Research Article
Open access
Published Online: 11 August 2022

Bowel and Bladder Dysfunction Is Associated with Psychiatric Comorbidities and Functional Impairment in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Publication: Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
Volume 32, Issue Number 6

Abstract

Objective: Neuropsychiatric disorders are common in children with bowel and bladder dysfunction (BBD), a syndrome associated with urinary frequency, urgency, holding, incontinence, and constipation. We evaluated BBD symptom severity in children and youth attending a tertiary care obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) clinic.
Methods: Consecutive patients attending initial OCD assessments between 2016 and 2020 were invited to participate in a registry study. Diagnosis of OCD and comorbidities was established by structured clinical interview. OCD severity and impact were assessed with the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) and the Child Obsessive Compulsive Impact Scale (COIS-R; self-report), respectively. BBD symptoms were quantified with the Vancouver Symptom Score (VSS), a validated self-report measure.
Results: One hundred twelve participants completed the VSS (mean age 13.5 ± 3.3, range 7–20). Based on a cutoff score of 11 corresponding to pediatric urologist-diagnosed BBD, 30.4% of participants screened positive, including more females than males (39.3% vs. 21.4%; p = 0.04). Daytime urinary incontinence was present in a greater proportion of participants with OCD forbidden thoughts (34.8% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.002), major depressive disorder (MDD; 38.5% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.001), and somatization disorder (60% vs. 9%, p = 0.001) compared with those without. A regression model including CY-BOCS, COIS-R, psychiatric comorbidities, medications, age, and gender explained 52.2% of the variance in VSS; COIS-R, tic disorder, and MDD were significant predictors.
Conclusion: BBD symptoms are common and associated with high OCD-related impairment and psychiatric comorbidities. Standardized assessment may facilitate identification of BBD symptoms in this population and is critical to mitigating long-term physical and mental health impacts. Further studies are required to assess the relationship between BBD and OCD treatment outcomes.

Introduction

Bowel and bladder dysfunction (BBD) describes a constellation of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) accompanied by constipation or encopresis. In children, BBD may manifest as day- or night-time incontinence, urinary frequency, urgency, or holding (Yang et al. 2018). Symptoms often persist into adulthood; long-term sequelae include urinary retention and persistent urinary incontinence (Santos et al. 2017). Social stigma related to incontinence is associated with low self-esteem, isolation, poor school performance, and behavioral changes (Hooman et al. 2011; Wolfe-Christensen et al. 2016; Iscan and Ozkayin 2020).
Multiple etiological factors likely contribute to BBD but remain incompletely understood (Franco 2011b). Some voiding behaviors, in particular delay or inhibition of micturition/defecation, may contribute to nonphysiological contraction of the pelvic floor during elimination (Palmer 2010). Maturational delays in nervous system development and bladder sphincter coordination can result in uninhibited detrusor contractions combined with voluntary contraction of the external urethral sphincter, leading to increased bladder pressure (Franco 2007). Factors modulating spinal reflexes and autonomic activity may also contribute (Roy and Green 2019).
Abnormalities in brain regions involved in mapping body sensations (right insula/somatosensory cortex), emotional processing (anterior cingulate cortex/limbic cortex and prefrontal cortex), and decision-making (orbitofrontal cortex) play a role in both continence and psychiatric symptoms (Franco 2011a). 20%–30% of patients with primary nocturnal enuresis may have an underlying neuropsychiatric disorder (von Gontard and Equit 2015; MacNeily 2016), and BBD is frequently diagnosed in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (Duel et al. 2003) and autism spectrum disorder (Logan et al. 2014; Niemczyk et al. 2018).
There are more limited data to inform the diagnosis and management of BBD in children with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Children with OCD may present with urination compulsions (Jiwanmall and Kattula 2016; Rahmat 2020) leading to urinary frequency, or with “phantom incontinence,” a sensation of wetness despite no objective signs based on child/parent report (Arlen et al. 2014). In our clinical experience, bathroom avoidance together with urinary holding, fluid restriction, or saving/storage of urine are common.
Straining to override a tight pelvic floor in an attempt to ensure complete elimination can lead to complications such as varicoceles, epididymitis, and retrograde ejaculation in males. Overwiping can lead to local irritation and, in females, dysuria. Urinary frequency and incontinence have also been described as features of pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome (PANS) and pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric disorder associated with streptococcal infection (PANDAS) (Chang et al. 2015). However, it has not become standard practice to assess OCD patients for BBD.
Several questionnaires have been developed for identifying children likely to have urologist-diagnosed BBD. The Vancouver Symptom Score (VSS) was initially validated in 62 children attending a Pediatric Urology clinic at our institution and fits a four-factor model comprising urinary incontinence, urgency, obstructive symptoms, and constipation/fecal soiling (Afshar et al. 2009). It has been further validated in American (Drzewiecki et al. 2012) and Dutch (‘t Hoen et al. 2016) cohorts. The goal of this exploratory study was to use this assessment tool to determine the prevalence of BBD symptoms in children and youth with OCD attending a tertiary care subspecialty clinic, and to evaluate the relationship between BBD symptoms and phenotype, including OCD severity.

