Research Article
No access
Published Online: 12 December 2019

#StateOfMind: Family Meal Frequency Moderates the Association Between Time on Social Networking Sites and Well-Being Among U.K. Young Adults

Publication: Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Volume 22, Issue Number 12

Abstract

Family belonging may influence relationships between the amount of time spent on social networking sites (SNS) and well-being. We examined the SNS and well-being association among young adults and investigated whether different markers of family belonging moderated this association. SNS, well-being, and family data (n = 2,229) were collected from adults aged 16–21 years living with their parent(s) in the United Kingdom. Participants were classed as nonusers (0 hours/weekday spent chatting or interacting with friends through social Web sites), moderate (nonzero to 4 hours/weekday), or heavy users (4+ hours/weekday). Multivariable linear regressions examined the SNS use and well-being associations; interaction terms tested whether these varied by family belonging (family meal frequency, strength of family support, and importance of family to personal identity). Well-being scores were lower for heavy users of SNS compared with moderate users (p = 0.044), and for those sharing few or no family meals (p < 0.001). The SNS use and well-being association was significantly moderated by family meal frequency (p = 0.009). Among those reporting no family meals, well-being scores were lower for heavy users versus nonusers (22.4 vs. 25.3). Well-being scores were similar across the SNS use categories among those having more family meals. Among heavy users of SNS, young adults having no family meals may be particularly vulnerable to the harms of being online. Our findings highlight the importance of minimizing the harms of heavy SNS use, including support for families to enable them to develop and build young adults' resilience to the stresses and anxieties that potentially accompany online social networking.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1. Valkenburg PM. Online communication and adolescent well-being: testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2007; 12:1169–1182.
2. Kelly Y, Zilanawala A, Booker C, et al. Social media use and adolescent mental health: findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. EClinicalMedicine 2018; 6:59–68.
3. Booker CL, Skew AJ, Kelly YJ, et al. Media use, sports participation, and well-being in adolescence: cross-sectional findings from the UK household longitudinal study. American Journal of Public Health 2015; 105:173–179.
4. Booker CL, Kelly YJ, Sacker A. Gender differences in the associations between age trends of social media interaction and well-being among 10–15 year olds in the UK. BMC Public Health 2018; 18:321.
5. Baker DA, Algorta GP. The relationship between online social networking and depression: a systematic review of quantitative studies. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2016; 19:638–648.
6. Seabrook EM, Kern ML, Rickard NS. Social networking sites, depression, and anxiety: a systematic review. JMIR Mental Health 2016; 3:e50.
7. Marino C, Gini G, Vieno A, et al. The associations between problematic Facebook use, psychological distress and well-being among adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders 2018; 226:274–281.
8. Morry MM, Sucharyna TA, Petty SK. Relationship social comparisons: your facebook page affects my relationship and personal well-being. Computers in Human Behavior 2018; 83:140–167.
9. The Prince's Trust. (2019) The Prince's Trust eBay Youth Index. London: The Prince's Trust.
10. Yoon S, Kleinman M, Mertz J, et al. Is social network site usage related to depression? A meta-analysis of Facebook-depression relations. Journal of Affective Disorders 2019; 248:65–72.
11. Li W, Garland EL, Howard MO. Family factors in Internet addiction among Chinese youth: a review of English-and Chinese-language studies. Computers in Human Behavior 2014; 31:393–411.
12. Ko CH, Yen JY, Yen CF, et al. Factors predictive for incidence and remission of internet addiction in young adolescents: a prospective study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2007; 10:545–551.
13. Ko CH, Wang PW, Liu TL, et al. Bidirectional associations between family factors and Iternet addiction among adolescents in a prospective investigation. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 2015; 69:192–200.
14. Kaakinen M, Keipi T, Rasanen P, et al. Cybercrime victimization and subjective well-being: an examination of the buffering effect hypothesis among adolescents and young adults. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2018; 21:129–137.
15. Buck N, McFall S. Understanding society: design overview. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies 2011; 3:5–17.
16. Boreham R, Boldysevaite D, Killpack C. (2012) UKHLS: Wave 1 Technical Report. London: NatCen.
17. Stewart-Brown S, Tennant A, Tennant R, et al. Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): a Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish health education population survey. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2009; 7:15.
18. Scales PC. Reducing risks and building developmental assets: essential actions for promoting adolescent health. Journal of School Health 1999; 69:113–119.
19. Viner RM, Aswathikutty-Gireesh A, Stiglic N, et al. Roles of cyberbullying, sleep, and physical activity in mediating the effects of social media use on mental health and wellbeing among young people in England: a secondary analysis of longitudinal data. The Lancet Child and Adolescent Health 2019; 3:685–696.
20. Primack BA, Shensa A, Escobar-Viera CG, et al. Use of multiple social media platforms and symptoms of depression and anxiety: a nationally-representative study among US young adults. Computers in Human Behavior 2017; 69:1–9.
21. Pinkerton J, Dolan P. Family support, social capital, resilience and adolescent coping. Child and Family Social Work 2007; 12:219–228.
22. Fiese BH, Schwartz M. (2008) Reclaiming the Family Table: Mealtimes and Child Health and Wellbeing. Social Policy Report. Michigan: Society for Research in Child Development.
23. Maynard MJ, Harding S. Ethnic differences in psychological well-being in adolescence in the context of time spent in family activities. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 2010; 45:115–123.
24. Department of Health and Social Care. (2019) United Kingdom Chief Medical Officers Commentary on ‘Screen-Based Activities and Children and Young People's Mental Health and Psychosocial Wellbeing: A Systematic Map of Reviews'. London, Department of Health and Social Care.
25. HM Government. (2019) Online Harms White Paper. London: HM Government.
26. Ngai EW, Tao SS, Moon KK. Social media research: theories, constructs, and conceptual frameworks. International Journal of Information Management 2015; 35:33–44.
27. Verduyn P, Ybarra O, Resibois M, et al. Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review 2017; 11:274–302.
28. Shakya HB, Christakis NA. Association of Facebook use with compromised well-being: a longitudinal study. American Journal of Epidemiology 2017; 185:203–211.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Volume 22Issue Number 12December 2019
Pages: 753 - 760
PubMed: 31841647

History

Published online: 12 December 2019
Published in print: December 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Topics

Authors

Affiliations

Memta Ramchand Jagtiani
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Yvonne Kelly
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Daisy Fancourt
Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nicola Shelton
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Shaun Scholes [email protected]
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Notes

Address correspondence to: Dr. Shaun Scholes, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom [email protected]

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Funding Information

No funding was received for this article.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top