Research Article
No access
Published Online: 3 July 2014

The Third Wheel: The Impact of Twitter Use on Relationship Infidelity and Divorce

Publication: Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Volume 17, Issue Number 7

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine how social networking site (SNS) use, specifically Twitter use, influences negative interpersonal relationship outcomes. This study specifically examined the mediational effect of Twitter-related conflict on the relationship between active Twitter use and negative relationship outcomes, and how this mechanism may be contingent on the length of the romantic relationship. A total of 581 Twitter users aged 18 to 67 years (Mage=29, SDage=8.9) completed an online survey questionnaire. Moderation–mediation regression analyses using bootstrapping methods indicated that Twitter-related conflict mediated the relationship between active Twitter use and negative relationship outcomes. The length of the romantic relationship, however, did not moderate the indirect effect on the relationship between active Twitter use and negative relationship outcomes. The results from this study suggest that active Twitter use leads to greater amounts of Twitter-related conflict among romantic partners, which in turn leads to infidelity, breakup, and divorce. This indirect effect is not contingent on the length of the romantic relationship. The current study adds to the growing body of literature investigating SNS use and romantic relationship outcomes.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
boyd d, Ellison BN. Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2007; 13.
2.
Choi JH. (2008) Living in cyworld: contextualising cy-ties in South Korea. In Bruns A, Jacobs J, eds. Uses of blogs. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 173–186.
3.
Clayton R, Nagurney A, Smith J. Cheating, breakup, and divorce: is Facebook use to blame? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2013; 16:717–720.
4.
Ellison BN, Steinfield C, Lampe C. The benefits of Facebook “friends”: exploring the relationship between college students' use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2007; 12:article 1.
5.
Lampe C, Ellison BN, Steinfield C. Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 2008; 29:434–445.
6.
Raacke J, Bonds-Raacke J. MySpace and Facebook: applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Individual Differences Research Group 2008; 8:27–33.
7.
Fox J, Warber K. Romantic relationship development in the age of Facebook: an exploratory study of emerging adults' perceptions, motives, and behaviors. Journal of Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2013; 16:3–7.
8.
About Twitter. https://twitter.com/about (accessed Jun. 20, 2013).
9.
2010 Best social networking site reviews and comparisons. http://social-networking-websites-review.toptenreviews.com (accessed Dec. 28, 2013).
10.
Statistics Brain. Twitter statistics. www.statisticbrain.com/twitter-statistics/ (accessed Jun. 20, 2013).
11.
Sarno D. On Twitter, mindcasting is the new lifecasting. Los Angeles Times, Mar. 11, 2009. http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2009/03/on-twitter-mind.html (accessed Jan. 12, 2014).
12.
Thompson C. Brave new world of digital intimacy. The New York Times, Sep. 5, 2008. www.nytimes.com/2008/09/07/magazine/07awareness-t.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all (accessed Dec. 29, 2013).
13.
Chen G. Tweet this: a uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Journal of Computers in Human Behavior 2011; 27:755–762.
14.
Johnson P, Yang S-U. Uses and gratifications of Twitter: an examination of user motives and satisfaction of Twitter use. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication in Boston, MA.
15.
Clayton R, Osborne R, Miller B, et al. Loneliness, anxiousness, and substance use as predictors of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior 2013; 29:687–693.
16.
Joinson AN. (2008) “Looking at,” “looking up” or “keeping up with” people? Motives and uses of Facebook. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy, April 5–10, 2008), CHI’08. New York: ACM Press, pp. 1027–1036.
17.
Tong ST. Facebook use during relationship termination: uncertainty reduction and surveillance. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2013; 16:788–793
18.
Utz S, Beukeboom CJ. The role of social network sites in romantic relationships: effects on jealousy and relationship happiness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2011; 16:511–527.
19.
Tokunaga RS. Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding the use of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior 2011; 27:705–713.
20.
Kerkhof P, Finkenauer C, Muusses LD. Relational consequences of compulsive internet use: a longitudinal study among newlyweds. Human Communication Research 2011; 37:147–173.
21.
Papp LM, Danielewicz J, Cayemberg C. “Are we Facebook official?” Implications of dating partners' Facebook use and profiles for intimate relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2012; 15:85–90.
22.
Lyndon A, Bonds-Raacke J, Cratty AD. College students' Facebook stalking of ex-partners. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2011; 14:711–716.
23.
Muise A, Christofides E, Desmarais S. More information than you ever wanted: does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy? CyberPsychology & Behavior 2009; 12:441–444.
24.
Marshall T. Facebook surveillance of former romantic partners: associations with postbreakup recovery and personal growth. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 2012; 15:521–526.
25.
Rubin AM. (2009) Uses and gratifications: an evolving perspective on media effects. In Nabi RL, Oliver MB, eds. The SAGE handbook of media processes and effect. Washington, DC: Sage, pp. 147–159.
26.
Hayes AF. (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
27.
Buck S. (2013) When Facebook official isn't enough. Mashable.com. http://mashable.com/2013/08/04/social-media-couples/ (accessed Jan. 10, 2014).
28.
2 For Life Media Inc (2013) 2Life App description. www.2life.io (accessed Sep. 28, 2013).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Volume 17Issue Number 7July 2014
Pages: 425 - 430
PubMed: 24690067

History

Published online: 3 July 2014
Published in print: July 2014
Published ahead of print: 1 April 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Topics

Authors

Affiliations

Russell B. Clayton, MA
Department of Journalism, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri.

Notes

Address correspondence to:Russell B. ClaytonDepartment of JournalismUniversity of Missouri-Columbia120 Neff HallColumbia, MO 65211E-mail: [email protected]

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top