Firearm Removal, Judicial Decision-Making, and Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Abstract
Firearms in situations of domestic violence (DV) are particularly lethal. Although firearms present a public health concern nationally, some states, such as Arizona, have especially high rates of intimate partner homicide (IPH). Despite empirical findings that state-level firearm removal policies significantly reduce rates of IPH, little is known about the factors shaping judicial decisions to implement these provisions at the local level. This study analyzes petitioner and judicial decision-making about firearm removal in cases of civil DV protection orders (POs). We use a sample of 580 PO filings from the DV protection order database (Durfee 2019). Petitioners request firearm removal in 49.6% of PO petitions, and judges include state-level firearm removal as a provision in 31.0% of POs that are granted. Of the 580 petitioners who request firearm removal and receive an issued PO, judges grant firearm removal 50.1% of the time. Findings reveal that judges are more likely to grant firearm removal when PO petitions contain mentions of physical violence, threats to kill the petitioner, and allegations that the respondent owns a gun, controlling for all demographics, incidence characteristics, and allegations about the respondent. Furthermore, judges are less likely to grant firearm removal when petitioners allege that the respondent has mental health issues. The results are discussed within the context of judicial discretion and U.S. firearm legislation.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Disclaimer
The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Justice.
References
Arizona Approved Protective Order Forms Administrative Directive Nos.2013–03, 2006–01, 2007. Retrieved from https://www.azcourthelp.org/finder/38-protective-order-form-packet/file.
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3112. Retrieved from https://www.azleg.gov/ars/13/03112.htm
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3601. Retrieved from https://www.azleg.gov/ars/13/03601.htm
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3602(G)(4). Retrieved from https://www.azleg.gov/ars/13/03602.htm
Ariz. Rev. Stat § 13-3623. Retrieved from https://www.azleg.gov/ars/13/03623.htm
Basile S. (2005). A measure of court response to requests for protection. J Fam Violence. 20, 171–179.
Campbell JC, Webster D, Koziol-McLain J, et al. (2003). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multisite case control study. Am J Public Health. 93, 1089–1097.
Carlson MJ, Harris SD, Holden GW. (1999). Protective orders and DV: Risk factors for re-abuse. J Fam Violence. 14, 205–226.
Center for American Progress. (2014). Fact sheet Arizona DV and guns. Retrieved from https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07CAP-DV-AZ.pdf (accessed November 1, 2016).
DeJong C, Burgess-Proctor A. (2006). A summary of personal protection order statutes in the United States. Violence Against Women. 12, 68–88.
Díez C, Kurland RP, Rothman EF, et al. (2017). State intimate partner violence–related firearm laws and intimate partner homicide rates in the United States, 1991 to 2015. Ann Intern Med. 167, 536–543.
Durfee A. (2009). Victim narratives, legal representation, and domestic violence civil protection orders. Fem Criminol. 4, 7–31.
Durfee A. (2011). I'm not a victim, she's an abuser masculinity, victimization, and protection orders. Gend Soc. 25, 316–334.
Durfee A. (2019). Domestic Violence Protection Order Database (DV-POD).
Eigenberg H, McGuffee K, Berry P, Hall WH. (2003). Protective order legislation: Trends in state statutes. J Crim Just. 31, 411–422.
Everytown for Gun Safety. (2015). A Census of Domestic violence Gun Homicides in Arizona. Retrieved from https://everytownresearch.org/documents/2015/09/census-domestic-violence-gun-homicides-arizona.pdf/ (accessed July 7, 2016).
Fleury-Steiner RE, Miller SL, Carcirieri A. (2017). Calling the shots: How family courts address the firearms ban in protection orders. Violence Against Women. 23, 1140–1151.
Frattaroli S, Teret SP. (2006). Understanding and informing policy implementation: A case study of the domestic violence provisions of the Maryland gun violence act. Eval Rev. 30, 347–360.
Glass N, Laughon K, Campbell J, et al. (2008). Non-fatal strangulation is an important risk factor for homicide of women. J Emerg Med. 35, 329–335.
Gondolf EW, McWilliams J, Hart B, Stuehling J. (1994). Court response to petitions for civil protection orders. J Interpers Violence. 9, 503–517.
