Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and PolicyVol. 5, No. 2 Symposium on the 2004 ElectionHow Many Parties Ought To Be on the Ballot?: An Analysis of Nader v. KeithRichard WingerRichard WingerSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:13 Apr 2006https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2006.5.170AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookXLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byElectoral competition and endogenous barriers to entryEuropean Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 34Electoral volatility, competition and third-party candidacies in US gubernatorial elections9 August 2010 | Party Politics, Vol. 17, No. 5Ballot Regulations and Multiparty Politics in the States3 October 2007 | PS: Political Science & Politics, Vol. 40, No. 4 Volume 5Issue 2Jun 2006 InformationCopyright 2006, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Richard Winger.How Many Parties Ought To Be on the Ballot?: An Analysis of Nader v. Keith.Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy.Jun 2006.170-200.http://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2006.5.170Published in Volume: 5 Issue 2: April 13, 2006PDF download