Methods

Study cohort

Consecutive patients attending an initial assessment at the BC Children's Hospital Provincial OCD Program between August 2016 and January 2020 were invited to participate in a clinical registry study. Diagnoses of OCD and psychiatric comorbidities were established through a clinical psychologist-administered structured interview and confirmed by a child and adolescent psychiatrist. Baseline assessments were conducted with participants and at least one caregiver.
Parent- and child-report measures were completed online through research electronic data capture (REDCap; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN) (Harris et al. 2009). Consenting participants meeting criteria for OCD described by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 2000) with onset under age 18 who had completed the VSS were included. This study was approved by the University of British Columbia Children's and Women's Research Ethics Board.

Measures

OCD severity was assessed using the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS) (Scahill et al. 1997). Presence of specific symptom dimensions was determined as described previously using the CY-BOCS Symptom Checklist to score each of four factors: forbidden thoughts, symmetry, cleaning, and hoarding (Bloch et al. 2008). Psychiatric disorders were assessed using either the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV: Parent Version (Silverman and Nelles 1988) (2011–2016) or an internally developed semistructured interview (2017–2019). Items were added to address diagnostic criteria for PANS and PANDAS (Swedo et al. 1998; Chang et al. 2015).
The Child Obsessive Compulsive Impact Scale (COIS-R) was used to assess self-reported OCD impact (Piacentini et al. 2007). Urinary and bowel symptoms were evaluated using the VSS (Afshar et al. 2009), a 13-question 52-point questionnaire that queries the quantity and frequency of daytime urinary incontinence, frequency, urgency, holding maneuvers, dysuria, nocturia, enuresis, constipation, and encopresis (Supplementary Fig. S1). Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale. A cutoff score ≥11 was used to define a positive screen for BBD (Afshar et al. 2009). Subscores for symptom clusters were generated by adding items together as specified in Table 2 for daytime incontinence, irritative, and obstructive LUTS.
Table 2. Median Scores for Individual Vancouver Symptom Score Items and Subgroups
ItemAll participantsFemaleMale
Median (IQRa)Range (min–max)n (% of total) with score ≥1Median (IQR)Median (IQR)
Individual items
 1. I pee in my underwear during the day…0 (0–0)0–411 (9.8)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)
 2. When I pee in my underwear, they are…0 (0–0)0–414 (12.5)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)
 3. In a normal day I go to the washroom to pee…2 (0–2)0–479 (71.8)2 (0–2)2 (0–2)
 4. I feel that I have to rush to the washroom to pee…1 (0–1)0–467 (63.1)1 (0–1)1 (0–1)
 5. I hold my pee by crossing my legs or sitting down…0 (0–1)0–451 (44.5)1 (0–1)0 (0–1)
 6. It hurts when I pee…0 (0–1)0–435 (30.6)0 (0–1)0 (0–1)
 7. I wet my bed at night…0 (0–0)0–34 (3.6)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)
 8. I wake up to pee at night…1 (0–2)b0–462 (55.0)1 (0–2)0 (0–1)
 9. When I pee, it stops and starts…0 (0–1)0–431 (27.9)0 (0–1)0 (0–0)
 10. I have to push or wait for my pee to start…0 (0–1)0–444 (39.3)0 (0–1)0 (0–1)
 11. I have bowel movements…1 (1–2)0–489 (79.3)1 (1–2)1 (1–2)
 12. My stool is hard…1 (0–2)0–475 (67.0)1 (0.25–2.75)1 (0–1.75)
 13. I have bowel accidents in my underwear…0 (0–0)0–23 (2.7)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)
Subscores
 All urinary symptoms (Items 1–10)5 (2–8)c0–20101 (96.2)6 (2.5–10)4 (2–7)
 Daytime incontinence (Items 1, 2)0 (0–0)0–614 (12.5)0 (0–0)0 (0–0)
 Irritative LUTS (Items 4, 5, 6, 8)2 (1–4)0–1392 (86.0)3 (1–5)2 (1–3)
 Obstructive LUTS (Items 1, 2, 7)0 (0–1)0–852 (46.8)0 (0–2)0 (0–1)
All bowel symptoms (Items 11, 12, 13)3 (1–4)0–6104 (93.7)3 (1–4)2 (1–4)
Total score8 (5–12)d0–25NA9 (5–14)7 (5–10)
a
Note that a median and IQR of 0 (0–0) does not imply that all respondents rated the item as 0; the second column reports the proportion of respondents endorsing a score of at least 1 on each item.
b
Greater than median of 0 for controls and equivalent to that of cases in initial VSS scale validation study(20).
c
Greater than median of 3 for controls (6 for cases) in initial scale validation study.
d
Greater than median of 6 for controls (14 for cases) in initial scale validation study.
IQR, interquartile range; LUTS, lower urinary tract symptoms; VSS, Vancouver Symptom Score.

Analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (Version 24; IBM Corporation). Differences between means were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), two-sided Student's t-test, or Mann–Whitney U test (for individual ordinal items or subscores). Pearson's chi-squared test was used to compare frequencies for nominal variables with two or more categories. Associations between continuous variables were evaluated with Pearson or Spearman correlations as specified. Individual VSS item scores are reported as a median and range given the ordinal nature of the data. Initial analyses evaluated differences between individuals screening positive versus negative for BBD.
We conducted further analysis using total VSS score as a continuous outcome to avoid information lost due to arbitrary dichotomization (Fedorov et al. 2009). Multiple linear regression was used to determine predictors of VSS score using stepwise modeling with sequential addition of participant characteristics (CY-BOCS, COIS-R, medications used by ≥10 participants, age/gender, and comorbidities affecting ≥5 participants with a potential association with BBD). Predictors were retained in the models regardless of the statistical significance of their beta estimates. Change statistics were evaluated for each step and the significance of the final model was determined by ANOVA.
Multicollinearity was assessed by examining variance inflation factors (all <3 for included predictors). Internal consistency of the VSS was assessed with Cronbach's alpha. Exploratory factor analysis was performed using principal axis factoring and Varimax rotation with Kaiser normalization. Correction for multiple comparisons was applied using a Benjamini–Hochberg procedure with false discovery rate of 0.05. Proportions of participants are presented as percentages based on the number of responses for the corresponding individual item. Continuous variables are reported as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range [IQR]) as indicated.

