Key Considerations in Ensuring a Safe Regional Telehealth Care Model: A Systematic Review
Publication: Telemedicine and e-Health
Volume 28, Issue Number 5
Abstract
Background: This literature review sets out to increase the knowledge on patient safety within the telehealth modality of care, to inform the relevant local health service departments on the key considerations to minimize patient harm.
Methods: A systematic search in Medline and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Google Scholar, and the University of New England (UNE) Library Search was conducted. A combination of key terms “Telehealth” OR “Telecare” OR “Telemedicine” AND “patient safety” AND “rural” was used. Based on the screening and eligibility criteria, 21 peer-reviewed articles published in English between 2015 and 2020 were included in the review.
Results and Discussion: On evaluating the included studies, three main themes and various corresponding subthemes emerged. The main themes were that of telehealth experience (TE), telehealth outcomes (TO), and telehealth risks (TR), with the corresponding subthemes of telehealth experience from a patient perspective (TE-PT), telehealth experience from a carer perspective (TE-CR), telehealth experience from a clinician perspective (TE-CN), positive telehealth (TO-P), and negative telehealth outcomes (TO-N), and patient (TR-PT) and clinician telehealth risks (TR-CN).
Conclusions: The results suggest that patients generally have positive experiences and are accepting telehealth as a modality of care. Furthermore, patient outcomes appear to be comparable with in-person care, with additional benefits of lower costs to both the service and patients.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
REFERENCES
1. Madden N, Emeruwa UN, Friedman AM, et al. Telehealth uptake into prenatal care and provider attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City: A quantitative and qualitative analysis. Am J Perinatol 2020;37:1005–1014.
2. Levine L, Guidry M. Telehealth and Covid-19. Except Parent 2020;50:26–28.
3. Angus D, Connolly M, Salita M. The shift to virtual care in response to COVID-19. 2020. Available at https://www.pwc.com.au/important-problems/coronavirus-covid-19/shift-virtual-care-response.html (last accessed April 24, 2021).
4. World Health Organisation. Patient safety. 2019. Available at https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/patient-safety (last accessed April 24, 2021).
5. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Guide to the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards for community health services. 2015. Available at https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/Guide-to-the-NSQHS-Standards-for-community-health-services-February-2016.pdf (last accessed April 24, 2021).
6. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. National safety and quality health service standards, 2nd ed. 2017. Available at https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-04/National-Safety-and-Quality-Health-Service-Standards-second-edition.pdf (last accessed April 24, 2021).
7. Queensland Health. Evaluation resource guide: Allied health telehealth capacity building project. 2016. Available at https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/451077/telehealth-evalguide.pdf. (last accessed April 24, 2021).
8. Morgan J, Muskett T. Interactional misalignment in the UK NHS111 healthcare telephone triage service. Int J Med Infor 2019;134:104030.
9. Wosik J, Fudim M, Cameron B, et al. Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020;27:957–962.
10. Johannessen TB, Storm M, Holm, AL. Safety for older adults using telecare: Perceptions of homecare professionals. Nurs Open 2019; 6:1254–1261.
11. NSW Health. Strategic review of telehealth in NSW: Final report. 2016. Available at https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/telehealth/Documents/strategic-review-of-telehealth-in-nsw.pdf (last accessed April 24, 2021).
12. NSW Health. Health System Performance Report July 2020. Available at https://internal.health.nsw.gov.au/data/Reports/HSP/July%202020/July_2020.html (last accessed April 24, 2021).
13. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Why the patient's voice is important. (n.d.). Available at https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/indicators-measurement-and-reporting/patient-experience/consumers/why-patients-voice-important#:~:text=Patients%27%20experience%20of%20care%20should,that%20patients%27%20voices%20are%20heard (last accessed April 24, 2021).
14. Brunton L, Bower, Sanders C. The contradictions of telehealth user experience in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): A qualitative meta-synthesis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0139561.
15. Guise V, Anderson J, Wiig S. Patient safety risks associated with telecare: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:588.
16. O'Leary Z. Researching real-world problems: A guide to methods of inquiry. London, England: Sage Publications, 2005.
17. Pickering C, Byrne J. The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. High Educ Res Dev 2014;33:1–15.
18. The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne Library. Databases and planning a search. 2020. Available at https://ww2.rch.org.au/library/docs/fact01.pdf (last accessed April 24, 2021).
19. University of New England. Writing a literature review. (n.d.). Available at https://www.une.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/12177/WE_Writing-a-literature-review.pdf (last accessed April 24, 2021).
20. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009;339:b2700.
21. Aveyard H. Doing a literature review in health and social care: A practical guide. ProQuest Ebook Central, 2010. Available at https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy.une.edu.au (last accessed April 24, 2021).
22. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP qualitative checklist. 2018. Available at https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists (last accessed April 24, 2021).
23. Agency for Clinical Innovation. Improving Patient and Staff Experience Program. (n.d.). Available at https://www.aci.health.nsw.gov.au/resources/patient-experience/programs/ipse#:~:text=The%20Improving%20Patient%20and%20Staff,supported%20intensive%20six%2Dmonth%20program (last accessed April 24, 2021).
24. NSW Health. Strategic Framework for Integrating Care. 2018. Available at https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/integratedcare/Publications/strategic-framework-for-integrating-care.PDF (last accessed April 24, 2021).