Harrell A, Smith BE. (1996). Effects of restraining orders on domestic violence victims. In Do Arrests and Restraining Orders Work? ES Buzawa, CG Buzawa, eds. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) pp. 214–242.
Jordan CE, Pritchard AJ, Wilcox P, Duckett-Pritchard D. (2008). The denial of emergency protection: Factors associated with court decision making. Violence Victims. 23, 603–616.
Keilitz SL. (1994). Civil protection orders: A viable justice system tool for deterring domestic violence. Violence Victims. 9, 79–84.
Kingsnorth RF, Wolcott L, Lonnquist K. (2013). The influence of plaintiff gender on the judicial decision to grant civil restraining orders: A replication and analysis. Violence Against Women. 19, 579–601.
Logan TK, Walker R. (2010). Civil protective order effectiveness: Justice or just a piece of paper? Violence Victims. 25, 332–348.
Lucken K, Rosky J, Watkins C. (2014). She said, he said, judge said: Analyzing judicial decision making in civil protection order hearings. J Interpers Violence. 30, 2038–2066.
Lynch KR, Logan TK. (2018). “You better say your prayers and get ready”: Guns within the context of partner abuse. J Interpers Violence. 33, 686.
Messing JT, Campbell JC, Brown S, et al. (2014). The association between protective actions and homicide risk: Findings from the Oklahoma lethality assessment study. Violence Victims. 29, 543.
Messing JT, Vega S, Durfee A. (2016). Protection order use among latina survivors of intimate partner violence. Fem Criminol. 12;.
Muller HJ, Desmarais SL, Hamel JM. (2009). Do judicial responses to restraining order requests discriminate against male victims of domestic violence? J Fam Violence. 24, 625–637.
Richards, T. N., Tudor, A., & Gover, A. R. (2018). An Updated Assessment of Personal Protective Order Statutes in the United States: Have Statutes Become More Progressive in the Past Decade? Violence Against Women, 24(7), 816–842. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801217722237
Vigdor ER, Mercy JA. (2003). Disarming batterers: The impact of domestic violence firearm laws. In Evaluating Gun Policy: Effects on Crime and Violence. J Ludwig, PJ Cook, eds. (Brookings Institute Press, Washington DC) pp. 157–201.
Vigdor ER, Mercy JA. (2006). Do laws restricting access to firearms by domestic violence offenders prevent intimate partner homicide? Eval Rev. 30, 313–346.
Vittes KA, Sorenson SB. (2006). Are temporary restraining orders more likely to be issued when applications mention firearms? Eval Rev. 30, 266–282.
Vittes KA, Webster DW, Frattaroli S, et al. (2013). Removing guns from batterers: Findings from a pilot survey of domestic violence restraining order recipients in California. Violence Against Women. 19, 602–616.
Webster DW, Frattaroli S, Vernick JS, et al. (2010). Women with protective orders report failure to remove firearms from their abusive partners: Results from an exploratory study. J Women's Health. 19, 93–98.
Wintemute GJ, Frattaroli S, Wright MA, Claire BE, et al. (2015). Firearms and the incidence of arrest among respondents to domestic violence restraining orders. Inj Epidemiol. 2, 1–11.
Zeoli AM, Frattaroli S, Roskam K, Herrera A. (2019). Removing firearms from those prohibited from possession by domestic violence restraining orders: A survey and analysis of state laws. Trauma Violence Abuse. 20, 114–125.
Zeoli, A. M., McCourt, A., Buggs, S., Frattaroli, S., Lilley, D., & Webster, D. W. (2018). Analysis of the strength of legal firearms restrictions for perpetrators of domestic violence and their associations with intimate partner homicide. American Journal of Epidemiology, 187(11), 2365–2371.
Zeoli AM, Webster DW. (2010). Effects of domestic violence policies, alcohol taxes and police staffing levels on intimate partner homicide in large US cities. Inj Prev. 16, 90–95.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In

Violence and Gender
Volume 7 • Issue Number 1 • March 2020
Pages: 27 - 32
Copyright
Copyright 2020, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.
History
Published online: 4 March 2020
Published in print: March 2020
Published ahead of print: 23 July 2019
Topics
Authors
Author Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Funding Information
This project was supported by Award No. 2015-IJ-CX- 0013, awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.