Results

Of 130 participants with OCD consenting to registry participation, 112 (86%) completed the VSS. There was no significant difference between participants who completed the VSS compared with those who did not with respect to age (13.5 ± 3.3 years vs. 13.8 ± 2.8 years, p = 0.154), gender (50% vs. 47.4% female, p = 0.832), or CY-BOCS score (23.5 ± 7.0 vs. 25.4 ± 7.2, p = 0.234). Demographic information for the 112 participants completing the VSS is shown in Table 1. CY-BOCS scores reflected moderate-to-severe symptoms in the group overall, and psychiatric comorbidities were prevalent. 30.4% of participants screened positive for BBD, including more females than males (39.3% vs. 21.4%; p = 0.04).
Table 1. Participant Characteristics
CharacteristicValuen
Current age, mean ± SD (range)13.5 ± 3.3 (7–20)112
Age at OCD onset, mean ± SD (range)a8.5 ± 3.5 (2–16)104
Gender, n (% female of total)56 (50)112
Race/ethnicity, n (% of total)b
 Caucasian/White76 (67.9)112
 Chinese9 (8.0)112
 South Asian8 (7.1)112
 Otherb19 (17)112
CY-BOCS score, mean ± SD (range)23.5 ± 7.0 (0–37)108
OCD symptom dimensions, n (% of total)
 Forbidden thoughts68 (63.6)107
 Cleaning85 (81.0)105
 Symmetry86 (78.9)109
 Hoarding38 (35.5)107
Current medications, n (% of total)
 Any medication72 (64.3)112
 Serotonin reuptake inhibitor63 (56.3)112
 Antipsychotic10 (8.9)112
 Benzodiazepine3 (2.7)112
 Stimulant13 (13.4)112
 Other16 (14.3)112
Comorbidity, n (% of total)c
 Anxiety disorder48 (48.5)99
 ADHD41 (43.2)95
 Tic disorder21 (19.6)112
 Learning disorder14 (16.3)86
 Major depressive disorder13 (15.1)86
 Pervasive developmental disorder8 (10.4)77
 Somatization disorder5 (6.0)83
 Posttraumatic stress disorder4 (4.3)93
 PANS/PANDAS3 (2.7)112
a
Average age of onset based on parent report of first symptom. Average age at diagnosis was 9.6 ± 5.2 (range 0–18) years.
b
Fewer than five participants each self-identified as West Asian (3.6%), Indigenous (2.7%), Black (2.7%), Latin American (2.7%), or other race/ethnicity including Arab, Filipino, and Korean (all <2%).
c
Current or lifetime diagnosis of comorbidity. Anxiety disorders include generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, separation anxiety, social anxiety, and specific phobias. Three participants met criteria for PANS and two for PANDAS. One met criteria for intellectual disability, 1 for bulimia nervosa (out of 39 screened for eating disorders), and 4 for psychosis. Medical history based on parent report with potential bowel/bladder implications included Crohn's disease (one participant), diabetes (two participants), and previous head injury (two participants).
CY-BOCS, Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale; OCD, obsessive-compulsive disorder; PANDAS, pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric disorder associated with streptococcal infection; PANS, pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome.
The distribution of VSS scores is shown in Figure 1. Mean score was 9.0 ± 5.4 (median 8, IQR 5–12), and was greater in females than males (9.8 ± 5.5 vs. 8.2 ± 5.2, p = 0.0117). Total VSS score was higher in participants with OCD forbidden thoughts (10.2 ± 5.5 vs. 7.3 ± 4.8, p = 0.008), symmetry-related obsessions/compulsions (9.7 ± 5.6 vs. 6.6 ± 3.9, p = 0.004), comorbid ADHD (10.4 ± 5.2 vs. 7.4 ± 4.5, p = 0.004), or somatization disorder (corresponding to a DSM-IV diagnosis of somatoform disorder; 19.0 ± 5.7 vs. 8.1 ± 4.4, p < 0.0005) compared with those without, but did not differ between groups based on other symptom dimensions or comorbidities when corrected for multiple comparisons.
FIG. 1. Total distribution of VSS scores. VSS, Vancouver Symptom Score.
Table 2 shows median scores for individual BBD items. More females than males reported waking to void most nights (n = 12/56 or 21.8% vs. n = 2/56 or 3.6%, p = 0.004; item 8). Night-time awakening was also more common among participants with certain comorbidities compared with those without: ADHD (n = 8/41 or 19.5% vs. n = 3/53 or 5.7%, p = 0.038), major depressive disorder (MDD) (n = 4/13 or 30.8% vs. n = 6/71 or 8.3%, p = 0.012), and somatization disorder (n = 2/5 or 40.0% vs. n = 7/77 or 9.1%, p = 0.032) but not anxiety disorders (14.6% vs. 10.0%, p = 0.489), pervasive developmental disorder (n = 0/8 or 0% vs. n = 7/68 or 10.3%, p = 0.341), or tic disorders (n = 9/74 or 12.5% vs. n = 2/21 or 9.5%, p = 0.739).
There was a significant difference in the proportion of participants with any daytime urinary incontinence compared with those without reporting holding of urine more than half the time (n = 5/13 or 38.5% vs. n = 9/97 or 9.3%, p = 0.003; item 5), consistent with the known association between holding and incontinence. Although the proportion of respondents reporting frequent holding in item 5 did not differ based on participant characteristics, urinary infrequency (as reported in item 3, defined as urinating 1–4 times per day) was more common among participants with moderate-to-severe compared with more mild OCD symptoms (n = 61/92 or 66.3% vs. n = 5/14 or 35.7%, p = 0.028).
Of participants with above-threshold VSS scores, only 17.6% reported problems with bladder control or bedwetting on medical history at intake; nevertheless, this is greater than the 3.8% of participants screening negative for BBD (p = 0.013). Total VSS score was greater in participants describing OCD-related bathroom interference as “very much” on the COIS-R (mean VSS score 8.0 ± 5.2) compared with “not at all” (12.2 ± 6.3) on a 5-point Likert scale (p = 0.033).
Total COIS-R score was higher in those with VSS ≥11 compared with those without, as was the prevalence of MDD and somatization disorder (Table 3). Individual OCD symptom dimension severity scores did not vary with BBD status. CY-BOCS score was higher in females with likely BBD compared with those without (26.3 ± 5.3 vs. 22.1 ± 7.3, d = 0.66, p = 0.028) but did not differ among males (21.8 ± 6.9 vs. 23.6 ± 7.4 d = −0.25, p = 0.453).
Table 3. Participant Characteristics Stratified by Bowel And Bladder Dysfunction Screen Status Based on Vancouver Symptom Score ≥11
Patient factorVSS <11 (n = 34)VSS ≥11a (n = 78)Cohen's dORpa
Demographics
 Age (mean ± SD)13.3 ± 3.314 ± 3.10.21 0.273
 Gender (% female)43.664.7 1.50.040
OCD severity and impact (mean ± SD)
 CYBOCS22.97 ± 7.3524.7 ± 6.20.25 0.251
 COIS-SR21.8 ± 18.332.4 ± 20.00.55 0.008*
