Research Article
No access
Published Online: 7 February 2024

Patient Satisfaction with Postoperative Telemedicine Versus In-Office Visits Following Primary Hip Arthroscopy: A Prospective Observational Study Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Publication: Telemedicine and e-Health
Volume 30, Issue Number 2

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare satisfaction with postoperative telemedicine visits versus in-office visits among patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy.
Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted involving subjects ≥18 years old undergoing primary hip arthroscopy at a single center from January 2020 to February 2021. Subjects chose between a telemedicine or in-office visit for 6-week follow-up. Patient satisfaction after the 6-week visit was assessed using an electronic survey. The primary outcome was satisfaction on a scale from 0 to 10. Intergroup comparisons of outcomes were performed using Student's t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, or Fisher's exact test. p-Values <0.05 were considered significant.
Results: Seventy-five patients (28M and 47F) were enrolled in the study with mean age 41.2 ± 12.7 years. Forty-four patients (58.7%) attended in-office visits and 31 (41.3%) attended telemedicine visits. There were no significant intergroup differences in age, gender, body mass index, or American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (p > 0.05). There were no significant intergroup differences in satisfaction with overall care (in-office 9.6 vs. telemedicine 9.3, p = 0.08) or the 6-week visit (in-office 9.0 vs. telemedicine 8.0, p = 0.06). The telemedicine group more frequently reported visits taking <20 min (p = 0.002) and spending >10 min with their surgeon (p = 0.01). However, 51.6% of the telemedicine group and 74.7% of the entire cohort expressed a retrospective preference for in-office visits.
Conclusions: There were no significant differences in satisfaction scores between hip arthroscopy patients assigned to telemedicine versus in-office visits for 6-week follow-up, but most patients expressed a preference for in-office visits.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1. Blaeser AM, Mojica ES, Mannino BJ, et al. Return to work after primary hip arthroscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2023;51(5):1340–1346;
2. Parisien RL, Shin M, Constant M, et al. Telehealth utilization in response to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020;28(11):e487–e492;
3. Hurley ET, Haskel JD, Bloom DA, et al. The use and acceptance of telemedicine in orthopedic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemed J E Health 2021;27(6):657–662;
4. Omari AM, Antonacci CL, Zaifman J, et al. Patient satisfaction with orthopedic telemedicine health visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemed J E Health 2022;28(6):806–814;
5. Satin AM, Shenoy K, Sheha ED, et al. Spine patient satisfaction with telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. Global Spine J 2022;12(5):812–819;
6. Bisson LJ, Kluczynski MA, Lindborg CM, et al. The association between patient satisfaction and mode of visit (telemedicine versus in-person) in a large orthopaedic practice during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown: A retrospective study. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2021;5(9):e21.00046; doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00046
7. Wickman J, Ferlotti C, Ferrell J, et al. Implementing video visits into an orthopedic hip arthroscopy practice: A case study. J Hip Preserv Surg 2020;7(4):655–659;
8. Kruse CS, Krowski N, Rodriguez B, et al. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: A systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open 2017;7(8):e016242;
9. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019;95:103208;
10. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42(2):377–381;
11. Sage J. Using S-CAHPS. Bull Am Coll Surg 2013;98(8):53–56.
12. Chaudhry H, Nadeem S, Mundi R. How satisfied are patients and surgeons with telemedicine in orthopaedic care during the COVID-19 pandemic? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021;479(1):47–56;
13. Petersen W, Karpinski K, Backhaus L, et al. A systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021;141(10):1731–1739;
14. Fahey E, Elsheikh MFH, Davey MS, et al. Telemedicine in orthopedic surgery: A systematic review of current evidence. Telemed J E Health 2022;28(5):613–635;
15. Taylor SM, Schwabe MT, Pashos G, et al. Telemedicine for hip preservation patients: Access, ability and preference. Iowa Orthop J 2021;41(2):40–44.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health
Volume 30Issue Number 2February 2024
Pages: 464 - 471
PubMed: 37585554

History

Published online: 7 February 2024
Published in print: February 2024
Published ahead of print: 16 August 2023
Accepted: 12 April 2023
Received: 29 March 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Alexander R. Hoberman
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Anna M. Blaeser
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Guillem Gonzalez-Lomas
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Thomas Youm [email protected]
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.

Notes

Address correspondence to: Thomas Youm, MD, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, 55 E 86th Street, #1A, New York, NY 10028, USA [email protected]

Authors' Contributions

Formal analysis, writing—original draft, and visualization by D.S.S. Formal analysis and writing—original draft by Z.I.L. Investigation and data curation by A.R.H. and A.M.B. Conceptualization, methodology, resources, and supervision by G.G.-L. Conceptualization, methodology, resources, writing—review and editing, supervision, and project administration by T.Y.

Disclosure Statement

T.Y. has received speaker fees, consulting fees, and intellectual property royalties unrelated to this study from Arthrex, Inc. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding Information

No funding was received for this article.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top