Does Personal Learning Style Predict the Ability to Learn Laparoscopic Surgery? A Pilot Study
Publication: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Volume 29, Issue Number 1
Abstract
Purpose: Acquiring laparoscopic skills occurs at different rates among trainees. We conducted a pilot study to determine whether variation in laparoscopic skill acquisition was associated with subject's learning styles.
Materials and Methods: Nineteen medical students performed 10 repetitions of the object transfer task over a period of 4 weeks using a validated laparoscopic simulator. The main exposure was participants' learning style categorized according to the Fleming VARK-learning style inventory. VARK (V = visual, A = aural, R = read/write, K = kinesthetic) is a validated learning style model that identifies four different learning styles. The main outcome measures that reflected laparoscopic skill acquisition were task completion time (<107 seconds) and total instrument distance (<2.03 m) obtained from SurgTrac® motion analysis software. To determine whether participants' laparoscopic proficiency was associated with learning style we used chi-square tests for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables.
Results: Nineteen participants completed the inventory, 37% (7) were classified as kinesthetic and/or visual style learners, while 63% (12) were considered multimodal or reading/writing style learners. Participants classified as visual/kinesthetic were ∼4 years older than participants classified as multimodal or reading/writing style learners. No gender differences were observed between the groups. Eighty-five percent (6) of participants with a kinesthetic and/or visual learning style reached the proficiency level for task completion time while only 17% (2) of participants with multimodal or read/write learning style performed the task in <107 seconds (χ2 = 8.7; P = .003). Regarding total instrument distance, 85% (6) of participants classified as kinesthetic and/or visual learners and 67% (8) of participants classified as multimodal or read/write learners performed the task in <2.03 m (P = .36).
Conclusions: This is the first study to investigate the correlation between trainees' VARK-learning style and their ability to acquire laparoscopic skills. This pilot study suggests that trainees' learning style may affect the ability to acquire laparoscopic skill proficiency. Larger studies are needed to confirm these preliminary observations.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1. Grantcharov TP, Funch-Jensen P. Can everyone achieve proficiency with the laparoscopic technique? Learning curve patterns in technical skills acquisition. Am J Surg 2009;197:447–449.
2. Sadideen H, Alvand A, Saadeddin M, Kneebone R. Surgical experts: Born or made? Int J Surg 2013;11:773–778.
3. Jack MC, Kenkare SB, Saville BR, et al. Improving education under work-hour restrictions: Comparing learning and teaching preferences of faculty, residents, and students. J Surg Educ 2010;67:290–296.
4. Preece RA, Cope AC. Are surgeons born or made? A comparison of personality traits and learning styles between surgical trainees and medical students. J Surg Educ 2016;73:768–773.
5. Louridas M, Szasz P, de Montbrun S, et al. Can we predict technical aptitude?: A systematic review. Ann Surg 2016;263:673–691.
6. Prithishkumar IJ, Michael SM. Understanding your student: Using the VARK model. J Postgrad Med 2014;60:183–186.
7. Romanelli F, Bird E, Ryan M. Learning styles: A review of theory, application, and best practices. Am J Pharm Educ 2009;73:9.
8. Fleming N. VARK a guide to learning styles. n.d. http://vark-learn.com (last accessed February 15, 2018).
9. Retrosi G, Cundy T, Haddad M, Clarke S. Motion analysis-based skills training and assessment in pediatric laparoscopy: Construct, concurrent, and content validity for the eoSim simulator. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2015;25:944–950.
10. Aggarwal R, Crochet P, Dias A, et al. Development of a virtual reality training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2009;96:1086–1093.
11. SurgTrac. n.d. www.eosurgical.com/collections/surgtrac-software (last accessed February 15, 2018).
12. Windsor JA, Zoha F. The laparoscopic performance of novice surgical trainees: Testing for acquisition, loss, and reacquisition of psychomotor skills. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1058–1063.
13. Windsor JA, Diener S, Zoha F. Learning style and laparoscopic experience in psychomotor skill performance using a virtual reality surgical simulator. Am J Surg 2008;195:837–842.
14. Engels PT, de Gara C. Learning styles of medical students, general surgery residents, and general surgeons: Implications for surgical education. BMC Med Educ 2010;10:51.
15. Urval RP, Kamath A, Ullal S, et al. Assessment of learning styles of undergraduate medical students using the VARK questionnaire and the influence of sex and academic performance. AJP Adv Physiol Educ 2014;38:216–220.
16. Hernández-Torrano D, Ali S, Chan C-K. First year medical students' learning style preferences and their correlation with performance in different subjects within the medical course. BMC Med Educ 2017;17:131.
17. Kolb DA. Experiential Learning—Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Second ed. London: Pearson Education, 2014.
18. Peterson K, Kolb D. My learning style, my life path. In: How You Learn Is How You Live. San Francisco: Berrett Koehler, 2017, pp. 33–75.
19. Kim RH, Viscusi RK, Collier AN, et al. Learning preferences of surgery residents: A multi-institutional study. Surgery. 2018;163:901–905.
20. Kim RH, Gilbert T, Ristig K, Chu QD. Surgical resident learning styles: Faculty and resident accuracy at identification of preferences and impact on ABSITE scores. J Surg Res 2013;184:31–36.
21. Fleming N, Baume D. Learning styles again: VARKing up the right tree! Educ Dev 2006;7:4–7.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Volume 29 • Issue Number 1 • January 2019
Pages: 98 - 102
PubMed: 30052125
Copyright
Copyright 2019, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.
History
Published online: 8 January 2019
Published in print: January 2019
Published ahead of print: 27 July 2018
Topics
Authors
Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.