OCD symptom dimensions (% with symptom)
 Forbidden thoughts58.175.8 1.30.080
 Symmetry73.790.9 1.20.043
 Cleaning79.284.8 1.10.491
 Hoarding34.737.5 1.10.779
Comorbidity (% with comorbidity)b
 Tic disorder19.427.6 1.40.373
 ADHD37.757.7 1.50.079
 Pervasive developmental disorder10.79.5 0.10.879
 Major depressive disorder8.133.3 4.10.003*
 Anxiety disorder45.755.2 1.20.391
 Somatization disorder020.8 NA<0.0005*
a
Significant differences with correction for multiple comparisons are denoted by *.
b
Anxiety disorder refers to any of generalized anxiety disorder, separation anxiety disorder, specific phobia, social phobia, or panic disorder. Diagnosis was based on standardized interview except for tic disorders, for which missing data necessitated use of parent-report.
ADHD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; COIS-SR, Child Obsessive Compulsive Impact Scale revised; OCD, obsessive-compulsive disorder; OR, odds ratio; VSS, Vancouver Symptom Score.
Predictors of total VSS score were assessed using multiple regression (Table 4). CY-BOCS alone did not explain any variance in VSS score (0.000%, p = 0.995). Addition of COIS-R, OCD symptom dimensions, and comorbidities to the model increased explained variance by 23.8% (F-change p < 0.0005), 6.8% (p = 0.273), 6.8% (p = 0.273), and 18.9% (p = 0.003), respectively. The final model including medications, age, and gender explained 53.8% of the total variance. COIS-R (β = 0.483, p = 0.001) and presence of comorbid MDD (β = 0.312, p = 0.020) or tic disorder (β = 0.316, p = 0.008) significantly contributed to the model. When parent- rather than self-reported COIS-R was included, this measure was not a significant predictor (β = 0.262, p = 0.069).
Table 4. Multiple Linear Regression of Participant Characteristics Associated with Vancouver Symptom Score
Predictors   Overall model 
Variable categoryVariableBetapaR2p
OCD severity/impairmentCYBOCS−0.1100.3220.5380.001*
COIS-SR0.4830.001*  
OCD symptom dimensionsForbidden thoughts0.0090.944  
Symmetry0.1700.138  
Cleaning0.1460.227  
Hoarding−0.1000.428  
ComorbiditiesTic disorder0.3160.008*  
ADHD0.1830.180  
Anxiety disorder−0.0510.694  
Major depressive disorder0.3120.020*  
MedicationsSerotonin reuptake inhibitor0.0600.664  
Antipsychotic−0.1200.340  
Stimulant0.0430.767  
DemographicsGender−0.1270.271  
Age−0.1130.410  
n = 61 following listwise deletion of missing data.
a
Variables explaining a significant proportion of the variance (p < 0.05, not corrected for multiple comparisons) are denoted by *.
ADHD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; COIS-SR, Child Obsessive Compulsive Impact Scale revised; CY-BOCS, Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale; OCD, obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Exploratory factor analysis was performed to assess empirically derived symptom clusters (Supplementary Table S1). Cronbach's alpha was 0.646, consistent with significant heterogeneity reported previously (Afshar et al. 2009). Five principal components explained 66.8% of the total variance. Common variance explained by the five factors after extraction was 49.4%. Supplementary Table S1 shows the loadings of variables on individual factors. Factors 1–3 corresponded to those described previously (Afshar et al. 2009): irritative symptoms (items 4, 5, 6, and 8, explaining 24% of the total variance); obstructive symptoms (items 9 and 10, explaining 14% of variance); and daytime urinary incontinence (items 1 and 2, explaining 12% of variance).
Although they did not load to a single factor in this analysis, stool symptoms (items 11, 12, and 13) were also combined to generate a subscore as described previously (Afshar et al. 2009). Subscores are reported in Table 2. Daytime urinary incontinence was present in 13% of participants (n = 14), with higher mean subscores in participants with MDD (1.5 ± 2.1 vs. 0.2 ± 0.6, p < 0.001), somatization disorder (2.8 ± 2.8 vs. 0.2 ± 0.7, p < 0.001), and OCD forbidden thoughts (0.7 ± 1.4 vs. 0.0 ± 0.0, p = 0.003), but not other comorbidities or symptom dimensions compared with those without.
Only three participants endorsed encopresis and four participants reported bed-wetting between three nights per month and five nights per week. Supplementary Table S2 shows correlations between participant characteristics defined by continuous variables and VSS subscores. COIS-R score correlated with irritative and obstructive LUTS, and forbidden thoughts with daytime incontinence. CY-BOCS was not associated with any VSS subscore in the overall sample; it correlated weakly with daytime incontinence in females (rs = 0.370, p = 0.006, n = 54) but not in males (rs = 0.056, p = 0.685, n = 54).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this study is the first to employ a standardized assessment tool to quantify BBD symptoms in children and youth with OCD. Our main findings are as follows: (1) BBD is common in this population and may not be captured by general screening questions about bowel or bladder “control”; (2) children with OCD and VSS scores ≥11 are more likely to have comorbid depression or somatization, to report greater OCD-related impairment, and (among females only) to have higher CY-BOCS scores compared with those who do not; (3) predictors of VSS score include self-reported OCD-related impairment, comorbid tic disorder, and MDD; and (4) specific BBD symptoms, including irritative/obstructive LUTS and daytime urinary incontinence, are associated with OCD-related impairment and forbidden thoughts, respectively.
Use of common medications, including serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antipsychotics, and stimulants, were not associated with BBD severity.
The mean VSS score of 9.0 ± 5.4 (median 8) in our cohort was greater than that of control groups in nearly all previous related studies, including 50 children from an otolaryngology clinic (mean score 6.9 ± 3.7, median 6) (Afshar et al. 2009), 133 pediatric urology outpatients without BBD (mean score 7.77 ± 0.42) (Drzewiecki et al. 2012), 60 primary school children age 8–12 (median score 6) (‘t Hoen et al. 2016), and 120 children age 11–17 from primary care and endocrinology clinics, with diabetes (median 7.5) and without (median 6.0) (Kelly et al. 2018). One study reported a mean score of 9.3 ± 7.8 (median 8) in 63 primary care patients age 8–11 attending yearly well-child visits (Ching et al. 2015); however, more than half of participants had chronic emotional/behavioral or physical conditions.