25. Purandare L, Hickish T. Acceptability and safety of telemedicine to assess patients before chemotherapy. Can Nurs Pract 2015;14: 20–24.
26. Soegaard-Ballester JM, Scott MF, Owei L, Neylan C, Hanson CW, Morris JB. Patient preference for time-saving telehealth postoperative visits after routine surgery in an urban setting. Surgery 2018;163:672–679.
27. Kyanko K, Hanley K, Zabar S, Joseph J, Bateman W, Schoenthaler A. Introducing primary care telephone visits: An urban safety-net community clinic experience. J Prim Care Community Health 2018;9:1–5.
28. Cook EJ, Randhawa G, Guppy A, et al. Exploring factors that impact the decision to use assistive telecare: Perspectives of family care-givers of older people in the United Kingdom. Ageing Soc 2018;38:1912–1932.
29. Mullen-Fortino M, Rising KL, Duckworth J, Gwynn V, Sites FD, Hollander JE. Presurgical assessment using telemedicine technology: Impact on efficiency, effectiveness, and patient experience of care. Telemed J E Health 2019;25:137–142.
30. Shulver W, Killington M, Crotty M. ‘Massive potential’ or ‘safety risk’? Health worker views on telehealth in the care of older people and implications for successful normalization. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2016;16:1–15.
31. Kayyali R, Hesso I, Mahdi A, Hamzat O, Adu A, Nabhani Gebara S. Telehealth: Misconceptions and experiences of healthcare professionals in England. Int J Pharm Pract 2017;25:203–209.
32. National Quality Forum. Creating a framework to support measure development for telehealth. 2017. Available at https://www.qualityforum.org/Publications/2017/08/Creating_a_Framework_to_Support_Measure_Development_for_Telehealth.aspx (last accessed April 24, 2021).
33. Beard M, Orlando JF, Kumar S. Overcoming the tyranny of distance: An audit of process and outcomes from a pilot telehealth spinal assessment clinic. J Telemed Telecare 2017;23:733–739.
34. Müller KI, Alstadhaug KB, Bekkelund SI. A randomized trial of telemedicine efficacy and safety for nonacute headaches. Neurology 2017;89:153–162.
35. Vesterby MS, Pedersen PU Laursen M, et al. Telemedicine support shortens length of stay after fast-track hip replacement. Acta Orthop 2017;88:41–47.
36. Valdivieso B, García-Sempere A, Sanfélix-Gimeno G, et al. The effect of telehealth, telephone support or usual care on quality of life, mortality and healthcare utilization in elderly high-risk patients with multiple chronic conditions. A prospective study. Med Clín 2018;151:308–314.
37. Nandra K, Koenig G, DelMastro A, Mishler EA, Hollander JE., Yeo CJ. Telehealth provides a comprehensive approach to the surgical patient. Am J Surg 2019;218:476–479.
38. Rademacher NJ, Cole G, Psoter KJ, et al. Use of telemedicine to screen patients in the emergency department: Matched cohort study evaluating efficiency and patient safety of telemedicine. JMIR Med Inform 2019;7:e11233.
39. Der-Martirosian C, Griffin AR, Chu K, Dobalian A. Telehealth at the US department of veterans affairs after Hurricane Sandy. J Telemed Telecare 2019;25:310–317.
40. Ishani A, Christopher J, Palmer D, et al. Telehealth by an interprofessional team in patients with CKD: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2016;68:41–49.
41. Chan C, Inskip JA, Kirkham AR, et al. A smartphone oximeter with a fingertip probe for use during exercise training: Usability, validity and reliability in individuals with chronic lung disease and healthy controls. Physiotherapy 2019; 105:297–306.
42. NSW Health. Enterprise-wide risk management framework. 2015. Available at https://www1.health.nsw.gov.au/pds/ActivePDSDocuments/PD2015_043.pdf (last accessed April 24, 2021).
43. Australian Council on Healthcare Standards. Risk management & quality improvement handbook. 2013. Available at https://www.achs.org.au/media/69305/risk_management_and_quality_improvement_handbook_july_2013.pdf (last accessed April 24, 2021).
44. Warren LEG, Kim MB, Martin NE, Shih HA. Analysis of after-hours patient telephone calls in two academic radiation oncology departments: An opportunity for improvement in patient safety and quality of care. J Oncol Pract 2016;12:487–494.
45. Cole J, Wilkins N, Moss M, Fu D, Carson P, Xiong L. Impact of pharmacist involvement on telehealth transitional care management (TCM) for high medication risk patients. Pharmacy (Basel) 2019;7:158.
46. Clay-Williams R, Baysari M, Taylor N, et al. Service provider perceptions of transitioning from audio to video capability in a telehealth system: A qualitative evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res 2017;17:558.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright 2022, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.
History
Published online: 11 May 2022
Published in print: May 2022
Published ahead of print: 5 May 2021
Accepted: 25 March 2021
Revision received: 25 March 2021
Received: 30 December 2020
Topics
Authors
Authors' Contributions
All authors contributed to the creation of the article. S.H. designed and conceptualized the review, and wrote the draft article. M.S.I. was involved in designing and implementing the project as a supervisor, and read and approved the final article.
Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Funding Information
No funding was received for this review.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Get Access
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.