Research Article
No access
Published Online: 13 December 2021

Impact of Pediatric Electronic Consultations in a Federally Qualified Health Center

Publication: Telemedicine and e-Health
Volume 27, Issue Number 12

Abstract

Background: Access to pediatric specialty care is a challenge, particularly for medically underserved populations.
Introduction: One evolving method that has shown promise in helping ameliorate this disparity is electronic consultations (e-consults).
Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared two groups: patients referred to pediatric cardiology, endocrinology, or pulmonology from a Federally-Qualified Health Center 10 months before the implementation of an evidence-based care pathway and those referred in the 10 months after implementation. The care pathway included evidence-based referral guidelines for common pediatric diagnoses and an e-consult process. Data included patient demographics, dates of referral requests, appointment dates, e-consult response dates and times, diagnosis codes, and consultants' recommendations.
Results: Twenty-three percent of all referrals made postimplementation were submitted for an e-consult, with 53% preventing an unnecessary face-to-face visit. The most common reason for an e-consult was heart murmur/chest pain for cardiology, short stature for endocrinology, and asthma for pulmonology.
Discussion: Providers used e-consults for nearly one-quarter of all consultations postimplementation, resulting in 17% of consultations not needing a face-to-face visit. The use of e-consults combined with evidence-based referral guidelines provided a useful tool to help front line pediatric primary care providers manage complex problems and identify those not needing to see a specialist in person.
Conclusions: Evidence-based care pathways combined with e-consults can help improve access to pediatric specialty care by reducing demand for in-person visits and allowing more care to be delivered in primary care.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1. Cunningham PJ, May J. Medicaid patients increasingly concentrated among physicians. Data Bull (Cent Stud Health Syst Change) 2006. Available at www.hschange.com/CONTENT/866 (last accessed September 9, 2019).
2. Bisgaier J, Rhodes KV. Auditing access to specialty care for children with public insurance. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2324–2333.
3. Chen AH, Kushel MB, Grumbach K, Yee HF. A safety-net system gains efficiencies through ‘eReferrals’ to specialists. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:969–971.
4. Kim-Hwang JE, Chen AH, Bell DS, Guzman D, Yee HF Jr, Kushel MB. Evaluating electronic referrals for specialty care at a public hospital. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25:1123–1128.
5. Zuckerman KE, Cai X, Perrin JM, Donelan K. Incomplete specialty referral among children in community health centers. J Pediatr 2011;158:24–30.
6. Anderson D, Villagra VG, Coman E, et al. Reduced cost of specialty care using electronic consultations for medicaid patients. Health Affairs 2018;37:2031–2036.
7. Anderson D, Villagra V, Coman EN, Zlateva I, Hutchinson A, Villagra J, Olayiwola JN. A cost-effectiveness analysis of cardiology eConsults for Medicaid patients. Am J Manag Care 2018;24:e9–e16.
8. Vimalananda VG, Orlander JD, Afable MK, et al. Electronic consultations (E-consults) and their outcomes: A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020;27:471–479.
9. Keely E, Liddy C, Afkham A. Utilization, benefits, and impact of an e-consultation service across diverse specialties and primary care providers. Telemed J E Health 2013;19:733–738.
10. Barnett ML, Yee HF, Mehrotra A, Giboney P. Los Angeles safety-net program eConsult system was rapidly adopted and decreased wait times to see specialists. Health Aff (Millwood) 2017;36:492–499.
11. Lai L, Liddy C, Keely E, et al. The impact of electronic consultation on a Canadian tertiary care pediatric specialty referral system: A prospective single-center observational study. PLoS One 2018;13:e0190247.
12. Rea CJ, Wenren LM, Tran KD, et al. Shared care: Using an electronic consult form to facilitate primary care provider–specialty care coordination. Acad Pediatr 2018;18:797–804.
13. Dhruva SS. Implementation of an eConsult system with patient navigation. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2019;30:28–39.
14. Joschko J, Liddy C, Moroz I, Reiche M, Crowe L, Afkham A, Keely E. Just a click away: Exploring patients' perspectives on receiving care through the Champlain BASETM eConsult service. Fam Pract 2018;35:93–98.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health
Volume 27Issue Number 12December 2021
Pages: 1379 - 1384
PubMed: 33719584

History

Published online: 13 December 2021
Published in print: December 2021
Published ahead of print: 12 March 2021
Accepted: 23 December 2020
Received: 11 September 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Topics

Authors

Affiliations

Anthony Porto
Weitzman Institute, Middletown, Connecticut, USA.
Karen Rubin
UConn School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Center for Innovation, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
Kristina Wagner
UConn School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Wei Chang
Weitzman Institute, Middletown, Connecticut, USA.
Giuseppe Macri
Weitzman Institute, Middletown, Connecticut, USA.
Daren Anderson [email protected]
Weitzman Institute, Middletown, Connecticut, USA.

Notes

Address correspondence to: Daren Anderson, MD, Weitzman Institute, 635 Main Street, Middletown, CT 06457, USA [email protected]

Disclosure Statement

A.P. serves as a research consultant for the Community eConsults Network. W.C. and K.W. declare that they have no conflict of interest. K.R. serves as an endocrinologist at Connecticut Children's Specialty Group. G.M. serves as the business integration coordinator for the Community eConsults Network. D.A. is the director of the Community eConsults Network.

Funding Information

No funding was received for this article.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top