Research Article
No access
Published Online: 5 January 2008

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Thyroid Nodules in 900 Patients: Comparison Among Ultrasonographic, Cytological, and Histological Findings

Publication: Thyroid
Volume 17, Issue Number 12

Abstract

Ultrasonography is the most useful tool for detection and evaluation of thyroid nodules. In this study, we present our classification system for ultrasonographic evaluation, which has been routinely performed since 1995. Of 1244 nodules identified by ultrasonography in 900 patients, 1145 nodules demonstrating adequate specimens on fine-needle aspiration biopsy were enrolled in the study. We stratified these nodules into classes 1 to 5 with intermediate steps of 0.5 for classes 2 to 5. Nodules classified as 3.5 or greater were evaluated as malignant, those classified as 3 were evaluated as borderline, and those classified as 2.5 or lower were evaluated as benign. Of 233 nodules evaluated as malignant, 179 (76.8%) were cytologically confirmed as malignant. Furthermore, 145 of 159 nodules (91.2%) classified as 4 or greater were cytologically diagnosed as carcinoma. Of 710 nodules evaluated as benign, 683 (96.1%) were cytologically confirmed as benign. Two hundred fifty-five nodules of 210 patients were surgically resected and pathologically examined. In this series, the positive predictive value of ultrasonographic evaluation of malignancy was 97.2%. These findings suggest that our classification system is simple and useful to facilitate ultrasonographic evaluation of thyroid nodules.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Thyroid®
Thyroid
Volume 17Issue Number 12December 2007
Pages: 1269 - 1276
PubMed: 17988196

History

Published online: 5 January 2008
Published in print: December 2007
Published ahead of print: 8 November 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Topics

Authors

Affiliations

Yasuhiro Ito
Kuma Hospital, 8–2–35, Shimoyamate-dori, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650–0011, Japan.
Nobuyuki Amino
Kuma Hospital, 8–2–35, Shimoyamate-dori, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650–0011, Japan.
Tamotsu Yokozawa
Sakuragaoka Hospital, 13-23 Sakuragaoka-cho, Shimizu-ku, Shizuoka 424-8601, Japan.
Hisashi Ota
Kuma Hospital, 8–2–35, Shimoyamate-dori, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650–0011, Japan.
Maki Ohshita
Kuma Hospital, 8–2–35, Shimoyamate-dori, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650–0011, Japan.
Nao Murata
Kuma Hospital, 8–2–35, Shimoyamate-dori, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650–0011, Japan.
Shinji Morita
Kuma Hospital, 8–2–35, Shimoyamate-dori, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650–0011, Japan.
Kaoru Kobayashi
Kuma Hospital, 8–2–35, Shimoyamate-dori, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650–0011, Japan.
Akira Miyauchi
Kuma Hospital, 8–2–35, Shimoyamate-dori, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650–0011, Japan.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/ePub

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top