and validation of a bi-axial loading bioreactor for mechanical stimulation of engineered cartilage. Med Eng Phys 33, 782, 2011.
83.
Di-Federico E., Bader D.L., and Shelton J.C. Design and validation of an in vitro loading system for the combined application of cyclic compression and shear to 3D chondrocytes-seeded agarose constructs. Med Eng Phys 36, 534, 2014.
84.
Freed L.E., and Vunjak-Novakovic G. Cultivation of cell-polymer tissue constructs in simulated microgravity. Biotechnol Bioeng 46, 306, 1995.
85.
Emin N., Koç A., Durkut S., Elçin A.E., and Elçin Y.M. Engineering of rat articular cartilage on porous sponges: effects of tgf-beta 1 and microgravity bioreactor culture. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol 36, 123, 2008.
86.
Hsu S.H., Kuo C.C., Whu S.W., Lin C.H., and Tsai C.L. The effect of ultrasound stimulation versus bioreactors on neocartilage formation in tissue engineering scaffolds seeded with human chondrocytes in vitro. Biomol Eng 23, 259, 2006.
87.
Ji Q., and He C. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy promotes chondrogenesis in cartilage tissue engineering: a hypothesis based on previous evidence. Med Hypotheses 91, 9, 2016.
88.
Zhu Y., Song K., Jiang S., Chen J., Tang L., Li S., Fan J., Wang Y., Zhao J., and Liu T. Numerical simulation of mass transfer and three-dimensional fabrication of tissue-engineered cartilages based on chitosan/gelatin hybrid hydrogel scaffold in a rotating bioreactor. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 181, 250, 2017.
89.
Subramanian A., Turner J.A., Budhiraja G., Guha-Thakurta S., Whitney N.P., and Nudurupati S.S. Ultrasonic bioreactor as a platform for studying cellular response. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 19, 244, 2013.
90.
Guha-Thakurta S., Kraft M., Viljoen H.J., and Subramanian A. Enhanced depth-independent chondrocyte proliferation and phenotype maintenance in an ultrasound bioreactor and an assessment of ultrasound dampening in the scaffold. Acta Biomater 10, 4798, 2014.
91.
Wang J., Tang N., Xiao Q., Zhao L., Li Y., Li J., Wang J., Zhao Z., and Tan L. The potential application of pulsed ultrasound on bone defect repair via developmental engineering: an In Vitro Study. Artif Organs 40, 505, 2016.
92.
Ongaro A., Pellati A., Setti S., Masieri F.F., Aquila G., Fini M., Caruso A., and De-Mattei M. Electromagnetic fields counteract IL-1β activity during chondrogenesis of bovine mesenchymal stem cells. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 9, E229, 2015.
93.
Hilz F.M., Ahrens P., Grad S., Alini M.J., Dahmani C., Wilken F.L., Sauerschnig M., Niemeyer P., Zwingmann J., Burgkart R., von-Eisenhart-Rothe R., Südkamp N.P., Weyh T., Imhoff A.B., Alini M., and Salzmann G.M. Influence of extremely low frequency, low energy electromagnetic fields and combined mechanical stimulation on chondrocytes in 3-D constructs for cartilage tissue engineering. Bioelectromagnetics 35, 116, 2014.
94.
Tsai M.T., Li W.J., Tuan R.S., and Chang W.H. Modulation of osteogenesis in human mesenchymal stem cellsby specific pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation. J Orthop Res 27, 1169, 2009.
95.
Brady M.A., Vaze R., Amin H.D., Overby D.R., and Ethier C.R. The design and development of a high-throughput magneto-mechanostimulation device for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 20, 149, 2014.
96.
Wernike E., Li Z., Alini M., and Grad S. Effect of reduced oxygen tension and long-term mechanical stimulation on chondrocyte-polymer construct. Cell Tissue Res 331, 473, 2008.
97.
Schrobback K., Klein T.J., Crawford R., Upton Z., Malda J., and Leavesley D.I. Effects of oxygen and culture system on in vitro propagation and redifferentiation of osteoarthritic human articular chondrocytes. Cell Tissue Res 347, 649, 2012.
98.
Tuan R.S., Chen A.F., and Klatt B.A. Cartilage regeneration. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21, 303, 2013.
99.
Albro M.B., Nims R.J., Durney K.M., Cigan A.D., Shim J.J., Vunjak-Novakovic G., Hung C.T., and Ateshian G.A. Heterogeneous engineered cartilage growth results from gradients of media-supplemented active TGF-β and is ameliorated by the alternative supplementation of latent TGF-β. Biomaterials 77, 173, 2016.
100.
Carmona-Moran C.A., and Wick T.M. Transient growth factor stimulation improves chondrogenesis in static culture and under dynamic conditions in a novel shear and perfusion bioreactor. Cell Mole Bioeng 8, 267, 2015.
101.
Nazempour A., Quisenberry C.R., Van-Wie B.J., and Abu-Lail N.I. Nanomechanics of engineered articular cartilage: synergistic influences of transforming growth factor-β3 and oscillating pressure. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 16, 3136, 2016.
102.
