Tracking Nemo: Help Scientists Understand Zebrafish Behavior
Abstract
The advent of automated tracking software has significantly reduced the time required to record movement trajectories, thereby facilitating behavioral studies of zebrafish. However, results are substantially influenced by tracking errors, such as loss and misidentification of individuals. In this study, we present the development of an online citizen science platform, Tracking Nemo, to improve data accuracy on swimming trajectories of zebrafish groups. As an online extension of software for tracking the position of zebrafish from video recordings, Tracking Nemo offers volunteers the opportunity to contribute to science by manually correcting tracked trajectory data from their personal computers. Researchers can upload their videos that require human intervention for correcting and validating the data. Citizen scientists can monitor their contributions through a leaderboard system, which is designed to strengthen participant retention and contribution by tapping into intrinsic and extrinsic motivations. Tracking Nemo is expected to help scientists improve data accuracy through the involvement of citizen scientists, who, in turn, engage in an authentic research activity and learn more about the behavior of zebrafish.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Dell AI, Bender JA, Branson K, Couzin ID, de Polavieja GG, Noldus LP, et al. Automated image-based tracking and its application in ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 2014;29:417–428.
2.
Miller N, Gerlai R: Automated tracking of zebrafish shoals and the analysis of shoaling behavior. In: Zebrafish Protocols for Neurobehavioral Research. Kalueff AV and Stewart AM (eds), pp. 217–230, Humana Press, New York, NY, 2012.
3.
Green J, Collins C, Kyzar EJ, Pham M, Roth A, Gaikwad S, et al. Automated high-throughput neurophenotyping of zebrafish social behavior. J Neurosci Methods 2012;210:266–271.
4.
Pérez-Escudero A, Vicente-Page J, Hinz RC, Arganda S, de Polavieja GG. idTracker: tracking individuals in a group by automatic identification of unmarked animals. Nat Methods 2014;11:743–748.
5.
Wang SH, Cheng XE, Qian ZM, Liu Y, Chen YQ. Automated planar tracking the waving bodies of multiple zebrafish swimming in shallow water. PLoS One 2016;11:e0154714.
6.
Butail S, Mwaffo V, Porfiri M. Model-free information-theoretic approach to infer leadership in pairs of zebrafish. Phys Rev E 2016;93:042411.
7.
Ladu F, Butail S, Macrí S, Porfiri M. Sociality modulates the effects of ethanol in zebra fish. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2014;38:2096–2104.
8.
Silvertown J. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol 2009;24:467–471.
9.
Nov O, Arazy O, Anderson D. Scientists@Home: what drives the quantity and quality of online citizen science participation? PLoS One 2014;9:e90375.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright 2018, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
History
Published in print: June 2018
Published online: 1 June 2018
Published ahead of print: 22 February 2018
Topics
Authors
Disclosure Statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Get Access
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.