The greater proportion of females than males with BBD symptoms in this study is consistent with previous reports (Drzewiecki et al. 2012). In the absence of a control group, we cannot draw definitive conclusions about BBD prevalence in OCD compared with other groups; however, a positive screen in at least a third of children points to a symptom cluster that may be impairing, missed without standardized assessment, and amenable to treatment.
That participants endorsing significant OCD-related problems with using the bathroom had higher VSS scores than those without suggests that at least some portion of BBD symptoms are likely to be OCD related. The median score for frequency of night-time awakenings to urinate was higher in this study than in previously reported controls (Afshar et al. 2009), perhaps consistent with differences in the perisleep arousal system in pediatric OCD (Jaspers-Fayer et al. 2018). Moreover, urinary holding was more common in participants with moderate-to-severe OCD compared with those with mild symptoms, pointing to the potential role of scheduled voiding as management for both BBD and as a component of exposure–response therapy for OCD.
Factors contributing to avoidance of school or public bathrooms in OCD may include obsessions related to contamination or exposure. Bullying also contributes to school bathroom avoidance (Kistner 2009) and is experienced at higher rates by children with OCD (Storch et al. 2006) and BBD (Ching et al. 2015). It is also possible that primary BBD symptoms trigger or exacerbate OCD obsessions, resulting in a cycle that is challenging to interrupt.
CY-BOCS scores were higher in females who screened positive for BBD compared with those who did not, and were weakly correlated with daytime urinary incontinence. These findings are consistent with the reported association between OCD severity and urinary incontinence among 104 adult inpatients (Drummond et al. 2012). Studies in adults have also identified associations between scores on the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory and overactive bladder (Hsiao et al. 2014; Ahn et al. 2016). We found that forbidden thoughts were associated with higher VSS scores and with daytime incontinence.
Patients with forbidden thoughts may be more likely to alter their bowel or bladder habits in association with obsessions related to urine, stool, sexual activity, genitals, or other “private” bodily functions. Further study in larger samples is needed to understand how characteristics of patients with OCD—including sex, gender, and symptom content—relate to specific BBD symptoms.
Factors unrelated to specific OCD symptoms but associated with distress may also contribute to BBD severity. Consistent with this hypothesis, variance in total VSS score was predicted by COIS-R, a measure of OCD-specific functional impairment (Piacentini et al. 2007), but not by CY-BOCS. A relationship with functional impairment is consistent with well-characterized associations between BBD and non-OCD psychiatric comorbidities, including MDD (Marciano et al. 2016), stressful life events (Joinson et al. 2016), adverse childhood experiences (Logan et al. 2014), and bullying victimization and perpetration (Ching et al. 2015).
This relationship could also reflect a tendency of those reporting more severe impairment in one domain to attend to symptoms in another due to negative cognitive bias or perfectionism. That self- but not parent-rated COIS-R was a significant predictor of VSS suggests that aspects of OCD-related impairment may not be observable to the family.
This study included only three participants with a diagnosis of PANS and did not detect significant differences in VSS scores based on this diagnosis, although power was limited. Our results emphasize the prevalence of BBD symptoms in general pediatric OCD and their range of severity. Frankovich et al. (2015) described “urinary issues”—including polyuria and enuresis—in 45% of 47 consecutive clinic patients meeting PANS criteria.
Similarly, a study comparing cohorts of patients with PANDAS found a prevalence of urinary complaints between 42% and 81% (Swedo et al. 2015). It is unclear how frequency, urgency, and enuresis have been defined in previous studies and whether they are specific to PANS/PANDAS, OCD symptoms or severity, associated distress, comorbidities, or a combination of these factors. It is difficult to compare our data in the absence of common symptom/frequency definitions. Use of standardized assessments may allow more consistent reporting and comparison across studies.
As suggested by our data, the presence of psychiatric comorbidities—including tic disorder, somatic symptom disorder, MDD, and ADHD—may also affect the severity of BBD in children with OCD. The association with tic disorders is consistent with previously reported delays in normative milestones for bladder and bowel function in Tourette syndrome (Comings and Comings 1987). The presence of other non-OCD comorbidities such as depression also impacts BBD-related quality of life (Vrijens et al. 2015; Lai et al. 2016). Severity of somatization and depression in adults has also been suggested to correlate with LUTS severity, and to respond to treatment for LUTS (Cho et al. 2015). How OCD and psychiatric comorbidities in children affect the response to behavioral treatments for BBD remains to be determined.
Limitations of this study include low power to detect differences in VSS scores based on patient characteristics and a sample size that prohibits assessment of interaction factors in linear regression modeling or predictors of low-frequency symptoms such as incontinence. Because a total cutoff score of 11 has been used previously to categorize patients with likely BBD, we have reported patient-related characteristics based on this stratification, but validation in children with OCD has not been performed.
It is reassuring that previous findings including a higher proportion of females than males with above-threshold scores were replicated in this population. Further study will be required to determine whether BBD prevalence is higher in OCD compared with the general pediatric population, and to determine responsiveness to treatment for both OCD and BBD.