Pohlig F., Guell F., Lenze U., Lenze F.W., Mühlhofer H.M., Schauwecker J., Toepfer A., Mayer-Kuckuk P., von-Eisenhart-Rothe R., Burgkart R., and Salzmann G.M. Hyaluronic acid suppresses the expression ofmetalloproteinases in osteoarthritic cartilagestimulated simultaneously by interleukin 1βand mechanical load. PLoS One 11, e0150020, 2016.
103.
Omata S., Sonokawa S., Sawae Y., and Murakami T. Effects of both vitamin C and mechanical stimulation on improving the mechanical characteristics of regenerated cartilage. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 424, 724, 2012.
104.
Spitters T.W., Leijten J.C., Deus F.D., Costa I.B., van-Apeldoorn A.A., van-Blitterswijk C.A., and Karperien M. A dual flow bioreactor with controlled mechanical stimulation for cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 19, 774, 2013.
105.
Khan A.A., and Surrao D.C. The importance of bicarbonate and nonbicarbonate buffer systems in batch and continuous flow bioreactors for articular cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 18, 358, 2012.
106.
Lin H., Lozito T.P., Alexander P.G., Gottardi R., and Tuan R.S. Stem cell-based microphysiological osteochondral system to modeltissue response to interleukin-1β. Mol Pharm 11, 2203, 2014.
107.
Goepfert C., Blume G., Faschian R., Meyer S., Schirmer C., Müller-Wichards W., Müller J., Fischer J., Feyerabend F., and Pörtne R. A modular flow-chamber bioreactor concept as a tool for continuous 2D- and 3D-cell culture. BMC Proc 7, 87, 2013.
108.
Wang D.S., Men Y.T., Gao L.L., Dong X., Lu J., and Zhang C.Q. A New Multifunctional Bioreactor Based on Linear Motor. Appl Mech Mater 391, 242, 2013.
109.
Hussein H., Williams D.J., and Liu Y. Design modification and optimisation of the perfusion system of a tri-axial bioreactor for tissue engineering. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 38, 1423, 2015.
110.
Wang N., Grad S., Stoddart M.J., Niemeyer P., Südkamp N.P., Pestka J., Alini M., Chen J., and Salzmann G.M. Bioreactor-induced chondrocyte maturation is dependent on cell passage and onset of loading. Cartilage 4, 165, 2013.
111.
Wang N., Grad S., Stoddart M.J., Niemeyer P., Reising K., Schmal H., Südkamp N.P., Alini M., and Salzmann G.M. Particulate cartilage under bioreactor-induced compression and shear. Int Orthop 38, 1105, 2014.
112.
Tonnarelli B., Santoro R., Adelaide-Asnaghi M., and Wendt D. Streamlined bioreactor-based production of human cartilage tissues Eur Cell Mater 31, 382, 2016.
113.
Schon B.S., Hooper G.J., and Woodfield T.B. Modular Tissue Assembly Strategies for Biofabrication of Engineered Cartilage. Ann Biomed Eng 45, 100, 2017.
114.
Iannetti L., D'Urso G., Conoscenti G., Cutrì E., Tuan R.S., Raimondi M.T., Gottardi R., and Zunino P. Distributed and lumped parameter modelsfor the characterization of high throughputbioreactors PLoS One 11, e0162774, 2016.
115.
Zhang Q., Gao L., Xiao P., Zhang C., and Ye J. Finite element analysis on the mechanical behavior of articular cartilage under rolling load. 2014 IEEE Int Conf Mechatronics Autom 2014, 936, 2014.
116.
Qiu L., Xuemei M.A., Gao L., Men Y., and Zhang C. Analysis of the mechanical state of the human knee joint with defect cartilage in standing. J Mech Med Biol 16, 1640021, 2016.
117.
Raimondi M.T., Causin P., Mara A., Nava M., Laganà M., and Sacco R. Breakthroughs in computational modeling of cartilage regeneration in perfused bioreactors. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 58, 3496, 2011.
118.
Gao L.L., Zhang C.Q., Dong L.M., and Jia Y.W. Description of depth-dependent nonlinear viscoelastic behavior for articular cartilage in unconfined compression. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 32, 119, 2012.
119.
Gao L.L., Zhang C.Q., Yang Y.B., Shi J.P., and Jia Y.W. Depth-dependent strain fields of articular cartilage under rolling load by the optimized digital image correlation technique. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 33, 2317, 2013.
120.
Gao L.L., Zhang C.Q., Gao H., Liu Z.D., and Xiao P.P. Depth and rate dependent mechanical behaviors for articular cartilage: experiments and theoretical predictions. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 38, 244, 2014.
121.
Gao L.L., Qin X.Y., Zhang C.Q., Gao H., Ge H.Y., and Zhang X.Z. Ratcheting behavior of articular cartilage under cyclic unconfined compression. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 57, 371, 2015.
122.
Paten J.A., Tilburey G.E., Molloy E.A., Zareian R., Trainor C.V., and Ruberti J.W. Utility of an optically-based, micromechanical system forprinting collagen fibers. Biomaterials 34, 2577, 2013.
123.
Saeidi N., Sander E.A., Zareian R., and Ruberti J.W. Production of highly aligned collagen lamellae by combining shear force andthin film confinement. Acta Biomater 7, 2437, 2011.
124.
Saeidi N., Sander E.A., and Ruberti J.W. Dynamic shear-influenced collagen self-assembly. Biomaterials 30, 6581, 2009.
125.
