Characterization of the Natural Soundscape of Zebrafish and Comparison with the Captive Noise Conditions
Abstract
Zebrafish is a well-established model organism in hearing research. Although the acoustic environment is known to shape the structure and sensitivity of auditory systems, there is no information on the natural soundscape of this species. Moreover, zebrafish are typically reared in large-scale housing systems (HS), although their acoustic properties and potential effects on hearing remain unknown. We characterized the soundscape of both zebrafish natural habitats and laboratory captive conditions, and discussed possible impact on auditory sensitivity. Sound recordings were conducted in five distinct zebrafish habitats (Southwest India), from quieter stagnant environments with diverse biological/abiotic sounds to louder watercourses characterized by current and moving substrate sounds. Sound pressure level (SPL) varied between 98 and 126 dB re 1 μPa. Sound spectra presented most energy below 3000 Hz and quieter noise windows were found in the noisiest habitats matching the species best hearing range. Contrastingly, recordings from three zebrafish HS revealed higher SPL (122–143 dB) and most energy below 1000 Hz with more spectral peaks, which might cause significant auditory masking. This study establishes an important ground for future research on the adaptation of zebrafish auditory system to the natural soundscapes, and highlights the importance of controlling noise conditions in captivity.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1. Ladich F, Schulz-Mirbach T. Diversity in fish auditory systems: one of the riddles of sensory biology. Front Ecol Evol 2016;4:2–26.
2. Popper AN, Fay RR. Sound detection and processing by fish critical review and major research questions. Brain Behav Evol 1993;41:14–38.
3. Ladich F. Diversity in hearing in fishes: ecoacoustical, communicative, and developmental constraints. In: Insights from Comparative Hearing Research. Köppl C, Manley GA, Popper AN, and Fay RR(eds), pp. 217–236, Springer-Verlag New York, New York, 2013.
4. Lagardere JP, Begout ML, Lafaye JY, Villotte JP. Influence of wind-produced noise on orientation in the Sole (Solea-Solea). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 1994;51:1258–1264.
5. Fay R. Soundscapes and the sense of hearing of fishes. Integr Zool 2009;4:26–32.
6. Bretschneider F, van Veen H, Teunis PFM, Peters RC, van den Berg A V. Zebrafish can hear sound pressure and particle motion in a synthesized sound field. Anim Biol 2013;63:199–215.
7. Amoser S, Ladich F. Are hearing sensitivities of freshwater fish adapted to the ambient noise in their habitats? J Exp Biol 2005;208:3533–3542.
8. Lugli M, Yan HY, Fine ML. Acoustic communication in two freshwater gobies: the relationship between ambient noise, hearing thresholds and sound spectrum. J Comp Physiol A 2003;189:309–320.
9. Soares D, Niemiller ML. Sensory adaptations of fishes to subterranean environments. Bioscience 2013;63:274–283.
10. Popper AN, Fewtrell J, Smith ME, McCauley RD. Anthropogenic sound: effects on the behavior and physiology of fishes. Mar Technol Soc J 2003;37:35–40.
11. Smith ME, Kane AS, Popper AN. Noise-induced stress response and hearing loss in goldfish (Carassius auratus). J Exp Biol 2004;207:427–435.
12. Slabbekoorn H, Bouton N, van Opzeeland I, Coers A, ten Cate C, Popper AN. A noisy spring: the impact of globally rising underwater sound levels on fish. Trends Ecol Evol 2010;25:419–427.
13. Lagardere JP. Effects of noise on growth and reproduction of Crangon crangon in rearing tanks. Mar Biol 1982;71:177–185.
14. Bart AN, Clark J, Young J, Zohar Y. Underwater ambient noise measurements in aquaculture systems: a survey. Aquac Eng 2001;25:99–110.
15. Wysocki LE, Davidson JW, Smith ME, Frankel AS, Ellison WT, Mazik PM, et al. Effects of aquaculture production noise on hearing, growth, and disease resistance of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture 2007;272:687–697.
16. Banner A, Hyatt M. Effects of noise on eggs and larvae of two estuarine fishes. Trans Am Fish Soc 1973;102:142–144.
17. Terhune JM, Friars GW, Bailey JK, O'Flynn FM. Noise levels may influence Atlantic salmon smolting rates in tanks. J Fish Biol 1990;37:185–187.
18. Davidson J, Bebak J, Mazik P. The effects of aquaculture production noise on the growth, condition factor, feed conversion, and survival of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture 2009;288:337–343.
19. Gutscher M, Wysocki LEVA, Ladich F. Aquarium and pond noise on hearing sensitivity in an otophysine fish. Int J Anim Sound its Rec 2011;20:117–136.
20. Whitfield TT. Zebrafish as a model for hearing and deafness. J Neurobiol 2002;53:157–171.
21. Bever MM, Fekete DM. Atlas of the developing inner ear in zebrafish. Dev Dyn 2002;223:536–543.
22. Wang J, Song Q, Yu D, Yang G, Xia L, Su K, et al. Ontogenetic development of the auditory sensory organ in zebrafish (Danio rerio): changes in hearing sensitivity and related morphology. Sci Rep 2015;5:15943.