Conclusions

Approximately one third of children and youth attending a tertiary OCD clinic screened positive for BBD, suggesting that bowel and bladder symptoms are not restricted to those with a diagnosis of PANS/PANDAS in whom they have been previously described as pathognomonic. BBD was associated with high OCD-related impairment and psychiatric comorbidities. Standardized assessment may facilitate identification of BBD symptoms in this population and is critical to mitigating long-term physical and mental health impacts in children and youth with OCD. Further studies are required to assess the relationship between BBD and OCD treatment outcomes.

Clinical Significance

This study has several implications for clinical practice. First, general screening questions may not capture the spectrum or severity of problematic bladder symptoms experienced by patients with OCD. Given the potential associated functional impairment, such symptoms should be asked about specifically or a standardized assessment tool employed in psychiatric treatment settings. Second, identification of patients with OCD and other psychiatric comorbidities who may benefit from behavioral treatment for BBD is critical to avoiding long-term physical and mental health sequelae, including the potential for interaction with OCD-related symptoms.
Further studies are required to understand the relationships among specific BBD and OCD symptoms, and to assess responsiveness to treatments for both BBD and OCD. Finally, the association between psychiatric disorders and BBD symptoms identified suggests that thoughtful use of screening tools and appropriate referral to mental health services in the pediatric urology setting may be warranted.