Cheng X., Gurkan U.A., Dehen C.J., Tate M.P., Hillhouse H.W., Simpson G.J., and Akkus O. An electrochemical fabrication process for the assembly of anisotropically oriented collagen bundles. Biomaterials 29, 3278, 2008.
126.
Chung C.Y., Heebner J., Baskaran H., Welter J.F., and Mansour J.M. Ultrasound elastography for estimation of regional strain of multilayered hydrogels and tissue-engineered cartilage. Ann Biomed Eng 43, 2991, 2015.
127.
Mansour J.M., Gu D.W., Chung C.Y., Heebner J., Althans J., Abdalian S., Schluchter M.D., Liu Y., and Welter J.F. Towards the feasibility of using ultrasound to determine mechanical properties of tissues in a bioreactor. Ann Biomed Eng 42, 2190, 2014.
128.
Crowe J.J., Grant S.C., Logan T.M., and Ma T. A magnetic resonance-compatible perfusion bioreactor system for three-dimensional human mesenchymal stem cell construct development. Chem Eng Sci 66, 4138, 2011.
129.
O'Conor C.J., Leddy H.A., Benefield H.C., Liedtke W.B., and Guilak F. TRPV4-mediated mechanotransduction regulatesthe metabolic response of chondrocytes to dynamic loading. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111, 1316, 2014.
130.
Rotherham M., and El-Haj A.J. Remote activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway using functionalised magnetic particles. PLoS One 10, e0121761, 2015.
131.
Parker E., Vessillier S., Pingguan-Murphy B., Abas W., Bader D.L., and Chowdhury T.T. Low oxygen tension increased fibronectin fragment induced catabolic activities-response prevented with biomechanical signals. Arthritis Res Ther 15, R163, 2013.
132.
Madry H., Kaul G., Zurakowski D., Vunjak-Novakovic G., and Cucchiarini M. Cartilage constructs engineered from chondrocytes overexpressing IGF-I improve the repair of osteochondral defects in a rabbit model. Eur Cell Mater 25, 229, 2013.
133.
Vonk L.A., de-Windt T.S., Slaper-Cortenbach I.C., and Saris D.B. Autologous, allogeneic, induced pluripotent stem cell or a combination stem cell therapy? Where are we headed in cartilage repair and why: a concise review. Stem Cell Res Ther 6, 94, 2015.
134.
Huey D.J., Hu J.C., and Athanasiou K.A. Unlike bone, cartilage regeneration remains elusive. Science 338, 917, 2012.
135.
Caldwell K.L., and Wang J. Cell-based articular cartilage repair: the link between development and regeneration. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 23, 351, 2015.
136.
Makris E.A., Gomoll A.H., Malizos K.N., Hu J.C., and Athanasiou K.A. Repair and tissue engineering techniques for articular cartilage. Nat Rev Rheumatol 11, 21, 2015.
137.
Cucchiarini M., Madry H., Guilak F., Saris D.B., Stoddart M.J., Koon-Wong M., and Roughley P. A vision on the future of articular cartilage repair. Eur Cell Mater 27, 12, 2014.
138.
Nukavarapu S.P., and Dorcemus D.L. Osteochondral tissue engineering: current strategies and challenges. Biotechnol Adv 31, 706, 2013.
139.
Huynh N.P., Anderson B.A., Guilak F., and McAlinden A. Emerging roles for long noncoding RNAs in skeletal biology and disease. Connect Tissue Res 58, 116, 2017.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews
Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews
Volume 23Issue Number 4August 2017
Pages: 399 - 411
PubMed: 28463576

History

Published in print: August 2017
Published online: 1 August 2017
Published ahead of print: 24 May 2017
Published ahead of production: 2 May 2017
Accepted: 20 April 2017
Received: 14 October 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Topics

Authors

Affiliations

Ke Li
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Design and Intelligent Control of the Advanced Mechatronical System, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Chunqiu Zhang
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Design and Intelligent Control of the Advanced Mechatronical System, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Lulu Qiu
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Design and Intelligent Control of the Advanced Mechatronical System, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Lilan Gao
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Design and Intelligent Control of the Advanced Mechatronical System, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China.
Xizheng Zhang
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Design and Intelligent Control of the Advanced Mechatronical System, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China.

Notes

*
This article is part of a special focus issue on Strategic Directions in Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering. Additional articles can be found in Tissue Engineering Part A, volume 23, numbers 15-16.
Address correspondence to:Chunqiu Zhang, PhDTianjin Key Laboratory of the Design and Intelligent Control of the Advanced Mechatronical SystemSchool of Mechanical EngineeringTianjin University of TechnologyTianjin 300384China
E-mail: [email protected]

Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top