23. Whitfield TT, Riley BB, Chiang M-Y, Phillips B. Development of the zebrafish inner ear. Dev Dyn 2002;223:427–458.
24. Bang PI, Sewell WF, Malicki JJ. Morphology and cell type heterogeneities of the inner ear epithelia in adult and juvenile zebrafish (Danio rerio). J Comp Neurol 2001;438:173–190.
25. Monroe JD, Manning DP, Uribe PM, Bhandiwad A, Sisneros JA, Smith ME, et al. Hearing sensitivity differs between zebrafish lines used in auditory research. Hear Res 2016;341:220–231.
26. Spence R, Gerlach G, Lawrence C, Smith C. The behaviour and ecology of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Biol Rev 2008;83:13–34.
27. Avdesh A, Chen M, Martin-Iverson MT, Mondal A, Ong D, Rainey-Smith S, et al. Regular care and maintenance of a zebrafish (Danio rerio) laboratory: an introduction. J Vis Exp 2012:e4196.
28. Lawrence C, Best J, James A, Maloney K. The effects of feeding frequency on growth and reproduction in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Aquaculture 2012;368–369:103–108.
29. Arunachalam M, Raja M, Vijayakumar C, Malaiammal P, Mayden RL. Natural history of zebrafish (Danio rerio) in India. Zebrafish. 2013;10:1–14.
30. Wysocki LE, Amoser S, Ladich F. Diversity in ambient noise in European freshwater habitats: noise levels, spectral profiles, and impact on fishes. J Acoust Soc Am 2007;121:2559–2566.
31. Amoser S, Ladich F. Year-round variability of ambient noise in temperate freshwater habitats and its implications for fishes. Aquat Sci 2010;72:371–378.
32. Wysocki LE, Ladich F. Hearing in fishes under noise conditions. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2005;6:28–36.
33. Higgs DM, Souza MJ, Wilkins HR, Presson JC, Popper AN. Age- and size-related changes in the inner ear and hearing ability of the adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2001;3:174–184.
34. Samuel Y, Morreale SJ, Clark CW, Greene CH, Richmond ME. Underwater, low-frequency noise in a coastal sea turtle habitat. J Acoust Soc Am 2005;117:1465–1472.
35. McDonald MA, Hildebrand JA, Wiggins SM. Increases in deep ocean ambient noise in the Northeast Pacific west of San Nicolas Island, California. J Acoust Soc Am 2006;120:711–718.
36. Codarin A, Wysocki LE, Ladich F, Picciulin M. Effects of ambient and boat noise on hearing and communication in three fish species living in a marine protected area (Miramare, Italy). Mar Pollut Bull 2009;58:1880–1887.
37. Bertucci F, Parmentier E, Lecellier G, Hawkins AD, Lecchini D. Acoustic indices provide information on the status of coral reefs: an example from Moorea Island in the South Pacific. Sci Rep 2016;6:1–9.
38. Buscaino G, Ceraulo M, Pieretti N, Corrias V, Farina A, Filiciotto F, et al. Temporal patterns in the soundscape of the shallow waters of a Mediterranean marine protected area. Sci Rep 2016;6:1–13.
39. Putland RL, Constantine R, Radford CA. Exploring spatial and temporal trends in the soundscape of an ecologically significant embayment. Sci Rep 2017;7:1–12.
40. Crawford JD, Jacob P, Bénech V. Sound Production and reproductive ecology of strongly acoustic fish in Africa: Pollimyrus isidori, Mormyridae. Behaviour 1997;134:677–725.
41. Lugli M. Sounds of shallow water fishes pitch within the quiet window of the habitat ambient noise. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 2010;196:439–451.
42. Amoser S, Wysocki LE, Ladich F. Noise emission during the first powerboat race in an Alpine lake and potential impact on fish communities. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;116:3789–3797.
43. Neo YY, Hubert J, Bolle L, Winter HV, Ten Cate C, Slabbekoorn H. Sound exposure changes European seabass behaviour in a large outdoor floating pen: effects of temporal structure and a ramp-up procedure. Environ Pollut 2016;214:26–34.
44. Nedelec SL, Simpson SD, Morley EL, Nedelec B, Radford AN. Impacts of regular and random noise on the behaviour, growth and development of larval Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Proc R Soc B 2015;282:20151943.
45. National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals: Eighth Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.
46. Anderson PA. Acoustic characterization of seahorse tank environments in public aquaria: a citizen science project. Aquac Eng 2013;54:72–77.
47. Lawrence C, Mason T. Zebrafish housing systems: a review of basic operating principles and considerations for design and functionality. ILAR J 2015;53:179–191.
48. Higgs DM, Rollo AK, Souza MJ, Popper AN. Development of form and function in peripheral auditory structures of the zebrafish (Danio rerio). J Acoust Soc Am 2003;113:1145–1154.
49. Scholz K, Ladich F. Sound production, hearing and possible interception under ambient noise conditions in the topmouth minnow Pseudorasbora parva. J Fish Biol 2006;69:892–906.
50. Amoser S, Ladich F. Diversity in noise-induced temporary hearing loss in otophysine fishes. J Acoust Soc Am 2003;113:2170–2179.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright 2019, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.
History
Published in print: April 2019
Published online: 27 March 2019
Published ahead of print: 26 December 2018
Topics
Authors
Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Get Access
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.