Acknowledgments

We thank BC Children's Hospital Provincial OCD Program staff, Antony Au, Boyee Lin, and Cynthia Lu for their contributions to the OCD registry data collection and maintenance. We also thank Maryam Noparast, Pediatric Urology Research Associate (Division of Pediatric Urology, BC Children's Hospital) for review of the electronic version of the VSS implemented in our registry.

Supplementary Material

File (supp_figures1.docx)
File (supp_tables1.docx)
File (supp_tables2.docx)

References

Afshar K, Mirbagheri A, Scott H, MacNeily AE: Development of a symptom score for dysfunctional elimination syndrome. J Urol 182:1939–1943, 2009.
Ahn KS, Hong HP, Kweon HJ, Ahn A-L, Oh E-J, Choi J-K, Cho D-Y: Correlation between Overactive Bladder Syndrome and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder in Women. Korean J Fam Med 37:25–30, 2016.
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th Edn., Text Revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
Arlen AM, Dewhurst LL, Kirsch SS, Dingle AD, Scherz HC, Kirsch AJ: Phantom urinary incontinence in children with bladder-bowel dysfunction. Urology 84:685–688, 2014.
Bloch MH, Landeros-Weisenberger A, Rosario MC, Pittenger C, Leckman JF: Meta-analysis of the symptom structure of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Psychiatry 165:1532–1542, 2008.
Chang K, Frankovich J, Cooperstock M, Cunningham MW, Elizabeth Latimer M, Murphy TK, Pasternack M, Thienemann M, Williams K, Walter J, Swedo SE; From the PANS Collaborative Consortium: Clinical evaluation of youth with pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome (PANS): Recommendations from the 2013 PANS Consensus Conference. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 25:3–13, 2015.
Ching CB, Lee H, Mason MD, Clayton DB, Thomas JC, Pope JC 4th, Adams MC, Brock JW, 3rd, Tanaka ST: Bullying and lower urinary tract symptoms: Why the pediatric urologist should care about school bullying. J Urol 193:650–654, 2015.
Cho KJ, Lee NS, Lee YS, Jeong WJ, Suh HJ, Kim JC, Koh JS: The changes of psychometric profiles after medical treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 13:269–274, 2015.
Comings DE, Comings BG: A controlled study of Tourette syndrome. VI. Early development, sleep problems, allergies, and handedness. Am J Hum Genet 41:822–838, 1987.
Drummond LM, Boschen MJ, Cullimore J, Khan-Hameed A, White S, Ion R: Physical complications of severe, chronic obsessive-compulsive disorder: A comparison with general psychiatric inpatients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 34:618–625, 2012.
Drzewiecki BA, Thomas JC, Pope JCt, Adams MC, Brock JW, 3rd Tanaka ST: Use of validated bladder/bowel dysfunction questionnaire in the clinical pediatric urology setting. J Urol 188:1578–1583, 2012.
Duel BP, Steinberg-Epstein R, Hill M, Lerner M: A survey of voiding dysfunction in children with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. J Urol 170:1521–1523; discussion 1523–1524, 2003.
Fedorov V, Mannino F, Zhang R: Consequences of dichotomization. Pharm Stat 8:50–61, 2009.
Franco I: Overactive bladder in children. Part 1: Pathophysiology. J Urol 178:761–768; discussion 768, 2007.
Franco I: The central nervous system and its role in bowel and bladder control. Curr Urol Rep 12:153–157, 2011a.
Franco I: New ideas in the cause of bladder dysfunction in children. Curr Opin Urol 21:334–338, 2011b.
Frankovich J, Thienemann M, Pearlstein J, Crable A, Brown K, Chang K: Multidisciplinary clinic dedicated to treating youth with pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome: Presenting characteristics of the first 47 consecutive patients. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 25:38–47, 2015.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG: Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381, 2009.
Hooman N, Hallaji F, Mostafavi SH, Mohsenifar S, Otukesh H, Moradi-Lakeh M: Correlation between lower urinary tract scoring system, behavior check list, and bladder sonography in children with lower urinary tract symptoms. Korean J Urol 52:210–215, 2011.
Hsiao SM, Liao SC, Chen CH, Chang T.C, Lin HH: Psychometric assessment of female overactive bladder syndrome and antimuscarinics-related effects. Maturitas 79:428–434, 2014.
Iscan B, Ozkayin N: Evaluation of health-related quality of life and affecting factors in child with enuresis. J Pediatr Urol 16:195 e1–e195 e7, 2020.
Jaspers-Fayer F, Lin SY, Belschner L, Mah J, Chan E, Bleakley C, Ellwyn R, Simpson A, McKenney K, Stewart SE: A case-control study of sleep disturbances in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Anxiety Disord 55:1–7, 2018.
Jiwanmall SA, Kattula D: Obsessive-compulsive disorder presenting with compulsions to urinate frequently. Indian J Psychol Med 38:364–365, 2016.
Joinson C, Sullivan S, von Gontard A, Heron J: Stressful events in early childhood and developmental trajectories of bedwetting at school age. J Pediatr Psychol 41:1002–1010, 2016.
Kelly MS, Routh JC, Davis LG, Purves JT, Wiener JS, Maciejewski ML: Lower urinary tract symptoms in older children with and without diabetes mellitus. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 57:1576–1581, 2018.
Kistner M: Dysfunctional elimination behaviors and associated complications in school-age children. J Sch Nurs 25:108–116, 2009.
Lai HH, Shen B, Rawal A, Vetter J: The relationship between depression and overactive bladder/urinary incontinence symptoms in the clinical OAB population. BMC Urol 16:60, 2016.
Logan BA, Correia K, McCarthy J, Slattery MJ: Voiding dysfunction related to adverse childhood experiences and neuropsychiatric disorders. J Pediatr Urol 10:634–638, 2014.
MacNeily AE: Should psychological assessment be a part of incontinence management in children and adolescents? J Urol 195:1327–1328, 2016.
Marciano RC, Cardoso MG, Vasconcelos MM, Paula JJ, Oliveira EA, Lima EM: Mental disorders in children and adolescents with lower urinary tract dysfunction. J Bras Nefrol 38:441–449, 2016.
Niemczyk J, Wagner C, von Gontard A: Incontinence in autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 27:1523–1537, 2018.
Palmer LS: Biofeedback in the management of urinary continence in children. Curr Urol Rep 11:122–127, 2010.
Piacentini J, Peris TS, Bergman RL, Chang S, Jaffer M: Functional impairment in childhood OCD: Development and psychometrics properties of the Child Obsessive-Compulsive Impact Scale-Revised (COIS-R). J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 36:645–653, 2007.
Rahmat R: Urinary frequency: Going beyond the tract. Malays Fam Physician 15:58–60, 2020.
Roy HA, Green AL: The central autonomic network and regulation of bladder function. Front Neurosci 13:535, 2019.
Santos JD, Lopes RI, Koyle MA: Bladder and bowel dysfunction in children: An update on the diagnosis and treatment of a common, but underdiagnosed pediatric problem. Can Urol Assoc J 11:S64–S72, 2017.
Scahill L, Riddle MA, McSwiggin-Hardin M, Ort SI, King RA, Goodman WK, Cicchetti D, Leckman JF: Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale: Reliability and validity. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36:844–852, 1997.
Silverman WK, Nelles WB: The anxiety disorders interview schedule for children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 27:772–778, 1988.
Storch EA, Ledley DR, Lewin AB, Murphy TK, Johns NB, Goodman WK, Geffken GR: Peer victimization in children with obsessive-compulsive disorder: Relations with symptoms of psychopathology. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 35:446–455, 2006.
Swedo SE, Leonard HL, Garvey M, Mittleman B, Allen AJ, Perlmutter S, Lougee L, Dow S, Zamkoff J, Dubbert BK: Pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal infections: Clinical description of the first 50 cases. Am J Psychiatry 155:264–271, 1998.
Swedo SE, Seidlitz J, Kovacevic M, Latimer ME, Hommer R, Lougee L, Grant P: Clinical presentation of pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal infections in research and community settings. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 25:26–30, 2015.
‘t Hoen LA, Korfage IJ, Verhallen JTCM, van Ledden-Klok MJ, van den Hoek J, Blok BFM, Scheepe JR: Vancouver symptom score for dysfunctional elimination syndrome: Reliability and validity of the Dutch Version. J Urol 196:536–541, 2016.
von Gontard A, Equit M: Comorbidity of ADHD and incontinence in children. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 24:127–140, 2015.
Vrijens D, Drossaerts J, van Koeveringe G, Van Kerrebroeck P, van Os J, Leue C: Affective symptoms and the overactive bladder—A systematic review. J Psychosom Res 78:95–108, 2015.
Wolfe-Christensen C, Guy WC, Mancini M, Kovacevic LG, Lakshmanan Y: Evidence of need to use self-report measures of psychosocial functioning in older children and adolescents with voiding dysfunction. J Urol 195:1570–1574, 2016.
Yang S, Chua ME, Bauer S, Wright A, Brandström P, Hoebeke P, Rittig S, De Gennaro M, Jackson E, Fonseca E, Nieuwhof-Leppink A, Austin P: Diagnosis and management of bladder bowel dysfunction in children with urinary tract infections: A position statement from the International Children's Continence Society. Pediatr Nephrol 33:2207–2219, 2018.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
Volume 32Issue Number 6August 2022
Pages: 358 - 365
PubMed: 35404114

History

Published online: 11 August 2022
Published in print: August 2022
Published ahead of print: 11 April 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Topics

Authors

Affiliations

Provincial OCD Program, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry and Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
John R. Best
Provincial OCD Program, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry and Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Zainab Naqqash
Provincial OCD Program, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry and Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Kourosh Afshar
Department of Urologic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Division of Pediatric Urology, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.
Andrew E. MacNeily
Department of Urologic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Division of Pediatric Urology, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.
S. Evelyn Stewart
Provincial OCD Program, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry and Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
British Columbia Mental Health and Substance Use Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.

Notes

Funding: S.E.S. is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research. C.W.R. is the recipient of a 2019 International OCD Foundation Young Investigator Award. Funding agencies had no role in the design and conduct of the study.
Address correspondence to: Clara Westwell-Roper, MD, PhD, Provincial OCD Program, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, 950 West 28th Avenue, V5Z 4H4 Vancouver, Canada [email protected]

Disclosures

No competing financial interests exist.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.

Society Access

If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Back to Top