The Association of Race/Ethnicity and Patch Test Results: North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998–2006
Publication: Dermatitis
Volume 27, Issue Number 5
Abstract
Background
The North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch tests patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to a broad series of screening allergens and publishes periodic reports. We have previously reported on the association of race and ethnicity with the rates of positive responses to standard patch test allergens. This report extends those observations.
Objective
The aim of the study was to report the North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch testing results from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2006, comparing the frequency of positive reactions between white and black subjects.
Methods and Materials
Standardized patch testing with 45 allergens was used at 13 centers in North America. χ2 analysis of results in black subjects as compared with whites was examined.
Results
A total of 19,457 patients were tested; 92.9% (17,803) were white and 7.1% (1,360) were black. The final diagnoses of ACD (whites, 45.9%; blacks, 43.6%) and irritant contact dermatitis (13.0%/13.3%) were similar in the 2 groups. The diagnosis of atopic dermatitis was less common in the white patients (8.9%) as compared with the black patients (13.3%). Positive patch test reactions rates were similar for most allergens. However, statistically, blacks reacted more frequently to p-phenylenediamine (7.0% vs 4.4%, P < 0.001), bacitracin (11.6% vs 8.3%, P = 0.0004), as well as specific rubber accelerators mercaptobenzothiazole (2.7% vs 1.8%), thiuram (6.2% vs 4.3%), and mercapto mix (1.9% vs 0.8%, P < 0.001). Whites had an increase in positive reactions to fragrances (12.12% vs 6.77%, P < 0.0001), formaldehyde (9.25% vs 5.45%, P < 0.0001), and some formaldehyde releaser preservatives used in personal care products and textile resins (9.80% vs 6.18%, P < 0.0001).
Conclusions
There were statistically different rates of positive patch test reactions to specific allergens between black and white patients suspected of having ACD. The etiology of these differences is unclear but probably relates to culturally determined exposure patterns rather than genetic differences.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
REFERENCES
1. 2010 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary file.
2. Olden K, White SL. Health-related disparities: influence of environmental factors. Med Clin North Am 2005;89(4):721–738.
3. Taylor SC, Kelly AP, Lim HW, et al. Taylor and Kelly’s Dermatology for Skin of Color. 2nd ed. New York: McGrawHill; 2016.
4. Alexis AF, Barbosa VH, eds. Skin of Color: A Practical Guide to Dermatologic Diagnosis and Treatment. Springer: New York; 2012.
5. Alder RM. Dermatology and Dermatological Therapy of Pigmented Skins. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis; 2005.
6. Jackson-Richards D, Pandya AJ. Dermatology Atlas for Skin of Color. New York: Springer; 2014.
7. Marks JG Jr, Anderson BE, Deleo VA. Contact and Occupational Dermatology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Jaypee; 2016.
8. Marks JG, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000. Am J Contact Dermat 2003;14(2):59–62.
9. Pratt MD, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001–2002 study period. Dermatitis 2004;15(4):176–183 Erratum: Dermatitis 2005; 16(2):106.
10. Warshaw EM, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2003–2004 study period. Dermatitis 2008;19(3):129–136.
11. Zug KA, Warshaw EM, Fowler JF Jr, et al. Patch-Test results of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2005–2006. Dermatitis 2009;20(3):149–160.
12. Dickel H, Taylor JS, Evey P, et al. Comparison of patch test results with a standard series among white and black racial groups. Am J Contact Dermat 2001;12(2):77–82.
13. Deleo VA, Taylor SC, Belsito DV, et al. The effect of race and ethnicity on patch test results. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;46(suppl 2):S107–S112.
14. Parker LU, Taylor JS. A 5-year study of contact allergy to quaternium-15. Am J Contact Dermat 1991;2:231.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2016 American Contact Dermatitis Society. All Rights Reserved.
History
Published in print: September/October 2016
Published online: 1 October 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.